***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

1…122123125127128…513

Comments

  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    2018
    CM189191 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    The point was to get people on record.  58 is a starting point.  As things get worse for tRump, and they will, that number will only go up.
    but how many times are they going to take this to a vote before they start getting complacent? I feel it cheapens the process every time they throw a dart into the dark. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644
    JC29856 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    JC29856 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    even if something concrete did surface it would unlikely be anything Russia Russia Russia related or election related. based on what has turned up so far whatever it is will be 6 ways of separation something or other from 15 years ago. 
    problem now is that the gop are now calling for a special counsel to investigate the special counsel.
    it's a glorious time to be alive!


    mueller has requested trump's finances. don't be so quick to assume they won't find anything election related. it's still very early. 
    that has been disputed by trumps attorney and retracted by Bloomberg
    Spin, spin, 3D d'ing. Must be some news about to drop today. Or is it another shoe? Its not the crime, its the cover up of the crime.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    CM189191 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    The point was to get people on record.  58 is a starting point.  As things get worse for tRump, and they will, that number will only go up.
    but how many times are they going to take this to a vote before they start getting complacent? I feel it cheapens the process every time they throw a dart into the dark. 
    hopefully only twice
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    investigate the investigators

    https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-calls-doj-watchdog-explore-potential-conflicts-clinton-server
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited December 2017
    2018
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    I think the democrats are huge wusses for not doing it anyway. They still wouldn't have won that vote - I never once suspected they might have. But I think even though they knew they'd lose it because of the republicans, every single vote for it strengthens the message. I'm just mad it was so lopsided.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • pickupyourwill
    pickupyourwill Posts: 3,135
    edited December 2017
    2018
    It seems like the world is giving Trump an easy way out of the presidency right now, an easy way to write it in the history books without completely ruining his reputation and credibility.  Both Democrats and Republicans are having trouble with him.  Now, its seems though maybe most of the Republicans are on the same page with him, but now this whole Roy Moore and Flynn thing are putting a hole in their plans, just when their steam was picking up?   I don't know, seems like that's the only explanation for why they would back Moore.  They want all these inconvenient truths and facts to go away because they haven't had their full four years yet in the oval office.   I think, in the grand scheme of things, they fear that the Democrats are stronger and more progressive.  They know we're a threat.   I think the Republicans are just holding on for dear life.  And yes, I realize it shouldn't be that way.  It should be more bipartisan and peaceful.  Maybe if they could meet halfway and negotiate on more things like they were doing for awhile there?   I think it starts in smaller communities too.  I'm guilty as well of not speaking my full mind to Republicans around me.
    Post edited by pickupyourwill on
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,862
    edited December 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    byHughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    I think the democrats are huge wusses for not doing it anyway. They still wouldn't have won that vote - I never once suspected they might have. But I think even though they knew they'd lose it because of the republicans, every single vote for it strengthens the message. I'm just mad it was so lopsided.
    its a strategic decision and i support those who voted against.  there is a reason pelosi and schumer wont consider talk of impeachment publicly 

    if the vote shows legitimate numbers and split on D and R.  it corners the Rs, creates a boogeyman, and will result in a bigger showing at the 2018 midterms.   we know how trump and his supporters love boogeymen.  the narrative in every battleground will be: not only give our representative to the dems, it will be congress, and they are actively looking to boot our republican president and that may cost 1 or 2 supreme court justices... that will likely drive disenfranchised republicans back to the polls.  

    win the midterms, take congress... then they can pounce on trump if necessary, whether its mueller investigation stuff or any self inflicted fuckups.  
    this impeachment talk and voting now is a waste of time and counterproductive.  grandstanding

    its similar to how obama and the clintons have avoided sparring with trump to the point of near silence.  obama talks, we all agree with hom, but he hands trump an adversary to rile everyone up in his speeches.  it is something to campaign against.  without anything to campaign against, trump is awful as a candidate.  leave him in his echo chamber
    Post edited by MayDay10 on
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    2018
    Some good points.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    2019
    CM189191 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    The point was to get people on record.  58 is a starting point.  As things get worse for tRump, and they will, that number will only go up.
    Right. People didn't think they had a shot to impeach him now did they?
    www.myspace.com
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    2018
    The Juggler said:
    CM189191 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    The point was to get people on record.  58 is a starting point.  As things get worse for tRump, and they will, that number will only go up.
    Right. People didn't think they had a shot to impeach him now did they?
    I don't believe so. I just would have liked to have seen more Dems than that vote for it... but I think that because I think the reasons laid out in this first try and perfectly reasonable and provable. Unfortunately, the rules governing this issue are fucking stupid.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    2018
    JC29856 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    JC29856 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    even if something concrete did surface it would unlikely be anything Russia Russia Russia related or election related. based on what has turned up so far whatever it is will be 6 ways of separation something or other from 15 years ago. 
    problem now is that the gop are now calling for a special counsel to investigate the special counsel.
    it's a glorious time to be alive!


    mueller has requested trump's finances. don't be so quick to assume they won't find anything election related. it's still very early. 
    that has been disputed by trumps attorney and retracted by Bloomberg
    Deutche Bank has begun sending information about its dealings with Trump to investigators following the subpoena by Mueller. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    JC29856 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    JC29856 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Kat said:
    House Votes Down Trump Impeachment Resolution
    But 58 Democrats voted for impeachment.

