Of the frequent commenters here, What is your education level?
Comments
-
Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...0 -
Post gradGo Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
mcgruff10 said:Go Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/27/study-finds-those-graduate-education-are-far-more-liberal-peers
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Post gradoftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Go Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/27/study-finds-those-graduate-education-are-far-more-liberal-peers
I consider myself pretty much in the middle, some things I am to the right and others I am to the left.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Post gradoftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Go Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/27/study-finds-those-graduate-education-are-far-more-liberal-peers
Of course though, going to college also means being exposed to a lot more people different from yourself and that will drive that behavior as well. If you live in the same town your whole life and don;t have $ to travel, if an issue doesn't effect you directly you can't understand it (or really don't try).
Oh - and professors certainly try to pass on their opinions of things. I had a lawyer teaching an Environmental law course that was a pretty solid activist...it certainly made the curriculum different than someone else. It's not all based on fact, it's based on fact and then someone's interpretation of other things.
I don't think the standard 4-year+ college is right for everyone. I do think that some extended job training really should be. Whether it be a technical school, apprenticeship, whatever. But something that hones a skill and critical thinking. All the while exposed to different points of view.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Post gradmcgruff10 said:oftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Go Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/27/study-finds-those-graduate-education-are-far-more-liberal-peers
I consider myself pretty much in the middle, some things I am to the right and others I am to the left.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Post gradcincybearcat said:mcgruff10 said:oftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Go Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/27/study-finds-those-graduate-education-are-far-more-liberal-peers
I consider myself pretty much in the middle, some things I am to the right and others I am to the left.
And I agree, opinions definitely change especially after having kids.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Post gradcincybearcat said:oftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Go Beavers said:Thoughts_Arrive said:jnimhaoileoin said:Well it's obvious to me anyway. It's interesting to see if people's social and political views can be linked to their level of educational attainment. It's a very common area of study in statistics
I made a thread recently in here with a study...
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/04/27/study-finds-those-graduate-education-are-far-more-liberal-peers
Of course though, going to college also means being exposed to a lot more people different from yourself and that will drive that behavior as well. If you live in the same town your whole life and don;t have $ to travel, if an issue doesn't effect you directly you can't understand it (or really don't try).
Oh - and professors certainly try to pass on their opinions of things. I had a lawyer teaching an Environmental law course that was a pretty solid activist...it certainly made the curriculum different than someone else. It's not all based on fact, it's based on fact and then someone's interpretation of other things.
I don't think the standard 4-year+ college is right for everyone. I do think that some extended job training really should be. Whether it be a technical school, apprenticeship, whatever. But something that hones a skill and critical thinking. All the while exposed to different points of view.
Also, the younger generation leans more left and also is more likely to go to college and graduate school. So it makes sense education would lean some to the left.
But I don't think it is as big of a gap as most studies make it out to be. I didn't see how this particular study defined liberal or conservative, but I have seen many other studies where the definition was skewed in a way to favor one or the other.
To me something doesn't add up with these findings right off the bat.
If voting even remotely represented these findings, every election would be a landslide. Whatever parameters were used, liberals make up 35% of the total population while conservatives make up 27%. In any election that would be a landslide.
The number of conservatives stays essentially the same, changing by just 3-4% throughout.
the number of conservatives and liberals for HS or less is exactly the same, 26% for each group. So in no category do conservatives outnumber liberals. How can this be possible when the country is essentially divided if liberals so overwhelmingly favor education? If the point many are trying to make is that liberals are more educated, shouldn't conservatives dominate the HS and some school categories then? But they even lose or tie in those.
In most categories the "mixed" makes up the largest group.
My guess, and it's only a guess, is that whatever parameters used to define this study did not correctly identify the "mixed" group. I've seen it done before, it is easy to manipulate statistics like this by asking just a couple identifying questions (For example I've seen "do you believe in no exception abortion laws?" and if they answer "yes" they are conservative and if they answer "no" they are liberal, when in fact nearly all conservatives/pro-lifers do believe in exceptions. This is just used to misidentify groups).
If the mixed group was truly mixed, and voting even remotely represented these findings, every election would be a landslide and there would be no republicans in office.
