Details about pressing the re-issues

I haven't seen anything about how these are going to be re-issued other than remixed. Are they using original tapes? Are they getting mastered for vinyl? Will it be an all analog pressing? Where is it being pressed? Is it 150 gram pressing?
«1345

Comments

  • I would love to know provenance information as well. This band is religion for a lot of us and I wish they treated their archives and releases with the care and respect the music deserves. 

    Fyi, Santos said that binaural and riot act will be remastered (but where and by who?) and avocado will be both remixed and remastered. I assume Brendan o'brien is doing the remix. 

    I'd like to know:
    - are these coming from original sources? We don't know definitively if the masters for these albums are analog or digital. Either way, what are the sources? 
    - who is remastering the albums?
    - where (and by who) are the lacquers being cut?
    - where are the records being plated and pressed? 
    - are these all double LPs?
    96 Hartford | 98 MSG 1 & 2 | 00 Jones Beach | 03 MSG 1 & 2 | 06 Irving Plaza | 06 Camden | 06 E. Rutherford | 08 MSG 1 & 2 | 10 MSG 1 & 2 | 11 EV/Portland | 13 Wrigley | 13 Brooklyn 1 & 2 | 13 Hartford | 13 Portland | 13 Seattle | 14 Stockholm | 17 EV/Tennessee | 18 Missoula
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,461
    Worthless pursuit IMO.
    www.cluthelee.com
  • kramer73
    kramer73 Posts: 2,636
    Worthless pursuit IMO.
    yep
  • fluff4u
    fluff4u Posts: 202
    Why is it worthless?
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,461
    fluff4u said:
    Why is it worthless?
    They've never released those kind of details.
    www.cluthelee.com
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    fluff4u said:
    Why is it worthless?
    They've never released those kind of details.
    Because if they told you, they'd have to kill you.
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,461
    dankind said:
    fluff4u said:
    Why is it worthless?
    They've never released those kind of details.
    Because if they told you, they'd have to kill you.
    :lol:
    www.cluthelee.com
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,461

    www.cluthelee.com
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 10,447
    edited September 2017
    You can make some inferences based on previous pressings. 

    These will most likely be digitally sourced, possibly cut by John Golden (maybe mastered there too?), pressed at CZ or MPO.

    I mean, most of what you want to know is in the deadwax, if it isn't then it was some shlub who cut it. If they were all analog source you better believe that they would be advertising is. Its just nt worth sweating over.



     
    Post edited by Tim Simmons on
  • fluff4u said:
    Why is it worthless?
    They've never released those kind of details.
    You're 100% right. I don't get the lack of transparency though. Why hide that info like it were the secret KFC recipe? 
    96 Hartford | 98 MSG 1 & 2 | 00 Jones Beach | 03 MSG 1 & 2 | 06 Irving Plaza | 06 Camden | 06 E. Rutherford | 08 MSG 1 & 2 | 10 MSG 1 & 2 | 11 EV/Portland | 13 Wrigley | 13 Brooklyn 1 & 2 | 13 Hartford | 13 Portland | 13 Seattle | 14 Stockholm | 17 EV/Tennessee | 18 Missoula
  • lolobugg
    lolobugg BLUE RDGE MTNS Posts: 8,195
    edited September 2017

    BK5403 said:
    fluff4u said:
    Why is it worthless?
    They've never released those kind of details.
    You're 100% right. I don't get the lack of transparency though. Why hide that info like it were the secret KFC recipe? 

    Ten-finger licken'

    Vs- finger licken'

    Vitalogy- finger licken'

    No Code- finger licken'

    Yield- finger licken'

    Binaural- finger licken'

    Riot Act- finger licken'

    livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446

    1995- New Orleans, LA  : New Orleans, LA

    1996- Charleston, SC

    1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN

    2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN

    2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA

    2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)

    2006- Cincinnati, OH

    2008- Columbia, SC

    2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2

    2010- Bristow, VA

    2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL

    2012- Atlanta, GA

    2013- Charlotte, NC

    2014- Cincinnati, OH

    2015- New York, NY

    2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA

    2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY

    2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2

    2020- Nashville, TN 

    2022- Smashville 

    2023- Austin, TX x2

    2024- Baltimore

  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • PSUS2H
    PSUS2H USA Posts: 2,406
    BK5403 said:
    fluff4u said:
    Why is it worthless?
    They've never released those kind of details.
    You're 100% right. I don't get the lack of transparency though. Why hide that info like it were the secret KFC recipe? 
    Especially considering how seasoned their vinyl clientele are.
    Pittsburgh, PA September 28, 2005 || Washington, DC June 22, 2008 || Barstow, VA May 13, 2010 || Seattle, WA  August 10, 2018 || Dana Point, CA September 29, 2018 (EV) || Dana Point, CA September 28, 2019 (EV) || Dana Point, CA September 25, 2021 (EV) || Dana Point, CA October 1, 2021 || Dana Point, CA October 2, 2021 || Chicago, IL August 29, 2024 || Pittsburgh, PA May 16, 2025 || Pittsburgh, PA May 18, 2025
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 10,447
    Also, last years reissues were pressed well. I'm guessing these will follow suit. 

  • MedozK
    MedozK Tennessee Posts: 9,212
    edited September 2017
    You can make some inferences based on previous pressings. 

    These will most likely be digitally sourced, possibly cut by John Golden (maybe mastered there too?), pressed at CZ or MPO.

    I mean, most of what you want to know is in the deadwax, if it isn't then it was some shlub who cut it. If they were all analog source you better believe that they would be advertising is. Its just nt worth sweating over.
    Hopefully not Golden. I think Daniel Krieger has done a wonderful job so far on the reissues (Yield and No Code).
    I hope he has re-cut all 10 for the box.
    Post edited by MedozK on
  • Shyner
    Shyner Posts: 1,226

    I think they'll be analog myself. 
    I have no clue about anything 


    PJ is da best 
  • Shyner said:

    I think they'll be analog myself. 
    I have no clue about anything 


    PJ is da best 
    I feel like if they were all analog that would've been emphasized as a huge selling point.
  • fluff4u
    fluff4u Posts: 202
    I don't understand why they won't just tell us what we want to know? It comes up every time they release vinyl. What's the big secret? Why not be transparent? 
  • drummerboy_73
    drummerboy_73 Las Vegas, NV Posts: 2,011
    fluff4u said:
    I don't understand why they won't just tell us what we want to know? It comes up every time they release vinyl. What's the big secret? Why not be transparent? 
    Does transparent vinyl sound as good as solid black? :D
    Osaka, Japan (2/21/95), San Diego (7/10/98), Las Vegas (10/22/00), San Diego (10/25/00), Las Vegas (6/6/03), Las Vegas (7/6/06), Los Angeles (7/9/06), VH1 Rock Honors (7/12/08), Ed Solo (7/8/11), Ed Solo (11/1/12), Los Angeles (11/23/13)
  • fluff4u said:
    I don't understand why they won't just tell us what we want to know? It comes up every time they release vinyl. What's the big secret? Why not be transparent? 
    Because they wouldn't sell as much when people realize that they're buying vinyl sourced from digital tape? Oh, never mind. People see the word "vinyl" and automatically assume it must be better than digital. So, yeah, what's the big secret?