#46 President Joe Biden

1452453455457458600

Comments

  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    edited November 2023
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I had a couple extra minutes today to look what was said about Hunter's laptop back in 2020. The only reason I didn't find it right away the first time is because my search results were buried with current news stories of it. Still only about the 10th hit from the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/12/09/hunter-biden-laptop-suppression-twitter-fbi-social-media/

    "When President Donald Trump raised Hunter Biden’s laptop during the final 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden dismissed it as a “Russian plant,” citing “five former heads of the CIA” who say it’s “a bunch of garbage.”

    We now know this was patently untrue. The laptop was authentic. But at the time, almost no one in the news media questioned Biden’s false assertion. To the contrary, CNN questioned whether Trump had “spread Russian disinformation” during the debate by raising the laptop."


    So everything on it is authentic? No way would Rudy or his team alter an email? No one else would either? Just curious why you would think Rudy and his team of morons would be above such a thing?

    And what is it specifically on the laptop that proves Joe Biden committed a crime?
    I never claimed that. I’ve said before I don’t think there’s a smoking gun in the laptop, or it would have been known within hours. I have no doubt they had a team of paralegals or whoever looking through every document. If they found something, they would have released it to the public.
    I just made a simple comment the other day saying I remember some doubted the laptop was even real and was called borderline cultish behavior and that it’s my “thing” to form strong opinions on topics I know nothing about since I didn’t immediately provide proof for what I thought was common knowledge. . 

    I don’t think Rudy is above altering or planting anything. But I don’t think he would, because it’d be hard to get away with. Isn’t there a digital fingerprint for documents and when they were created? So I would think it would be easy to verify if it’s been altered. And if not, remember he just has a copy of a hard drive, the FBI has the computer. Would be a little suspicious if they found something on the copy that wasn’t on the computer. 
    Just backing up my claim that not everyone believed the authenticity of the laptop and hard drive. And, again, why wouldn’t you? Rudy coming up with a copy of Hunter’s hard drive to break a story does seem a little suspicious. Of course people are going to question it. But I was asked for proof people questioned it, so I found a link.
    Post edited by mace1229 on
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I had a couple extra minutes today to look what was said about Hunter's laptop back in 2020. The only reason I didn't find it right away the first time is because my search results were buried with current news stories of it. Still only about the 10th hit from the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/12/09/hunter-biden-laptop-suppression-twitter-fbi-social-media/

    "When President Donald Trump raised Hunter Biden’s laptop during the final 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden dismissed it as a “Russian plant,” citing “five former heads of the CIA” who say it’s “a bunch of garbage.”

    We now know this was patently untrue. The laptop was authentic. But at the time, almost no one in the news media questioned Biden’s false assertion. To the contrary, CNN questioned whether Trump had “spread Russian disinformation” during the debate by raising the laptop."


    So everything on it is authentic? No way would Rudy or his team alter an email? No one else would either? Just curious why you would think Rudy and his team of morons would be above such a thing?

    And what is it specifically on the laptop that proves Joe Biden committed a crime?
    I never claimed that. I’ve said before I don’t think there’s a smoking gun in the laptop, or it would have been known within hours. I have no doubt they had a team of paralegals or whoever looking through every document. If they found something, they would have released it to the public.
    I just made a simple comment the other day saying I remember some doubted the laptop was even real and was called borderline cultish behavior for saying that since I didn’t immediately provide proof. 

    I don’t think Rudy is above altering or planting anything. But I don’t think he would, because it’d be hard to get away with. Isn’t there a digital fingerprint for documents and when they were created? So I would think it would be easy to verify if it’s been altered. And if not, remember he just has a copy of a hard drive, the FBI has the computer. Would be a little suspicious if they found something on the copy that wasn’t on the computer. 
    Just backing up my claim that not everyone believed the authenticity of the laptop and hard drive. And, again, why wouldn’t you? Rudy coming up with a copy of Hunter’s hard drive to break a story does seem a little suspicious. Of course people are going to question it. But I was asked for proof people questioned it, so I found a link.
    So who didn't believe that laptop was an actual inanimate object in the possession of Rudy?  The question was the contents and authenticity of it. 
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,388
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I had a couple extra minutes today to look what was said about Hunter's laptop back in 2020. The only reason I didn't find it right away the first time is because my search results were buried with current news stories of it. Still only about the 10th hit from the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/12/09/hunter-biden-laptop-suppression-twitter-fbi-social-media/

    "When President Donald Trump raised Hunter Biden’s laptop during the final 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden dismissed it as a “Russian plant,” citing “five former heads of the CIA” who say it’s “a bunch of garbage.”

    We now know this was patently untrue. The laptop was authentic. But at the time, almost no one in the news media questioned Biden’s false assertion. To the contrary, CNN questioned whether Trump had “spread Russian disinformation” during the debate by raising the laptop."


    So everything on it is authentic? No way would Rudy or his team alter an email? No one else would either? Just curious why you would think Rudy and his team of morons would be above such a thing?

    And what is it specifically on the laptop that proves Joe Biden committed a crime?
    I never claimed that. I’ve said before I don’t think there’s a smoking gun in the laptop, or it would have been known within hours. I have no doubt they had a team of paralegals or whoever looking through every document. If they found something, they would have released it to the public.
    I just made a simple comment the other day saying I remember some doubted the laptop was even real and was called borderline cultish behavior for saying that since I didn’t immediately provide proof. 

