#47 - Musk/trump/Vance
Comments
-
Halifax2TheMax said:Seems some are finally catching on. The brain drain across our institutions are going to wreak havoc. Better hope for no calamities or conflicts. You’ve got about two, two and a half years.0
-
We need to shut the border down to stop the flow of criminals into our country.
We're also going to release 1500 domestic terrorists back into their communities.
We're very serious about cracking down on violent crime.
0 -
Merkin Baller said:We need to shut the border down to stop the flow of criminals into our country.
We're also going to release 1500 domestic terrorists back into their communities.
We're very serious about cracking down on violent crime.
look we need to leave criming to the people FROM here. we can't let foreign born criminals take those jobs too.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
-
mickeyrat said:Merkin Baller said:We need to shut the border down to stop the flow of criminals into our country.
We're also going to release 1500 domestic terrorists back into their communities.
We're very serious about cracking down on violent crime.
look we need to leave criming to the people FROM here. we can't let foreign born criminals take those jobs too.0 -
Gern Blansten said:Parksy said:Gern Blansten said:Parksy said:I have a question for the Americans here... I've always understood Republican / Conservative supporters being very Pro police. Given that Trump recently pardoned / released the J6 criminals... do American police officers etc. still support Trump / Republicans?
I can't imagine the notion of cops still supporting a man who released criminals who struck and caused the death of other cops along with the other crimes they committed.
Once again...the GOP has brilliantly convinced blue collar workers that they are the party for them. Even though the GOP continually cuts funding for their salaries and benefits in order to support tax breaks for the wealthy.
Second.. and I know this may take more time.... we here in Canada often discuss Trump... and what I constantly think of is his insinuation that he will make america great again. But that said, he was already in power for 4 years. So based on those 4 years.. and looking at blue collar workers and emergency service workers.... is there anything he did policy wise that did in fact make life better for emergency service workers and the lower to middle class? And I ask this putting all bias aside.Toronto 2000
Buffalo, Phoenix, Toronto 2003
Boston I&II 2004
Kitchener, Hamilton, London, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto 2005
Toronto I&II, Las Vegas 2006
Chicago Lollapalooza 2007
Toronto, Seattle I&II, Vancouver, Philly I,II,III,IV 2009
Cleveland, Buffalo 2010
Toronto I&II 2011
Buffalo 2013
Toronto I&II 2016
10C: 220xxx0 -
josevolution said:Gern Blansten said:I can't wait to see the Sunday shows this weekend and watch the GOP get grilled
Q: You previously stated that you opposed the pardons for those involved in assaulting and vandalizing the capitol....what do you say now that trump has pardoned them?
A: donald trump won the election in a massive landslide, he has a mandate to secure our border, make america great, and strengthen our miltary
Q: yeah but please answer my question....what do you think now that trump has pardoned these criminals?
A: what we should really be talking about is why Biden let criminals across our border
Q: thank you for coming
Repeated across 3-4 shows by 3-4 hosts
The DOJ was weaponized against trump, the people that deserved to be incarcerated have served enough time because of this weaponization, end of story.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Parksy said:Gern Blansten said:Parksy said:Gern Blansten said:Parksy said:I have a question for the Americans here... I've always understood Republican / Conservative supporters being very Pro police. Given that Trump recently pardoned / released the J6 criminals... do American police officers etc. still support Trump / Republicans?
I can't imagine the notion of cops still supporting a man who released criminals who struck and caused the death of other cops along with the other crimes they committed.
Once again...the GOP has brilliantly convinced blue collar workers that they are the party for them. Even though the GOP continually cuts funding for their salaries and benefits in order to support tax breaks for the wealthy.
Second.. and I know this may take more time.... we here in Canada often discuss Trump... and what I constantly think of is his insinuation that he will make america great again. But that said, he was already in power for 4 years. So based on those 4 years.. and looking at blue collar workers and emergency service workers.... is there anything he did policy wise that did in fact make life better for emergency service workers and the lower to middle class? And I ask this putting all bias aside.
0 -
He oversaw the growth of the economy that started in the second term of Obama. Wage Growth, low unemployment, etc. so that was good. I mean, I guess he didn’t pass bad policy that ruined that, so W there I guess.0
-
Tim Simmons said:He oversaw the growth of the economy that started in the second term of Obama. Wage Growth, low unemployment, etc. so that was good. I mean, I guess he didn’t pass bad policy that ruined that, so W there I guess.
The economy will flatten soon and he'll have to own it. As we learned under Bush you can't cut taxes and get your ass out of a recession.
Hopefully the dems wise up and see that huge tax cuts need to be given to the lower/middle class and pay for it by raising tax on the wealthy. Not an overall responsible method but that's the only way to get those ignorant fools back. Give them the money that they thought they were going to get under trump.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
So much has changed in the last 10 years. Remember when Hilary first ran for president she was against gay marriage. That wasn't that long ago. In about 15 years we've gone from no gay marriage being the norm in both parties, to if you don't support multiple genders then you're a transphobe gay-hating bigot.
