***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***
Comments
-
Actually testifying under oath and stating that you're 100% willing to do so are two completely different things. I look forward to seeing how that works out for the Donald. Probably more hard to follow MSM links and brilliantly disappearing headlines.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
^^^
I get dizzy from vomiting after reading their spew all day. It's relentless fluff that means nothing and the outcome will mean even less for President Trump.0 -
Semantics. Enough already. Who is stalling in getting President Trump to go under oath? Do it already.Halifax2TheMax said:Actually testifying under oath and stating that you're 100% willing to do so are two completely different things. I look forward to seeing how that works out for the Donald. Probably more hard to follow MSM links and brilliantly disappearing headlines.
You look forward to seeing how it works out for him over every single thing - so far nothing has happened. It's always "Hey look at this big juicy carrot I have against President Trump wait and see how this takes him down"! Yet it never does, always waiting.
0 -
If relentless fluff that means nothing is so undesirable for you, then why do you keep posting Trump's fabrications and self-agrandizing statements? They are (at least) as unsubstantial and/or unsubstantiated as what the MSM spews.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
I get dizzy from vomiting after reading their spew all day. It's relentless fluff that means nothing and the outcome will mean even less for President Trump.
Why do you believe in Trumpian exceptionalism; why should he be exempt from the criticisms you attribute to posters here and the MSM (namely immediate deliverables)?
Some ask for impeachment, he asks for a border wall, a travel ban, the best health care - which is closer to fruition?
Pro-impeachers hark on obstruction of justice and collusion with foreign bodies, he harks on DNC obstruction (instead of conceding to the fact that bills being submitted are morally bankrupt in many cases) and the fact that he should have won the popular vote - why should one of these voices be silenced?
I'll readily admit I'd love if we could end the conversations on Trump's impeachment as well as Trump's nonsensical messages to the public, but to participate in sharing Trump's crap while being perturbed by the MSM's shows your inability to remove your own bias from your decision-making process, and entirely invalidates the points you're currently trying to make. Your words are nothing more than fallacious regurgitated propaganda which you've decided have the right to be disseminated unchecked because of the office they came from.
To any Americans reading this trash, please know that some of us Canadians are capable of seeking conclusions based on empirical evidence, and that we aren't all so easily deceived as this one was.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
My family built a house. Our contractor stole money from us. That case took seven years. Did you know that bureaucracies often take time to get things done? I'll repeat myself - if you don't want to talk about the impeachment proceedings, leave the god damn thread about impeachment proceedings.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Semantics. Enough already. Who is stalling in getting President Trump to go under oath? Do it already.Halifax2TheMax said:Actually testifying under oath and stating that you're 100% willing to do so are two completely different things. I look forward to seeing how that works out for the Donald. Probably more hard to follow MSM links and brilliantly disappearing headlines.
You look forward to seeing how it works out for him over every single thing - so far nothing has happened. It's always "Hey look at this big juicy carrot I have against President Trump wait and see how this takes him down"! Yet it never does, always waiting.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
I would be furious if it took seven years for my case to get resolved because of bureaucracies. There is approximately 7 1/2 years left of President Trump surely it wont take that long right? Until then discuss away the bureaucracy.benjs said:
My family built a house. Our contractor stole money from us. That case took seven years. Did you know that bureaucracies often take time to get things done? I'll repeat myself - if you don't want to talk about the impeachment proceedings, leave the god damn thread about impeachment proceedings.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Semantics. Enough already. Who is stalling in getting President Trump to go under oath? Do it already.Halifax2TheMax said:Actually testifying under oath and stating that you're 100% willing to do so are two completely different things. I look forward to seeing how that works out for the Donald. Probably more hard to follow MSM links and brilliantly disappearing headlines.
You look forward to seeing how it works out for him over every single thing - so far nothing has happened. It's always "Hey look at this big juicy carrot I have against President Trump wait and see how this takes him down"! Yet it never does, always waiting.
