EMEK Limited Edition Mini-prints / Studio Releases!!!

2456

Comments

  • Jbarker
    Jbarker Alberta Posts: 560
    Such a neat graphic. similar to the one Ames Bros did for metallica. has that whole Madame Talbot vibe
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 98,322
    50 left in stock! 
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 98,322
    My copy just arrived. :)



    Missed today's 10club sale. Doh! If wouldn't of been for me if I scored one. Already own the AP edition. Friend would of loved it. So sorry. 
  • EM194007
    EM194007 Posts: 2,827
    What type of printing was used on it? On the other thread, some say screen, others say digital? You have one in hand, so, you will know. 
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 98,322
    Eternal Embrace Mini Print is now sold out!
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 98,322

    "Pearl Jam Clock" Mini Print
    https://emekstudios.com/collections/mini-prints/products/pearl-jam-clock-mini-print

  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    ^^easily one of my all time favorite posters
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • buck502000
    buck502000 Birthplace of GIBSON guitar Posts: 8,951
    I see the indian chief is in emek's shop - dude is wicked talented and a savvy business man!!!
  • drakeheuer14
    drakeheuer14 Posts: 4,628
    edited October 2018
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    Pittsburgh 2013
    Cincinnati 2014
    Greenville 2016
    (Raleigh 2016)
    Columbia 2016
  • Lost In Ohio
    Lost In Ohio Posts: 7,292
    These posters are one-sided, correct?
    Presidential Advice from President-Elect Mike McCready: "Are you getting something out of this all encompassing trip?"
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 98,322
    Lost In Ohio said:
    These posters are one-sided, correct?
     That's correct on these mini prints. 
  • KN219077
    KN219077 Montana Posts: 1,204
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
  • BF89905
    BF89905 Posts: 1,449
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
  • drakeheuer14
    drakeheuer14 Posts: 4,628
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    Reusing it cheapens the image for me. If you don’t find the print, look out for it on a zippo! Lol. 

    And yeah, I am not paying more than $10 for a tiny and cheaply made image. 
    Pittsburgh 2013
    Cincinnati 2014
    Greenville 2016
    (Raleigh 2016)
    Columbia 2016
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,976
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    The artists keep a bunch of prints for their future shows and make a killing off of it.  Emek isn't a dummy.
  • drakeheuer14
    drakeheuer14 Posts: 4,628
    tempo_n_groove said:
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    The artists keep a bunch of prints for their future shows and make a killing off of it.  Emek isn't a dummy.
    Far from a dummy. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same thing in his position. 
    Pittsburgh 2013
    Cincinnati 2014
    Greenville 2016
    (Raleigh 2016)
    Columbia 2016
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,976
    drakeheuer14 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    The artists keep a bunch of prints for their future shows and make a killing off of it.  Emek isn't a dummy.
    Far from a dummy. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same thing in his position. 
    They cash in on their "archives".  It's cool seeing the older prints at a show that they attend.
  • drakeheuer14
    drakeheuer14 Posts: 4,628
    tempo_n_groove said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    The artists keep a bunch of prints for their future shows and make a killing off of it.  Emek isn't a dummy.
    Far from a dummy. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same thing in his position. 
    They cash in on their "archives".  It's cool seeing the older prints at a show that they attend.
    No debate on that. I was just referring to these mini prints being a cash grab and cheapens the image to me
    Pittsburgh 2013
    Cincinnati 2014
    Greenville 2016
    (Raleigh 2016)
    Columbia 2016
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,976
    drakeheuer14 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    The artists keep a bunch of prints for their future shows and make a killing off of it.  Emek isn't a dummy.
    Far from a dummy. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same thing in his position. 
    They cash in on their "archives".  It's cool seeing the older prints at a show that they attend.
    No debate on that. I was just referring to these mini prints being a cash grab and cheapens the image to me
    ahhh got it.  So am I right to assume you aren't a fan of the image on zippos and poster weights too?
  • drakeheuer14
    drakeheuer14 Posts: 4,628
    tempo_n_groove said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    tempo_n_groove said:
    BF89905 said:
    KN219077 said:
    drakeheuer14 said:
    Hefty price for reusing images that arent even screenprinted 
    The market is up to the buyer. If he didn’t sell them he’d lower the prices. I’m sure it’s not like he whips these masterpieces out in a day. Some of them are incredible and he should be rewarded monetarily (in my opinion) and be able to make a good living being a great artist.
    hefty price?
    Some of these artists see their artwork get resold here and elsewhere within hours/days of release, for 2 - 5 times what they sell it for. The artists can reuse their artwork as much as they want and charge whatever they want. 
    The artists keep a bunch of prints for their future shows and make a killing off of it.  Emek isn't a dummy.
    Far from a dummy. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same thing in his position. 
    They cash in on their "archives".  It's cool seeing the older prints at a show that they attend.
    No debate on that. I was just referring to these mini prints being a cash grab and cheapens the image to me
    ahhh got it.  So am I right to assume you aren't a fan of the image on zippos and poster weights too?
    And slipmats, you’d be correct. Let an image be used what it was meant for originally, maybe a higher quality art print down the line. But after that just create something new and let old images be the past
    Pittsburgh 2013
    Cincinnati 2014
    Greenville 2016
    (Raleigh 2016)
    Columbia 2016

Categories