Donald Trump

bootlegger10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

bootlegger10 said:

Merkin Baller said:

The Juggler said:

lindamarie73 said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

The Juggler said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

Did i insult you?  You called me "caveman".  Pot meet kettle.  Typical liberal hypocrisy.  Ask your "specialist" how much you've lost since 2021 vs how much you gained since 2016.  Ask him how much you stand to lose in the next 2.  Bet he doesn't return your cal..... 

Hey buddy...what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents at maralago?

Also....the market is higher right now compared to when trump left office. 

He went with the "they planted it" defense because.....you know, because there's no defense for having it in the first place. 

Guilty until proven innocent!  The liberal way! Jesus you he/hims really are a special bunch!  

You know your rhetoric over the last few days is similar to that of the wackjob who tried to kill the speaker of the house? But, nah, you're not some far right extremist.

Please share w/ the group the rhetoric from the right wing extremist whackjob who tried to kill the speakers Husband?  Be very careful, not a good look to spread FAKE News and all on this fact based forum of ours…lol    Good God the hypocrisy on here gets worse by the day, yet entertaining as ever and only gonna get more entertaining  in coming weeks…

Apparently Miss Linda easily bought into the far right conspiracies about the speaker's husband over the weekend. This is not surprising. The ironic thing is the people spreading that nonsense are likely the same people spreading the fake stolen election nonsense that flips switches in these wackjob's heads in the first place. 

How is anything related to an almost deadly home invasion of the speaker of the house's home "entertaining" to these people? 

Owning libz is the only thing that matters.

Don't pretend both sides are after the truth.   I'll grant you the Republicans are more overtly showing their hand, but all you have to do is look at how Dems treat Hunter Biden and how they treated Jared.  Dems wouldn't leave a stone unturned to see if Jared was benefiting from his access to Trump, but Hunter Biden is clearly on boards of companies with ties to China and Ukraine and good luck trying to see if any Dem is interested in lifting a finger to figure out if there was corruption.  Even Jon Stewart admitted it was corruption on its face (not sure he was implying illegal but admitted it sure looks like he was only on the boards for his access to Joe).    At least Jared isn't some cokehead and has a business background. 

Few Dems are interested in finding out if there was a lab leak because Trump was using China as a campaign platform.  So there was a media lockdown on claiming it was lab originated until Biden finally had admit it was possible.    

Was there a media “lockdown?” Did Faux and the right wing media empire, WSJ, OAN, newsmax, Washington Times, Drudge, Brietbart, et al all get canceled. Or maybe, just maybe, there’s no there, there, when it comes to Hunter? No worries though, Maggie Three Names, Matt Getts Off and Lorena Bobbit will be chairing investigative committees soon enough to find your truth.

Sorry, mainstream liberal media blackout.  

I would rather there be an investigation into a cokehead son of a President and former VP who is on boards of companies in China and Ukraine for no other purpose than his connection to his dead, then none at all.  

I think Trump's family should have been investigated too.  Just be consistent.  

mickeyrat said:

bootlegger10 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

bootlegger10 said:

Merkin Baller said:

The Juggler said:

lindamarie73 said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

The Juggler said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

Did i insult you?  You called me "caveman".  Pot meet kettle.  Typical liberal hypocrisy.  Ask your "specialist" how much you've lost since 2021 vs how much you gained since 2016.  Ask him how much you stand to lose in the next 2.  Bet he doesn't return your cal..... 

Hey buddy...what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents at maralago?

Also....the market is higher right now compared to when trump left office. 

He went with the "they planted it" defense because.....you know, because there's no defense for having it in the first place. 

Guilty until proven innocent!  The liberal way! Jesus you he/hims really are a special bunch!  

You know your rhetoric over the last few days is similar to that of the wackjob who tried to kill the speaker of the house? But, nah, you're not some far right extremist.

Please share w/ the group the rhetoric from the right wing extremist whackjob who tried to kill the speakers Husband?  Be very careful, not a good look to spread FAKE News and all on this fact based forum of ours…lol    Good God the hypocrisy on here gets worse by the day, yet entertaining as ever and only gonna get more entertaining  in coming weeks…

Apparently Miss Linda easily bought into the far right conspiracies about the speaker's husband over the weekend. This is not surprising. The ironic thing is the people spreading that nonsense are likely the same people spreading the fake stolen election nonsense that flips switches in these wackjob's heads in the first place. 

How is anything related to an almost deadly home invasion of the speaker of the house's home "entertaining" to these people? 

