"I know they all look alike"

Bentleyspop said:

Go Beavers said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

unsung said:

njnancy said:

dignin said:

"Mixed breeding". Is that some kind of white supremacist lingo?

Yes, as is 'forced association'. 

Unsung pops in and posts or says something that is outright racist or controversial. He then leaves, ignores questions or demands answers for questions that any person of any political persuasion would find offensive and not worthy of answering. 

He used to post as a libertarian but it seems he has drank the Kool-Aid. If only for his inability to have an intelligent & respectful debate with anyone anymore. 

It is tiresome and SAD! to watch someone devolve.

I'd say that my attendance here is really none of your business and my reasons why or why not as well.  

If you knew anything of Libertarian core principles you'd know that the following apply.

Do no harm but to prevent harm.
All associations should be voluntary.
Taxation is theft.  In other words you don't have any right to my labor, and vice versa.

Now while I no longer claim to be a Libertarian, I do still believe in those three points.  

Government is force.  I don't believe in forcing my beliefs, even on someone such as yourself, and therefore I will not have you force yours on me.

The common tactic that the left uses is to discredit the source, quickly followed by name calling and attacking the person with the opinion, instead of arguing the point.  Straight out of the Alinsky Communist playbook.

I'm not here to provide your research, not going to use your hijacked vocabulary either,  and really don't care of what you think of my attendance.  My attendance is voluntary.  I have been attacked here repeatedly and never give it a second thought, even by the guy that still lives in Mommy's basement 

You want an unsung AMA so that the stalking and screeching to my opinions can be isolated to one thread?  Easy enough to go back and see me devolve, huh?

Maybe you just want your echo chamber.  Get your safe space, huh?

so you deride others as attacking the person, and then you proceed to:

-make fun of someone for living with their parents
-parrot the right's stupid talking points "echo chamber" and "safe space". 

the hypocrisy is hilarious. 

Add to the list of talking points ‘Alinsky’ and ‘screeching’. All shared on the internet which was built by the government apparently stealing money. 

The cry of "Alinsky" come from a list that includes....

Paid crisis actors
Virtue signalling
Snowflakes
Triggered
Fake news
Mixed breeding
White genocide
Govt. out to get you
Etc

unsung said:

njnancy said:

unsung said:

Yawn.  Point proven.  Again.  Usual suspects.

I didn't use names, unlike the obession with some here.

When you respond to me, and use the word YOU, a name isn't needed. It is implied. So don't put up your hands and say 'Not Me!'. 

It would be nice if you would respond at such length and with such passion when I have tried to have a back and forth with you instead of ignoring my responses/questions. It seems that it is only fun to respond directly when you feel you have been wronged.

When people with different opinions are attempting to intelligently and politely debate, there is a need for both sides to engage. If someone asks you a question, attempts to answer your question or asks where you are getting a meme or talking point it is helpful if you give a response. Reasoned debate usually doesn't progress when that request is met with either silence or feigned outrage. 

I'm not forcing anything upon you, I have as much right to post my opinion here as you do. Interesting that you have taken the most time I have seen in a long time to try and dress down the woman who expressed her frustration and true sadness over your lack of courtesy in discourse. But that seems to be the thing to do. Stir the pot and then be outraged, OUTRAGED when someone finally calls you on it.

I'd like to discuss the policies or points and not the person, so I'd appreciate it if some men on here could grow a thicker skin. It might make for a more interesting and less hostile debate. 

The problem isn't with any person's ideology; it is with the way in which they go about expressing it that causes others to become frustrated. But perhaps it would be better if I just do not engage with people who have no interest in reasoned debate. 

And I hold no ill will, even with someone such as yourself. 

Call me on it? That is calling me on it?  What is it?  Your policy of theft to fund your agenda?  

Outrage?  The only outrage is on your side.  I sleep soundly knowing your will will never change my life.

And yeah I was talking at YOU, that is what most internet forums code as "reply or quote".

unsung said:

njnancy said:

Bentleyspop said:

Go Beavers said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

unsung said:

njnancy said:

dignin said:

"Mixed breeding". Is that some kind of white supremacist lingo?

Yes, as is 'forced association'. 

Unsung pops in and posts or says something that is outright racist or controversial. He then leaves, ignores questions or demands answers for questions that any person of any political persuasion would find offensive and not worthy of answering. 

He used to post as a libertarian but it seems he has drank the Kool-Aid. If only for his inability to have an intelligent & respectful debate with anyone anymore. 

It is tiresome and SAD! to watch someone devolve.

I'd say that my attendance here is really none of your business and my reasons why or why not as well.  

If you knew anything of Libertarian core principles you'd know that the following apply.

Do no harm but to prevent harm.
All associations should be voluntary.
Taxation is theft.  In other words you don't have any right to my labor, and vice versa.

Now while I no longer claim to be a Libertarian, I do still believe in those three points.  

Government is force.  I don't believe in forcing my beliefs, even on someone such as yourself, and therefore I will not have you force yours on me.

The common tactic that the left uses is to discredit the source, quickly followed by name calling and attacking the person with the opinion, instead of arguing the point.  Straight out of the Alinsky Communist playbook.