    WASHINGTON ― Fifty-eight House Democrats voted to advance the impeachment of President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in direct defiance of the pleas of House Democratic leaders earlier in the day.

    A vote to table the impeachment resolution was agreed to 368-58, with four Democrats voting present and 126 other Democrats voting with Republicans to kill the resolution.

    It may seem like this was an overwhelming confirmation of Trump ― and it was, in the sense that no Republican voted to advance impeachment and more than two-thirds of Democrats joined their GOP colleagues ― but 58 Democratic votes is still a significant statement on impeachment.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/house-impeachment-donald-trump_us_5a28616be4b03ece02ffedd1?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



    What a bunch of fucking wimps.
    I can't profess to know much about the impeachment process, but they all probably knew, at this juncture anyway, that impeachment would never stick. it would be a waste of time and tax payer's money. do it when they have something concrete. 
    even if something concrete did surface it would unlikely be anything Russia Russia Russia related or election related. based on what has turned up so far whatever it is will be 6 ways of separation something or other from 15 years ago. 
    problem now is that the gop are now calling for a special counsel to investigate the special counsel.
    it's a glorious time to be alive!


    mueller has requested trump's finances. don't be so quick to assume they won't find anything election related. it's still very early. 
    that has been disputed by trumps attorney and retracted by Bloomberg
    Deutche Bank has begun sending information about its dealings with Trump to investigators following the subpoena by Mueller. 
    possibly...I'm going by this updated correction

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-05/deutsche-bank-said-to-be-subpoenaed-by-mueller
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644
    Yup, no Russia, Russia, Russia here. Nothingburgers abound. Its all about the unmasking and the wires tapped. Didn't know any of this 10-11 months ago either. Investigate the investigators because they made this shit up. Russia, Russia, Russia!

    In his session with the Intelligence Committee, Trump Jr. was pressed to detail what transpired on a call he had with the president about the Trump Tower meeting in July 2017, just days after the news of it broke. Trump Jr.’s email chain, you will recall, confirmed that he took this meeting — which was also attended by Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign chair Paul Manafort — in the full expectation that it would yield dirt on Hillary Clinton provided by the Russian government, which was trying to tip the election to his father. Trump Jr. declined to detail the conversation, on the grounds that lawyers for both Trump Jr. and his father were also on the call, meaning it is protected by attorney-client privilege, a claim Schiff rejects.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/12/07/donald-trump-jr-just-clammed-up-on-russia-republicans-may-help-him-do-it/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c:homepage/story&utm_term=.32a2179fb309
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,973
    Too funny. The con-man thinks crooks haven't tried that before. Father-son privilege? The judge will slap that down fast.


    Falling down,...not staying down
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    Kat said:
    Too funny. The con-man thinks crooks haven't tried that before. Father-son privilege? The judge will slap that down fast.



    Just think, he's supposed the be the smart one (besides Barron)


  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644
    We also didn't know about this 10-11 months ago. The funny thing is, these guys thought they could act like they did in the NYC real estate and business worlds. Politics/government, a whole different set of rules. Rules they had no clue about because Trump, the brilliant one, didn't have a clue about governing, governance or what his role in that circus ring was. So, mistakes were made. Mistakes that will lead to impeachment and jail time. Cheney and Bush would have been on Meet the Press sneering at the camera and daring you to indict them. Then gotten away with it. These guys? Not so much.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/07/politics/previously-undisclosed-emails-after-trump-tower-meeting/index.html
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644
    Perjury? Obstruction of justice? Lying under oath?

    The emails raise new questions for congressional investigators about what was discussed at Trump Tower. Trump Jr. has for months contended that after being promised he would get dirt on Hillary Clinton, the brief meeting focused almost exclusively on the issue of Russian adoptions, saying there was no discussion with the participants after that session.

    Goldstone's lawyer, Bob Gage, declined to comment. The White House also declined to comment for this story.

    What are they hiding?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644
    Beginning of the end?

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/07/politics/president-donald-trump-physical/index.html
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644
    edited December 2017
    If you’re wondering why it’s “impending” and not “immediate” like one former poster used to prattle on about, think about the complexity of the Mueller investigation and money laundering in general. But hey, there’s no ties to Russia, Russia, Russia!

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/massive-leak-reveals-new-ties-between-trump-administration-and-russia-implicating-commerce-secretary-wilbur-ross-and-jared-kushner

    Yea, Jared’s going to jail. He’s going to wish he was going to buy diamonds. At Jared’s of course.
    Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,644

    Communist News Network gets it right. When will RTN get up to speed on their reporting and commentariat?

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/opinions/its-time-to-start-talking-about-impeachment-louis/index.html

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©

Categories