    I don’t think Rudy is above altering or planting anything. But I don’t think he would, because it’d be hard to get away with. Isn’t there a digital fingerprint for documents and when they were created? So I would think it would be easy to verify if it’s been altered. And if not, remember he just has a copy of a hard drive, the FBI has the computer. Would be a little suspicious if they found something on the copy that wasn’t on the computer. 
    Just backing up my claim that not everyone believed the authenticity of the laptop and hard drive. And, again, why wouldn’t you? Rudy coming up with a copy of Hunter’s hard drive to break a story does seem a little suspicious. Of course people are going to question it. But I was asked for proof people questioned it, so I found a link.
    So who didn't believe that laptop was an actual inanimate object in the possession of Rudy?  The question was the contents and authenticity of it. 

    literalism.....
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I had a couple extra minutes today to look what was said about Hunter's laptop back in 2020. The only reason I didn't find it right away the first time is because my search results were buried with current news stories of it. Still only about the 10th hit from the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/12/09/hunter-biden-laptop-suppression-twitter-fbi-social-media/

    "When President Donald Trump raised Hunter Biden’s laptop during the final 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden dismissed it as a “Russian plant,” citing “five former heads of the CIA” who say it’s “a bunch of garbage.”

    We now know this was patently untrue. The laptop was authentic. But at the time, almost no one in the news media questioned Biden’s false assertion. To the contrary, CNN questioned whether Trump had “spread Russian disinformation” during the debate by raising the laptop."


    So everything on it is authentic? No way would Rudy or his team alter an email? No one else would either? Just curious why you would think Rudy and his team of morons would be above such a thing?

    And what is it specifically on the laptop that proves Joe Biden committed a crime?
    I never claimed that. I’ve said before I don’t think there’s a smoking gun in the laptop, or it would have been known within hours. I have no doubt they had a team of paralegals or whoever looking through every document. If they found something, they would have released it to the public.
    I just made a simple comment the other day saying I remember some doubted the laptop was even real and was called borderline cultish behavior for saying that since I didn’t immediately provide proof. 

    I don’t think Rudy is above altering or planting anything. But I don’t think he would, because it’d be hard to get away with. Isn’t there a digital fingerprint for documents and when they were created? So I would think it would be easy to verify if it’s been altered. And if not, remember he just has a copy of a hard drive, the FBI has the computer. Would be a little suspicious if they found something on the copy that wasn’t on the computer. 
    Just backing up my claim that not everyone believed the authenticity of the laptop and hard drive. And, again, why wouldn’t you? Rudy coming up with a copy of Hunter’s hard drive to break a story does seem a little suspicious. Of course people are going to question it. But I was asked for proof people questioned it, so I found a link.
    So who didn't believe that laptop was an actual inanimate object in the possession of Rudy?  The question was the contents and authenticity of it. 
    The first reply to my comment was asking what I meant and I clarified that I meant there were questions about not only tampering but also if a Hunter laptop even existed in the first place. You don’t have to scroll back far to see who spent a whole page disagreeing with that. The conclusion was that apparently I’m in a cult fpr thinking that and it’s my thing to talk about topics I know nothing about. But isn’t calling the laptop a Russian fake essentially denying it’s real? I think so.
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,388
    JB adbook post.

    love his self-deprecating sense of humor....

      Thanks for the birthday well-wishes today, everyone. Turns out on your 146th birthday, you run out of space for candles!


    what you cant see just off camera is 2 fire companies to put that out.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I had a couple extra minutes today to look what was said about Hunter's laptop back in 2020. The only reason I didn't find it right away the first time is because my search results were buried with current news stories of it. Still only about the 10th hit from the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/12/09/hunter-biden-laptop-suppression-twitter-fbi-social-media/

    "When President Donald Trump raised Hunter Biden’s laptop during the final 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden dismissed it as a “Russian plant,” citing “five former heads of the CIA” who say it’s “a bunch of garbage.”

    We now know this was patently untrue. The laptop was authentic. But at the time, almost no one in the news media questioned Biden’s false assertion. To the contrary, CNN questioned whether Trump had “spread Russian disinformation” during the debate by raising the laptop."


    So everything on it is authentic? No way would Rudy or his team alter an email? No one else would either? Just curious why you would think Rudy and his team of morons would be above such a thing?

    And what is it specifically on the laptop that proves Joe Biden committed a crime?
    I never claimed that. I’ve said before I don’t think there’s a smoking gun in the laptop, or it would have been known within hours. I have no doubt they had a team of paralegals or whoever looking through every document. If they found something, they would have released it to the public.
    I just made a simple comment the other day saying I remember some doubted the laptop was even real and was called borderline cultish behavior for saying that since I didn’t immediately provide proof. 

    I don’t think Rudy is above altering or planting anything. But I don’t think he would, because it’d be hard to get away with. Isn’t there a digital fingerprint for documents and when they were created? So I would think it would be easy to verify if it’s been altered. And if not, remember he just has a copy of a hard drive, the FBI has the computer. Would be a little suspicious if they found something on the copy that wasn’t on the computer. 
    Just backing up my claim that not everyone believed the authenticity of the laptop and hard drive. And, again, why wouldn’t you? Rudy coming up with a copy of Hunter’s hard drive to break a story does seem a little suspicious. Of course people are going to question it. But I was asked for proof people questioned it, so I found a link.
    So who didn't believe that laptop was an actual inanimate object in the possession of Rudy?  The question was the contents and authenticity of it. 
    The first reply to my comment was asking what I meant and I clarified that I meant there were questions about not only tampering but also if a Hunter laptop even existed in the first place. You don’t have to scroll back far to see who spent a whole page disagreeing with that. The conclusion was that apparently I’m in a cult fpr thinking that and it’s my thing to talk about topics I know nothing about. But isn’t calling the laptop a Russian fake essentially denying it’s real? I think so.
    I think it's pretty clear that the comments are that the information on the laptop could be inauthentic and that's what the FBI warned social media companies about,  not that the laptop didn't exist. 

