Donald Trump
Comments
-
Where are the supporters to defend him on here?
0 -
from what I have heard --would not take much to hide itikiT said:
Reasonable adults in real life and in politics is what I prefer. Spare me the fascist overlord.tempo_n_groove said:
I have heard many a person from Jello Biafra to Newt Gingrich complain about status quo in government for years. So finally, here is someone doing it all differently and no one is happy with that either.Bentleyspop said:
Do we go to politics as usual and suck it up or do we really want change in things?
Are we better off with Moderates running the country?
Yo He's not even trying to hide that boner he has for Vladdie, Viktor Orban, MBS and KJI.
Well...the tie kind of covers it.So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream
Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me0 -
Anyone get the opinion of the ranking repub and chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee regarding Team Trump Treason’s foreign policy and national security capabilities? Anyone? Better hope there’s no “incidences” or “accidents.”09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Seems as if Mr. Bolton has some things to get off his chest........
Tell us, Johnny!www.myspace.com0 -
Yes moderates.. you're goddamm right.tempo_n_groove said:
I have heard many a person from Jello Biafra to Newt Gingrich complain about status quo in government for years. So finally, here is someone doing it all differently and no one is happy with that either.Bentleyspop said:
Do we go to politics as usual and suck it up or do we really want change in things?
Are we better off with Moderates running the country?0 -
https://nypost.com/2019/09/10/trump-license-plate-rejected-in-sweden-for-being-offensive/
‘Trump’ license plate rejected in Sweden for being offensive
Talk about drunk texting.A Swedish man’s application for a vanity license plate reading “TRUMP” has been denied.Marcus Saaf told the Aftonbladet newspaper that he recently purchased a new American SUV (model unspecified) and “was drunk and thought it was fun to apply” for the custom registration, but was denied.Swedish Transport agency rules explicitly prohibit political messages, along with other potentially “offensive” terms on license plates.“In retrospect, I understand that it can be perceived as such. I will keep the registration plate I have,”0 -
Waiting for Hillary to be indicted and the gubmint to come and take their guns. Or at Area 51.Bentleyspop said:Where are the supporters to defend him on here?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Trumpito don't care for the blacks yo. He isn't trying to hide it.
When he's running his mouth like a goddamned lunatic out on the lawn and he holds his hand up and gets LOUDER to stop any and all interruptions by whoever just asked him something? Like he actually believes he's the only person in history who ever had a valid point to express?
I don't like anything about this guy but that's the thing about him that I hate the most.
#ITMFABristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
Approval numbers continue their downward slide...www.myspace.com0
-
Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
www.myspace.com0 -
Let’s see how Mr Douche Bag makes the 9/11 remembrance about how great he is and how he is just picked on. Oh and let’s see if we get a shout out to himself for being at ground zero. Fuck you Mr. Chump.Peace,Love and Pearl Jam.0
-
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.0 -
Your republican friends aren't very familiar with statistics, are they? "Well, they didn't ask me"....tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.0 -
all polls had Hillary winning by a landslide. this is why trumpsters don't believe polls anymore. regardless of the fact that the 2016 polls were only off in a few keys areas, which led to him winning. they don't understand that or choose to ignore it.tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
mrussel1 said:
Your republican friends aren't very familiar with statistics, are they? "Well, they didn't ask me"....tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.
Agreed w the both of you.HughFreakingDillon said:
all polls had Hillary winning by a landslide. this is why trumpsters don't believe polls anymore. regardless of the fact that the 2016 polls were only off in a few keys areas, which led to him winning. they don't understand that or choose to ignore it.tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.
I gave up and flat out said " No matter how many times I answer your questions you will find another thing to question rather than find it for yourself, you'll then give me some reason as to why you don't believe it, so why bother?"
I wasn't even trying to stir up shit, it came up in conversation(online) so i posted. I figured a FOX poll would be suffice but nope.0 -
No they didn't. The average of all polls was HRC +2.1, which was quite close to the result and within the MOE. The polls were remarkably accurate. The difference is that these are national polls, so they don't achieve statistical significance at the state level.HughFreakingDillon said:
all polls had Hillary winning by a landslide. this is why trumpsters don't believe polls anymore. regardless of the fact that the 2016 polls were only off in a few keys areas, which led to him winning. they don't understand that or choose to ignore it.tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.0 -
sorry, not a landslide, wrong wording, but a 92% chance of winning. from what I recall of watching that night.mrussel1 said:
No they didn't. The average of all polls was HRC +2.1, which was quite close to the result and within the MOE. The polls were remarkably accurate. The difference is that these are national polls, so they don't achieve statistical significance at the state level.HughFreakingDillon said:
all polls had Hillary winning by a landslide. this is why trumpsters don't believe polls anymore. regardless of the fact that the 2016 polls were only off in a few keys areas, which led to him winning. they don't understand that or choose to ignore it.tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Yes, the "inside straight" argument. And it was true. He won Michigan and PA by less than a percent each. Those flip, and the election flips. The problem is not the polls and the stats, the problem is the conclusions drawn by media analysts, disregarding the margins of error.HughFreakingDillon said:
sorry, not a landslide, wrong wording, but a 92% chance of winning. from what I recall of watching that night.mrussel1 said:
No they didn't. The average of all polls was HRC +2.1, which was quite close to the result and within the MOE. The polls were remarkably accurate. The difference is that these are national polls, so they don't achieve statistical significance at the state level.HughFreakingDillon said:
all polls had Hillary winning by a landslide. this is why trumpsters don't believe polls anymore. regardless of the fact that the 2016 polls were only off in a few keys areas, which led to him winning. they don't understand that or choose to ignore it.tempo_n_groove said:
So let me tell you how the other half looks at polls.The Juggler said:Beyond the topline of Trump's approval rating, CNN also asked how strongly Americans approved or disapproved of Trump's job performance. The percentage who moderately approve (11%) is similar to the percentage who moderately disapprove (10%).
The real nugget is that the 45% who strongly disapprove is significantly higher than the 28% who strongly approve. That 17-point gap is wider than the 7-point gap we found in April of this year.
What's so interesting about that is some form of enthusiasm gap on approval exists across age, gender, race and even education levels.
Now, it's not unusual for there to be an enthusiasm gap in which more people strongly disapprove than strongly approve of a president. We saw it with George W. Bush and Barack Obama at roughly this point in their presidencies.
The difference is that Trump's is much larger. Obama's strongly disapprove rating in CNN polling was never more than 10 points higher than his strongly approve rating through his first three years in office. The same held true with Bush.
Coming into 2020, it's easy to imagine that Trump may lack the enthusiastic supporters he will likely need to overcome what looks to be an unpopular standing overall.
Remember that FOX poll that stated the 37% or whatever said he was "tearing the country apart"?
I posted that and none of my rep friends could find it and thought I was lying.
I told them how to find it and still called me a fibber.
Posted direct link to that very question and it's findings and question the "amount of people whom actually were polled on that question".
Polls don't matter to them. It is just mind blowing.0 -
Yep...didn't disappoint. Cringeworthy--i could only take 5 min.pearljammr78 said:Let’s see how Mr Douche Bag makes the 9/11 remembrance about how great he is and how he is just picked on. Oh and let’s see if we get a shout out to himself for being at ground zero. Fuck you Mr. Chump.
So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream
Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help