*** 1948 * 1949 * 1960 * 2017 * 2024...YOUR SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS: THE PHILADELPHIA EAGLES ***

F Me In The Brain said:

That was a brutal game.  Is it time for Hurts yet?

No. Do you really think a rookie QB behind this line would be a good idea?

Even though it ended up not making a difference.  Not going for the extra point was not a good idea.

Cliffy6745 said:

The future was so bright

Whos gonna have a better career? Wentz or Jamis?!? Hhahaha

Can't really blame Wentz too much. If you're on pace to get sacked 1000 times. Not much any qb can do

pjhawks said:

F Me In The Brain said:

That was a brutal game.  Is it time for Hurts yet?

No. Do you really think a rookie QB behind this line would be a good idea?

Not sure.  A legitimate question to ask....but also, when there was time the QB play was very weak today for Philly.

F Me In The Brain said:

pjhawks said:

F Me In The Brain said:

That was a brutal game.  Is it time for Hurts yet?

No. Do you really think a rookie QB behind this line would be a good idea?

Not sure.  A legitimate question to ask....but also, when there was time the QB play was very weak today for Philly.

Didn’t think Wentz was weak today, he was average. Both lines got whipped today. In all the Wentz talk what gets lost is the defense has no playmakers, they just can’t ever get turnovers which makes it so much more difficult on the offense.  

pjhawks said:

F Me In The Brain said:

pjhawks said:

F Me In The Brain said:

That was a brutal game.  Is it time for Hurts yet?

No. Do you really think a rookie QB behind this line would be a good idea?

Not sure.  A legitimate question to ask....but also, when there was time the QB play was very weak today for Philly.

Didn’t think Wentz was weak today, he was average. Both lines got whipped today. In all the Wentz talk what gets lost is the defense has no playmakers, they just can’t ever get turnovers which makes it so much more difficult on the offense.  

Well, as a Niners fan I would have cut off a finger a few years ago to have Wentz.
Now I don't see him any differently than I do Jimmy G.  Not that I'm saying they are the same player....but my take on both is that they are overpaid and not top tier qbs....and I don't think they will be in the future.
As such, I wouldn't want either as my starting qb.  

We all know there are not a lot of top tier qbs, so there is a place for carson, and likely a place for Jimmy.  

Were I a birds fan I think (if I wasn't a Carson homer and oblivious to his obvious shortcomings) I would likely want to see if Hurts could be the QB of the future.

Wobbie said:

eeriepadave said:

on the bright side still in first

the race to the bottom!

yeah pretty much

Poncier said:

igotid88 said:

Even though it ended up not making a difference.  Not going for the extra point was not a good idea.

When I saw the moron did it again going for 2 when down 4, was hoping the final score would end up 21-20.
Guy just has no clue.

Most of the time I support him going for 2 but that one made no sense.   People do tend to forget when he goes for it and makes it...like the 1st one yesterday.

pjhawks said:

Poncier said:

igotid88 said:

Even though it ended up not making a difference.  Not going for the extra point was not a good idea.

When I saw the moron did it again going for 2 when down 4, was hoping the final score would end up 21-20.
Guy just has no clue.

Most of the time I support him going for 2 but that one made no sense.   People do tend to forget when he goes for it and makes it...like the 1st one yesterday.

I don't forget that. The first one made sense. You were down 11 at the time, so you end up down 5 after the TD and going for 2 makes sense to try and get within 3. The difference between 4 and 5 if you fail is nearly negligible.
But the 2nd time its not the case. If you fail, the difference between being down 3 or 4 is vast.
Pederson needs work on his math. If I'm the owner, its a borderline fire-able offense to keep doing it.

Poncier said:

pjhawks said:

Poncier said:

igotid88 said:

Even though it ended up not making a difference.  Not going for the extra point was not a good idea.

When I saw the moron did it again going for 2 when down 4, was hoping the final score would end up 21-20.
Guy just has no clue.

Most of the time I support him going for 2 but that one made no sense.   People do tend to forget when he goes for it and makes it...like the 1st one yesterday.

I don't forget that. The first one made sense. You were down 11 at the time, so you end up down 5 after the TD and going for 2 makes sense to try and get within 3. The difference between 4 and 5 if you fail is nearly negligible.
But the 2nd time its not the case. If you fail, the difference between being down 3 or 4 is vast.
Pederson needs work on his math. If I'm the owner, its a borderline fire-able offense to keep doing it.

Pederson has been overly aggressive on going for two and 4th down conversion.  it's part of his dna and when it works it's great.  you gotta live with it.   For this year that is far down the list of his issues.

and isn't it amazing how when the talent on the roster gets worse the coaching looks worse?  the offense is down 3 offensive line starters, the 4th one is playing on one leg and the 5th and best one has at times forgotten how to snap the ball (i'm guessing there is an injury reason for that most likely).

I still think they are going to win the division although the Giants are playing much better than their record.