    It seems like you are the one that is defending what you think other people believe.  And no one here that I know of is saying the laptop didn't exist.  
  • JB16057 said:
    mace1229 said:
    I had a couple extra minutes today to look what was said about Hunter's laptop back in 2020. The only reason I didn't find it right away the first time is because my search results were buried with current news stories of it. Still only about the 10th hit from the top.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/12/09/hunter-biden-laptop-suppression-twitter-fbi-social-media/

    "When President Donald Trump raised Hunter Biden’s laptop during the final 2020 presidential debate, Joe Biden dismissed it as a “Russian plant,” citing “five former heads of the CIA” who say it’s “a bunch of garbage.”

    We now know this was patently untrue. The laptop was authentic. But at the time, almost no one in the news media questioned Biden’s false assertion. To the contrary, CNN questioned whether Trump had “spread Russian disinformation” during the debate by raising the laptop."


    TRUTH!
    Here's the transcript of the first debate between POOTWH and Brandon as it relates to the laptop. Which, as entertaining as it is, I'll post other answers to particular topics, seeing we're 3 years on and looking at a rematch. I'll post the transcript from the second and final debate soon. More of the same however. The existence of the laptop or that it belonged to Hunter was not denied. Rather POOTWH's characterization of the contents is what is denied. And rightly so, given the provenance and chain of custody. Somebody on that debate stage was lying and it wasn't Brandon, no matter what you "remember."

    So, is it billions, millions or how much did Brandon earn? Anyone?

    TRUMP: China ate your lunch, Joe. And no wonder your son goes in and, wha–, he takes out billions of dollars. He takes out billions of dollars to manage. He makes millions of dollars. And also, while we’re at it, why is it just out of curiosity, the mayor of Moscow’s wife gave your son three and a half million dollars?

    BIDEN: That is not true.

    TRUMP: What did he do to deserve it? What did he do with Burisma-

    BIDEN: None of that is true.

    TRUMP: … to deserve $183,000?

    WALLACE: Sir, you’ve asked him a question, let him answer it.

    BIDEN: None of that is true.

    TRUMP: Oh really, he didn’t get three and a half million?

    WALLACE: Mr. President-

    BIDEN: Is totally-

    WALLACE: Mr. President, please. You’ve asked a question- [crosstalk]

    BIDEN: Totally discredited. Totally discredited. And by the way-

    TRUMP: Well wait, he didn’t get three and a half million dollars, Joe?

    BIDEN: Mr. Vice-

    TRUMP: He got three and a half million dollars-

    WALLACE: Mr. President.

    TRUMP: … dollars.

    BIDEN: That is not true.

    TRUMP: Oh, really?

    WALLACE: Mr. President, it’s an open discussion. Please- [crosstalk]

    TRUMP: It’s a fact.

    BIDEN: It is not a fact.

    WALLACE: Well, you have raised an issue, let the Vice President answer.

    BIDEN: It’s been totally discredited.

    TRUMP: Did Burisma pay him 183 thousand a month, with no experience in energy?

    WALLACE: Mr. President-

    BIDEN: My son did nothing wrong at Burisma-

    TRUMP: I think he did.

    BIDEN: The only guy that. . .

    WALLACE: Mr. President, let him answer. [crosstalk].

    BIDEN: He doesn’t want to let me answer, because he knows I have the truth. His position has been totally thoroughly discredited. . .

    TRUMP: By who?

    BIDEN: And you can-

    TRUMP: The media.

    BIDEN: by everybody. Well, by the media, by our allies.

    TRUMP: By the media, because they refuse to talk about it-

    BIDEN: By the World Bank-

    TRUMP: … because they’re embarrassed.

    BIDEN: By everyone, as discredited. And matter of fact [crosstalk] Matter of fact-

    WALLACE: Mr. President, please stop.

    BIDEN: Even the people who testified under oath-

    TRUMP: So let me ask you this, Joe- [crosstalk].

    WALLACE: No, no. Go ahead, Mr.– I’m listening to you.

    BIDEN: Even the people under-

    TRUMP: He got three and a half million dollars from Moscow.

    BIDEN: … testified, he testified under oath in his Administration said I did my job and I did it very well.

    TRUMP: Oh, really?

    BIDEN: I did it honorably.

    TRUMP: I’d like to know who they are.

    BIDEN: Well, I’ll give you the list of the people who-

    TRUMP: I’ll fire them.

    WALLACE: No, no. Go ahead, sir.

    BIDEN: I’m sure that you’ve already fired most of them, because they did a good job.

    TRUMP: Some people don’t do a good job.

    BIDEN: Well, here’s the- [crosstalk]

    WALLACE: Go ahead. You get the- [crosstalk] Wait a minute. You get the final word, Mr.-

    BIDEN: Well, it’s hard to get any word in with this clown. Excuse me, this person.

    TRUMP: Hey, hey, let me just say, that

    BIDEN: No, no. Mr. President- [crosstalk]

    TRUMP: Three and a half million, Joe.

    BIDEN: That is simply not true.

    TRUMP: Why did he deserve three and a half million from Moscow?

