2018/2019 NBA Thread
Options
Comments
-
45% vs 44% winning percentage. Statistical dead heat, folks. That argument is put to rest.Poncier said:
Which is better than 12-15.The Juggler said:
Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. Sorry.Poncier said:
Very similar to last year when they ended the season on that 69 game winning streak where they played Atlanta, Brooklyn and the Knicks 23 times each and suddenly they were seen as the team to beat in the east then the Celts pantsed them.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And Celts are 3-0 against their current projected first round opponent.www.myspace.com0 -
Also @tempo_n_groove, you made me curious so I checked. They're 11-9 against +500 teams since Butler got here. So...yeah, I don't understand your argument.www.myspace.com0
-
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.0 -
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...www.myspace.com0 -
Nice, i didn't knew about it..tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.htmlAthens 2006. Dusseldorf 2007. Berlin 2009. Venice 2010. Amsterdam 1 2012. Amsterdam 1+2 2014. Buenos Aires 2015.
Prague Krakow Berlin 2018. Berlin 2022
EV, Taormina 1+2 2017.
I wish i was the souvenir you kept your house key on..0 -
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.The Juggler said:
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...0 -
Not sure if this was ever mentioned but the T'Wolves' uniforms are atrocious...0
-
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25960655/can-sixers-reach-their-incredible-ceilingtempo_n_groove said:
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.The Juggler said:
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
www.myspace.com0 -
Yep. People are changing their tune now. You are correct. McGrady has changed his mind. I know he was one of the people that wasn't sold on them.The Juggler said:
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25960655/can-sixers-reach-their-incredible-ceilingtempo_n_groove said:
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.The Juggler said:
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...
https://youtu.be/m5E1r6mHFp0
0 -
Rachel Nichols sold on the Sixers after 2 games with Harris...well that's the definitive word.This weekend we rock Portland0
-
tempo_n_groove said:
Yep. People are changing their tune now. You are correct. McGrady has changed his mind. I know he was one of the people that wasn't sold on them.The Juggler said:
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25960655/can-sixers-reach-their-incredible-ceilingtempo_n_groove said:
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.The Juggler said:
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...https://youtu.be/m5E1r6mHFp0
Reaction to the trade has been overwhelmingly positive. Only negatives I saw was regarding them giving up too much...which goes out the window once they resign him this summer.Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
They are going to have to try to re-sign 3 of the starting 5 this summer (assuming Butler declines his player option which at 19 Mil is probably a safe assumption).
Can they pull that off?
This weekend we rock Portland0 -
If they want to, absolutely. Not sure they bring Butler back, but we will see.Poncier said:They are going to have to try to re-sign 3 of the starting 5 this summer (assuming Butler declines his player option which at 19 Mil is probably a safe assumption).
Can they pull that off?www.myspace.com0 -
Once again Pacers can't beat a contender. 10 point lead late in the game, lose by 9. Combined 4-7 against BOS/MIL/PHI/TOR this season.
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
Pacers are screwed without Oladipo anyway. Too bad for them, but no way they can overcome that injury to make a run in the playoffs.This weekend we rock Portland0
-
Indeed. And where tf was the Paul George we're seeing right now 3-4 years ago?? Would've been nice had he ever shown up for us.Poncier said:Pacers are screwed without Oladipo anyway. Too bad for them, but no way they can overcome that injury to make a run in the playoffs.
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
How in any way could they overcome the loss of Oladipo? Dude can play and was their superstar. You can't recover from a loss of that caliber of player.Poncier said:Pacers are screwed without Oladipo anyway. Too bad for them, but no way they can overcome that injury to make a run in the playoffs.0 -
They've been on a good run.Poncier said:Pacers are screwed without Oladipo anyway. Too bad for them, but no way they can overcome that injury to make a run in the playoffs.Alright, alright, alright!
Tom O.
"I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone?"
-The Writer0 -
Let me take in another couple of games to get a better feel for them and we can chat more.The Juggler said:tempo_n_groove said:
Yep. People are changing their tune now. You are correct. McGrady has changed his mind. I know he was one of the people that wasn't sold on them.The Juggler said:
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25960655/can-sixers-reach-their-incredible-ceilingtempo_n_groove said:
Watch any TNT, NBC or ESPN pre game/post game show and many of the pros are saying it so no links, sorry.The Juggler said:
Who are these “insiders?” Post a link?tempo_n_groove said:
I'm not sold on the Celtics right now even though they won. I admitted this and may backtrack and take the Bucks as a finalist w the Raptors.The Juggler said:
The Celtics are 10-12 against 500+ teams. The numbers you are citing are consistent with most good teams in the league. You beat up against the scrubs and then hold your own against the better ones. That usually ends teams up with 50+ wins.tempo_n_groove said:
They are 12-15 vs +500 teams. 24-6 against sub 500.The Juggler said:
Give me an example of how they're not playing together? Because Tobias Harris has fit in seamlessly so far. There's nothing in the three games he's played in to suggest otherwise, unless I am missing something. They're 2-1 and only lost last night because of an off night for Embiid...and they still had a shot at the end.tempo_n_groove said:
I keep saying that the Sixers aren't playing together. They have another half of the season to get right.23scidoo said:Big win for the Celtics!!
@23scidoo every time I see your handle I think of the ghost town out in Cali.
http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/ca/skidoo.html
They just lost to the Celtics minus a Kyrie.
If they play any sub 500 teams in the playoffs they will be just fine.
And your argument doesn't make a lot of sense anyway. You keep saying they need to play together since the trade which just happened three games ago....yet you're citing numbers that includes games since before even Jimmy Butler got here?
My question was, what in the last three games indicates they are not gelling well together? Because I think the exact opposite is true.
Listen to other insiders about the Sixers and they aren't sold on them either.
If they pound the ball inside and have Butler and Simmons take 15 footers I think they will do great but they aren't doing that.
They’ve got some of the best odds to win the title for a reason dude...https://youtu.be/m5E1r6mHFp0
Reaction to the trade has been overwhelmingly positive. Only negatives I saw was regarding them giving up too much...which goes out the window once they resign him this summer.0 -
Problem remains, with or without Oladipo, they've proven all season they can't hang with the other contenders in the EC.
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help