The Worst Movie Ever?

1235

Comments

  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    ed243421 said:
    tbergs said:
    dankind said:
    tbergs said:
    No Coder said:
    dankind said:
    Fight Club.

    Let's be fuckin real. You're not a 15 year old alpha male anymore. Fight Club was never as god damn epic as you made it out to be.
    I never liked it. Or any film by David Fincher, for that matter. 

    To be fair, I want to like Zodiac. At least there's no gimmick to it, and I recognize Fincher's talent. It's just too damn obvious for my taste, though. No subtlety or nuance whatsoever. Kind of Oliver Stone-y.

    Christopher Nolan is another one I don't really like. Also gimmicky, and unoriginal with his gimmicks. The backward Seinfeld  episode did it first and much better. Unlike Fincher, I do still give his films a chance. They still look great despite their lame attempts at being cerebral. The only Nolan film I've actually enjoyed so far was the Batman one with Hardy as Bane. I missed Interstellar, but I hear that one is good. 


    I like most of Fincher's work and loved Fight Club, but must admit to not having watched it in over 10 years, so not sure what I'd think now, but still think I would enjoy it - certainly wouldn't dislike it. I LOVED The Game and Se7en is a favourite of mine.


    As for Nolan, I think he is a genius! Memento, Inception and Interstellar are all time great movies and his Batman Trillogy are the best Super hero movies by a long way for me - all of coarse in my opinion. Can't wait to see Dunkirk

    Agreed. Momento was amazing and something no one had done. I remember seeing it in an art house theater and being blown away. Then there was Inception. Nolan just rewrites the rules and isn't rehashing old scripts and ideas.
    Watching a Fincher film to me is like being hit across the face with a brick.

    As for Memento, again, nothing original about it--Seinfeld did it first. And better. I will give Nolan credit for something, though: By sucking all the joy out of Batman and making those films bubblegum-pop thinkpieces for mindless millennials, the whiff of something posing as cerebral somehow got chicks to show up at the cinema for a comic book movie. That in itself was a huge win for nerds everywhere. I can't say the same for Burton's more whimsical Batman flicks.
    Well, I'm not a millennial, but I liked the more serious take on Batman. I think parts of the original movie are a bit cheesy and I prefer Burton's darker take in Batman Returns. So you really think Nolan's Batman got chicks to show up at the cinema? Never saw any of those films appealing to millennials and chicks. Seemed like the opposite of anything Nolan directs.

    As for Memento, why does it matter so much that Seinfeld did it "first"? It's not even comparable. A comedy show in a 22 minute segment and a 2 hour movie production. Also, if we're splitting hairs, Nolan's brother actually pitched the plot and wrote the original script in '96, well before the Seinfeld episode aired. It just takes longer with movies. And honestly the budget wasn't that much different! 

    Memento and that Seinfeld episode were inspired by a play titled "betrayal", later made into a movie in 1983
    Exactly! Love Pinter. I saw the Broadway production with Daniel Craig a few years back. 

    Not the best Pinter production I've seen -- that honor goes to the Stewart/McKellan No Man's Land -- but pretty damn good. 
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,903
    edited July 2017
    I think Tree of Life SUCKED. I absolutely hated it. A movie has never been so pointlessly pretentious, and few film characters have been as unlikable as that stupid asshole son of theirs. The only good part in the movie was when he died, lol.

    However, I'm not sure most people here are taking the word "worst" seriously enough, lol. You don't get into the worst movie ever realm until you're talking about shit that is even worse than the likes of Sharknado or something. My vote is for either Left Behind: World at War (that's the third of the Left Behind Trilogy, those religious propaganda films starring Kirk Cameron... oddly, the first one was remade with Nicholas Cage recently, lol, That also sucked, but not as much), or for Cannibal Holocaust (1980), and that is solely because there is real life animal torture in it - they did not fake any of that. The animals were really mutilated and killed on film. So that alone makes it a very easy contender for worst movie ever IMO.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Who Princess
    Who Princess out here in the fields Posts: 7,305
    dankind said:
    Yeah, I was one of the nerds in line for the midnight Batman showings, and about half of those waiting with me each time were women, many of them not accompanying some nerd SO. They were there of their own free will to watch a comic book movie. (Wish I could say the same for my poor wife. Although she never complains if Thor is in the picture. :lol: )
    Clearly, your wife is an intelligent person.  :grin:
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • No Coder
    No Coder Brisbane Posts: 1,126
    tbergs said:
    dankind said:
    tbergs said:
    No Coder said:
    dankind said:
    Fight Club.