    BIDEN: Look, here’s the deal. We want to talk about families and ethics. I don’t want to do that. I mean, his family, we could talk about all night. His family’s already-

    TRUMP: My family-

    WALLACE: No, no- [crosstalk].

    TRUMP: My family lost a fortune by coming down and helping us with government.

    BIDEN: And that’s such a- [crosstalk]

    WALLACE: Mr. President-

    TRUMP: Every single one of them lost a fortune by coming down and helping us with government.

    BIDEN: This is not about my family or his family. It’s about your family, the American people. [crosstalk]

    TRUMP: And he got three and a half million dollars for nothing.

    BIDEN: That’s not true. It doesn’t want to talk about what you need. You, the American people. It’s about you. That’s what we’re talking about here. [crosstalk]

    WALLACE: That’s the end of the segment. We’re moving on.

    BIDEN: He didn’t take that.

    WALLACE: Vice President-

    TRUMP: Chris, can I be honest? It’s a very important question-

    BIDEN: Try to be honest.

    WALLACE: No.

    TRUMP: He stood up-

    WALLACE: The answer to the question is no.

    TRUMP: … and he threatened Ukraine-

    WALLACE: Sir-

    TRUMP: … with a billion dollars-

    BIDEN: That is absolutely not true.

    WALLACE: Stop. [crosstalk] Gentlemen, I hate to raise my voice, but I- [crosstalk] Why should I be different than the two of you? So here’s the deal.

    BIDEN: That’s a good point.

    WALLACE: We have six segments. We have ended that segment. We’re going to go to the next segment. In that segment, you each are going to have two uninterrupted moments. In those two uninterrupted minutes, Mr. President, you can say anything you want. I’m going to ask a question about race, but if you want to answer about something else, go ahead. But we, I, I think that the country would be better served, if we allowed both people to speak with fewer interruptions. I’m appealing to you, sir, to do that.

    TRUMP: Are you talking Hunter, are you talking about Hunter.

    BIDEN: I’m talking about my son, Beau Biden, you’re talking about Hunter?

    TRUMP: I don’t know Beau. I know Hunter. Hunter got thrown out of the military. He was thrown out dishonorably discharged. . .

    BIDEN: That’s not true he wasn’t dishonorably discharged.

    TRUMP: . . .for cocaine use. And he didn’t have a job until you became Vice-President. Once you became Vice-President

    BIDEN: None of that is true.

    TRUMP: . . . he made a fortune in Ukraine, in China, in Moscow and various other places.

    BIDEN: That is simply not true.

    TRUMP: He made a fortune. . .

    BIDEN: My son. . . my son. . .

    TRUMP: . . . and he didn’t have a job.

    BIDEN: My son. . . like a lot of people. Like a lot of people we know at home had a drug problem. He’s overtaken it. He’s, he’s fixed it. He’s worked on it. And I’m proud of him. I’m proud of my son.

    TRUMP: But why was he given tens of millions of dollars?

    WALLACE: Alright. . .

    BIDEN: He wasn’t given tens of millions of dollars. [crosstalk]

    TRUMP: He was given tens of millions of dollars?

    BIDEN: That was totally discredited.

    WALLACE: President Trump. President Trump. We’ve already been through this.

    BIDEN: Totally discredited.

    WALLACE: We’ve bo. . .already been through this. I think the American people would rather hear about more substantial subjects.

    BIDEN: So do I.

    TRUMP: [unintelligible]

    WALLACE: Well, as the moderator, sir, I’m going to make a judgment call here.

    TRUMP: I know but when somebody gets three and a half million dollars from the Mayor of Moscow.

    BIDEN: That is not true. That report is totally discredited.

    TRUMP: Why did he get it?

    BIDEN: Mitt Romney on that committee said it wasn’t worth taxpayer’s money. That report was written for political reason.

    WALLACE: I’d like to talk about climate change.

    BIDEN: So would I.

    CPD: September 29, 2020 Debate Transcript (debates.org)

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • And here's the transcript of the second and final debate as it relates to the laptop. No denial of its existence, in fact never asked whether it existed or was real. Just unfounded, still, allegations, that were clearly all over the place and that Brandon addressed. Seems like projection to me. But here we are. And knowing what we know now and still trying to claim that Brandon denied it or that the press didn't report on it and it was all a nefarious plot to keep it hush-hush so Brandon would win the rigged election? 

    WELKER: All right, we’re gonna move on to our next section which is national security. And I do want to start with the security of our elections and some breaking news from overnight. Just last night, top intelligence officials confirmed again that both Russia and Iran are working to influence this election. Both countries have obtained U.S. voter registration information, these officials say, and Iran sent intimidating messages to Florida voters. This question goes to you, Mr. Vice President, what would you do to put an end to this threat? You have two minutes, uninterrupted.

