So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
As far as I can tell.
And to your question earlier about focusing on the WB, yes it's absolutely a red herring. His identity and motives are irrelevant. Everything he wrote has been corroborated, so it's completely unnecessary but the only defense available.
So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Why is there two witnesses at one time? They don't seem to have anything to do with each other? To save time?
They were both on the second "perfect" call.
Just picked that up.
Vindman has a bit of attitude. Haha.
What station is this on in Sweden? Or are you watching a stream?
unlimited streaming is part and parcel of the Swedish Socialism Starter Pack.
Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall after a very restful summer exploring the Great Canadian Wilderness and beaches, listening to Pearl Jam, Headstones, Watchmen, Queens of the Stone Age, and many others.
In my absence, please refer to the following for any reasoned debate on any given matter (please note this list is not exhaustive):
So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
Yes. It's just to confuse and distract. Supposedly the whistle blower is a democrat and there are pics of the person with prominent democrat politicians. It is to continue his "deep state" nonsense.
But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people.
So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
Yes. It's just to confuse and distract. Supposedly the whistle blower is a democrat and there are pics of the person with prominent democrat politicians. It is to continue his "deep state" nonsense.
But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people.
like a cow's opinion. doesn't matter.
IT'S MOO.
Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall after a very restful summer exploring the Great Canadian Wilderness and beaches, listening to Pearl Jam, Headstones, Watchmen, Queens of the Stone Age, and many others.
In my absence, please refer to the following for any reasoned debate on any given matter (please note this list is not exhaustive):
So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
Yes. It's just to confuse and distract. Supposedly the whistle blower is a democrat and there are pics of the person with prominent democrat politicians. It is to continue his "deep state" nonsense.
But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people.
like a cow's opinion. doesn't matter.
IT'S MOO.
haha....I've been using that reference damn near 20 years now.
So the point of getting to the whistleblower (with whatever he/she reported being true - told by the President himself) is just a hail mary to find some straw to grasp at to focus on? Like finding out that person was a demcorat and something and movie to focus off the substance and go all in on it being a politically motivated hit job? or whatever else they might find out about that person - THE WHISTLE BLOWER WAS LATE IN TWO OCCASIONS OF PAYING CHILD ALIMONY! TWO OF THEM! THIS IS A SHAM! AND HE NEVER EVER EVEN MET THE PRESIDENT! etc
The point is simply to give the Trumpers a common enemy throughout the impeachment proceedings. Creating common enemies who are actors against the "cause" is the MOST important factor when growing fascism. Hitler knew it, Trump knows it.
Yes. It's just to confuse and distract. Supposedly the whistle blower is a democrat and there are pics of the person with prominent democrat politicians. It is to continue his "deep state" nonsense.
But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people.
like a cow's opinion. doesn't matter.
IT'S MOO.
haha....I've been using that reference damn near 20 years now.
Me too. sometimes people get it. sometimes they don't., but i laugh my ass off every damn time.
Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall after a very restful summer exploring the Great Canadian Wilderness and beaches, listening to Pearl Jam, Headstones, Watchmen, Queens of the Stone Age, and many others.
In my absence, please refer to the following for any reasoned debate on any given matter (please note this list is not exhaustive):
Two brave patriots. Lieutenant Colonel Vindman: "Here, right matters." and Jennifer Williams. They both risk a lot standing up for our country.
True. Unfortunately, it's right vs. left; not right vs. wrong.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine 2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin 2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
^ I don't see how putting Gym Jordan on this committee helps them with any people other than those who would already support the president if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue.
Comments
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
Vindman: Ranking Member - It's Lt. Col. Vindman please
And to your question earlier about focusing on the WB, yes it's absolutely a red herring. His identity and motives are irrelevant. Everything he wrote has been corroborated, so it's completely unnecessary but the only defense available.
Vindman has a bit of attitude. Haha.
Stream.
Lieutenant Colonel Vindman: "Here, right matters."
and Jennifer Williams. They both risk a lot standing up for our country.
In my absence, please refer to the following for any reasoned debate on any given matter (please note this list is not exhaustive):
@mrussel1 , @Go Beavers , @tbergs, @mickeyrat, @brianlux, @PJ_Soul, @The Juggler, @Gern Blansten
That's how I watch, start on a delay and skip through the BS.
But...unfortunately for them, the things the whistle blower blew about have turned out to be remarkably accurate. So its a moo point for rational people.
IT'S MOO.
In my absence, please refer to the following for any reasoned debate on any given matter (please note this list is not exhaustive):
@mrussel1 , @Go Beavers , @tbergs, @mickeyrat, @brianlux, @PJ_Soul, @The Juggler, @Gern Blansten
In my absence, please refer to the following for any reasoned debate on any given matter (please note this list is not exhaustive):
@mrussel1 , @Go Beavers , @tbergs, @mickeyrat, @brianlux, @PJ_Soul, @The Juggler, @Gern Blansten
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Although it all seems like semantics. Everyone knows this was Trump's doing.
I don't see how putting Gym Jordan on this committee helps them with any people other than those who would already support the president if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue.