The Democratic Candidates
Comments
-
cincybearcat said:Not a summary...but I can. This is from a moderate...so I may not be the target audience for the debates in a democratic primary.
1) Bernie - He is who he has been. He is not a democrat, he is a legit socialist. Free everything. He hasn't moved off his point of view in any direction. Which is good and bad. He will win the votes he already has and not many more. He may beat Trump...but its a vote that as a moderate I cannot make. I won't vote for trump or Bernie. His yelling and hand raising is getting really annoying. Less tough and more angry grandpa.
2) Warren - she's what Bernie wants to be. She has many of the same plans. She comes across as tough. She doesn't back down. She yells too...but the bad traits are toned down a bit. This she is too far to the left for a moderate like me. But she would be terrific in a debate with trump and could energize the voters in the Dem party. She would have headwinds (like Hillary) but she will actually campaign. It was a strong performance and I really think set her apart from bernie some. Her free everything campaign will face significant hurdles and it would be tough for someone like me to vote for her though. It would be interesting how she defends her plans in front of a moderate or mixed crowd and not a primary.
3) Pete - While I don't like all his policies, he was great again that night. He was calm, collected, smart and able to articulate his answers and even the small details at times. He is an inspiring candidate without relying on the HATE vote that Bernie does. I really think he has a very slim shot at this nomination...but his career is going to be promising. It wouldn't surprise me if he is elected president in in the next 12 years.
4) Amy K - she had a strong night for her. She really is the candidate that comes the closest to matching my views. She is strong, tough and poised. I think she improved herself in her debate.
5) Williamson - the bar was low for her, but she was impressive on stage that night. She made some great comments regarding the Dem party and seemed to be saying the things that some others should say to defend their plans. It was a really strong debate for her.
The rest - mostly throwaways. Some nice things, but not enough their to energize the base or win a general election. Perhaps if it was a 2 way race between on of them and like a Bernie. But too many other options that are similar in ways a better candidates.
I think the whole "I'm a moderate" thing is a bit silly, but I guess it's a phase.Other than that I agree with a lot.
I think Bernie yelling helps him though and makes him feel honest. The "I WROTE THE DAMN BILL" felt more real than anything else of what I've seen that night. So I don't think that would be a negative for him making people care to vote.
Amy K I didn't like from the start, so haven't really given her any attention.
Williamson is great - because like Trump and Yang she's in a position to not having to "protect" being a politician and therefore can spit truths. But she is crazy.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:Right, right ... I keep forgetting about that snarky attitude of yours.
Sorry for asking.0 -
Lerxst1992 said:
Its actually even trickier than the wonky debates this week.
MFA is not free and will not include massive govt spending or an enormous tax
The trick is converting a sizable portion of the economy, what employers pay for healthcare, directly to worker salaries salaries. Pay us instead of our insurers.
If Bernie or Liz could do that, and then account for the lowering of the actual cost to provide care, the impact on our taxes would be minimal in theory
The reason I love Bernie but dont support him is he has done a terrible job communicating this. Too many Americans have a false perception on cost and I'll blame bernie for that because he has been talking about MFA healthcare the longest.
I also loathe when Average Joe's cry about a "death tax" that effects billionaires.... yet, Average Joe goes to the nursing home and they siphon off their life's savings for their care.0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
And from last night, the one who gained the most value to me was Inslee.
These things are mainly worthless. Candidates all largely agreeing with one another trying to stand out in some way, vying to reach that elusive 5% mark. The ones over 5% just trying to survive and advance. Lots of grandstanding, time hogging, and yelling.
Harris did give me douche chills when she went on about requiring companies to immediately adapt equal pay or else lose 1% of their profits. Sounds like a terrible idea with a lot of potentially unintended consequencesPost edited by MayDay10 on0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:Thank you.
I think the whole "I'm a moderate" thing is a bit silly, but I guess it's a phase.Other than that I agree with a lot.
I think Bernie yelling helps him though and makes him feel honest. The "I WROTE THE DAMN BILL" felt more real than anything else of what I've seen that night. So I don't think that would be a negative for him making people care to vote.
Amy K I didn't like from the start, so haven't really given her any attention.
Williamson is great - because like Trump and Yang she's in a position to not having to "protect" being a politician and therefore can spit truths. But she is crazy.