    Let's be fuckin real. You're not a 15 year old alpha male anymore. Fight Club was never as god damn epic as you made it out to be.
    I never liked it. Or any film by David Fincher, for that matter. 

    To be fair, I want to like Zodiac. At least there's no gimmick to it, and I recognize Fincher's talent. It's just too damn obvious for my taste, though. No subtlety or nuance whatsoever. Kind of Oliver Stone-y.

    Christopher Nolan is another one I don't really like. Also gimmicky, and unoriginal with his gimmicks. The backward Seinfeld  episode did it first and much better. Unlike Fincher, I do still give his films a chance. They still look great despite their lame attempts at being cerebral. The only Nolan film I've actually enjoyed so far was the Batman one with Hardy as Bane. I missed Interstellar, but I hear that one is good. 


    I like most of Fincher's work and loved Fight Club, but must admit to not having watched it in over 10 years, so not sure what I'd think now, but still think I would enjoy it - certainly wouldn't dislike it. I LOVED The Game and Se7en is a favourite of mine.


    As for Nolan, I think he is a genius! Memento, Inception and Interstellar are all time great movies and his Batman Trillogy are the best Super hero movies by a long way for me - all of coarse in my opinion. Can't wait to see Dunkirk

    Agreed. Momento was amazing and something no one had done. I remember seeing it in an art house theater and being blown away. Then there was Inception. Nolan just rewrites the rules and isn't rehashing old scripts and ideas.
    Watching a Fincher film to me is like being hit across the face with a brick.

    As for Memento, again, nothing original about it--Seinfeld did it first. And better. I will give Nolan credit for something, though: By sucking all the joy out of Batman and making those films bubblegum-pop thinkpieces for mindless millennials, the whiff of something posing as cerebral somehow got chicks to show up at the cinema for a comic book movie. That in itself was a huge win for nerds everywhere. I can't say the same for Burton's more whimsical Batman flicks.
    Well, I'm not a millennial, but I liked the more serious take on Batman. I think parts of the original movie are a bit cheesy and I prefer Burton's darker take in Batman Returns. So you really think Nolan's Batman got chicks to show up at the cinema? Never saw any of those films appealing to millennials and chicks. Seemed like the opposite of anything Nolan directs.

    As for Memento, why does it matter so much that Seinfeld did it "first"? It's not even comparable. A comedy show in a 22 minute segment and a 2 hour movie production. Also, if we're splitting hairs, Nolan's brother actually pitched the plot and wrote the original script in '96, well before the Seinfeld episode aired. It just takes longer with movies. And honestly the budget wasn't that much different! 


    I'd never seen anything like Memento when I first saw it on release and thought the acting was brilliant. I love Seinfeld, but never saw a link between the 2 due to their differences in delivery. But I didn't think about it too much either

    I love the dark tones in his movies and can't think of a movie he has done that I haven't thoroughly enjoyed. What he did with the Batman movies, was perfect for me, because I have trouble enjoying most of the super hero movies due to their lack of story line and reliance on wrecking cities.

    I'll ride the wave where it takes me

    *BEC, Brisbane, March 1995
    *BEC, Brisbane, March 1998
    *BEC, Brisbane, November 2006
    *QSAC, Brisbane November 2009
    *EV Solo, QPAC, Brisbane March 10 and 12 2011
    *Big Day Out, Gold Coast, 19 Jan 2014
    *EV Solo, QPAC, Brisbane, 22,23 & 25 Feb 2014
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 18,028
    dankind said:
    . (Wish I could say the same for my poor wife. Although she never complains if Thor is in the picture. :lol: )

    My wife has the same attitude about Thor. She was bummed when I pointed out his haircut at the end of the trailer for Thor: Ragnarok.