You're right that I don't care what people call themselves. But it's this culture of everything is racists and anti-trans that gets tiring. And I see a lot of the pushback related to that. Yes, I know that the original joke about Caitlyn that I responded to wasn't 100% literal, but it's rooted in that fear that everything is racist, sexist and anti-trans.
Look at so many of the conversations people have had here and around the country. You don't want biological males in women's sports, then you're hitler. You think biological women should have a say if a biological male joins their sorority in intimate settings, then you're anti-trans. You think there should be at least some regulations for public bathroom use, then you're a bigot. If you think Boy Scouts should be a place for boys to be boys, then you're sexist. 10 years ago people laughed at you if you suggested males would play in women's sports because it would never happen, now you're being laughed at for being concerned about it.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do. To me it's just documentation. And if you don't confirm to this new way of thinking then you're labeled as anti-everything.I guess I felt the urge to respond when I see all the claims that Trump banned being trans, etc that people are saying on social media.Post edited by mace1229 on0 -
Yeah, Parksy just wanted an unbiased account of what he positively accomplished for the middle and working class. I felt like if I included that (of which the effects are widely known and certainly not to anyones benefit), it would have been a bit too much finger on scale for the unbiased take.
0 -
mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
So much has changed in the last 10 years. Remember when Hilary first ran for president she was against gay marriage. That wasn't that long ago. In about 15 years we've gone from no gay marriage being the norm in both parties, to if you don't support multiple genders then you're a transphobe gay-hating bigot.
You're right that I don't care what people call themselves. But it's this culture of everything is racists and anti-trans that gets tiring. And I see a lot of the pushback related to that. Yes, I know that the original joke about Caitlyn that I responded to wasn't 100% literal, but it's rooted in that fear that everything is racist, sexist and anti-trans.
Look at so many of the conversations people have had here and around the country. You don't want biological males in women's sports, then you're hitler. You think biological women should have a say if a biological male joins their sorority in intimate settings, then you're anti-trans. You think there should be at least some regulations for public bathroom use, then you're a bigot. If you think Boy Scouts should be a place for boys to be boys, then you're sexist. 10 years ago people laughed at you if you suggested males would play in women's sports because it would never happen, now you're being laughed at for being concerned about it.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do. To me it's just documentation. And if you don't confirm to this new way of thinking then you're labeled as anti-everything.I guess I felt the urge to respond when I see all the claims that Trump banned being trans, etc that people are saying on social media.
Other than that issue, it's all purely fear mongering. Trump literally said that you send your boy to school and he comes as a girl after the school operated on him. It's absurd. That's fear mongering.0 -
mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
So much has changed in the last 10 years. Remember when Hilary first ran for president she was against gay marriage. That wasn't that long ago. In about 15 years we've gone from no gay marriage being the norm in both parties, to if you don't support multiple genders then you're a transphobe gay-hating bigot.
You're right that I don't care what people call themselves. But it's this culture of everything is racists and anti-trans that gets tiring. And I see a lot of the pushback related to that. Yes, I know that the original joke about Caitlyn that I responded to wasn't 100% literal, but it's rooted in that fear that everything is racist, sexist and anti-trans.
Look at so many of the conversations people have had here and around the country. You don't want biological males in women's sports, then you're hitler. You think biological women should have a say if a biological male joins their sorority in intimate settings, then you're anti-trans. You think there should be at least some regulations for public bathroom use, then you're a bigot. If you think Boy Scouts should be a place for boys to be boys, then you're sexist. 10 years ago people laughed at you if you suggested males would play in women's sports because it would never happen, now you're being laughed at for being concerned about it.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do. To me it's just documentation. And if you don't confirm to this new way of thinking then you're labeled as anti-everything.I guess I felt the urge to respond when I see all the claims that Trump banned being trans, etc that people are saying on social media.
Other than that issue, it's all purely fear mongering. Trump literally said that you send your boy to school and he comes as a girl after the school operated on him. It's absurd. That's fear mongering.
This is a good example of the GOP making an issue out of nothing.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Falling down,...not staying down0
-
mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
So much has changed in the last 10 years. Remember when Hilary first ran for president she was against gay marriage. That wasn't that long ago. In about 15 years we've gone from no gay marriage being the norm in both parties, to if you don't support multiple genders then you're a transphobe gay-hating bigot.
You're right that I don't care what people call themselves. But it's this culture of everything is racists and anti-trans that gets tiring. And I see a lot of the pushback related to that. Yes, I know that the original joke about Caitlyn that I responded to wasn't 100% literal, but it's rooted in that fear that everything is racist, sexist and anti-trans.
