America's Gun Violence
Comments
- 
            
all solid points bud. You hitting up the seattle oar wrigley shows?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lolI'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 - 
            mcgruff10 said:
all solid points bud. You hitting up the seattle oar wrigley shows?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
Seattle (I hope... I'm just a tad concerned re: the ticket situation).
You getting your ass out to the west coast or no? We can meet up... go for some chowder... and drink a bunch of IPAs!"My brain's a good brain!"0 - 
            
I'm not sure how many nights of coverage we have with the kids so seattle doesn't seem worth it for such a short amount of time. I'm heading to chicago night 2 this time around.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:
all solid points bud. You hitting up the seattle oar wrigley shows?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
Seattle (I hope... I'm just a tad concerned re: the ticket situation).
You getting your ass out to the west coast or no? We can meet up... go for some chowder... and drink a bunch of IPAs!I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 - 
            mcgruff10 said:
I'm not sure how many nights of coverage we have with the kids so seattle doesn't seem worth it for such a short amount of time. I'm heading to chicago night 2 this time around.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:
all solid points bud. You hitting up the seattle oar wrigley shows?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
Seattle (I hope... I'm just a tad concerned re: the ticket situation).
You getting your ass out to the west coast or no? We can meet up... go for some chowder... and drink a bunch of IPAs!
Once the last kid moves out and you become 'empty nesters' (approximately 2031)... we can make some solid plans!"My brain's a good brain!"0 - 
            
deal!Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:
I'm not sure how many nights of coverage we have with the kids so seattle doesn't seem worth it for such a short amount of time. I'm heading to chicago night 2 this time around.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:
all solid points bud. You hitting up the seattle oar wrigley shows?Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
Seattle (I hope... I'm just a tad concerned re: the ticket situation).
You getting your ass out to the west coast or no? We can meet up... go for some chowder... and drink a bunch of IPAs!
Once the last kid moves out and you become 'empty nesters' (approximately 2031)... we can make some solid plans!I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 - 
            
Way to make the point for us LOL.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
0 - 
            
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 - 
            I was once at a party at my buddy's cottage. his dad kept his hunting rifle on a mount above the fireplace. no one knew if it was loaded or not. But at one point, two guys started having an argument and one grabbed the gun and was pointing it, point blank, in other's face, while the one being pointed at was screaming "DO IT! DO IT!". the guy's finger was on the trigger. I was flipping the fuck out, just wanting him to put the gun down in case there was a round left in it.
we have pictures from parties there with people posing with this fucking thing (not me, never touched it). Good thing no one was ever hurt.
this was the same gun that I mentioned previously had been confiscated after his dad died.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 - 
            
With that line of thinking, one could also say that having a gun in the house also increases the odds of you stopping a burglary with a gun...etc, etc, etc.Smellyman said:
Way to make the point for us LOL.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
It’s somewhat of a moot point.0 - 
            
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
0 - 
            
but if you store the gun properly and safely, there's pretty much zero chance of it helping you in a break in.PJPOWER said:
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4g8777
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 - 
            
Evidently you missed the quick access safe discussion we had a while back. There are plenty of options out there that provide quick access as well as safe storing. Bedside biometric or coded handgun safes have been around a while now. Most gun owners I know have some variant of them.HughFreakingDillon said:
but if you store the gun properly and safely, there's pretty much zero chance of it helping you in a break in.PJPOWER said:
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4g87770 - 
            
I did miss that, and that's great. But I'd like to see stats on what percentage of gun owners actually have them, and how affordable such a thing really is.PJPOWER said:
Evidently you missed the quick access safe discussion we had a while back. There are plenty of options out there that provide quick access as well as safe storing. Bedside biometric or coded handgun safes have been around a while now. Most gun owners I know have some variant of them.HughFreakingDillon said:
but if you store the gun properly and safely, there's pretty much zero chance of it helping you in a break in.PJPOWER said:
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4g8777Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 - 
            
My handgun is stored in one. In addition every single rifle and shotgun I own has a trigger lock and is stored in a safe.HughFreakingDillon said:
I did miss that, and that's great. But I'd like to see stats on what percentage of gun owners actually have them, and how affordable such a thing really is.PJPOWER said:
Evidently you missed the quick access safe discussion we had a while back. There are plenty of options out there that provide quick access as well as safe storing. Bedside biometric or coded handgun safes have been around a while now. Most gun owners I know have some variant of them.HughFreakingDillon said:
but if you store the gun properly and safely, there's pretty much zero chance of it helping you in a break in.PJPOWER said:
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4g8777I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 - 
            
https://www.shootingandsafety.com/best-gun-safe-reviews/HughFreakingDillon said:
I did miss that, and that's great. But I'd like to see stats on what percentage of gun owners actually have them, and how affordable such a thing really is.PJPOWER said:
Evidently you missed the quick access safe discussion we had a while back. There are plenty of options out there that provide quick access as well as safe storing. Bedside biometric or coded handgun safes have been around a while now. Most gun owners I know have some variant of them.HughFreakingDillon said:
but if you store the gun properly and safely, there's pretty much zero chance of it helping you in a break in.PJPOWER said:
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4g8777
Pretty sure no stats have been tallied, but most of these are pretty affordable.
Anyone that does not lock their firearms up in some form or fashion is asking for trouble, in the same way someone that leaves draino (and Tide pods evidently) laying around is asking for trouble.
Post edited by PJPOWER on0 - 
            
