***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

Kat said:

Kat said:

If we took a vote, I tend to think most of you would agree with this. In any event, do not post the whistle blower's identity here. There are whistle blower protections and we'll go along with that. This doesn't mean a situation can't be discussed but keep any details that would give the identity private. Thanks everyone...have a great evening.

This is still true. If there is any change, I will update. Thank you for not posting the name soul-eater has tweeted. I hear that what soul-eater has done is illegal by revealing the name, and that would be no surprise.

Bentleyspop said:

josevolution said:

Kat said:

Kat said:

If we took a vote, I tend to think most of you would agree with this. In any event, do not post the whistle blower's identity here. There are whistle blower protections and we'll go along with that. This doesn't mean a situation can't be discussed but keep any details that would give the identity private. Thanks everyone...have a great evening.

This is still true. If there is any change, I will update. Thank you for not posting the name soul-eater has tweeted. I hear that what soul-eater has done is illegal by revealing the name, and that would be no surprise.

Soul eater as you named him which by the way I like just as much as Baffoon would love to hang the WB if he could! 

Sout-eaters are offended when compared to and lumped in with the piece-of-shit-in-chief 

lindamarie73 said:

 I love me some Nancy. You go Girl!!! 

Halifax2TheMax said:

tempo_n_groove said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

mickeyrat said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

mickeyrat said:

tempo_n_groove said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

tempo_n_groove said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

The Juggler said:

ikiT said:

I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat. 

My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.

You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important. 

I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.

Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...

The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”

Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?

In what context?

A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line.  You know, how politics are done nowadays.

technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.

chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......

Nor subvert the will of the people via passed legislation by both houses of Congress, you know, one of the co-equal branches of government.

well , theres that......really the whole affair is textbook definitions of bribery (whitehouse visit, still hasnt happened) and extortion( give me a fucking break, "its a coincidence the money got held an hour after the call. nothing to see here.")

And then the coverup, refusing to cooperate in a congressional investigation. The Impeachment 4 should testify at trial.

@Halifax
Who are the 4?  I missed them.  Wondering if Gulianni is one?

Mulvaney, Ghouliani, Bolton and the OMB guy.

lindamarie73 said:

mickeyrat said:

lindamarie73 said:

 I love me some Nancy. You go Girl!!! 

except thats not what she said. she said she wanted to know what the rules would be, rules she will have no say in crafting. once she knows, she can choose the managers, which I believe have to be included in sending the articles over.

at least be honest in your hatred of fully half or more of the country.......

btw , registered independent since I first registered in 1988......

My hatred for half or more of the country???? Where the heck do you get off saying I hate half the country, or anyone for that matter??  Just because I do not see things the way a majority of the folks on these boards do should not imply that I hate anyone on here let a lone half the country.  Perhaps you should take a look in the mirror before you so callously make a statement like that about a person you know zip about other then leaning conservative politically.  

RYME said:

Y'all are nothing but a bunch of bearded bicyclists with BO!
You've got nothing!
Otherwise one of the articles would have included quid pro quo or bribery, non of that stuck.  Everything the left has tried to do to get rid of Trump has failed.
Keep digging yourselves a deeper hole.
You know, outside of your safe space here, nobody is buying this shit!
Happy New Year!  

lindamarie73 said:

Lerxst1992 said:

lindamarie73 said:

mickeyrat said:

lindamarie73 said:

 I love me some Nancy. You go Girl!!! 

except thats not what she said. she said she wanted to know what the rules would be, rules she will have no say in crafting. once she knows, she can choose the managers, which I believe have to be included in sending the articles over.

at least be honest in your hatred of fully half or more of the country.......

btw , registered independent since I first registered in 1988......

My hatred for half or more of the country???? Where the heck do you get off saying I hate half the country, or anyone for that matter??  Just because I do not see things the way a majority of the folks on these boards do should not imply that I hate anyone on here let a lone half the country.  Perhaps you should take a look in the mirror before you so callously make a statement like that about a person you know zip about other then leaning conservative politically.  

conservative lol

you guys and gals realize you ain’t conservative no more?

Ok, I’ll bite, what are we then??

josevolution said:

Kat said:

Kat said:

If we took a vote, I tend to think most of you would agree with this. In any event, do not post the whistle blower's identity here. There are whistle blower protections and we'll go along with that. This doesn't mean a situation can't be discussed but keep any details that would give the identity private. Thanks everyone...have a great evening.

This is still true. If there is any change, I will update. Thank you for not posting the name soul-eater has tweeted. I hear that what soul-eater has done is illegal by revealing the name, and that would be no surprise.

Soul eater as you named him which by the way I like just as much as Baffoon would love to hang the WB if he could! 

lindamarie73 said:

mickeyrat said:

lindamarie73 said:

 I love me some Nancy. You go Girl!!! 

except thats not what she said. she said she wanted to know what the rules would be, rules she will have no say in crafting. once she knows, she can choose the managers, which I believe have to be included in sending the articles over.

at least be honest in your hatred of fully half or more of the country.......

btw , registered independent since I first registered in 1988......

My hatred for half or more of the country???? Where the heck do you get off saying I hate half the country, or anyone for that matter??  Just because I do not see things the way a majority of the folks on these boards do should not imply that I hate anyone on here let a lone half the country.  Perhaps you should take a look in the mirror before you so callously make a statement like that about a person you know zip about other then leaning conservative politically.