Police abuse

1274275277279280308

Comments

  • Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,422
    "But you posted a video from FauxNews"

    How dare you?  I prefer to get my news from the Washington Post where they teach me how to film police encounters so I can "stay in control of the narrative".  How does this in any way help move the conversation along?

    image
    This is a good idea.
    The more citizens filming cops being bad the better.
    Imagine if that teenage girl hadn't stood her ground in Minneapolis. 
  • Posts: 935
    This is a good idea.
    The more citizens filming cops being bad the better.
    Imagine if that teenage girl hadn't stood her ground in Minneapolis. 
    Absolutely, 100% with you.  But why use the language of controlling a narrative?  Saying officer-worn body cameras can obscure the truth?

    Why not just release the videos and let the facts speak for themselves?  
  • Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    I guess we need citizen-worn body cameras. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Posts: 12,791
    This is a good idea.
    The more citizens filming cops being bad the better.
    Imagine if that teenage girl hadn't stood her ground in Minneapolis. 

    Exactly. 
  • Posts: 42,255
    Absolutely, 100% with you.  But why use the language of controlling a narrative?  Saying officer-worn body cameras can obscure the truth?

    Why not just release the videos and let the facts speak for themselves?  
    Because DAs, cops and detectives never tamper with or withhold evidence or intimidate witnesses to interfere with an investigation of one of their own. Never happens. That’s why.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Posts: 16,836
    so everyone who disagrees with you is a racist now. ok. 
    Yeah I was trying to understand what that statement meant.   

    I'm all for changes in policing.  It is very clear that it is needed.  I do wonder if we are all truly willing to deal with what it means in the short term potentially.  Let's take the shooting in Columbus for example.  Let's say police don;t grab for their guns...they end up engaging and disarming the girl with a knife, but instead of no harm coming to the person she was attacking when she was shot, now that other person gets stabbed.  Are we ok with that?  Those situations are extremely difficult to navigate for me.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Posts: 5,091
    Absolutely, 100% with you.  But why use the language of controlling a narrative?  Saying officer-worn body cameras can obscure the truth?

    Why not just release the videos and let the facts speak for themselves?  
    Officers body cameras often “don’t work” and many times the footage released is a super cut to put out the PD side of things.  A running camera in the hands of a citizen with uncut footage is much more trustworthy.
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Posts: 5,091
    edited April 2021
    Yeah I was trying to understand what that statement meant.   

    I'm all for changes in policing.  It is very clear that it is needed.  I do wonder if we are all truly willing to deal with what it means in the short term potentially.  Let's take the shooting in Columbus for example.  Let's say police don;t grab for their guns...they end up engaging and disarming the girl with a knife, but instead of no harm coming to the person she was attacking when she was shot, now that other person gets stabbed.  Are we ok with that?  Those situations are extremely difficult to navigate for me.
    Justifying killing certain black people over others is problematic, especially when we say stupid things like “why did he run” well do we or do we not live in a society where a black man is almost three times as likely as a white man to be killed by a cop, while only making up 13% of the population?  Do African Americans not get harsher and longer sentences for minor crimes than whites? The problem is the system of policing in America with deep roots in slavery, Jim Crow, good ol boy racism and false cultural narratives.  America wants to pretend it doesn’t have a racism problem and we need to address that especially when it comes to policing and incarceration.  Until the law is applied fairly and equally to all and we have a better system in place, the idea of saying the police killing of any black person is justified is a non starter.  Justifying the police killing one African American over another really has the same energy as saying, well that slave didn’t deserve to get whipped but this other slave had a justifiable whipping, while not realizing the problem is slavery, not an individual enslaved persons behavior.  It’s hard to deal with the justifiers of a racist police system and that justifying a racist police system makes you racist.
    Post edited by static111 on
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Posts: 16,836
    static111 said:
    Justifying killing certain black people over others is problematic, especially when we say stupid things like “why did he run” well do we or do we not live in a society where a black man is almost three times as likely as a white man to be killed by a cop, while only making up 13% of the population?  Do African Americans not get harsher and longer sentences for minor crimes than whites? The problem is the system of policing in America with deep roots in slavery, Jim Crow, good ol boy racism and false cultural narratives.  America wants to pretend it doesn’t have a racism problem and we need to address that especially when it comes to policing and incarceration.  Until the law is applied fairly and equally to all and we have a better system in place, the idea of saying the police killing of any black person is justified is a non starter.  Justifying the police killing one African American over another really has the same energy as saying, well that slave didn’t deserve to get whipped but this other slave had a justifiable whipping, while not realizing the problem is slavery, not an individual enslaved persons behavior.  It’s hard to deal with the justifiers of a racist police system and that justifying a racist police system makes you racist.
    Justifying killing a person with a knife over a person about to be stabbed. 

    I understand your overall points and very valid. I do not think it just applies blindly whenever a cop and an African American are involved in an altercation. 

    Comparing it to slavery is a weird statement to me. And I do not fully understand the point of your last sentence. Is this directed at me or is this a general statement?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Posts: 5,091
    @cincybearcat

    “Comparing it to slavery is a weird statement to me. And I do not fully understand the point of your last sentence. Is this directed at me or is this a general statement?“

    couldn’t get the quote function to work. Not directed at you, directed at the comments in general. Until the system is completely overhauled and applied equally and cops are held accountable  and trained not to escalate situations by trying to gain compliance by force, to me any justification of one killing over the other is just ludicrous.  The comparison of American policing to slavery is that both are things inherently designed to keep Black people down.  Certain people spend so much time and energy
    trying to immediately justify the actions of officers, rather than spending that time and energy on something positive like reforming or recreating the current system.  So for me the behavior of justifying an action in a broken system rather than being critical of the system itself comes across, especially when we are talking about police killing Black Americans, with the same energy of someone 200 years ago justifying one whipping over another but not realizing that the real problem was the system that allowed the whipping in the first place.
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Posts: 5,091
    From our wonderful police departments officers union. ...