Look at so many of the conversations people have had here and around the country. You don't want biological males in women's sports, then you're hitler. You think biological women should have a say if a biological male joins their sorority in intimate settings, then you're anti-trans. You think there should be at least some regulations for public bathroom use, then you're a bigot. If you think Boy Scouts should be a place for boys to be boys, then you're sexist. 10 years ago people laughed at you if you suggested males would play in women's sports because it would never happen, now you're being laughed at for being concerned about it.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do. To me it's just documentation. And if you don't confirm to this new way of thinking then you're labeled as anti-everything.I guess I felt the urge to respond when I see all the claims that Trump banned being trans, etc that people are saying on social media.
Other than that issue, it's all purely fear mongering. Trump literally said that you send your boy to school and he comes as a girl after the school operated on him. It's absurd. That's fear mongering.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Gern Blansten said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
So much has changed in the last 10 years. Remember when Hilary first ran for president she was against gay marriage. That wasn't that long ago. In about 15 years we've gone from no gay marriage being the norm in both parties, to if you don't support multiple genders then you're a transphobe gay-hating bigot.
You're right that I don't care what people call themselves. But it's this culture of everything is racists and anti-trans that gets tiring. And I see a lot of the pushback related to that. Yes, I know that the original joke about Caitlyn that I responded to wasn't 100% literal, but it's rooted in that fear that everything is racist, sexist and anti-trans.
Look at so many of the conversations people have had here and around the country. You don't want biological males in women's sports, then you're hitler. You think biological women should have a say if a biological male joins their sorority in intimate settings, then you're anti-trans. You think there should be at least some regulations for public bathroom use, then you're a bigot. If you think Boy Scouts should be a place for boys to be boys, then you're sexist. 10 years ago people laughed at you if you suggested males would play in women's sports because it would never happen, now you're being laughed at for being concerned about it.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do. To me it's just documentation. And if you don't confirm to this new way of thinking then you're labeled as anti-everything.I guess I felt the urge to respond when I see all the claims that Trump banned being trans, etc that people are saying on social media.
Other than that issue, it's all purely fear mongering. Trump literally said that you send your boy to school and he comes as a girl after the school operated on him. It's absurd. That's fear mongering.
This is a good example of the GOP making an issue out of nothing.0 -
mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do.
To your point about gay marriage. yeah, 15 years ago the landscape was dramatically different and now a majority of Americans support it.
But we said the same thing for years about Roe. And look where we are. There are those who oppose gay marriage and LGBTQ issues. they have that direct line if not a seat in governance. So people fight back, even if its preemptively, because they're scared.
Post edited by Tim Simmons on0 -
mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:mrussel1 said:mace1229 said:Tim Simmons said:mace1229 said:HughFreakingDillon said:yes, mace, the tweet is not intended to be taken 100% seriously. it's part truth, part humour. But the point remains: trans folks won't be able to identify as they are on government docs. Imagine the government telling you, you effectively no longer exist as you are. Some cis folks may think that's not a big deal, but just imagine for a second what a "small" thing like that means to them.
But what harm was the "x" actually doing? If its about people living their life how they want, how does that designation fall outside of that?
And I don't know if those reasons were even considered. Probably not. Just noting there are reasons to need to know someone's identity, including their sex. Especially legal government forms. It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me. No one is asking people to show it when they buy groceries, or wear it like a Star of David on their arm. I haven't even seen anyone say it can't be changed from what is assigned at birth. Your sex is part of your identity, and governments like to be able to identify people. I can't even sign up for the local grocery store discounts without providing tons of identifying information, our government should want to be more precise than them.
Sex is biological. Gender is how you identify. I know Trump said "gender," but most official documents list it as "sex."
It's not about passports. It's about chipping away at the identity of someone who is different than most of us. I could care less what someone calls themselves, and I bet you don't care either. But there are LOTS of hard core people in this country who do care. It's the same people who cared that gays got married. And a generation ago, it was the same people who cared what water fountain you used.
So much has changed in the last 10 years. Remember when Hilary first ran for president she was against gay marriage. That wasn't that long ago. In about 15 years we've gone from no gay marriage being the norm in both parties, to if you don't support multiple genders then you're a transphobe gay-hating bigot.
You're right that I don't care what people call themselves. But it's this culture of everything is racists and anti-trans that gets tiring. And I see a lot of the pushback related to that. Yes, I know that the original joke about Caitlyn that I responded to wasn't 100% literal, but it's rooted in that fear that everything is racist, sexist and anti-trans.
Look at so many of the conversations people have had here and around the country. You don't want biological males in women's sports, then you're hitler. You think biological women should have a say if a biological male joins their sorority in intimate settings, then you're anti-trans. You think there should be at least some regulations for public bathroom use, then you're a bigot. If you think Boy Scouts should be a place for boys to be boys, then you're sexist. 10 years ago people laughed at you if you suggested males would play in women's sports because it would never happen, now you're being laughed at for being concerned about it.
To me I see all this hype around declaring your sex as feeding into this fear when no one cares who you sleep with or what you do. To me it's just documentation. And if you don't confirm to this new way of thinking then you're labeled as anti-everything.I guess I felt the urge to respond when I see all the claims that Trump banned being trans, etc that people are saying on social media.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help