***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***
Comments
-
2019https://news.yahoo.com/public-support-trump-conviction-time-091925963.html?soc_src=newsroom&soc_trk=com.apple.UIKit.activity.PostToTwitter&.tsrc=newsroom&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly90LmNvL29NdWpyVmRxeWc_YW1wPTE&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHdN_fCYswQQmQAykaM9cYxtaKoRokUcbcF1OKm3A3Y5pEhoHACMVtJl6-Ot7P5iFPYlFURhMw7PyWWuRvWne_RhubxeWRESuzjf3zAROpab_Bx-WQ92XVnH6tJK6YFhewPlMwneRkGHjk3VRhmN8npejkyIzdS_nIIPpASgU9Q_&guccounter=2
Public support for impeachment/removal reaches all time high—55%www.myspace.com0 -
2019Oh sorry about that! Didn’t check to see if it was posted earlier.Good sign though, folksPost edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0
-
2019
I think iki is thinking in terms of the election maybe...losing some republicans will make him look weaker heading into itmickeyrat said:
5+ 47 = very short of conviction, which I believe stands at 67 votes for conviction?ikiT said:Unless they have huge sample sizes, polls should be ignored.
5 Reepeww-bie Sens can sink this fucker. That's the number I'm looking at.www.myspace.com0 -
"THE FIELD"gimmesometruth27 said:https://www.yahoo.com/news/public-support-trump-conviction-time-091925963.html?guccounter=1
new poll out this morning showing support for conviction and removal at 55%. the highest it is has ever been, up from 48% when last poll was released.
the gop senate strategy of whitewashing this is not popular.All the gop does is whitewash. From gerrymandering, to blocking voter registration to only caring about the deficit when a dem is Pres, it’s all whitewash. And they always get away with it.0 -
2018I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
2018I don't trust that shady bastardBristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
2019
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...0 -
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...0 -
A little different than what Team Trump Treason did. And lobbying has its own set of laws, rules and regulations regarding conduct. I’m not sure I understand what comparison you’re making?tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Hmmm? What comparison could be made of a quid pro quo?Halifax2TheMax said:
A little different than what Team Trump Treason did. And lobbying has its own set of laws, rules and regulations regarding conduct. I’m not sure I understand what comparison you’re making?tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...
Can't think of a one, just thinking out loud...0 -
Nor subvert the will of the people via passed legislation by both houses of Congress, you know, one of the co-equal branches of government.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Yes, the last part is insider trading of sorts.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......0 -
well , theres that......really the whole affair is textbook definitions of bribery (whitehouse visit, still hasnt happened) and extortion( give me a fucking break, "its a coincidence the money got held an hour after the call. nothing to see here.")Halifax2TheMax said:
Nor subvert the will of the people via passed legislation by both houses of Congress, you know, one of the co-equal branches of government.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
And then the coverup, refusing to cooperate in a congressional investigation. The Impeachment 4 should testify at trial.mickeyrat said:
well , theres that......really the whole affair is textbook definitions of bribery (whitehouse visit, still hasnt happened) and extortion( give me a fucking break, "its a coincidence the money got held an hour after the call. nothing to see here.")Halifax2TheMax said:
Nor subvert the will of the people via passed legislation by both houses of Congress, you know, one of the co-equal branches of government.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
@HalifaxHalifax2TheMax said:
And then the coverup, refusing to cooperate in a congressional investigation. The Impeachment 4 should testify at trial.mickeyrat said:
well , theres that......really the whole affair is textbook definitions of bribery (whitehouse visit, still hasnt happened) and extortion( give me a fucking break, "its a coincidence the money got held an hour after the call. nothing to see here.")Halifax2TheMax said:
Nor subvert the will of the people via passed legislation by both houses of Congress, you know, one of the co-equal branches of government.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...technically speaking, I would say yes. but only up to a point.chief difference though is advocating on behalf of a client, for legislative purposes. Even kosher when efforts are in the national interest but NOT for personal political gain......
Who are the 4? I missed them. Wondering if Gulianni is one?0 -
Holy shit dude, you don't see the difference? Trump withheld congressionally appropriated tax dollars for defense, until he received a personal favor for his re-election. You don't see how that is different than lobbying under the very structured statutes in this country? Give me a break. Lobbyists campaign for LAWS to be written and passed by congress, and then signed by the president. These are the established checks and balances.tempo_n_groove said:
Hmmm? What comparison could be made of a quid pro quo?Halifax2TheMax said:
A little different than what Team Trump Treason did. And lobbying has its own set of laws, rules and regulations regarding conduct. I’m not sure I understand what comparison you’re making?tempo_n_groove said:
A lobbyist receives money from a contributor and makes sure that contributor gets taken care of later down the line. You know, how politics are done nowadays.Halifax2TheMax said:
In what context?tempo_n_groove said:
Isn't lobbying a form or even a Quid Pro Quo in itself?Halifax2TheMax said:
The Impeachment 4 need to testify and the Team Trump Treason Administration needs to be compelled to release all related documents as requested by the House. What are they hiding, if it was a “perfect call” and “no quid pro quo.”The Juggler said:
You are right that only a handful of them wield some control in making this be a fair trial. That's why polls like the one from this morning are important.ikiT said:I was thinking more about MItch not being in control of jamming this shizz down everyone's throat.
My take on removal is that its prob not gonna happen.
I would say there's a 12% chance of removal at this point. If, somehow, Bolton becomes a witness....I would jump it to about 30%.
Pelosi holding onto the articles is looking smarter and smarter...
Can't think of a one, just thinking out loud...0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help