***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1…368369371373374…526

Comments

  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,995
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    2 articles are not enough.

    i guarantee trump believes that Rudy can lawyer him out of 2 articles. The dems should have come out with 5 or 6. Then the conversation would be about the potential to resign without being arrested instead of trying to weasel out of only 2 articles. Dems needed to come out aggressively and let the entire world know that they are not fucking around. Trump still thinks this is a joke. He is in serious legal jeopardy but he does not believe it. If they had come out with 5 or 6 separate articles they have a better chance of one of them sticking.

    leave it to the dems to mismanage a slam dunk. 
    Why do you think that 2/3 of the Senate would slam dunk 1 or 15 articles?  
    to acquit on 2 charges is nothing. happens all the time. you throw 5 or 6 articles, knowing he is guilty as hell of 2 of them, to acquit of all 5 or 6 would reek of corruption of the process. it will be a constitutional crisis that will have to be addressed. 
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 31,024
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    2 articles are not enough.

    i guarantee trump believes that Rudy can lawyer him out of 2 articles. The dems should have come out with 5 or 6. Then the conversation would be about the potential to resign without being arrested instead of trying to weasel out of only 2 articles. Dems needed to come out aggressively and let the entire world know that they are not fucking around. Trump still thinks this is a joke. He is in serious legal jeopardy but he does not believe it. If they had come out with 5 or 6 separate articles they have a better chance of one of them sticking.

    leave it to the dems to mismanage a slam dunk. 
    Why do you think that 2/3 of the Senate would slam dunk 1 or 15 articles?  
    to acquit on 2 charges is nothing. happens all the time. you throw 5 or 6 articles, knowing he is guilty as hell of 2 of them, to acquit of all 5 or 6 would reek of corruption of the process. it will be a constitutional crisis that will have to be addressed. 
    You're using criminal logic, not political logic.  
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,995
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    2 articles are not enough.

    i guarantee trump believes that Rudy can lawyer him out of 2 articles. The dems should have come out with 5 or 6. Then the conversation would be about the potential to resign without being arrested instead of trying to weasel out of only 2 articles. Dems needed to come out aggressively and let the entire world know that they are not fucking around. Trump still thinks this is a joke. He is in serious legal jeopardy but he does not believe it. If they had come out with 5 or 6 separate articles they have a better chance of one of them sticking.

    leave it to the dems to mismanage a slam dunk. 
    Why do you think that 2/3 of the Senate would slam dunk 1 or 15 articles?  
    to acquit on 2 charges is nothing. happens all the time. you throw 5 or 6 articles, knowing he is guilty as hell of 2 of them, to acquit of all 5 or 6 would reek of corruption of the process. it will be a constitutional crisis that will have to be addressed. 
    You're using criminal logic, not political logic.  
    are the two articles not crimes? if not, then what the hell are the dems doing?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    2018
    18 months ago...

    Just remember, what you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening.



    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    2018
    They need to go after the Hitler rallies.  This isn't a fucking joke.
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    2018
    This belligerent behavior is unacceptable.  Threatening people and what not.  What are we?  Savages?
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Congrats to the 17 AMT posters who called 2019.


    Should have been 2017... what a dumpster fire.
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,995
    dignin said:
    Congrats to the 17 AMT posters who called 2019.


    Should have been 2017... what a dumpster fire.
    i had forgotten this was a poll, lmao!!

    congrats!!
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 45,371
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    2 articles are not enough.

    i guarantee trump believes that Rudy can lawyer him out of 2 articles. The dems should have come out with 5 or 6. Then the conversation would be about the potential to resign without being arrested instead of trying to weasel out of only 2 articles. Dems needed to come out aggressively and let the entire world know that they are not fucking around. Trump still thinks this is a joke. He is in serious legal jeopardy but he does not believe it. If they had come out with 5 or 6 separate articles they have a better chance of one of them sticking.

    leave it to the dems to mismanage a slam dunk. 
    Why do you think that 2/3 of the Senate would slam dunk 1 or 15 articles?  
    to acquit on 2 charges is nothing. happens all the time. you throw 5 or 6 articles, knowing he is guilty as hell of 2 of them, to acquit of all 5 or 6 would reek of corruption of the process. it will be a constitutional crisis that will have to be addressed. 
    You're using criminal logic, not political logic.  
    are the two articles not crimes? if not, then what the hell are the dems doing?
    engaging in their mandated constitutional political process......
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,987
    edited December 2019
    When a president tries to cheat in an American election, it's against the Constitution and the Constitution provides for impeachment to stop him/her. There's no ambiguity about that.  Souleater likes to cheat at all sorts of things. Maybe some day we'll see his tax returns...numbers don't lie. 



    Post edited by Kat on
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 43,315
    edited December 2019
    Kat said:
    When a president tries to cheat in an American election, it's against the Constitution and the Constitution provides for impeachment. There's no ambiguity about that.  Souleater likes to cheat at all sorts of things. Maybe some day we'll see his tax returns...numbers don't lie. 