I vote republican and democrat.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:hippiemom = goodness0
-
mcgruff10 said:The more I read and watch the more I realize that all the dem candidates are pretty damn shitty. Where is the next Obama? A country of 300 million plus and this is the best we have?Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Gern Blansten said:Disagree....any of them would be better than tRump.hippiemom = goodness0
-
Gern Blansten said:Disagree....any of them would be better than tRump.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
-
mcgruff10 said:True but do any of them really stand out to you? I mean i absolutely loved Obama as a candidate. I was excited and proud to vote for him. These candidates? Yeah not too much. It was the same feeling for Hillary, I voted for her but I wasn't overly excited to think of her as the president.hippiemom = goodness0
-
Hillary is as center as they come and was possibly the most qualified person ever to run for president.0
-
MayDay10 said:Hillary is as center as they come and was possibly the most qualified person ever to run for president.
She is like "Can't Deny Me" if its on the new album.
Even if most of them did not know why they disliked her. It seems. Something-something-emails-and-boring-clothes
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Spiritual_Chaos said:But people had been conditioned to not like her for so many years.
She is like "Can't Deny Me" if its on the new album.
Even if most of them did not know why they disliked her. It seems. Something-something-emails-and-boring-clothes
There was a ex-TV news 'celebrity', all polished on interviews and television, with a white smile... but no real financial or government experience.
The other guy was an awkward looking overweight pale guy who looked like he hadn't been outside in awhile with glasses and when interviewed he kept looking at his feet.
I told my wife that I know exactly who I want handling our money.
Ex TV news local celebrity guy won in a landslide.
Since then, all sorts of corruption.0 -
cincybearcat said:I’d feel good voting for Pete or Amy. Someone else could stand out between now and Election Day. But as of now those are the only 2 that could get me to the polls based on them and not their opponent
As a politically engaged person, yeah, you can vote for Amy. I'm from her state and she's smart and capable. But she's not going to bring people to the polls like Obama did. You mention Pete...he's the most Obama-like among them, but I don't think he quite has the appeal to the sometimes-apolitical that Obama did.
But to McGruff's point, most of them seem to be stumbling their way through and just as likely to turn people off as pull them in.
I feel like there was a time when Biden was actually kinda sharp-tongued and would have run up the score in the debates with a dolt like Trump. Well, if so, those days seem to be behind him.Post edited by OnWis97 on1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
OnWis97 said:I tend to agree with McGruff 1) there's no Obama in the mix and 2) it's amazing that there can't be one every cycle...it's amazing that Obama's practically a once-in-a-generation candidate.
As a politically engaged person, yeah, you can vote for Amy. I'm from her state and she's smart and capable. But she's not going to bring people to the polls like Obama did. You mention Pete...he's the most Obama-like among them, but I don't think he quite has the appeal to the sometimes-apolitical that Obama did.
But to McGruff's point, most of them seem to be stumbling their way through and just as likely to turn people off as pull them in.
I feel like there was a time when Biden was actually kinda sharp-tongued and would have run up the score in the debates with a dolt like Trump. Well, if so, those days seem to be behind him.0 -
OnWis97 said:I tend to agree with McGruff 1) there's no Obama in the mix and 2) it's amazing that there can't be one every cycle...it's amazing that Obama's practically a once-in-a-generation candidate.
As a politically engaged person, yeah, you can vote for Amy. I'm from her state and she's smart and capable. But she's not going to bring people to the polls like Obama did. You mention Pete...he's the most Obama-like among them, but I don't think he quite has the appeal to the sometimes-apolitical that Obama did.
But to McGruff's point, most of them seem to be stumbling their way through and just as likely to turn people off as pull them in.
I feel like there was a time when Biden was actually kinda sharp-tongued and would have run up the score in the debates with a dolt like Trump. Well, if so, those days seem to be behind him.hippiemom = goodness0 -
OnWis97 said:I tend to agree with McGruff 1) there's no Obama in the mix and 2) it's amazing that there can't be one every cycle...it's amazing that Obama's practically a once-in-a-generation candidate.
As a politically engaged person, yeah, you can vote for Amy. I'm from her state and she's smart and capable. But she's not going to bring people to the polls like Obama did. You mention Pete...he's the most Obama-like among them, but I don't think he quite has the appeal to the sometimes-apolitical that Obama did.
But to McGruff's point, most of them seem to be stumbling their way through and just as likely to turn people off as pull them in.
I feel like there was a time when Biden was actually kinda sharp-tongued and would have run up the score in the debates with a dolt like Trump. Well, if so, those days seem to be behind him.
I think Biden will hit his stride. He's been out of the mix for awhile, it's just taking him time to adjust. It's been 7 years since he's been in a campaign after all.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
cincybearcat said:I have no data...but it wouldn't surprise me that if the African american community wasn't as homophobic as it is, Mayor Pete would be doing a lot better. I think he is likely "that" candidate. But we will miss out on him cause even a large portion of the democratic voters don't like it when a guy loves another guy. But I guess I haven't seen any recent data...have to go look.
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help