Owning libz is the only thing that matters.

Don't pretend both sides are after the truth.   I'll grant you the Republicans are more overtly showing their hand, but all you have to do is look at how Dems treat Hunter Biden and how they treated Jared.  Dems wouldn't leave a stone unturned to see if Jared was benefiting from his access to Trump, but Hunter Biden is clearly on boards of companies with ties to China and Ukraine and good luck trying to see if any Dem is interested in lifting a finger to figure out if there was corruption.  Even Jon Stewart admitted it was corruption on its face (not sure he was implying illegal but admitted it sure looks like he was only on the boards for his access to Joe).    At least Jared isn't some cokehead and has a business background. 

Few Dems are interested in finding out if there was a lab leak because Trump was using China as a campaign platform.  So there was a media lockdown on claiming it was lab originated until Biden finally had admit it was possible.    

Was there a media “lockdown?” Did Faux and the right wing media empire, WSJ, OAN, newsmax, Washington Times, Drudge, Brietbart, et al all get canceled. Or maybe, just maybe, there’s no there, there, when it comes to Hunter? No worries though, Maggie Three Names, Matt Getts Off and Lorena Bobbit will be chairing investigative committees soon enough to find your truth.

Sorry, mainstream liberal media blackout.  

I would rather there be an investigation into a cokehead son of a President and former VP who is on boards of companies in China and Ukraine for no other purpose than his connection to his dead, then none at all.  

I think Trump's family should have been investigated too.  Just be consistent.  

Investigate Hunter Biden? Most Democrats say yes. Investigate Trump? Most Republicans say no.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/08/12/trump-hunter-biden-investigations/ 

Investigate Hunter Biden? Most Democrats say yes. Investigate Trump? Most Republicans say no.
By Philip Bump
August 12, 2022 at 11:27 ET
Since the public became aware of the FBI’s search of Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate at the beginning of the week, the former president’s defenders have repeatedly claimed that he is a victim of an investigatory double standard. Trump’s home got searched — but not Hillary Clinton’s, when it was learned that she was operating a private email server? Trump is being probed — but not President Biden’s son Hunter, who is known to have engaged in dubious business dealings? Just another example of how Trump is treated unfairly.
It’s not, of course. Clinton’s house wasn’t searched in part because there was no obvious need to; her cooperation with the FBI included turning over a server on which the email system was hosted. And Hunter Biden is being investigated, as has been reported.
But this idea that Democrats skate while Trump is pilloried persists, in part because it’s so useful for Trump to promote it. His casting of himself as a perennial victim has been enormously effective at reducing Republican support for investigating his actions.
As new polling from Fox News makes clear.
[Sign up for How To Read This Chart, a weekly data newsletter from Philip Bump]
The Trump-friendly cable-news network has a well-respected polling arm that consistently produces interesting analyses of the public mood (even if those results aren’t always prominently featured on the network). In its most recent iteration, the pollsters asked a pair of questions evaluating support for politically loaded investigations, including one of Hunter Biden.
First, the pollsters asked how important it was that Congress and the Justice Department probe the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Nearly three-quarters of Democrats said it was “very important”; 9 in 10 said it was at least somewhat important. Among Republicans, though, 4 in 10 said it was even somewhat important.

continues..  

A

"Clinton’s house wasn’t searched in part because there was no obvious need to; her cooperation with the FBI included turning over a server on which the email system was hosted."

Hahaha! You mean she turned over a server that was soaked in bleach bit and a cell phone that was smashed into a thousand pieces. There must have been no there there based on those actions! I love how you guys pick and choose your facts/talking points. You might want to throw in some facts from the other side once in a while to make yourselves not look so biased. Here watch me do it:

 I'm sure Trump and his sons have had some shady business dealings in their past and boy won't we know it when the DOJ and the state of New York etc. get done prosecuting them from the last few years to eternity. No public figure has been more investigated, scrutinized and slandered then Trump. 

Joe and Hunter Biden, not so much. The now proven corrupt FBI had Hunter's laptop way before the 2020 elections and chose to sit on it until after the election. The polls show that enough Dems and independents would not have voted for Biden had they known more about the laptop before the election which would have changed the outcome. 

Now that Biden is the kiss of death to Dems in their reelection bid they can leak a little bit of the misdemeanor stuff out to show good faith but the serious stuff will never be fully investigated as it would expose much deeper deep state stuff tying Obama and company in with it all. 