I'm not here to provide your research, not going to use your hijacked vocabulary either,  and really don't care of what you think of my attendance.  My attendance is voluntary.  I have been attacked here repeatedly and never give it a second thought, even by the guy that still lives in Mommy's basement 

You want an unsung AMA so that the stalking and screeching to my opinions can be isolated to one thread?  Easy enough to go back and see me devolve, huh?

Maybe you just want your echo chamber.  Get your safe space, huh?

so you deride others as attacking the person, and then you proceed to:

-make fun of someone for living with their parents
-parrot the right's stupid talking points "echo chamber" and "safe space". 

the hypocrisy is hilarious. 

Add to the list of talking points ‘Alinsky’ and ‘screeching’. All shared on the internet which was built by the government apparently stealing money. 

The cry of "Alinsky" come from a list that includes....

Paid crisis actors
Virtue signalling
Snowflakes
Triggered
Fake news
Mixed breeding
White genocide
Govt. out to get you
Etc

When you are asked for the sourcing of a particular post, and this goes for anyone, you are not doing my research for me. You posted, you back it up. I'm not going to scour the web for you.

And I do not use 'hijacked vocabulary', whatever that is. I have a plentiful vocabulary without anyone's assistance. Even someone such as yourself.

Screeching and stalking were aimed at me I believe. You know, the crazed woman searching out someone's posts so she can ram her Commie thoughts down their throat. 

But there is no sexism. Nope. 

Actually I wasn't implying you but feel free to wave that flag.

unsung said:

njnancy said:

dignin said:

"Mixed breeding". Is that some kind of white supremacist lingo?

Yes, as is 'forced association'. 

Unsung pops in and posts or says something that is outright racist or controversial. He then leaves, ignores questions or demands answers for questions that any person of any political persuasion would find offensive and not worthy of answering. 

He used to post as a libertarian but it seems he has drank the Kool-Aid. If only for his inability to have an intelligent & respectful debate with anyone anymore. 

It is tiresome and SAD! to watch someone devolve.

I'd say that my attendance here is really none of your business and my reasons why or why not as well.  

If you knew anything of Libertarian core principles you'd know that the following apply.

Do no harm but to prevent harm.
All associations should be voluntary.
Taxation is theft.  In other words you don't have any right to my labor, and vice versa.

Now while I no longer claim to be a Libertarian, I do still believe in those three points.  

Government is force.  I don't believe in forcing my beliefs, even on someone such as yourself, and therefore I will not have you force yours on me.

The common tactic that the left uses is to discredit the source, quickly followed by name calling and attacking the person with the opinion, instead of arguing the point.  Straight out of the Alinsky Communist playbook.

I'm not here to provide your research, not going to use your hijacked vocabulary either,  and really don't care of what you think of my attendance.  My attendance is voluntary.  I have been attacked here repeatedly and never give it a second thought, even by the guy that still lives in Mommy's basement 

You want an unsung AMA so that the stalking and screeching to my opinions can be isolated to one thread?  Easy enough to go back and see me devolve, huh?

Maybe you just want your echo chamber.  Get your safe space, huh?

oftenreading said:

unsung said:

njnancy said:

dignin said:

"Mixed breeding". Is that some kind of white supremacist lingo?

Yes, as is 'forced association'. 

Unsung pops in and posts or says something that is outright racist or controversial. He then leaves, ignores questions or demands answers for questions that any person of any political persuasion would find offensive and not worthy of answering. 

He used to post as a libertarian but it seems he has drank the Kool-Aid. If only for his inability to have an intelligent & respectful debate with anyone anymore. 

It is tiresome and SAD! to watch someone devolve.

I'd say that my attendance here is really none of your business and my reasons why or why not as well.  

If you knew anything of Libertarian core principles you'd know that the following apply.

Do no harm but to prevent harm.
All associations should be voluntary.
Taxation is theft.  In other words you don't have any right to my labor, and vice versa.

Now while I no longer claim to be a Libertarian, I do still believe in those three points.  

Government is force.  I don't believe in forcing my beliefs, even on someone such as yourself, and therefore I will not have you force yours on me.

The common tactic that the left uses is to discredit the source, quickly followed by name calling and attacking the person with the opinion, instead of arguing the point.  Straight out of the Alinsky Communist playbook.

I'm not here to provide your research, not going to use your hijacked vocabulary either,  and really don't care of what you think of my attendance.  My attendance is voluntary.  I have been attacked here repeatedly and never give it a second thought, even by the guy that still lives in Mommy's basement 

You want an unsung AMA so that the stalking and screeching to my opinions can be isolated to one thread?  Easy enough to go back and see me devolve, huh?

Maybe you just want your echo chamber.  Get your safe space, huh?

I think this is where I point out all the benefits you derive from services provided through taxation, and then you fail to recognize them or respond to the discussion. 

brianlux said:

KAT must be on vacation. 

unsung said:

brianlux said:

KAT must be on vacation. 

And what is that supposed to mean?   Talking about do no harm too offensive?  Saying associations should be voluntary too hot of a topic?  Discussing the lack of morals in the policy of taxation now hate speech?  Or was it the mommy's basement comment that did it?  Nah that can't be it.  

We're not supposed to say "fuck" here.  Looks like I broke a rule.