    BIDEN: I made it clear. And I asked everyone else to take the pledge. I made it clear that any country, no matter who it is, that interferes in American elections will pay a price. They will pay a price. It has been overwhelmingly clear in this election — I won’t even get into the last one — this election, that Russia has been involved. China has been involved to some degree, and now we learned that, that Iran is involved. They will pay a price if I’m elected. They’re interfering with American sovereignty. That’s what’s going on right now. They’re interfering with American sovereignty. And to the best of my knowledge, I don’t think the President has said anything to Putin about it. I don’t think he’s talking to him a lot. I don’t think he’s said a word. I don’t know why he hasn’t said a word to Putin about it. And I don’t know what he has recently said, if anything, to the Iranians. My guess is he’d probably be more outspoken with regard to the Iranians. But the point is this, folks. We are in a situation where we have foreign countries trying to interfere in the outcome of our election. His own national security advisor told him that what is happening with his buddy — well, I won’t, I shouldn’t — I will — his buddy Rudy Giuliani. He’s being used as a Russian pawn. He’s being fed information that is Russian, that is not true. And then what happens? Nothing happens. And then you find out that everything is going on here about Russia is wanting to make sure that I do not get elected the next President of the United States because they know I know them, and they know me. I don’t understand why this President is unwilling to take on Putin when he’s actually paying bounties to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan, when he’s engaged in activities that are trying to destabilize all of NATO. I don’t know why he doesn’t do it but it’s worth asking the question. Why isn’t that being done? Any country that interferes with us will, in fact, pay a price because they’re affecting our sovereignty.

    WELKER: President Trump, same question to you. Let me, let me ask the question. You’re gonna have two minutes to respond for two elections in a row now there has been substantial interference from foreign adversaries. What would you do in your next term to put an end to this? Two minutes, uninterrupted.

    TRUMP: Well, let me respond to the first part, as Joe answered. Joe got three and a half million dollars from Russia. And it came through Putin, because he was very friendly with the former mayor of Moscow and it was the mayor of Moscow’s wife. You got three and a half million dollars. Your family got three and a half million dollars and you know someday, you’re gonna have to explain — why did you get three and a half? I never got any money from Russia. I don’t get money from Russia. Now, about your thing last night, I knew all about that, and through John — who is John Radcliffe, who is fantastic, DNI — he said, the one thing that’s common to both of them, they both want you to lose. Because there has been nobody tougher to Russia. Between the sanctions, nobody tougher than me on Russia. Between the sanctions between all of what I’ve done with NATO. You know, I’ve got the NATO countries to put up an extra 130 billion, going to $420 billion a year, that’s to guard against Russia. I sold — while he was selling pillows and sheets — I sold tank busters to Ukraine. There has been nobody tougher on Russia than Donald Trump. And I’ll tell you, they were so bad. They took over the, the submarine port. You remember that very well during your term, during you and Barack Obama. They took over a big part of what should have been Ukraine. You handed it to them. But you were getting a lot of money from Russia. They were paying you a lot of money and they probably still are, but now, with what came out today, it’s even worse. All of the emails, the emails are horrible. The emails of the kind of money that you were raking in, you and your family. And Joe, you were vice president when some of this was happening. And it should have never happened. And I think you owe an explanation to the American people. Why is it, somebody just had a news conference a little while ago, who was essentially supposed to work with you and your family, but what he said was damning. And regardless of me, I think you have to clean it up and talk to the American people. Maybe you can do it right now.

    WELKER: Vice President Biden, you may respond and then I do want to follow up on the election security.

    BIDEN: I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life. We learn that this President paid 50 times the tax in China, has a secret bank account with China, does business in China, and in fact, is talking about me taking money? I have not taken a single penny from any country whatsoever, ever, number one. Number two, this is a president — I have released all of my tax returns. 22 years. Go look at them. 22 years of my tax returns. You have not released a single solitary year of your tax return. What are you hiding? Why are you unwilling? The foreign countries are paying you a lot. Russia is paying you a lot. China is paying a lot. And your hotels and all your businesses all around the country, all around the world. And China’s building a new road to a new gas… a golf course you have overseas. So what’s going on here? Why don’t you release your tax return or stop talking about corruption?

    WELKER: President Trump, your response.

    TRUMP: First of all, I called my accountants — under audit. I’m going to release them as soon as we can. I want to do it, and it will show how successful, how great this company is. But much more importantly than that, people were saying $750. I asked them a week ago, I said, what did I pay? They said, sir, you pre-paid tens of millions of dollars. I prepaid my tax. Tens. Over the last number of years. Tens of millions of dollars, I prepaid, because at some point, they think, it’s an estimate. They think I may have to pay tax. So, I already prepaid it. Nobody told me that.

    WELKER: Did your accountant tell you —

    TRUMP: Excuse me. And it wasn’t written whenever they write this. They keep talking about $750, which I think is a filing fee. But let me just tell you, I prepaid millions and millions of dollars in taxes, number one. Number two, I don’t make money from China, you do. I don’t make money from Ukraine, you do. I don’t make money from Russia. You made three and a half million dollars, Joe, and your son gave you. They even have a statement that we have to give 10% to the big man. You’re the big man, I think. I don’t know, maybe you’re not. But you’re the big man, I think. Your son said we have to give 10% to the big man. Joe, what’s that all about? It’s terrible.

    WELKER: Alright, gentlemen, I want to ask you both some questions about all of this. I’m gonna let you both respond, very quickly. You just said you spoke to your accountant about potentially releasing your taxes. Did he tell you when you can release them? Do you have a deadline for when you’re going to release them to the American people?

    TRUMP: I get treated worse than the Tea Party got treated. A lot of people in there, deep down in the IRS, they treat me horribly. We made a deal, it was all settled, until I decided to run for president. I get treated very badly by the IRS, very unfairly, but we had a deal all done. As soon as we’re completed with the deal, I want to release it. But I have paid millions and millions of dollars. And it’s worse than paying. I paid in advance. It’s called prepaying your taxes. 

    WELKER: I want to ask you both about questions regarding your potential foreign entanglements and questions that have been raised to give you both a chance to talk about this more broadly.

    BIDEN: At some point I want to respond.

    WELKER: Respond very quickly, and then I’ll get to my question.

    Continued next post.