I'm sure that Joe Biden being the Ambassador to China, Ukraine etc. and having his fine upstanding son Hunter being on boards of prominent foreign countries companies of which he had zero experience was just a sign of good faith. Nothing to see here indeed. 

Halifax2TheMax said:

TJ25487 said:

Nothing like a little election interference huh? 

From the above article:

As Breitbart News previously reported, the EIP provided tools to the federal government and to organs of the Democrat party to censor “misinformation” in the runup to the 2020 election, and targeted various conservative media, including Breitbart News, for censorship.

Via Breitbart News:

In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.

Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.

News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others

In a statement to the Intercept, a Twitter spokesperson said “we do not coordinate with other entities when making content moderation decisions, and we independently evaluate content in line with the Twitter Rules.”

What “organs” of the Democrat party were provided “tools?” Which “tools” might they have been? Who are the EIP? Also, have any of those “news” outlets spread or purposely “reported” mis and or dis-information? I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. Further, how is “flagging” dis or mis-information election interference? Does it equate to making false accusations that the election was “stolen” since from before the election to present day, losing 62 court cases, proposing to present an alternative slate electors, calling the SOS of Georgia and begging him to find the number of votes POOTWH lost by and encouraging and participating in an act of treason by inciting your mob to storm the capitol?

I’m sure Brietbart has fully investigated the claims and can back them up with facts.

Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view. 

The Juggler said:

TJ25487 said:

Hey buddy....what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents at maralago?

TJ25487 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

TJ25487 said:

Nothing like a little election interference huh? 

From the above article:

As Breitbart News previously reported, the EIP provided tools to the federal government and to organs of the Democrat party to censor “misinformation” in the runup to the 2020 election, and targeted various conservative media, including Breitbart News, for censorship.

Via Breitbart News:

In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.

Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.

News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others

In a statement to the Intercept, a Twitter spokesperson said “we do not coordinate with other entities when making content moderation decisions, and we independently evaluate content in line with the Twitter Rules.”

What “organs” of the Democrat party were provided “tools?” Which “tools” might they have been? Who are the EIP? Also, have any of those “news” outlets spread or purposely “reported” mis and or dis-information? I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. Further, how is “flagging” dis or mis-information election interference? Does it equate to making false accusations that the election was “stolen” since from before the election to present day, losing 62 court cases, proposing to present an alternative slate electors, calling the SOS of Georgia and begging him to find the number of votes POOTWH lost by and encouraging and participating in an act of treason by inciting your mob to storm the capitol?

I’m sure Brietbart has fully investigated the claims and can back them up with facts.

Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view. 

"I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. "

Oh you mean like the Washington Compost and the New York Slimes??? They put out major false Front Page headlines and then when found out to be debunked they print the retraction on the bottom of the last page. It's the ole throw a bunch of spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks strategy. 

"Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view."

This is your guys main problem. You don't read any other news than the state run media which covers for the left in Washington. 
I get it that your a lefty and who could blame you but what your not seeing is we are all being sold down the river by the Washington elite.

Jeff Zucker while running CNN was recorded by Project Veritas in a staff meeting saying "Fuck the news, get Trump!" 
It was all down hill for them after that. Too much blatent bias. 

The Juggler said:

Gern Blansten said:

TJ25487 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

TJ25487 said:

Nothing like a little election interference huh? 

From the above article:

As Breitbart News previously reported, the EIP provided tools to the federal government and to organs of the Democrat party to censor “misinformation” in the runup to the 2020 election, and targeted various conservative media, including Breitbart News, for censorship.

Via Breitbart News:

In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.

Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.

News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others

In a statement to the Intercept, a Twitter spokesperson said “we do not coordinate with other entities when making content moderation decisions, and we independently evaluate content in line with the Twitter Rules.”

What “organs” of the Democrat party were provided “tools?” Which “tools” might they have been? Who are the EIP? Also, have any of those “news” outlets spread or purposely “reported” mis and or dis-information? I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. Further, how is “flagging” dis or mis-information election interference? Does it equate to making false accusations that the election was “stolen” since from before the election to present day, losing 62 court cases, proposing to present an alternative slate electors, calling the SOS of Georgia and begging him to find the number of votes POOTWH lost by and encouraging and participating in an act of treason by inciting your mob to storm the capitol?

I’m sure Brietbart has fully investigated the claims and can back them up with facts.

Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view. 

"I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. "

Oh you mean like the Washington Compost and the New York Slimes??? They put out major false Front Page headlines and then when found out to be debunked they print the retraction on the bottom of the last page. It's the ole throw a bunch of spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks strategy. 

"Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view."

This is your guys main problem. You don't read any other news than the state run media which covers for the left in Washington. 
I get it that your a lefty and who could blame you but what your not seeing is we are all being sold down the river by the Washington elite.

Jeff Zucker while running CNN was recorded by Project Veritas in a staff meeting saying "Fuck the news, get Trump!" 
It was all down hill for them after that. Too much blatent bias. 

Brietbart is absolute shit. At least form opinions using somewhat intelligent right leaning sources.

And you people really don't understand the major news organizations. The WP and NYT are true news organizations. Just because they publish news that you don't like doesn't mean they are state run. That is just an incredibly ignorant thing to say.

They're the same way with polling with these people.....and because of Trump, it has now morphed into not believing actual election results they don't like. Hard to function as a democracy when 40%+ of the people are lost in their own world. 

Halifax2TheMax said:

TJ25487 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

TJ25487 said:

Nothing like a little election interference huh? 

From the above article:

As Breitbart News previously reported, the EIP provided tools to the federal government and to organs of the Democrat party to censor “misinformation” in the runup to the 2020 election, and targeted various conservative media, including Breitbart News, for censorship.

Via Breitbart News:

In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.

Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.

News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others

In a statement to the Intercept, a Twitter spokesperson said “we do not coordinate with other entities when making content moderation decisions, and we independently evaluate content in line with the Twitter Rules.”

What “organs” of the Democrat party were provided “tools?” Which “tools” might they have been? Who are the EIP? Also, have any of those “news” outlets spread or purposely “reported” mis and or dis-information? I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. Further, how is “flagging” dis or mis-information election interference? Does it equate to making false accusations that the election was “stolen” since from before the election to present day, losing 62 court cases, proposing to present an alternative slate electors, calling the SOS of Georgia and begging him to find the number of votes POOTWH lost by and encouraging and participating in an act of treason by inciting your mob to storm the capitol?

I’m sure Brietbart has fully investigated the claims and can back them up with facts.

Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view. 

"I’m sure they’ve never done so and print or broadcast retractions when found to do so. "

Oh you mean like the Washington Compost and the New York Slimes??? They put out major false Front Page headlines and then when found out to be debunked they print the retraction on the bottom of the last page. It's the ole throw a bunch of spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks strategy. 

"Full disclosure: I won’t click on Brietbart and give it a view."

This is your guys main problem. You don't read any other news than the state run media which covers for the left in Washington. 
I get it that your a lefty and who could blame you but what your not seeing is we are all being sold down the river by the Washington elite.

Jeff Zucker while running CNN was recorded by Project Veritas in a staff meeting saying "Fuck the news, get Trump!" 
It was all down hill for them after that. Too much blatent bias. 

Are you looking forward to the Hillary Clinton email server hearings? And what does “being sold down the river by Washington’s elite” mean? Is the river the Potomac, Mississippi, Missouri, Charles, Colorado, Snake, seems appropriate, Wood or Saugatucket? Or one to be named?

bootlegger10 said:

Go Beavers said:

bootlegger10 said:

Merkin Baller said:

The Juggler said:

lindamarie73 said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

The Juggler said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

Did i insult you?  You called me "caveman".  Pot meet kettle.  Typical liberal hypocrisy.  Ask your "specialist" how much you've lost since 2021 vs how much you gained since 2016.  Ask him how much you stand to lose in the next 2.  Bet he doesn't return your cal..... 

Hey buddy...what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents at maralago?

Also....the market is higher right now compared to when trump left office. 

He went with the "they planted it" defense because.....you know, because there's no defense for having it in the first place. 

Guilty until proven innocent!  The liberal way! Jesus you he/hims really are a special bunch!  

You know your rhetoric over the last few days is similar to that of the wackjob who tried to kill the speaker of the house? But, nah, you're not some far right extremist.

Please share w/ the group the rhetoric from the right wing extremist whackjob who tried to kill the speakers Husband?  Be very careful, not a good look to spread FAKE News and all on this fact based forum of ours…lol    Good God the hypocrisy on here gets worse by the day, yet entertaining as ever and only gonna get more entertaining  in coming weeks…

Apparently Miss Linda easily bought into the far right conspiracies about the speaker's husband over the weekend. This is not surprising. The ironic thing is the people spreading that nonsense are likely the same people spreading the fake stolen election nonsense that flips switches in these wackjob's heads in the first place. 

How is anything related to an almost deadly home invasion of the speaker of the house's home "entertaining" to these people? 

