What's your feeling about the two-party system in the US or other countries with a two party system?

brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669
Pick one and let's see where this goes. And maybe tell us why you made your choice.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"
-Roberto Benigni
What's your feeling about the two-party system in the US or other countries with a two party system? 22 votes
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced three-party system.
0%
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.
31%
I'm not thrilled with the two-party system but I don't think three or more would work.
0%
I want a one party system, I'm all for a benevolent dictator.
0%
0
Comments
-
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.Should I add another choice called "No Comment"?
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.Ah! We have some votes. But so far, no comments.I went with "I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits". I don't think that has a chance of being put into practice, but why not put it out there? I think it would be great. Don't give us your tired party line rhetoric, tell us what you are going to do to help lead and make your world or country or state or province or city or town a better place. I'm all for this idea.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487Is there a crush your opponent party?
I'm for candidates that want to reduce the role of govt in people's lives.0 -
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.I made my choice because I hate both of the current parties but and feel that more competition and split govt would eventually end in more compromise (after a tough transition period).
I do like the idea of parties with ties in some aspects as it would be too hard to govern with no one agreeing on a platform.Post edited by cincybearcat onhippiemom = goodness0 -
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.unsung said:Is there a crush your opponent party?
I'm for candidates that want to reduce the role of govt in people's lives."Is there a crush your opponent party?"Isn't that what every party wants- to crush their opponent?"I'm for candidates that want to reduce the role of govt in people's lives."But wait, how can you have both candidates and no government?
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.I like the idea of several parties so that no single party has a majority. This way they are forced to work with the others to get anything passed which means (in theory) that nothing extremely radical will be passed unless it benefits all.0
-
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.flywallyfly said:I like the idea of several parties so that no single party has a majority. This way they are forced to work with the others to get anything passed which means (in theory) that nothing extremely radical will be passed unless it benefits all.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.Same old crap here too. Both the Liberals and Labor often let Aussies down.
We have minor parties but they will never get elected.Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/20140 -
I'm totally against any party system (please expain this alternative)If we're discussing parliamentary democracy, then pluralism and polyvocality are prerequisites (3rd option). However, because Greece has a pretty much two-party system (totally corrupted as all of them are), I'd like to see how a self-governed society based on voluntary institutions (i.e., anarchism) would work out.
Athens 2006 / Milton Keynes 2014 / London 1&2 2022 / Seattle 1&2 2024 / Dublin 2024 / Manchester 2024 / New Orleans 20250 -
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.Thoughts_Arrive said:Same old crap here too. Both the Liberals and Labor often let Aussies down.
We have minor parties but they will never get elected.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.Pap said:If we're discussing parliamentary democracy, then pluralism and polyvocality are prerequisites (3rd option). However, because Greece has a pretty much two-party system (totally corrupted as all of them are), I'd like to see how a self-governed society based on voluntary institutions (i.e., anarchism) would work out.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.I'm horrible at politics and I never understand what each side is meant to represent. The lines are too blurred. I think if each candidate ran independently then we chose I would have more of a clue . It seems all smoke and mirrors to me.
this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -0 -
Other (please explain)I am in favour of more direct democracy.Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Other (please explain)cincybearcat said:I made my choice because I hate both of the current parties but and feel that more competition and split govt would eventually end in more compromise (after a tough transition period).
I do like the idea of parties with ties in some aspects as it would be too hard to govern with no one agreeing on a platform.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Other (please explain)flywallyfly said:I like the idea of several parties so that no single party has a majority. This way they are forced to work with the others to get anything passed which means (in theory) that nothing extremely radical will be passed unless it benefits all.Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Other (please explain)lastexitlondon said:I'm horrible at politics and I never understand what each side is meant to represent. The lines are too blurred. I think if each candidate ran independently then we chose I would have more of a clue . It seems all smoke and mirrors to me.Give Peas A Chance…0
-
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.Meltdown99 said:cincybearcat said:I made my choice because I hate both of the current parties but and feel that more competition and split govt would eventually end in more compromise (after a tough transition period).
I do like the idea of parties with ties in some aspects as it would be too hard to govern with no one agreeing on a platform.hippiemom = goodness0 -
I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits.Fuck Republicans. Fuck Democrats. Love America. Be Independent."Red Rover, Red Rover, Mike McCready – Take Over!!" - E.V.
Ten Club "Ambassador" (recap-writer) - DEEP.pearljam.com
Contributor & Patron - liveon4legs.com
2018: Chicago 2 (Wrigley Field) 8/20 | 20(20)22: St Louis 9/18 | 2023: Chicago 2 (United Center) 9/7, Indianapolis (Deer Creek) 9/10 | 2024: Vegas 5/16-&-18, Indy? Wrigley 2?
EV:
2018: CURE Benefit Show (Chicago - Navy Pier) 10/15* * * * * * * * *
RIP: Andy, Kurt, Chris0 -
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.brianlux said:Ah! We have some votes. But so far, no comments.I went with "I would like to see every candidate run strictly on his or her own merits". I don't think that has a chance of being put into practice, but why not put it out there? I think it would be great. Don't give us your tired party line rhetoric, tell us what you are going to do to help lead and make your world or country or state or province or city or town a better place. I'm all for this idea.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I'm against the strictly two-party system and would like to see a balanced four or more-party system.brianlux said:flywallyfly said:I like the idea of several parties so that no single party has a majority. This way they are forced to work with the others to get anything passed which means (in theory) that nothing extremely radical will be passed unless it benefits all.
"I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help