    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    static111 said:
    Justifying killing certain black people over others is problematic, especially when we say stupid things like “why did he run” well do we or do we not live in a society where a black man is almost three times as likely as a white man to be killed by a cop, while only making up 13% of the population?  Do African Americans not get harsher and longer sentences for minor crimes than whites? The problem is the system of policing in America with deep roots in slavery, Jim Crow, good ol boy racism and false cultural narratives.  America wants to pretend it doesn’t have a racism problem and we need to address that especially when it comes to policing and incarceration.  Until the law is applied fairly and equally to all and we have a better system in place, the idea of saying the police killing of any black person is justified is a non starter.  Justifying the police killing one African American over another really has the same energy as saying, well that slave didn’t deserve to get whipped but this other slave had a justifiable whipping, while not realizing the problem is slavery, not an individual enslaved persons behavior.  It’s hard to deal with the justifiers of a racist police system and that justifying a racist police system makes you racist.
    applying a blanket "if you disagree with this statement, you are racist" is nonsense. and a "non starter". I judge each case based on the merits of the case, not if the person was black or not. that's just absurd. that would be akin to saying every single black person on trial should automatically be found not guilty until the system is fixed. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Posts: 41,395
    static111 said:
    From our wonderful police departments officers union. ...

    I have zero problems w this.  Escalation in a situation is bad yet people don't think it plays a role in what made the outcome.
  • Posts: 41,395
    applying a blanket "if you disagree with this statement, you are racist" is nonsense. and a "non starter". I judge each case based on the merits of the case, not if the person was black or not. that's just absurd. that would be akin to saying every single black person on trial should automatically be found not guilty until the system is fixed. 
    You're a racist for not seeing color.
  • Posts: 16,836
    static111 said:
    @cincybearcat

    “Comparing it to slavery is a weird statement to me. And I do not fully understand the point of your last sentence. Is this directed at me or is this a general statement?“

    couldn’t get the quote function to work. Not directed at you, directed at the comments in general. Until the system is completely overhauled and applied equally and cops are held accountable  and trained not to escalate situations by trying to gain compliance by force, to me any justification of one killing over the other is just ludicrous.  The comparison of American policing to slavery is that both are things inherently designed to keep Black people down.  Certain people spend so much time and energy
    trying to immediately justify the actions of officers, rather than spending that time and energy on something positive like reforming or recreating the current system.  So for me the behavior of justifying an action in a broken system rather than being critical of the system itself comes across, especially when we are talking about police killing Black Americans, with the same energy of someone 200 years ago justifying one whipping over another but not realizing that the real problem was the system that allowed the whipping in the first place.
    Ok, thanks for the clarification.  Yes, biased policing certainly is designed to keep people in their place.  I think it's very fair to discuss the system, etc in all of these instances.  What I do not agree with is always wanting the individual police officer to be fired, convicted, and jailed.  Sometimes, they are following their training.  So - I could see how an individual police officer avoids charges.  Except in the extreme cases (like George Floyd), the discussion should be far more about the system and a lot less about the specific officer involved.  
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Posts: 16,836
    You're a racist for not seeing color.
    Well you have to see color to understand the full case.  It is part of it.  You cannot ignore it.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    You're a racist for not seeing color.
    The "I don't see colour" phrase is such total bs. There are reams of data showing that yes, all humans "see colour", right from infancy. We all have biases, both conscious and unconscious, about a whole range of traits, including unfortunately skin colour. The issue is what we choose to do about those biases and how much effort we put into becoming aware and mindful. Those who talk about not "seeing colour" are likely either lacking in self awareness or aren't willing to put in the effort to recognize and work on them. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Posts: 41,395
    Well you have to see color to understand the full case.  It is part of it.  You cannot ignore it.
    The "I don't see colour" phrase is such total bs. There are reams of data showing that yes, all humans "see colour", right from infancy. We all have biases, both conscious and unconscious, about a whole range of traits, including unfortunately skin colour. The issue is what we choose to do about those biases and how much effort we put into becoming aware and mindful. Those who talk about not "seeing colour" are likely either lacking in self awareness or aren't willing to put in the effort to recognize and work on them. 
    It was meant as a joke.

    Trying to explain yourself nowadays and saying "I don't see color" and saying that they are lacking and not seeing it is just dumb to me.

    How else do you explain yourself tactfully that would make you happy that a persons skin color wasn't why you came up w the decision you did?  Honest question.  I proposed this to someone else and they didn't have an answer but dismissed what I said.


  • Posts: 6,927
    Absolutely, 100% with you.  But why use the language of controlling a narrative?  Saying officer-worn body cameras can obscure the truth?

    Why not just release the videos and let the facts speak for themselves?  

    What controlling the narrative might look like:

    https://pasquotankgop.com/andrew-browns-arrest-record-and-legacy/

  • Posts: 42,255
    Ummmm, sure.

    Disclaimer: The statements posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of the entire Pasquotank GOP, Pasquotank Republican Party, or all Republicans in Pasquotank County.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
This discussion has been closed.