***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1…346347349351352…522

Comments

  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646
    edited November 2019
    mrussel1 said:
    ikiT said:
    Vindy came in full military regalia. 

    sweet




    He's active duty.  It makes for powerful TV.  
    I would think it also works as a somewhat of a shield against vicious attacks (like FOX' "he is not born in the US so she is a spy!")


    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,965
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    mrussel1 said:
    ikiT said:
    Vindy came in full military regalia. 

    sweet




    He's active duty.  It makes for powerful TV.  
    I would think it also works as a somewhat of a shield against vicious attacks (like FOX' "he is not born in the US so she is a spy!")


    They tried that day one,  but I've heard less of it after the backlash.  It was despicable. 
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    2018
    Vindman’s opening statement was pretty damn powerful.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    2018
    DOCTORED DOCUMENTS...so Trumpy.


    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646
    edited November 2019
    So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646
    Nunes: ...Mr Vindman--

    Vindman: Ranking Member - It's Lt. Col. Vindman please
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,965
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    As far as I can tell.  

    And to your question earlier about focusing on the WB, yes it's absolutely a red herring.  His identity and motives are irrelevant.  Everything he wrote has been corroborated,  so it's completely unnecessary but the only defense available. 
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    They were both on the second "perfect" call.
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646
    dignin said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    They were both on the second "perfect" call.
    Just picked that up. 

    Vindman has a bit of attitude. Haha.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,965
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    dignin said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    They were both on the second "perfect" call.
    Just picked that up. 

    Vindman has a bit of attitude. Haha.
    What station is this on in Sweden? Or are you watching a stream?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,887
    edited November 2019
    2018
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
    The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,646
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    dignin said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    They were both on the second "perfect" call.
    Just picked that up. 

    Vindman has a bit of attitude. Haha.
    What station is this on in Sweden? Or are you watching a stream?
    https://youtu.be/GqRfRrhtAZs

    Stream.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,983
    edited November 2019
    Two brave patriots.
    Lieutenant Colonel Vindman: "Here, right matters."
    and Jennifer Williams. They both risk a lot standing up for our country.
    Post edited by Kat on
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,002
    2018
    mrussel1 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    dignin said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
    They were both on the second "perfect" call.
    Just picked that up. 

    Vindman has a bit of attitude. Haha.
    What station is this on in Sweden? Or are you watching a stream?
    unlimited streaming is part and parcel of the Swedish Socialism Starter Pack. 
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,983
    I believe C-Span was streaming on Twitter. :)

    Falling down,...not staying down
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Every network and news cable channel is streaming it as far as I can tell. Lot's of streams on Youtube.

    That's how I watch, start on a delay and skip through the BS.
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,599
    2019
    PJ_Soul said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
    The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
    Yes. It's just to confuse and distract. Supposedly the whistle blower is a democrat and there are pics of the person with prominent democrat politicians. It is to continue his "deep state" nonsense. 

    But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people. 
    www.myspace.com
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,002
    edited November 2019
    2018
    The Juggler said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
    The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
    Yes. It's just to confuse and distract. Supposedly the whistle blower is a democrat and there are pics of the person with prominent democrat politicians. It is to continue his "deep state" nonsense. 

    But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people. 
    like a cow's opinion. doesn't matter. 

    IT'S MOO. 
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



Categories