Owning libz is the only thing that matters.

Don't pretend both sides are after the truth.   I'll grant you the Republicans are more overtly showing their hand, but all you have to do is look at how Dems treat Hunter Biden and how they treated Jared.  Dems wouldn't leave a stone unturned to see if Jared was benefiting from his access to Trump, but Hunter Biden is clearly on boards of companies with ties to China and Ukraine and good luck trying to see if any Dem is interested in lifting a finger to figure out if there was corruption.  Even Jon Stewart admitted it was corruption on its face (not sure he was implying illegal but admitted it sure looks like he was only on the boards for his access to Joe).    At least Jared isn't some cokehead and has a business background. 

Few Dems are interested in finding out if there was a lab leak because Trump was using China as a campaign platform.  So there was a media lockdown on claiming it was lab originated until Biden finally had admit it was possible.    

Jared was on staff as an advisor and was selling access and using his position to run a private business while he was a government employee. Or maybe that $2 billion deal with the Saudis was above the table

Understood.   It is only a problem if you are selling influence to your President or VP father if you are on the payroll too.  

I'm not saying Pres. Biden did anything wrong pertaining to Hunter, it is just that the mainstream media doesn't give a crap about looking and neither do any other Dems.   And guess what......it is human nature!  Just accept that humans are biased and especially biased with politics.    

Go Beavers said:

bootlegger10 said:

Go Beavers said:

bootlegger10 said:

Merkin Baller said:

The Juggler said:

lindamarie73 said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

The Juggler said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

The Juggler said:

KP_McMinn said:

Did i insult you?  You called me "caveman".  Pot meet kettle.  Typical liberal hypocrisy.  Ask your "specialist" how much you've lost since 2021 vs how much you gained since 2016.  Ask him how much you stand to lose in the next 2.  Bet he doesn't return your cal..... 

Hey buddy...what do you think Trump was doing with all those top secret documents at maralago?

Also....the market is higher right now compared to when trump left office. 

He went with the "they planted it" defense because.....you know, because there's no defense for having it in the first place. 

Guilty until proven innocent!  The liberal way! Jesus you he/hims really are a special bunch!  

You know your rhetoric over the last few days is similar to that of the wackjob who tried to kill the speaker of the house? But, nah, you're not some far right extremist.

Please share w/ the group the rhetoric from the right wing extremist whackjob who tried to kill the speakers Husband?  Be very careful, not a good look to spread FAKE News and all on this fact based forum of ours…lol    Good God the hypocrisy on here gets worse by the day, yet entertaining as ever and only gonna get more entertaining  in coming weeks…

Apparently Miss Linda easily bought into the far right conspiracies about the speaker's husband over the weekend. This is not surprising. The ironic thing is the people spreading that nonsense are likely the same people spreading the fake stolen election nonsense that flips switches in these wackjob's heads in the first place. 

How is anything related to an almost deadly home invasion of the speaker of the house's home "entertaining" to these people? 

Owning libz is the only thing that matters.

Don't pretend both sides are after the truth.   I'll grant you the Republicans are more overtly showing their hand, but all you have to do is look at how Dems treat Hunter Biden and how they treated Jared.  Dems wouldn't leave a stone unturned to see if Jared was benefiting from his access to Trump, but Hunter Biden is clearly on boards of companies with ties to China and Ukraine and good luck trying to see if any Dem is interested in lifting a finger to figure out if there was corruption.  Even Jon Stewart admitted it was corruption on its face (not sure he was implying illegal but admitted it sure looks like he was only on the boards for his access to Joe).    At least Jared isn't some cokehead and has a business background. 

Few Dems are interested in finding out if there was a lab leak because Trump was using China as a campaign platform.  So there was a media lockdown on claiming it was lab originated until Biden finally had admit it was possible.    

Jared was on staff as an advisor and was selling access and using his position to run a private business while he was a government employee. Or maybe that $2 billion deal with the Saudis was above the table

Understood.   It is only a problem if you are selling influence to your President or VP father if you are on the payroll too.  

I'm not saying Pres. Biden did anything wrong pertaining to Hunter, it is just that the mainstream media doesn't give a crap about looking and neither do any other Dems.   And guess what......it is human nature!  Just accept that humans are biased and especially biased with politics.    

Your bias is trying to equate the two. Trump didn’t divest in his business and basically did the opposite and ran his company from the White House. And yes, being on staff makes a huge difference. Did you think the mainstream media and dems cared about Trump’s Emolument Clause violations?