|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GOP
Comments
-
It's a hopeless situation...0 -
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
I agree, but either way it's not a good look.HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.0 -
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.0 -
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
just like it's not a good look for bill clinton to be pictured with epstein, because everyone knows, a good chunk of society will look at a picture and say "guilty!".cutz said:
I agree, but either way it's not a good look.HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
just like it's not a good look for bill clinton to be pictured with epstein, because everyone knows, a good chunk of society will look at a picture and say "guilty!".cutz said:
I agree, but either way it's not a good look.HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
Here's a better look.0 -
yeah, as I said and thought was clear, roger stone isn't sarah sanders. there's no doubt about stone's affiliations.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0
-
HughFreakingDillon said:
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered?
I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing.
But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell.
0 -
There was someone that did this to a congresswoman or senator, asked for a selfie then he proceeded to tell her to "Go Fuck Herself".Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered?
I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing.
But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell.
I thought that was classy, no matter how much you disagree with them should you do this...0 -
That was done to that QAnon psycho. Her name needs to quit getting press.tempo_n_groove said:
There was someone that did this to a congresswoman or senator, asked for a selfie then he proceeded to tell her to "Go Fuck Herself".Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered?
I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing.
But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell.
I thought that was classy, no matter how much you disagree with them should you do this...It's a hopeless situation...0 -
So the entire admin is guilty. got it.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered?
I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing.
But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour.
how interesting.
By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Your suggestion that she wouldn't have taken the picture if she knew who Enrique Torres was doesn't hold much water.HughFreakingDillon said:
So the entire admin is guilty. got it.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered?
I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing.
But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell.
If SHB had a problem with white supremacists, she wouldn't have taken on the role of press secretary for this administration.
EDIT: 'trump's' administrationPost edited by Merkin Baller on0 -
Did Michelle take that picture after it was known that he was a rapist?HughFreakingDillon said:i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour.
how interesting.0 -
Both sides are the same. Got it.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Seriously.Halifax2TheMax said:Both sides are the same. Got it.0 -
According to some.Merkin Baller said:
Seriously.Halifax2TheMax said:Both sides are the same. Got it.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Had the Clintons or Obamas defended Epstein or Weinstein as 'very fine people' after allegations of their conduct was made known to the public, I might see your point, but to my knowledge they didn't.HughFreakingDillon said:i guess conservatives are right then, if proud boys taking selfies with trump admin staff means they're all nazis, then michelle obama calling harvery weinstein a great man, not to mention the clintons cozying up to him as well, must mean that democrats ARE in fact baby eating pedophiles in a pizza parlour.
how interesting.
Also, proud boys are a real thing, pizzagate isn't.0 -
YesHughFreakingDillon said:
So the entire admin is guilty. got it.Merkin Baller said:HughFreakingDillon said:
roger stone is no sarah sanders. she's not stupid. my guess is she didn't know who he was at the time.Merkin Baller said:
In a vacuum, I agree... these pictures may / could be nothing, but the Proud Boys connection to trump associates has been established. Do you really think this is just a whole lot of smoke & there’s no fire here?HughFreakingDillon said:
i honestly don't put any stock in these types of pictures. it could easily just be a "hey Sarah! mind taking a selfie with me?" and she says "sure" not having a clue who it actually is.cutz said:
if it was a pic of them riding in a limo, or having dinner together, that would be something.
She was the press secretary for an administration that courted and cozied up to these "very fine people" - a job she performed with great skill, passion, and also dishonesty. The plausible deniability angle is valid, but how much benefit of the doubt should be extended, all things considered?
I do agree, in and of itself, this picture means nothing.
But when this & pictures of proud boys cozying up to the likes of Don Jr, Lindsey Graham & others are considered in the context of who and what this administration was, dismissing it as an innocent faux pas is a hard sell.Scio me nihil scire
There are no kings inside the gates of eden0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help