Right on, same here.mcgruff10 said:
My handgun is stored in one. In addition every single rifle and shotgun I own has a trigger lock and is stored in a safe.HughFreakingDillon said:
I did miss that, and that's great. But I'd like to see stats on what percentage of gun owners actually have them, and how affordable such a thing really is.PJPOWER said:
Evidently you missed the quick access safe discussion we had a while back. There are plenty of options out there that provide quick access as well as safe storing. Bedside biometric or coded handgun safes have been around a while now. Most gun owners I know have some variant of them.HughFreakingDillon said:
but if you store the gun properly and safely, there's pretty much zero chance of it helping you in a break in.PJPOWER said:
I guess it is a matter of risk and mediating those risks. Having draino in the house increased the risk of a child drinking draino...that’s why you lock it up or keep it out of reach...Taking appropriate measures to prevent accidents mitigates many of the associated risks.HughFreakingDillon said:
the whole point of this, though, is that people argue they keep guns in their house for protection, when so often the opposite occurs; they end up shooting themselves or someone they care about instead of a big bad boogeyman.mcgruff10 said:
that's like saying if you have a fireplace in your home your chances of having a fire will increase. It's a pretty obvious statement Del.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
at'sHalifax2TheMax said:Another responsible gun owner, I’m sure.
Man Celebrating 21st Birthday Kills Himself Minutes After Accidentally Killing His Best Friend, Police Say - TIME https://apple.news/AejklQ_b8QCC23Gg7jEYHuA
Having a firearm in your household exponentially increases the likelihood of someone getting hurt or killed with it.
I have lots of beer in my house, my chances of getting drunk are increased.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4g87770 - 
            
That isn't completely true. I know very few people with a fence around their pool. My parents had a pool built just a couple years ago, had to get a city inspection for approval and everything. They were not allowed to have in ground lights in the walkway leading to the pool so they had to remove those. But nothing about fences. I think think you get an insurance discount with a fence, but there's nothing legal or illegal about it.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
I think I know of 1 person, my aunt, who has a fenced pool, but definiately isn't a requirement.
But I agree I think locking up a firearm should be a requirement, and if someone gets injured because you didn't, then you should be liable. So I agree completely with your analogy even though I'm not sure it is entirely accurate.
As soon as I wrote that I remembered what the law is. If your yard is fenced, that counts as a fenced pool. So legally as long as you have a fenced backyard (and who doesn't?) that met the legal requirement of a fenced pool. Insurance wouldn't give the fenced discount unless the fence was within a certain feet of the pool.
I think it depends on the state. Getting a gun in California wasn't very easy. Getting a pool is as long as you have the money. Getting a gun here in Colorado was pretty easy though. Every gun I bought in California I had to write the name and model of of an TFA approved gun safe and sign that I will keep my firearm in that safe. Not doing so would make me liable for injuries that resulted in me not properly storin gmy firearm. I had no problem with that, and would think that is a good requirement for every state.Post edited by mace1229 on0 - 
            
in canada you need a 6 foot fence around your yard if you have a pool or you don't get a permit.mace1229 said:
That isn't completely true. I know very few people with a fence around their pool. My parents had a pool built just a couple years ago, had to get a city inspection for approval and everything. They were not allowed to have in ground lights in the walkway leading to the pool so they had to remove those. But nothing about fences. I think think you get an insurance discount with a fence, but there's nothing legal or illegal about it.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
I think I know of 1 person, my aunt, who has a fenced pool, but definiately isn't a requirement.
But I agree I think locking up a firearm should be a requirement, and if someone gets injured because you didn't, then you should be liable. So I agree completely with your analogy even though I'm not sure it is entirely accurate.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 - 
            
Yeah, I remembered what insurance counts as a fence and what the city/local government did were two different things.HughFreakingDillon said:
in canada you need a 6 foot fence around your yard if you have a pool or you don't get a permit.mace1229 said:
That isn't completely true. I know very few people with a fence around their pool. My parents had a pool built just a couple years ago, had to get a city inspection for approval and everything. They were not allowed to have in ground lights in the walkway leading to the pool so they had to remove those. But nothing about fences. I think think you get an insurance discount with a fence, but there's nothing legal or illegal about it.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:mcgruff10 said:As I m looking into my yard I thought of: the chance of someone drowning in your backyard increases when you have a pool.
Well... seeing as you've brought it up... there are many by-laws to pool ownership aimed at public safety. For example, your pool needs to be fenced in so toddlers cannot make the mistake of accessing the pool and falling in. Homeowners are liable when accidents occur in their pools on their property if safety measures were neglected.
Weird eh? I mean... I know gun owners are 'encouraged' to lock their firearms up, but many don't and as a result... accidents occur. Gun owners are rarely held responsible for their negligence.
Guns are tools designed specifically to shoot a hole into something (to paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd: guns are made for killing... they ain't no good for nothing else). Pools are designed for leisure.
Pools have tougher restrictions than guns? Weird, man.
And no post of mine in this thread would be complete with one... good... 'YEE HAW GIT 'ER Dun'.
lol
I think I know of 1 person, my aunt, who has a fenced pool, but definiately isn't a requirement.
But I agree I think locking up a firearm should be a requirement, and if someone gets injured because you didn't, then you should be liable. So I agree completely with your analogy even though I'm not sure it is entirely accurate.0 - 
            Another responsible gun owner until he wasn’t.
http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/29/us/pennsylvania-car-wash-shooting/index.html
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Categories
- All Categories
 - 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
 - 110.1K The Porch
 - 278 Vitalogy
 - 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
 - 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
 - 39.2K Flea Market
 - 39.2K Lost Dogs
 - 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
 - 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
 - 29.1K Other Music
 - 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
 - 1.1K The Art Wall
 - 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
 - 22.2K A Moving Train
 - 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
 - 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help
 