In reality I would predict that the difference is small, probably 3-5%, and that would be accounted for the newer generation leaning left and having more education available/required.Post edited by mace1229 on0 -
Comparing voting outcomes to this poll to debunk the poll doesn’t really work because of the country’s low voter turnout. There isn’t a 50/50 split. Conservatives are less than half, maybe 35-40%. If voter turnout was 100%, there would hardly be any republicans in office because non-voter values align more with the Dems. It’s why Republicans essentially want to put up barriers to voting and don’t really care about low turnout.0
-
Post gradGo Beavers said:Comparing voting outcomes to this poll to debunk the poll doesn’t really work because of the country’s low voter turnout. There isn’t a 50/50 split. Conservatives are less than half, maybe 35-40%. If voter turnout was 100%, there would hardly be any republicans in office because non-voter values align more with the Dems. It’s why Republicans essentially want to put up barriers to voting and don’t really care about low turnout.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
brianlux said:Go Beavers said:Comparing voting outcomes to this poll to debunk the poll doesn’t really work because of the country’s low voter turnout. There isn’t a 50/50 split. Conservatives are less than half, maybe 35-40%. If voter turnout was 100%, there would hardly be any republicans in office because non-voter values align more with the Dems. It’s why Republicans essentially want to put up barriers to voting and don’t really care about low turnout.0
-
Post gradIts not just the voting polls. I can't find a single article that places the number of overall libs higher than cons in this country. But according to this poll it isn't even close.
When I googled number of liberals and conservatives, every one put the number of conservatives higher. I actually thought it was essentially equal, but reading through the first several sources they all quoted conservatives as a higher number.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/there-are-more-liberals-but-not-fewer-conservatives/
that was like the 7th article down and I stopped looking after that.
So you don't find it odd that every source reports the overall number of conservatives higher, except for this poll? That doesn't make you question the source and motives of this poll and how they classified people as conservative or liberal?
0 -
Post gradmace1229 said:Its not just the voting polls. I can't find a single article that places the number of overall libs higher than cons in this country. But according to this poll it isn't even close.
When I googled number of liberals and conservatives, every one put the number of conservatives higher. I actually thought it was essentially equal, but reading through the first several sources they all quoted conservatives as a higher number.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/there-are-more-liberals-but-not-fewer-conservatives/
that was like the 7th article down and I stopped looking after that.
So you don't find it odd that every source reports the overall number of conservatives higher, except for this poll? That doesn't make you question the source and motives of this poll and how they classified people as conservative or liberal?
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Post gradeddiec said:brianlux said:Go Beavers said:Comparing voting outcomes to this poll to debunk the poll doesn’t really work because of the country’s low voter turnout. There isn’t a 50/50 split. Conservatives are less than half, maybe 35-40%. If voter turnout was 100%, there would hardly be any republicans in office because non-voter values align more with the Dems. It’s why Republicans essentially want to put up barriers to voting and don’t really care about low turnout.
And then what about early/mail in ballots?
Anyone who wants to vote can very easily do so.0 -
Post gradI think it would be funny to see how many people involved in the protests and marches didn't take the time out to vote.0
-
Post gradmace1229 said:I think it would be funny to see how many people involved in the protests and marches didn't take the time out to vote.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
mace1229 said:eddiec said:brianlux said:Go Beavers said:Comparing voting outcomes to this poll to debunk the poll doesn’t really work because of the country’s low voter turnout. There isn’t a 50/50 split. Conservatives are less than half, maybe 35-40%. If voter turnout was 100%, there would hardly be any republicans in office because non-voter values align more with the Dems. It’s why Republicans essentially want to put up barriers to voting and don’t really care about low turnout.
And then what about early/mail in ballots?
Anyone who wants to vote can very easily do so.0 -
-
Post gradNot trying to grind one.
I was just responding to the comment, or article posted. I just didn't think their numbers added up and therefore wasn't a valid article to make that claim. No one seemed to question the article or the claim, but to me the numbers didn't add up, to me it seemed like there was some clear bias and fudging of some labels to make that statement. Just calling the article out for what I saw in it.
You asked GB to explain low voter turnout, and I just don't buy his explanation of work. It is incredibly easy to vote. I just think anyone who has a remote interest in doing so can with little difficulty.
The comment about protesters wasn't meant to target anyone, for all I know they all voted. I just think it would be an interesting study to see if they actually did, and why they didn't if they didn't.0 -
Post gradbrianlux said:mace1229 said:Its not just the voting polls. I can't find a single article that places the number of overall libs higher than cons in this country. But according to this poll it isn't even close.
When I googled number of liberals and conservatives, every one put the number of conservatives higher. I actually thought it was essentially equal, but reading through the first several sources they all quoted conservatives as a higher number.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/there-are-more-liberals-but-not-fewer-conservatives/
that was like the 7th article down and I stopped looking after that.
So you don't find it odd that every source reports the overall number of conservatives higher, except for this poll? That doesn't make you question the source and motives of this poll and how they classified people as conservative or liberal?Post edited by mace1229 on0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help