15-TON PREHISTORIC SHARK CAPTURED OFF COAST OF PAKISTAN
Comments
-
tempo_n_groove said:I was duped... I was going to start researching this more too but oh well...
Meltdown your credibility has been downsized...'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
benjs said:tempo_n_groove said:I was duped... I was going to start researching this more too but oh well...
Meltdown your credibility has been downsized...
Now if this was a setup by Meltdown then Bravo!!!0 -
F Me In The Brain said:0
-
Halifax2TheMax said:Spiritual_Chaos said:Halifax2TheMax said:And to think that social media and the inter webs can’t possibly influence how people vote. Who woulda thunk?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
tempo_n_groove said:benjs said:tempo_n_groove said:I was duped... I was going to start researching this more too but oh well...
Meltdown your credibility has been downsized...
Now if this was a setup by Meltdown then Bravo!!!Ditto. I was at work, with someone talking to me, 10 emails to reply to... I only half read the article, certainly didn't see anything weird on the rest of the page, saw a photo of a believably large shark (IMO), and replied. People are making way too much of this, lol.If this was a setup by Meltdown he's now an official troll.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.
Post edited by HughFreakingDillon onBy The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
tempo_n_groove said:F Me In The Brain said:
The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.But paying attention to some article about a giant shark and paying attention to an article about important political matters is hardly the same thing. One can be on the look out for political influences, and not for stupid articles about sharks. However, those paid trolls are very subtle and sneaky at the time, and I'm not sure I've ever seen anyone suggest that all of those who are influenced by this super shady election meddling via social media is a moron, unless they were specifically talking about stuff that is very obviously ridiculous, which is often NOT the case when it comes to these paid social media trolls trying to impact elections. That is why internet literacy has to be taught at basic curriculum in all schools. It's a tricky business.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.
I was duped...
Oh well.0 -
oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
PJ_Soul said:oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.But paying attention to some article about a giant shark and paying attention to an article about important political matters is hardly the same thing. One can be on the look out for political influences, and not for stupid articles about sharks. However, those paid trolls are very subtle and sneaky at the time, and I'm not sure I've ever seen anyone suggest that all of those who are influenced by this super shady election meddling via social media is a moron, unless they were specifically talking about stuff that is very obviously ridiculous, which is often NOT the case when it comes to these paid social media trolls trying to impact elections. That is why internet literacy has to be taught at basic curriculum in all schools. It's a tricky business.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.
I was duped...
Oh well.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
PJ_Soul said:oftenreading said:HughFreakingDillon said:I think it's hilarious that when someone posts something that is found to be a hoax, if they:
-were duped, "i was busy", "I wasn't paying attention", "people are making too much of this", "I didn't read the entire thing"
-were not duped, it's "jesus, people, it's the fucking (satire website), don't you know how to think critically?" "did you READ the article before posting?" or "people will believe anything"
had I read the article prior to it being pointed out, good chance I'd have been duped too. such is life. and the ads on the side are not a dead giveaway. seriously, I see the same shit on any website, including CNN's under "paid content". but if you don't notice that subtle headline, you could easily believe some of them are real.But paying attention to some article about a giant shark and paying attention to an article about important political matters is hardly the same thing. One can be on the look out for political influences, and not for stupid articles about sharks. However, those paid trolls are very subtle and sneaky at the time, and I'm not sure I've ever seen anyone suggest that all of those who are influenced by this super shady election meddling via social media is a moron, unless they were specifically talking about stuff that is very obviously ridiculous, which is often NOT the case when it comes to these paid social media trolls trying to impact elections. That is why internet literacy has to be taught at basic curriculum in all schools. It's a tricky business.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
We had a poster on here post an article with a picture and ask, “Is this behavior mainstream now?” What if we, or a majority of us, had all said yes (faceturd, Twitter feed, comment section of insert news, blog, chat site here)?
Someone might have been influenced without the facts. Weekly World News used to be in paper form at the supermarket check out line. Maybe it still is?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I saw this posted in earnest on FB. While many laughed, other people were pleasantly surprised and looking forward to saving all that money in only a year. My question is, at what point can we actually just boil things down to people being dummies when they take something at face value?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Dummies is too nice a term
Lazy fools.The love he receives is the love that is saved0 -
I was going to research it more so at least I was going to do my part to delve into the story more. That is the problem w most people though like Soul said in that people take it for face value and pursue it no further.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help