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Continued from previous post. And congratulations for finding that extra time to find one of several conservative commentary writers on WaPo to back up your claim that "lots of people were questioning the existence of the laptop," or whatever you "remembered." Sure, the right wing echo chamber across platforms were making that claim. But you know who wasn't? Brandon. Facts. Context. They're difficult.


    BIDEN: Why do he — He’s been saying this for four years. Show us. Just show us. Stop playing around. You’ve been saying for four years you’re going to release your taxes. Nobody knows, Mr. President, what they do know is you’re not paying your taxes or you’re paying taxes that are so low. When last time he said what he paid, he said, ‘I only pay that little because I’m smart. I know how to game the system.’ Come on, come on, folks.

    WELKER: Quickly, President Trump, and then I want to get to two questions to both of you.

    TRUMP: I was put through a phony witch hunt for three years. It started before I even got elected. They spied on my campaign. No president should ever have to go through what I went through. Let me just say this. Mueller and 18 angry Democrats, and FBI agents all over the place spent $48 million. They went through everything I had, including my tax returns, and they found absolutely no collusion and nothing wrong. $48 million. I guarantee you, if I spent 1 million on you Joe, I could find plenty wrong, because the kind of things that you’ve done and the kind of monies that your family has taken — I mean, your brother made money in Iraq, millions of dollars. Your other brother made a fortune, and it’s all through you, Joe. And they say you get some of it. And you do live very well. You have houses all over the place. You live very well.

    WELKER: All right, gentlemen, let me just ask some questions about all of this broadly. Vice President Biden, there have been questions about the work your son has done in China, and for a Ukrainian energy company when you were Vice President. In retrospect, was anything about those relationships inappropriate or unethical?

    BIDEN: Nothing was unethical. Here’s what the deal. With regard to Ukraine, we had this whole question about whether or not, because he was on the board, I later learned, of Burisma, a company, that somehow I had done something wrong. Yet every single solitary person, when he was going through his impeachment, testifying under oath who worked for him, said I did my job impeccably. I carried out US policy. Not one, single, solitary thing was out of line. Not a single thing, number one. Number two, the guy who got in trouble in Ukraine was this guy, trying to bribe the Ukrainian government to say something negative about me, which they would not do, and did not do, because it never, ever, ever happened. My son has not made money in terms of this thing about — what are you talking about — China. I have not had it. The only guy that made money from China is this guy. He’s the only one. Nobody else has made money from China.

    WELKER: President Trump, let me ask my question to you.

    TRUMP: Could I just — one thing.

    WELKER: Very quickly.

    TRUMP: His son didn’t have a job for a long time, was sadly no longer in the military service, I won’t get into that. And he didn’t have a job. As soon as he became vice president, Burisma — not the best, not the best reputation in the world — I hear they paid him 183,000 a month. Listen to this, 183, and they gave him a $3 million upfront payment, and he had no energy experience. That’s 100% dishonest.

    WELKER: I’m going to let the vice president respond to that quickly and then I have a question for you.

    BIDEN: No basis for that. Everybody investigated that, no one said anything he did was wrong in Ukraine.

    WELKER: OK, President Trump, this is for you. Since you took office, you’ve never divested from your business. You’ve personally promoted your properties abroad. A report this week, which was referenced, does indicate that your company has a bank account in China. So how can voters know that you don’t have any foreign conflicts of interest?

    TRUMP: I have many bank accounts and they’re all listed and they’re all over the place. I mean, I was a businessman doing business. The bank account you’re referring to — which is, everybody knows about it, it’s listed — the bank account was in 2013. That’s what it was. It was opened. It was closed in 2015, I believe, and then I decided, because I was going to do, I was thinking about doing a deal in China, like millions of other people, I was thinking about it. And I decided I’m not going to do it, didn’t like it, I decided not to do it, had an account open and I closed it.

    WELKER: OK.

    TRUMP: Excuse me, and then unlike him, where he’s Vice President, and he does business, I then decided to run for president after that. That was before. So I closed it before I even ran for president, let alone became president, big difference. He is the Vice President of the United States, and his son, his brother and his other brother are getting rich, they’re like a vacuum cleaner, there’s something —

    WELKER: Okay, President Trump, thank you. We do need to move on. I do want to ask you, Vice President Biden, about China. Let’s talk about China more broadly. There have, of course, President Trump has said that they should pay for not being fully transparent in regards to the coronavirus. If you were president, would you make China pay and please be specific, what would that look like?

    BIDEN: What I’d make China do is play by the international rules, not like he has done. He has caused the deficit in China to go up not down — with China, up not down. We are making sure that in order to do business in China, you have to give all your intellectual property. You have to get/have a partner in China, it is 51%. We would not do that at all, number one. Number two, we’re in a situation where China would have to play by the rules internationally as well. When I met with Xi, and when I was still vice president, he said ‘we’re setting up air identification zones in the South China Sea, you can’t fly through them.’ I said, ‘we’re gonna fly through them. We just flew B52/B1 bombers through it. We’re not going to pay attention.’ They have to play by the rules, and what’s he do? He embraces guys like the thugs like in North Korea, and, and, and the Chinese president and Putin and others, and he pokes his finger in the eye of all our friends, all of our allies. We make up only — we’re 25%. 25% of the world’s economy. We need to be having the rest of our friends with us, saying to China, these are the rules. You play by them or you’re going to pay the price for not playing by them, economically. That’s the way I will run it. And that’s what we did and upholding steel tariffs and a range of other things when we were president and vice president.

