America's Gun Violence

Options
1319320322324325903

Comments

  • Posts: 17,117
    rgambs said:
    At a certain point, when the bodies are piling up by the dozens, I simply no longer have any fucks to give about somebody's hobby.
  • San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    riley540 said:
    Hand guns are responsible for way more deaths than assault rifles. 
    gotta pick your battles i guess.  handguns are going nowhere.
  • San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    For me a gun is a gun. 
    I still cannot understand this need to"protect" or bare arms.
    Why does this seem to make a difference how many shots it can fire and how? 
    One bullet is too many. Why the fuck are people shooting anyone thats a question. 
    There is never a need for any human to carry a gun.
    If you shoot one person or 600. All wrong. Remove the gun it can't happen.
    All this bs about its not the gun its the person.come on.
    the world is full of paranoid cowards.  i don't say that in a light sense.  its true though.  get to know certain types of seemingly normal people and you'll see this deep fear and insecurity that only a weapon can cure.
  • Asia Posts: 4,528


    vaggar99 said:
    the world is full of paranoid cowards.  i don't say that in a light sense.  its true though.  get to know certain types of seemingly normal people and you'll see this deep fear and insecurity that only a weapon can cure.
    and then the ones who just get off on having firepower
  • Posts: 31,516
    We all know that nothing will happen from this event so let's not debate or argue amongst each other about gun control, it's a dead issue amongst our elected officials !
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    PJ_Soul said:
    I am talking about stalking prey in the wild. We are already doing more than enough to destroy nature, and if we don't have to go out there and shoot wild animals, then I don't think we should. If we weren't a bunch of parasites destroying Earth and the animals we share it with about as fast as possible, I probably would not be saying this. And if nobody got any pleasure out of hunting whatsoever I wouldn't saying it either, but nobody can claim that in developed countries the vast majority of hunting is about the sport far more than it is the food.
    I am 100% not saying we shouldn't eat other animals at all, nor that I think steaks need to be made in a lab (although I wouldn't be against that if it was possible and tasted good - that would be insanely beneficial for environmental reasons and humane reasons - meat without the damage raising meat causes and without any death?? Count me in!! I have no idea why anyone would prefer to kill for meat if they could get it without killing. Surely that isn't what you meant).
    i know what you are referring to. but hunting on your own and using it for food takes agriculture, a major source of climate change, out of the picture. I don't like sport hunting any more than you do, but if it's for food, then to me it's neither here nor there if the person shooting is "enjoying it" or not. the fact is, they are using their own means and bypassing the "system", which, as I said above, is a major problem. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • Posts: 8,702
    We have murders almost 3x a week in my city and many more shootings that end up survivable.  Vast majority are from handguns.  I’m willing to bet that a lot of them were not obtained using the proper channels.  Not sure how you solve those issues.  It’s just very sad. Obviously you do your best to never venture into those neighborhoods but the threat of someone shooting up the grocery store always exists.  
  • Smellyman said:


    and then the ones who just get off on having firepower
    Guilty.  It's recreation for me.  I don't expect you to understand it...
  • Posts: 6,499
    I am quite perplexed that there have been no responses to the 538 article that I posted earlier.  I know that there are some strong 538 fans around here...

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/mass-shootings-are-a-bad-way-to-understand-gun-violence/
    “You could, theoretically, cut down on all these deaths with a blanket removal of guns from the U.S. entirely — something that is as politically unlikely as it is legally untenable.”
    There is no magic spell that is just going to make guns go away in the US, but as the article suggests, many other things could change.  The same changes that may stop a mass shooting would do little to stop other forms of gun violence.  Personally, I am a big supporter of individual responsibilities.  There are no quick fixes that are going to guarantee that this sort of thing will not happen again.  That’s reality.  That being said, what could an average person be doing on top of bitching about politics on an AMT forum?  Go to the fucking active shooter awareness classes that many cities make available for free.  They teach you to be aware of basic warning signs that could help a person recognize potentially unsafe places.  Take some basic first aid classes (even just a CPR class is better than nothing).  Learn some simple techniques for staying somewhat calm and focused during chaos.  Take a firearm safety course (whether or not you are a gun owner), that way you can educate your friends and family about firearm safety.  
    Do not take this to mean that I am telling you to stop whatever fight you are trying to win in the gun debate, but think of it as supplemental education.  If saving lives is truly the main goal, then fucking learn some life saving techniques.  They may not stop a person from raining down gunfire on a bunch of people, but may save a few lives when, yes “when”, another event like this takes place.  This is stuff you could do today instead of waiting for some unlikely gun control measure to be implemented that would effectively end crazy people doing crazy things.
  • Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,124
    edited October 2017
    "...while serving in the militia.."

    John Paul Stevens said that the 2nd amendment was likely intended to have included those FIVE WORDS so that arming state militias would be considered constitutional.  NOT the arming of every citizen.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-five-extra-words-that-can-fix-the-second-amendment/2014/04/11/f8a19578-b8fa-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html?utm_term=.37deeefa795d
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • Posts: 9,823
    Guilty.  It's recreation for me.  I don't expect you to understand it...
    Me too. I don't get the comments about getting off with them or compensation for something else.
    Now mine are mostly .22s, and the ones that aren't are bolt or lever action,  I don't have anything that could even be modified to replicate automatic fire. I don't know why anyone who has a different hobby thinks we are getting off with it. I just ignore it and chalk it up to one of those from the party of tolerance being intolerant of anyone who has a different belief or even hobby now than they do.
  • Posts: 6,499
    edited October 2017
    "...while serving in the militia.."

