Options
I know there's so much hype about the new WMA..
LeatherMosquitoMan
Posts: 4,034
And i'm sorry, but, i just can't do it.
The Bonnaroo version is the best of the new version, and that's just barely listen-able to my ears. And it seems each version after that gets worse and worse (maybe it's the order i listened to the boots.... wasn't exactly in order of appearance)
And the reason why i don't like it, is the drumming. And yes, i have played, for 14 years. I will never go past the Atlanta 1994 version as my favourite of this song.
The drums were never 'nailed' in the new version, except for a few sequences here and there, but not an entire song, and even sounded quite sloppy at times. Nothing against Matt, but this and 'Who You Are' just aren't him. It's the same reason i can't get into the new 'Who You Are'.
The Bonnaroo version is the best of the new version, and that's just barely listen-able to my ears. And it seems each version after that gets worse and worse (maybe it's the order i listened to the boots.... wasn't exactly in order of appearance)
And the reason why i don't like it, is the drumming. And yes, i have played, for 14 years. I will never go past the Atlanta 1994 version as my favourite of this song.
The drums were never 'nailed' in the new version, except for a few sequences here and there, but not an entire song, and even sounded quite sloppy at times. Nothing against Matt, but this and 'Who You Are' just aren't him. It's the same reason i can't get into the new 'Who You Are'.
-Chris
Male, 34
I'm on Facebook - facebook.com/christopher.leesye1
1998 Brisbane 2
2003 Brisbane 1
2006 LA 1 & 2
2008 LA 2, San Diego 1 (EV)
2009 LA 1, 2, 3 & 4, San Diego
2011 St. Louis (EV)
2012 Tulsa 1 & 2 (EV)
2013 Chicago, Dallas & OKC
Male, 34
I'm on Facebook - facebook.com/christopher.leesye1
1998 Brisbane 2
2003 Brisbane 1
2006 LA 1 & 2
2008 LA 2, San Diego 1 (EV)
2009 LA 1, 2, 3 & 4, San Diego
2011 St. Louis (EV)
2012 Tulsa 1 & 2 (EV)
2013 Chicago, Dallas & OKC
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
well here's a heads-up, there were two drummers for that Atlanta 1994 WMA; Dave and Jerry Gaskill, the drummer of the opening band "King's X." So it can't really be duplicated.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Yeah, so go drink some Haterade.
how am I being a hater? He's saying that Matt's drums on the new WMA aren't as good as Atlanta '94. Well, that's because they can't be. even the studio version of WMA has two drum tracks.
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Both taste like Good Charlotte sounds!
8/7/08, 6/9/09
7-11-95, 6-14-98, 6-26-98, 6-27-98, 6-29-98, 8-17-98, 08-18-00, 8-20-00, 09-05-00, 10-7-00, 10-8-00, 10-9-00, 10-11-00, 4-21-03, 4-22-03, 4-23-03, 4-25-03, 04-26-03, 6-18-03, 6-21-03, 6-22-03, 6-25-03, 06-26-03, 10-3-04, 9-11-05, 9-12-05, 9-13-05, 5-9-06, 5-10-06, 5-16-06, 5-17-06, 5-19-06, 5-20-06, 6-23-06, 6-24-06, 6-29-06, 8-5-07, E.V. Milwaukee and Chicago night 1, 8-23-09,08-24-09, 5-7-10, 5-9-10, E.V. 6-28-011, 9-3-11, 9-4-11, 7-19-13, 10-11-13, 10-3-14, 10-17-14, 10-20-14, E.V. 04-26-16, 08-20-16, 08-22-16, 8-20-18, 8-22-18, 9-16-22, 9-18-22, 9-5-23, 9-7-23, 9-10-23
I wasn't talking about you, guy. I quoted you as a pretext to what I said. I meant no offense.
but theres nothing wrong with the new one. its awesome thats its being played again so who cares..
I could too, except IT'S THE BEST F'N PART.
Lots of weirdos running around this board these days
for the least they could possibly do