BILL COSBY IS A CONVICTED RAPIST
Comments
-
really? awesome.Cliffy6745 said:
I asked the same thing above, but his bail was revoked and he is being take straight to county for processing then on to state at some point. He was taking off valuables in the court room.HughFreakingDillon said:I wonder if he'll even see the inside of a prison cell. they are going to appeal, and I don't know they'll incarcerate him during that process if he was allowed bail during the initial trial. it's quite possible he'll die before this is all resolved.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.
Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.0 -
Now that this whole thing is over (besides any appeals), I'm just thinking about how fucked up it really is. I mean, someone doing that stuff is always fucked up of course, but the fact that BILL COSBY, "America's dad", was doing it all these years is especially crazy. I find it difficult to understand what could be going on in someone's head when they are living such an extreme Jekyll and Hyde life as this. Does anyone know if psychiatrists have weighed in on Cosby in a meaningful way?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Post edited by pjhawks on0 -
pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Ya, that was a funny gif! It wasn't a cartoon though. It was a wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube man, lol!pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?Post edited by pjhawks on0 -
having only seen that post right now (can't see images at work, so I went on my phone to look), I'm quite surprised you find that appropriate, never mind humourous. I mean, the only way that gif makes sense is in the context of him being a convicted rapist.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Brilliant idea!!!pjhawks said:
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?
Someone with gif-making skills can surely do this. Below is your template.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
so more than 1 person finds GIFs of sexual assault funny. especially in today's environment. surprisingdankind said:
Brilliant idea!!!pjhawks said:
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?
Someone with gif-making skills can surely do this. Below is your template.Post edited by pjhawks on0 -
pjhawks said:
so more than 1 person finds GIFs of sexual assault funny. especially in today's environment. surprisingdankind said:
Brilliant idea!!!pjhawks said:
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?
Someone with gif-making skills can surely do this. Below is your template.
I don't think that blow up thingy had genitals.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446
1995- New Orleans, LA : New Orleans, LA
1996- Charleston, SC
1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY
2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2
2020- Nashville, TN
2022- Smashville
2023- Austin, TX x2
2024- Baltimore
0 -
genitals are't required for sexual assault. sounds like Brett Kavanaugh's virginity defenselolobugg said:pjhawks said:
so more than 1 person finds GIFs of sexual assault funny. especially in today's environment. surprisingdankind said:
Brilliant idea!!!pjhawks said:
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?
Someone with gif-making skills can surely do this. Below is your template.
I don't think that blow up thingy had genitals.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
having only seen that post right now (can't see images at work, so I went on my phone to look), I'm quite surprised you find that appropriate, never mind humourous. I mean, the only way that gif makes sense is in the context of him being a convicted rapist.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.I never expect comedy to be appropriate. I'm a person who thinks that literally nothing is off limits when it comes to comedy. I couldn't care less if someone finds a joke inappropriate.... Actually, I think people finding a joke inappropriate and complaining about it and being oh so serious about it makes the joke even funnier! So keep it up folks!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Good to see that you deleted the tired old male classic "daughter" example. I don't know what's worse, the "daughter/sister/mother" example or the "black friend" example.pjhawks said:
so more than 1 person finds GIFs of sexual assault funny. especially in today's environment. surprisingdankind said:
Brilliant idea!!!pjhawks said:
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?
Someone with gif-making skills can surely do this. Below is your template.
Anyway, I'll answer that lost question, since what you wrote above isn't worthy of a response -- and I actually feel like I Iost a few IQ points just by reading it.
If my daughter (or anyone, for that matter) were to appear in the video/gif above, then yes, I would still find it funny. If my daughter (or, again, anyone) were to experience an actual sexual assault by an actual human being, then, no, that would not be funny.
OK, I still feel like I lost a few IQ points by addressing that, but I didn't want to leave you hanging.Post edited by dankind onI SAW PEARL JAM0 -
pjhawks said:
genitals are't required for sexual assault. sounds like Brett Kavanaugh's virginity defenselolobugg said:pjhawks said:
so more than 1 person finds GIFs of sexual assault funny. especially in today's environment. surprisingdankind said:
Brilliant idea!!!pjhawks said:
you are right i don't get your humor. in fact i find it a bit disturbing especially for a woman to find that funny. how is having a GIF of a convicted rapist assaulting a woman funny? it wasn't funny a year ago and now that the fucker is going to prison it isn't funny now. I guess we will just agree to disagree on it.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.
find any good Kavanaugh assaulting women GIFs to laugh at?
Someone with gif-making skills can surely do this. Below is your template.
