I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
Like a young girls room
Yeah I didn't even get to the bedding. Pink walls, white comforter... my Lord.
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
Like a young girls room
Yeah I didn't even get to the bedding. Pink walls, white comforter... my Lord.
That is that classic Trump style. the decor just screams "Ewwwwwwww!!!"
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
Like a young girls room
Yeah I didn't even get to the bedding. Pink walls, white comforter... my Lord.
Ivanka's room most likely...so weird.
It's a hopeless situation...
0
F Me In The Brain
this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,691
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
and that ridiculous fucking hair...the dead birdsnest that became the base of that cotton candy shit stuck to his head now
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
I've always thought that is funniest picture. I mean, is that a hotel robe? Who wears those things? What adult male wears robes? Who sits on a bed like that? WTFFFFFF?
Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...
No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.
That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?
Come now...
No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that. Reaching.
I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated? Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election... It can be assumed or implied, that is it. It isn't cut and dry. So no.
Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage. No on that too.
Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty. You like Trump, he's innocent.
I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.
I guess I'm in the center then...
He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself.
Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis.
I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play.
You want logic then? Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats. You see who voted no? All republicans and 3 dems.
Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.
I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment. My guess would all be along party lines.
You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.
Look. I don't think this is impeachable. That's it. If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.
Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...
No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.
That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?
Come now...
No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that. Reaching.
I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated? Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election... It can be assumed or implied, that is it. It isn't cut and dry. So no.
Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage. No on that too.
Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty. You like Trump, he's innocent.
I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.
I guess I'm in the center then...
He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself.
Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis.
I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play.
You want logic then? Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats. You see who voted no? All republicans and 3 dems.
Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.
I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment. My guess would all be along party lines.
You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.
Look. I don't think this is impeachable. That's it. If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.
And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it.
He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves.
https://apple.news/AQIQEbKRbSNGIOkBemVAWlw Ok let’s see if he can be civil or completely loose it in front of the nation! Surely to be watched by most of the nation ...
Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...
No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.
That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?
Come now...
No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that. Reaching.
I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated? Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election... It can be assumed or implied, that is it. It isn't cut and dry. So no.
Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage. No on that too.
Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty. You like Trump, he's innocent.
I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.
I guess I'm in the center then...
He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself.
Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis.
I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play.
You want logic then? Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats. You see who voted no? All republicans and 3 dems.
Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.
I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment. My guess would all be along party lines.
You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.
Look. I don't think this is impeachable. That's it. If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.
And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it.
He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves.
Amash is proof republicans were not allowed to vote against trump.
their choice was vote no or leave the party
its crazy if anyone thinks since all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty
Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...
No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.
That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?
Come now...
No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that. Reaching.
I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated? Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election... It can be assumed or implied, that is it. It isn't cut and dry. So no.
Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage. No on that too.
Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty. You like Trump, he's innocent.
I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.
I guess I'm in the center then...
He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself.
Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis.
I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play.
You want logic then? Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats. You see who voted no? All republicans and 3 dems.
Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.
I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment. My guess would all be along party lines.
You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.
Look. I don't think this is impeachable. That's it. If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.
And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it.
He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves.
Amash is proof republicans were not allowed to vote against trump.
their choice was vote no or leave the party
its crazy if anyone thinks since all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty
Yep...just a sign that the GOP is 100% monster.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin 2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,109
Evangelical Magazine Christianity Today Calls for Trump’s Removal
Yeah but according to the president this publication is a far left radical democrat rag....
Once again, then man hasn't a clue. Christianity Today has been called "evangelicalism's flagship magazine", and describe as "mainstream evangelical magazine", and was founded by Billy Graham, Mr. Born Again himself.
Though I did briefly at one point in my life, I no longer subscribe to evangelical Christianities spiritual predilections, but many who lean moderate to conservative do and these are the exact people who need to understand that our currant POTUS is a spiritually vacant and morally corrupt man. It is absolutely wonderful to hear Christianity Today call for his removal.
Dimitri Firtash. Remember him? Get to know him. Big, close ties to Team Trump Treason and particularly Ruddy Ghouliani. Another quid pro quo? You don’t say!
“There was no collusion.”
“I have nothing to hide.”
“I don’t know any Russians.”
“I’ll sit down and talk with anyone.”
“We do everything by the book.”
“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”
“Very legal, very cool.”
“Fully exonerated.”
“Essentially no obstruction.”
“Very friendly and totally appropriate.”
“No quid pro quo.”
Follow the damn money, from Russia with love and a PTape all the way to impeachment.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Comments
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
he even had a combover back then.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
@Halifax2TheMax
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Look. I don't think this is impeachable. That's it. If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves.
Ok let’s see if he can be civil or completely loose it in front of the nation! Surely to be watched by most of the nation ...
Evangelical Magazine Christianity Today Calls for Trump’s Removal
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
their choice was vote no or leave the party
its crazy if anyone thinks since all republicans voted no that was a sign Trump is even 1% less guilty
call me King Donny. I love you. 212-867-5309.
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14