    John Paul Stevens said that the 2nd amendment was likely intended to have included those FIVE WORDS so that arming state militias would be considered constitutional.  NOT the arming of every citizen.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-five-extra-words-that-can-fix-the-second-amendment/2014/04/11/f8a19578-b8fa-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html?utm_term=.37deeefa795d
    Meh, nothing new here that hasn’t been debated a thousand times.  For every lawyer saying firearms are only for militias, there is one defining a militia as “every able bodied male” or defining the 2nd in another way...Removing the right of “the people” to arm themselves is “politically unlikely and legally untenable”-From the 538 article I posted earlier.  Pointless debate at this point in my opinion...
  • Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,228
    dignin said:
    Even if his macho self had a gun what exactly was he going to do? He probably was going to be suspected as a shooter or THE shooter.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Posts: 4,619
    dignin said:
    He is an interesting human being. But I don’t see the point you are trying to make? Guy tried to save his own life first, like most people would, and then the rest is up for debate. He said/she said all over the article. What do you want him to do? 
    Pittsburgh 2013
    Cincinnati 2014
    Greenville 2016
    (Raleigh 2016)
    Columbia 2016
  • Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    mace1229 said:
    Me too. I don't get the comments about getting off with them or compensation for something else.
    Now mine are mostly .22s, and the ones that aren't are bolt or lever action,  I don't have anything that could even be modified to replicate automatic fire. I don't know why anyone who has a different hobby thinks we are getting off with it. I just ignore it and chalk it up to one of those from the party of tolerance being intolerant of anyone who has a different belief or even hobby now than they do.
    it's all based in anger because of the atrocities committed. I know it's probably difficult, but try not to take it personally. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • Posts: 6,499
    He is an interesting human being. But I don’t see the point you are trying to make? Guy tried to save his own life first, like most people would, and then the rest is up for debate. He said/she said all over the article. What do you want him to do? 
    Exactly, I had never even heard of this dude before.  Sounds like he survived and came back to help though...Did he act inappropriately and potentially put others in danger like the drunk idiots standing up and flipping off the shooter?  He escaped and then accessed the situation...nothing wrong with that.
  • PJPOWER said:
    I am quite perplexed that there have been no responses to the 538 article that I posted earlier.  I know that there are some strong 538 fans around here...

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/mass-shootings-are-a-bad-way-to-understand-gun-violence/
    “You could, theoretically, cut down on all these deaths with a blanket removal of guns from the U.S. entirely — something that is as politically unlikely as it is legally untenable.”
    There is no magic spell that is just going to make guns go away in the US, but as the article suggests, many other things could change.  The same changes that may stop a mass shooting would do little to stop other forms of gun violence.  Personally, I am a big supporter of individual responsibilities.  There are no quick fixes that are going to guarantee that this sort of thing will not happen again.  That’s reality.  That being said, what could an average person be doing on top of bitching about politics on an AMT forum?  Go to the fucking active shooter awareness classes that many cities make available for free.  They teach you to be aware of basic warning signs that could help a person recognize potentially unsafe places.  Take some basic first aid classes (even just a CPR class is better than nothing).  Learn some simple techniques for staying somewhat calm and focused during chaos.  Take a firearm safety course (whether or not you are a gun owner), that way you can educate your friends and family about firearm safety.  
    Do not take this to mean that I am telling you to stop whatever fight you are trying to win in the gun debate, but think of it as supplemental education.  If saving lives is truly the main goal, then fucking learn some life saving techniques.  They may not stop a person from raining down gunfire on a bunch of people, but may save a few lives when, yes “when”, another event like this takes place.  This is stuff you could do today instead of waiting for some unlikely gun control measure to be implemented that would effectively end crazy people doing crazy things.

    So in other words... get used to it.

    Unbelievable.

    Actually it's not. You guys elected Donald Trump. If you have the collective mindset to do that... why would anyone think you'd be wise enough to solve your gun problem which is far easier than gun advocates make it out to be?

    Simply put: the will to solve the problem isn't there. You guys would rather have Sandy Hooks than relinquish the opportunity to shoot machine guns at empty beer cans at the landfill.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Posts: 6,499
    edited October 2017

    So in other words... get used to it.

    Unbelievable.

    Actually it's not. You guys elected Donald Trump. If you have the collective mindset to do that... why would anyone think you'd be wise enough to solve your gun problem which is far easier than gun advocates make it out to be?

    Simply put: the will to solve the problem isn't there. You guys would rather have Sandy Hooks than relinquish the opportunity to shoot machine guns at empty beer cans at the landfill.
    No, do not ”get used to it” for fucks sake.  Keep trying to solve the gun problem, but the odds are that something like this will happen again before any real policies make a difference.  So *also* do your part in personally trying to be as diligent and educated as possible.  Do not be a sheep.  Unbelievable indeed...
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • PJPOWER said:
    No, do not ”get used to it” for fucks sake.  Keep trying to solve the gun problem, but the odds are that something like this will happen again before any real policies make a difference.  So *also* do your part in personally trying to be as diligent and educated as possible.  Do not be a sheep.  Unbelievable indeed...

    You submitted a post that encourages people to be prepared for mass shootings.

    To me... that says 'get used to it'.

    The answer is simple, Power, whether you care to admit it or not. I stand by my statement: the will to change is not there. Your country is willing to feature mass shootings so that people can shoot shit with cool guns.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
This discussion has been closed.