I don't think that blow up thingy had genitals.
dude. it was a joke. ease up a little. I think that you will find that everyone here agrees with the fact that Kavanaugh is a scum bag. I don't see the relation to the GIF???livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446
1995- New Orleans, LA : New Orleans, LA
1996- Charleston, SC
1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY
2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2
2020- Nashville, TN
2022- Smashville
2023- Austin, TX x2
2024- Baltimore
0 -
trash.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
having only seen that post right now (can't see images at work, so I went on my phone to look), I'm quite surprised you find that appropriate, never mind humourous. I mean, the only way that gif makes sense is in the context of him being a convicted rapist.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.I never expect comedy to be appropriate. I'm a person who thinks that literally nothing is off limits when it comes to comedy. I couldn't care less if someone finds a joke inappropriate.... Actually, I think people finding a joke inappropriate and complaining about it and being oh so serious about it makes the joke even funnier! So keep it up folks!Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
You're calling me trash?!HughFreakingDillon said:
trash.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
having only seen that post right now (can't see images at work, so I went on my phone to look), I'm quite surprised you find that appropriate, never mind humourous. I mean, the only way that gif makes sense is in the context of him being a convicted rapist.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.I never expect comedy to be appropriate. I'm a person who thinks that literally nothing is off limits when it comes to comedy. I couldn't care less if someone finds a joke inappropriate.... Actually, I think people finding a joke inappropriate and complaining about it and being oh so serious about it makes the joke even funnier! So keep it up folks!
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
not you. that post.PJ_Soul said:
You're calling me trash?!HughFreakingDillon said:
trash.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
having only seen that post right now (can't see images at work, so I went on my phone to look), I'm quite surprised you find that appropriate, never mind humourous. I mean, the only way that gif makes sense is in the context of him being a convicted rapist.PJ_Soul said:pjhawks said:
cute...but no. I'm curious if her perspective has changed on the GIF as well.dankind said:pjhawks said:
just checking to see if you still find a cartoon of Cosby assaulting a woman on the street funny?PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
spent time looking back at the original post and then noticing your post a few below that, that completely contradicts your current opinion on the matter? it was about 2 seconds.PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:
no, one accusation is enough for a SCOTUS nominee apparrently. multiple are good for a conviction of anyone. I just thought it was interesting since this post from 2014 doesn't seem to line up at all with current opinions.dankind said:
Yeah, for a SCOTUS nominee.HughFreakingDillon said:
interesting. I thought multiple accusations was enough......PJ_Soul said:Really why has this not gotten any traction in the news i mean multiple victims and this is the 1st i'm hearing of it , where is the big mouth Sharpton on this ....
Because there is no evidence.Lol. Jesus, I can't believe you actually spent your time doing this HFD. I'm really not sure what your motivation is here, but I know it's not just because you find it "interesting".Yes, it all lines up. As dankind pointed out, and as I pointed out myself several times in the AMT, the fact that it's a SCOTUS nominee during confirmation hearings is EXTREMELY relevant.Also, my perspective about media coverage of Cosby 4 years ago isn't relevant now in any case, whether you compare it to the totally different situation with Kavanaugh or not. Has it occurred to you that my evolving perspective, as shown in this thread and others, has been influenced by the Cosby case and how accusations are handled and perceived? I guess not.
as I pointed out to dankind, the take of many is this:
-one accusation is good enough to disqualify a SCOTUS nominee, so that's not what I was referencing here
-multiple accusations make them all credible, no matter who the accused is (but back in 2014, to you, not cosby)
yes, I did find it interesting. why? because it's a complete 180. and in the context of a discussion about sexual assault/rape, that's pretty significant.
but by all means, assume I have some ulterior motive. ok.I think your ulterior motive was to basically just try and stick it to me, lol.And no, it's not a complete 180. Once I knew there were multiple accusers and had the details I was fully convinced. What you quoted above was me explaining why there was no traction in the media, not me stating that I didn't believe multiple accusers. I think I did say something early on about being suspicious but reserving my ultimate decision until I knew more, and that was short-lived, because I did learn more and made a decision.Why would it have? I think you showed that you don't get my humour after he was found guilty.Know what's also funny? That you're asking about this.I never expect comedy to be appropriate. I'm a person who thinks that literally nothing is off limits when it comes to comedy. I couldn't care less if someone finds a joke inappropriate.... Actually, I think people finding a joke inappropriate and complaining about it and being oh so serious about it makes the joke even funnier! So keep it up folks!
you obviously don't give a shit about the implications of humour like that, and the effect it can and will have on some of those that view it.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help