    WELKER: All right, let’s talk about North Korea.

    TRUMP: Excuse me, no, I have to respond to this.

    WELKER: OK, very quickly and then we’re gonna move on to North Korea…

    TRUMP: His son walked out with a billion and a half dollars from China —

    BIDEN: Not true.

    TRUMP: — after spending 10 minutes in office and being in Air Force Two, number one. Number two, there’s a very strong email, talking about your family wanting to make $10 million a year for introductions.

    BIDEN: That is not true.

    WELKER: President Trump, on China policy, though. What are you gonna do? What specifically are you going to do to make China pay? You’ve said you’re going to make them pay.

    TRUMP: First of all, China is paying. They’re paying billions and billions of dollars. I just gave $28 billion.

    TRUMP: You know, Joe, I ran because of you. I ran because of Barack Obama, because you did a poor job. If I thought you did a good job, I would have never run. I would’ve never run. I ran because of you. I’m looking at you now, you’re a politician. I ran because of you.

    WELKER: Alright, Vice President Biden, your response to that? And then I do have some questions for both of you.

    BIDEN: Well, I’ll tell you what, I hope he does look at me because what’s happening here is you know who I am, you know who he is, you know his character, you know my character, you know our reputations for honor and telling the truth. I am anxious to have this race. I’m anxious to see this take place. I am — the character of the country is on the ballot. Our character is on the ballot. Look at us closely.

    WELKER: Let me ask them some follow–

    TRUMP: Excuse me–

    WELKER: Please respond and then we’re gonna have follow up questions.

    TRUMP: If this stuff is true about Russia, Ukraine, China, other countries, Iraq — If this is true, then he’s a corrupt politician. So don’t give me the stuff about how you’re this innocent baby. Joe, they’re calling you a corrupt politician–

    BIDEN: Nobody says–

    WELKER: President Trump, I want to stay on the issue of race. We’re talking about the issue–

    TRUMP: It’s the laptop from hell. 

    WELKER: President Trump, we’re talking about race right now and I do want to stay on the issue of race. President Trump—

    BIDEN: Nobody– Kristen, I have to respond to that.

    WELKER: Please, very quickly.

    BIDEN: Look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this, he’s accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have said that this has all the characteristics — four– five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend Rudy Giuliani.

    TRUMP: You mean, the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? You gotta be–

    BIDEN: That’s exactly what — That’s exactly what–

    TRUMP: Is this where you’re going? This is where he’s going. The laptop is Russia, Russia, Russia?

    WELKER: Gentleman, I want to stay on the issue of race, okay —

    TRUMP: You have to be kidding. Here we go again with Russia. Boy oh boy.

    CPD: October 22, 2020 Debate Transcript (debates.org)

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,773
    edited November 2023
    So did Biden say the laptop story wasn’t true, or did he deny the existence of the laptop? 
    Honest question because there’s a lot of hangup about semantics here…. Which in the end is a waste of fucking time considering there’s no evidence of criminality, but I digress: did Biden outright deny the existence of the laptop? 
    What's the quote? 
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    edited November 2023
    nvm - was supposed to be a joke, but after reading it, I don't think it would come across the way.
    Post edited by mace1229 on
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,076
    That transcript Hal posted reminds me.  Did they ever release all of Trump's tax returns?
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden

  • static111 said:
    That transcript Hal posted reminds me.  Did they ever release all of Trump's tax returns?
    Not that I'm aware of... meanwhile Biden has released decades worth of tax returns, and somehow he's the guy w/ something to hide in all of this. Trumps facing ninety-one (91) criminal charges, and as far as I know, Biden is facing zero (0) but yeah... Biden's the one to worry about because a "laptop exists". 

    Weird how all that works.
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,076

    static111 said:
    That transcript Hal posted reminds me.  Did they ever release all of Trump's tax returns?
    Not that I'm aware of... meanwhile Biden has released decades worth of tax returns, and somehow he's the guy w/ something to hide in all of this. Trumps facing ninety-one (91) criminal charges, and as far as I know, Biden is facing zero (0) but yeah... Biden's the one to worry about because a "laptop exists". 

    Weird how all that works.
    @JB16057 What are your thoughts on tax return gate? Do American'e deserve to know the TRUTH?
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • I still want to see where Biden and others denied the literal existence of the laptop, because in the absence of that, 'the laptop is real' is a pretty stupid argument to keep making,
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    edited November 2023
    So did Biden say the laptop story wasn’t true, or did he deny the existence of the laptop? 
    Honest question because there’s a lot of hangup about semantics here…. Which in the end is a waste of fucking time considering there’s no evidence of criminality, but I digress: did Biden outright deny the existence of the laptop? 
    What's the quote? 
    When I read the transcripts I interpret it as denying it is connected to Hunter at all, that there is no original Hunter laptop, and its all fake.

    BIDEN: Look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this, he’s accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have said that this has all the characteristics — four– five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend Rudy Giuliani.

    TRUMP: You mean, the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? You gotta be–

    BIDEN: That’s exactly what — That’s exactly what–

    TRUMP: Is this where you’re going? This is where he’s going. The laptop is Russia, Russia, Russia?


    He isn't saying Rudy's copy was tampered with, he's calling the computer a Russian plant. Rudy came forward about mid October 2020 with his story. The FBI didn't confirm they had the original laptop until about a month later. During that time there was speculation if the whole computer left behind by Hunter was true. 

    The timing made it easy for a lot of accusations. Because what happened between October 2020 when Rudy went to The Post and a month later when the FBI confirmed they had the computer? The election taking place made for easy accusations that it was part of the cover up.