    This weekend we rock Portland
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,860
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,500
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,903
    edited July 2017
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,500
    edited July 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    Yeah, I mean, it wasn't so much that I watch things to predict the ending, it's just that I knew he was a ghost all along and when the ending came I was like "Wait, that's the surprise? Well, duh, he died in the opening scene." I just kept hearing about the big surprise and I was expecting something other than what was blatantly obvious from the start. I guess I just don't understand how everyone didn't catch that.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,903
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    Yeah, I mean, it wasn't so much that I watch things to predict the ending, it's just that I knew he was a ghost all along and when the ending came I was like "Wait, that's the surprise? Well, duh, he died in the opening scene." I just kept hearing about the big surprise and I was expecting something other than what was blatantly obvious from the start. I guess I just don't understand how everyone didn't catch that.
    Oh, well maybe I didn't think that because I saw it really early, so the "news" about some kind of big surprise at the end hadn't reached me. I thought he'd survived the shooting - I took it at face value I guess at the time because there was no reason for me to be expecting any kind of twist. They didn't actually show him die. THey only showed him get shot, and then they cut to a year later where his marriage sucks and his career was in shambles, all as a result of him being shot by an ex-patient who he failed. Even now I don't think the part about him getting shot is the give-away at all. In retrospect, it is the fact that nobody besides the kid speaks to him directly that is the indicator, but I don't think that factor was obvious until you knew he was dead (sounds like you just guessed he was dead and you were right, haha!).
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,860
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    You are my kind of woman Soul!  Glad that there is someone else out there that enjoys it for what it is!
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    You are my kind of woman Soul!  Glad that there is someone else out there that enjoys it for what it is!
    Y'all have spent way too much time discussing one of the shittiest films of the past 20 years. 
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • Hobbes
    Hobbes Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,438
    The following scene is the wurst:

    https://youtu.be/XTMyG-HGppU
  • The Hours!!!!
    Hearts and thoughts they fade....
    fade away...

    I am at peace with my lust.....for Eddie.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,011
    dankind said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    You are my kind of woman Soul!  Glad that there is someone else out there that enjoys it for what it is!
    Y'all have spent way too much time discussing one of the shittiest films of the past 20 years. 
    hm. I thought the Sixth Sense was fucking brilliant. I'm usually pretty good at predicting outcomes of movies, but that one, ZERO idea. ZERO. I guess, like PJ Soul, I wasn't expecting any kind of twist. I didn't know who shmalamadingdong was. I just heard it was a great movie. and it was. 
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • RogueStoner
    RogueStoner Sunny AZ Posts: 1,716
    dankind said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    You are my kind of woman Soul!  Glad that there is someone else out there that enjoys it for what it is!
    Y'all have spent way too much time discussing one of the shittiest films of the past 20 years. 
    hm. I thought the Sixth Sense was fucking brilliant. I'm usually pretty good at predicting outcomes of movies, but that one, ZERO idea. ZERO. I guess, like PJ Soul, I wasn't expecting any kind of twist. I didn't know who shmalamadingdong was. I just heard it was a great movie. and it was. 
    I liked Sixth Sense. Still do. It made me scream out loud in the theater. Granted, I was hella pregnant so maybe a bit more jumpy than usual, but still liked it. 

  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    dankind said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I've never understood how anyone could've been surprised at the end of The Sixth Sense.
    I was.  I get entrenched in a movie.  I don't look for metaphors, I don't look for symbolism.  I just enjoy it...

    That being said I hated the new Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  What a steamy pile that was.  I tried to like it and couldn't...
    I just thought it was pretty obvious from the opening scene.  I actually didn't catch much of the symbolism until I watched the extras & commentary on the DVD. That made me appreciate the film a bit more.
    I am usually able to totally stay in the moment with a movie. Where it may or may not go or how it will end literally never crosses my mind one way or the other when I'm watching a good film (I will start thinking about it if it's a bad film because I'm bored or appalled enough for my mind to wander). So when I watched the Sixth Sense my brain didn't even question what may have been obvious - I just watched it moment to moment, so watching it that way I never predicted the ending. I have found, though, that I'm in a very small minority there. Most people I've known don't watch movies quite that way, and they tend to predict what is going to happen next or whatever. I just don't go there.
    You are my kind of woman Soul!  Glad that there is someone else out there that enjoys it for what it is!
    Y'all have spent way too much time discussing one of the shittiest films of the past 20 years. 
    hm. I thought the Sixth Sense was fucking brilliant. I'm usually pretty good at predicting outcomes of movies, but that one, ZERO idea. ZERO. I guess, like PJ Soul, I wasn't expecting any kind of twist. I didn't know who shmalamadingdong was. I just heard it was a great movie. and it was. 
    I liked Sixth Sense. Still do. It made me scream out loud in the theater. Granted, I was hella pregnant so maybe a bit more jumpy than usual, but still liked it. 

    Dumb.
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • RogueStoner
    RogueStoner Sunny AZ Posts: 1,716
    Bite me, Dan. :hug:
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    Bite me, Dan. :hug:

    I SAW PEARL JAM