    $2BB in loans from Duetsch Bank over 2 decades. How much of that has Team Trump Treason paid back? And who co-signed?
    Post edited by Kat on
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    2018
    Washington Post page A15  January 15th, 2018

    https://instagram.com/p/Bz-gJu9Hybt/embed/





    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 31,024
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    2 articles are not enough.

    i guarantee trump believes that Rudy can lawyer him out of 2 articles. The dems should have come out with 5 or 6. Then the conversation would be about the potential to resign without being arrested instead of trying to weasel out of only 2 articles. Dems needed to come out aggressively and let the entire world know that they are not fucking around. Trump still thinks this is a joke. He is in serious legal jeopardy but he does not believe it. If they had come out with 5 or 6 separate articles they have a better chance of one of them sticking.

    leave it to the dems to mismanage a slam dunk. 
    Why do you think that 2/3 of the Senate would slam dunk 1 or 15 articles?  
    to acquit on 2 charges is nothing. happens all the time. you throw 5 or 6 articles, knowing he is guilty as hell of 2 of them, to acquit of all 5 or 6 would reek of corruption of the process. it will be a constitutional crisis that will have to be addressed. 
    You're using criminal logic, not political logic.  
    are the two articles not crimes? if not, then what the hell are the dems doing?
    High crimes and misdemeanors are not necessarily criminal code crimes.  For example, obstruction of congress is not in the criminal code.  
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    dignin said:
    Congrats to the 17 AMT posters who called 2019.


    Should have been 2017... what a dumpster fire.
    Thank you, thank you. They still need to vote though, but yeah
    www.myspace.com
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    edited December 2019
    2018
    I'm no lawyer, but Inciting to Violence (Disturbing the Peace) is an actual crime (misdemeanor).  TX Statute of Limitations is ticking away though.  One year from Feb 12 2019.


    BBC Cameraman Is Attacked at Trump Rally

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/us/politics/bbc-cameraman-attacked.html


    Post edited by ikiT on
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    2018
    https://twitter.com/EleanorMontague/status/1095194973602045952
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,987
    The man has no shame at all. He's not even aware in the slightest of what he's done wrong.
    I believe he's quite pathetic and without a shred of honor. Cheater, cheater, pants on fire.

    Growing divide between Trump and McConnell over impeachment trial
    December 10, 2019

    Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are both looking ahead to the Senate impeachment trial, but there is a growing divide between the two over what that trial should look like, CNN has learned.

    In conversations with the White House, the Kentucky Republican has made clear he hopes to end the trial as soon as he can, an effort to both get impeachment off his lap and protect his conference from potentially damaging votes should the process break out into partisan warfare. That will include a continuous whip count until McConnell feels he has the votes to acquit the President and end the show. He has even floated a 10-day minimum during these talks, one person said.

    But the show is exactly what Trump wants. He's made clear to advisers privately that rather than end the trial as quickly as possible, he is hoping for a dramatic event, according to two people familiar with his thinking. He wants Hunter Biden, Rep. Adam Schiff and the whistleblower to testify. He wants the witnesses to be live, not clips of taped depositions. And he's hoping to turn it into a spectacle, which he thinks is his best chance to hurt Democrats in the election.

    continued at
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/10/politics/donald-trump-mitch-mcconnell-senate-trial-impeachment/index.html
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    edited December 2019
    2019
    ^
    Yeah I read that earlier, Kat. More republican grown ups in the senate than in congress, thankfully. 
    www.myspace.com
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,995
    Kat said:
    The man has no shame at all. He's not even aware in the slightest of what he's done wrong.
    I believe he's quite pathetic and without a shred of honor. Cheater, cheater, pants on fire.

    Growing divide between Trump and McConnell over impeachment trial
    December 10, 2019

    Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are both looking ahead to the Senate impeachment trial, but there is a growing divide between the two over what that trial should look like, CNN has learned.

    In conversations with the White House, the Kentucky Republican has made clear he hopes to end the trial as soon as he can, an effort to both get impeachment off his lap and protect his conference from potentially damaging votes should the process break out into partisan warfare. That will include a continuous whip count until McConnell feels he has the votes to acquit the President and end the show. He has even floated a 10-day minimum during these talks, one person said.

    But the show is exactly what Trump wants. He's made clear to advisers privately that rather than end the trial as quickly as possible, he is hoping for a dramatic event, according to two people familiar with his thinking. He wants Hunter Biden, Rep. Adam Schiff and the whistleblower to testify. He wants the witnesses to be live, not clips of taped depositions. And he's hoping to turn it into a spectacle, which he thinks is his best chance to hurt Democrats in the election.

    continued at
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/10/politics/donald-trump-mitch-mcconnell-senate-trial-impeachment/index.html
    of course this is what he wants. a spectacle. mcconnell is to good of a politician to give it to him though. hopefully.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 45,371
    gimmesometruth27 said:
    Kat said:
    The man has no shame at all. He's not even aware in the slightest of what he's done wrong.
    I believe he's quite pathetic and without a shred of honor. Cheater, cheater, pants on fire.

    Growing divide between Trump and McConnell over impeachment trial
    December 10, 2019

    Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are both looking ahead to the Senate impeachment trial, but there is a growing divide between the two over what that trial should look like, CNN has learned.

    In conversations with the White House, the Kentucky Republican has made clear he hopes to end the trial as soon as he can, an effort to both get impeachment off his lap and protect his conference from potentially damaging votes should the process break out into partisan warfare. That will include a continuous whip count until McConnell feels he has the votes to acquit the President and end the show. He has even floated a 10-day minimum during these talks, one person said.

    But the show is exactly what Trump wants. He's made clear to advisers privately that rather than end the trial as quickly as possible, he is hoping for a dramatic event, according to two people familiar with his thinking. He wants Hunter Biden, Rep. Adam Schiff and the whistleblower to testify. He wants the witnesses to be live, not clips of taped depositions. And he's hoping to turn it into a spectacle, which he thinks is his best chance to hurt Democrats in the election.

    continued at
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/10/politics/donald-trump-mitch-mcconnell-senate-trial-impeachment/index.html
    of course this is what he wants. a spectacle. mcconnell is to good of a politician to give it to him though. hopefully.
    he can give him the ultimate spectacle. the only president to be removed from office.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14

Categories