    Now I don't personally believe the FBI tried to cover it up until after the election. But if the existence of Hunter's computer was never in question, there wouldn't be these accusations. 

    The contents of the copied hard drive has always been in question as to its authenticity. But until the FBI confirmed they had the original, there was debate as to whether the original even existed. This debate took place in that window of time, and I interpret it as Joe denying the original computer belonging to Hunter and left behind exists. He blamed it on a Russian plant (this transcript says Russian plan, but others I've seen says "plant", and plant makes more sense). Hunter, when asked if the computer was his, said he doesn't remember dropping off the computer. Why would you ask him if its his in an interview if there isn't any question about it?

    An excerpt from wikipedia states "PolitiFact wrote in June 2021 that, while "over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "[n]othing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma".[11]" I mean, to have less doubt means there was at one time more doubt, right?

    In the initial months of the story, there was question as to if Hunter's abandoned laptop even existed, existed in the sense that it never actually belonged to hunter. There was a physical laptop, did it ever belong to Hunter was in debate at the beginning, i.e. did Hunter's laptop exist?

    Post edited by mace1229 on
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    edited November 2023
    static111 said:
    That transcript Hal posted reminds me.  Did they ever release all of Trump's tax returns?
    That transcript reminds me of watching/hearing it live and vividly remembering how horrible a person Trump is just in the way he interacts with people.

    Being off real social media and out of the spotlight the last few years has really done him well. 
    www.myspace.com
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    static111 said:
    That transcript Hal posted reminds me.  Did they ever release all of Trump's tax returns?
    That transcript reminds me of watching/hearing it live and vividly remembering how horrible a person Trump is just in the way he interacts with people.

    Being off real social media and out of the spotlight the last few years has really done him well. 
    I agree. I felt a little disgusted reading how Trump brings in Joe's kids and the way he referenced them.
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,594
    mace1229 said:
    static111 said:
    That transcript Hal posted reminds me.  Did they ever release all of Trump's tax returns?
    That transcript reminds me of watching/hearing it live and vividly remembering how horrible a person Trump is just in the way he interacts with people.

    Being off real social media and out of the spotlight the last few years has really done him well. 
    I agree. I felt a little disgusted reading how Trump brings in Joe's kids and the way he referenced them.
    Policy and everything else aside...he's just rude. My stomach was turning reading and hoping I was towards the end...but the damn transcript kept going and going. lol. 

    This is why next year, I think, is such a wild card. So many people are going to have the same reaction when being inundated with him on a daily basis again. 
    www.myspace.com
  • mace1229 said:
    So did Biden say the laptop story wasn’t true, or did he deny the existence of the laptop? 
    Honest question because there’s a lot of hangup about semantics here…. Which in the end is a waste of fucking time considering there’s no evidence of criminality, but I digress: did Biden outright deny the existence of the laptop? 
    What's the quote? 
    When I read the transcripts I interpret it as denying it is connected to Hunter at all, that there is no original Hunter laptop, and its all fake.

    BIDEN: Look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this, he’s accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have said that this has all the characteristics — four– five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend Rudy Giuliani.

    TRUMP: You mean, the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? You gotta be–

    BIDEN: That’s exactly what — That’s exactly what–

    TRUMP: Is this where you’re going? This is where he’s going. The laptop is Russia, Russia, Russia?


    He isn't saying Rudy's copy was tampered with, he's calling the computer a Russian plant. Rudy came forward about mid October 2020 with his story. The FBI didn't confirm they had the original laptop until about a month later. During that time there was speculation if the whole computer left behind by Hunter was true. 

    The timing made it easy for a lot of accusations. Because what happened between October 2020 when Rudy went to The Post and a month later when the FBI confirmed they had the computer? The election taking place made for easy accusations that it was part of the cover up.

    Now I don't personally believe the FBI tried to cover it up until after the election. But if the existence of Hunter's computer was never in question, there wouldn't be these accusations. 

    The contents of the copied hard drive has always been in question as to its authenticity. But until the FBI confirmed they had the original, there was debate as to whether the original even existed. This debate took place in that window of time, and I interpret it as Joe denying the original computer belonging to Hunter and left behind exists. He blamed it on a Russian plant (this transcript says Russian plan, but others I've seen says "plant", and plant makes more sense). Hunter, when asked if the computer was his, said he doesn't remember dropping off the computer. Why would you ask him if its his in an interview if there isn't any question about it?

    An excerpt from wikipedia states "PolitiFact wrote in June 2021 that, while "over time, there has been less doubt that the laptop did in fact belong to Hunter Biden", the laptop "was real in the sense that it exists, but it didn't prove much", as "[n]othing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma".[11]"

    In the initial months of the story, there was question as to if Hunter's abandoned laptop even existed, existed in the sense that it never actually belonged to hunter. There was a physical laptop, did it ever belong to Hunter was in debate at the beginning, i.e. did Hunter's laptop exist?

    Most, if not all of those are all fair questions to ask out the gate, most especially after they tried to extort the Ukraine into "finding Hunter's server". Remember that? A certain someone was impeached over it. (that was the 1st impeachment, for clarity's sake) 
    Furthermore, the assertion that the laptop was some sort of smoking gun WAS disinformation. Maybe not Russian disinformation, but disinformation all the same. There's no evidence of criminality there, this has been established. 

    So at the end of the day, Biden didn't deny the existence of the laptop, just the allegations of the inherent criminality, is that where we're at now?