***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1…391392394396397…526

Comments

  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 45,404
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?
    Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
    Like a young girls room
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,009
    ikiT said:
    Don Trump has no vinyl. 
    His favorite song is Sharp Dressed Man by ZZ Top.  It's playing in the background.


    playboy? LMAO right.

    he even had a combover back then.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 31,030
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?
    Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
    Like a young girls room
    Yeah I didn't even get to the bedding.  Pink walls, white comforter... my Lord.  
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,009
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?
    Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
    Like a young girls room
    Yeah I didn't even get to the bedding.  Pink walls, white comforter... my Lord.  
    That is that classic Trump style. the decor just screams "Ewwwwwwww!!!"
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,513
    mrussel1 said:
    mickeyrat said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?
    Look at the bedding. How is that not a girls room?
    Like a young girls room
    Yeah I didn't even get to the bedding.  Pink walls, white comforter... my Lord.  
    Ivanka's room most likely...so weird.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,983
    "THE FIELD"
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?

    @Halifax2TheMax
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    F Me In The Brain said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?

    @Halifax2TheMax
    @lolobugg
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,890
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?
    and that ridiculous fucking hair...the dead birdsnest that became the base of that cotton candy shit stuck to his head now
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 43,333
    F Me In The Brain said:
    mrussel1 said:
    I've always thought that is funniest picture.  I mean, is that a hotel robe?  Who wears those things?  What adult male wears robes?  Who sits on a bed like that?  WTFFFFFF?

    @Halifax2TheMax
    Easy on the robe criticism. Robes can be luxurious. Or stained. Even sexy time appropriate. Depends.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 42,057
    benjs said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    benjs said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    mrussel1 said:

    Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...

    No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.  

    That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?

    Come now...

    No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that.  Reaching.  

    I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
    You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
    He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated?  Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election...  It can be assumed or implied, that is it.  It isn't cut and dry. So no.

    Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage.  No on that too.

    Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty.  You like Trump, he's innocent.

    I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.

    I guess I'm in the center then...

    He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself. 

    Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis. 

    I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play. 
    You want logic then?  Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats.  You see who voted no?  All republicans and 3 dems.

    Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.

    I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment.  My guess would all be along party lines.



    You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
    3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.

    Look.  I don't think this is impeachable.  That's it.  If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.  

  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,009
    dude combed his hair with a porkchop.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 31,030
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    dude combed his hair with a porkchop.
    Ha!  
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    edited December 2019
    2019
    tempo_n_groove said:
    benjs said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    benjs said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    mrussel1 said:

    Again I'll ask because apparently I am "ignorant"...

    No where do yo mention that Trump wanted other countries to interfere with an election.  

    That is what I am missing and you did too, but I'm ignorant?

    Come now...

    No I don't support Trump but the reach here is just that.  Reaching.  

    I'm still waiting for someone to show me the evidence of where Trump asked for the election interference?
    You don't understand how asking a foreign gov't to launch a sham investigation into his most likely 2020 rival, and demanding it be done on television, while tying it to aid isn't attempting to interfere and corrupt the election? You don't see how he is using the power of the presidency to give himself an unfair advantage and leveraging OUR tax dollars to do it?
    He would have multiple rivals in the upcoming election, is he going to have them all investigated?  Having it tied to aid is not interfering with the upcoming election...  It can be assumed or implied, that is it.  It isn't cut and dry. So no.

    Not seeing how he used his presidency to "leverage" an advantage.  No on that too.

    Just not seeing it the way you all do which is interesting, if you dislike Trump, he's guilty.  You like Trump, he's innocent.

    I don't care for Trump but I think he is innocent.

    I guess I'm in the center then...

    He has multiple rivals in the election - what BS. Biden has been the front runner with the strongest name recognition since this campaign started. To claim that this is innocent betrays all prior knowledge of Trump and how he conducts himself. 

    Your conclusion that your opinion on Trump is purely related to whether you ‘like’ or ‘dislike’ him is fucking dumb, and fucking baseless, and fucking insulting. Some of us follow logic, not the bullshit rhetoric thrust at us on a regular basis. 

    I can’t believe that intelligent humans who can string a sentence together can’t see the egregious behaviours at play. 
    You want logic then?  Look at who voted for impeachment, all democrats.  You see who voted no?  All republicans and 3 dems.

    Last I checked the democrats didn't like him.

    I'd love to ask what side of the aisle everyone is that is for the impeachment.  My guess would all be along party lines.



    You’re once again making an assumption that this is extreme partisanship instead of logic. Your claim is also ridiculous when the Republicans voted in party lines exclusively as well - why does your bias assume that every single Republican is right and every single Democrat is corrupt, and what is it that leads you in this one case (fuck the BS about wanting it from the start - Pelosi owns this and was against for months and months) to assume this to be the case when the facts speak so incredibly loudly? Could it not, dare I say, be the opposite? You’ve not given a single valid argument against impeachment, nor have I seen one posted here. May I have one? Otherwise, all due respect, those who are arguing on the merit of the facts instead of the merit of the process, are deserving of the faith when the facts need not even be interpreted to be obviously troubling.
    3 dems went over and voted no so it didn't exactly go down party lines but I will agree for the most part it did.

    Look.  I don't think this is impeachable.  That's it.  If I can't coherently make my case for you then so be it.  

    And Justin Amash, who was a republican, until earlier this year voted for it. 

    He abused the power of his office for his own personal gain. This is a pretty open and shut case if folks are being reasonable and honest with themselves. 
    www.myspace.com
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,697
    At any point did they subpoena the actual call recording? Did that get caught up in the executive privilege bucket?
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    pjl44 said:
    At any point did they subpoena the actual call recording? Did that get caught up in the executive privilege bucket?
    I don't believe there is a recording. Just the summary they released. 
    www.myspace.com
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 32,254
    2018
    https://apple.news/AQIQEbKRbSNGIOkBemVAWlw
    Ok let’s see if he can be civil or completely loose it in front of the nation! Surely to be watched by most of the nation ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,697
    The Juggler said:
    pjl44 said:
    At any point did they subpoena the actual call recording? Did that get caught up in the executive privilege bucket?
    I don't believe there is a recording. Just the summary they released. 
    I thought it was one of the calls that had been moved to a higher clearance bank because of previous leaks. No? Am I mixing up stories?
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,697
    The Juggler said:
    pjl44 said:
    At any point did they subpoena the actual call recording? Did that get caught up in the executive privilege bucket?
    I don't believe there is a recording. Just the summary they released. 
    Did some quick googling and I think you're right 
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    pjl44 said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjl44 said:
    At any point did they subpoena the actual call recording? Did that get caught up in the executive privilege bucket?
    I don't believe there is a recording. Just the summary they released. 
    Did some quick googling and I think you're right 
    What's your fastest google?
    www.myspace.com
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,697
    The Juggler said:
    pjl44 said:
    The Juggler said:
    pjl44 said:
    At any point did they subpoena the actual call recording? Did that get caught up in the executive privilege bucket?
    I don't believe there is a recording. Just the summary they released. 
    Did some quick googling and I think you're right 
    What's your fastest google?
    About tree, tree fitty

Categories