0 -
benjs said:
If relentless fluff that means nothing is so undesirable for you, then why do you keep posting Trump's fabrications and self-agrandizing statements? They are (at least) as unsubstantial and/or unsubstantiated as what the MSM spews.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
I get dizzy from vomiting after reading their spew all day. It's relentless fluff that means nothing and the outcome will mean even less for President Trump.
Why do you believe in Trumpian exceptionalism; why should he be exempt from the criticisms you attribute to posters here and the MSM (namely immediate deliverables)?
Some ask for impeachment, he asks for a border wall, a travel ban, the best health care - which is closer to fruition?
Pro-impeachers hark on obstruction of justice and collusion with foreign bodies, he harks on DNC obstruction (instead of conceding to the fact that bills being submitted are morally bankrupt in many cases) and the fact that he should have won the popular vote - why should one of these voices be silenced?
I'll readily admit I'd love if we could end the conversations on Trump's impeachment as well as Trump's nonsensical messages to the public, but to participate in sharing Trump's crap while being perturbed by the MSM's shows your inability to remove your own bias from your decision-making process, and entirely invalidates the points you're currently trying to make. Your words are nothing more than fallacious regurgitated propaganda which you've decided have the right to be disseminated unchecked because of the office they came from.
To any Americans reading this trash, please know that some of us Canadians are capable of seeking conclusions based on empirical evidence, and that we aren't all so easily deceived as this one was.
I never thought of my words as propaganda, that's a little extreme. Anyway President Trump was duly elected and there has been nothing but darts thrown at him every single step he takes when walking across the lawn of the WH or the golf course. Regardless I am not biased I just don't fall in the crowd of President Trump hate. To me that is propaganda. The impeachment process may be all fine and dandy with rules and such but that does not mean that others can't call for a speedier due process if the truth is so plainly defined. The impeachment steam is running out and only comes in wafts on TV.
0 -
We were furious. You are massively presumptive in suggesting a second term. I can't remove a bureaucracy by Monday, can you? Until then, discuss away how you circumvent defined structure.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I would be furious if it took seven years for my case to get resolved because of bureaucracies. There is approximately 7 1/2 years left of President Trump surely it wont take that long right? Until then discuss away the bureaucracy.benjs said:
My family built a house. Our contractor stole money from us. That case took seven years. Did you know that bureaucracies often take time to get things done? I'll repeat myself - if you don't want to talk about the impeachment proceedings, leave the god damn thread about impeachment proceedings.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Semantics. Enough already. Who is stalling in getting President Trump to go under oath? Do it already.Halifax2TheMax said:Actually testifying under oath and stating that you're 100% willing to do so are two completely different things. I look forward to seeing how that works out for the Donald. Probably more hard to follow MSM links and brilliantly disappearing headlines.
You look forward to seeing how it works out for him over every single thing - so far nothing has happened. It's always "Hey look at this big juicy carrot I have against President Trump wait and see how this takes him down"! Yet it never does, always waiting.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
No, it's not extreme. You ignore or repudiate when people prove your words, or the rhetoric of Trump, empirically false. You ignore a trend of almost perfectly fallacious arguments over a span of over half a year, and continue to post them as though there's no precedence for Trump being discredited. With that knowledge at hand, it is blatantly dishonest to call yourself anything but a propagandist. Not a shred of anything remotely empirical comes from your keyboard, and yet you spread the falsehoods like you're paid to do it.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:benjs said:
If relentless fluff that means nothing is so undesirable for you, then why do you keep posting Trump's fabrications and self-agrandizing statements? They are (at least) as unsubstantial and/or unsubstantiated as what the MSM spews.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
I get dizzy from vomiting after reading their spew all day. It's relentless fluff that means nothing and the outcome will mean even less for President Trump.
Why do you believe in Trumpian exceptionalism; why should he be exempt from the criticisms you attribute to posters here and the MSM (namely immediate deliverables)?
Some ask for impeachment, he asks for a border wall, a travel ban, the best health care - which is closer to fruition?
Pro-impeachers hark on obstruction of justice and collusion with foreign bodies, he harks on DNC obstruction (instead of conceding to the fact that bills being submitted are morally bankrupt in many cases) and the fact that he should have won the popular vote - why should one of these voices be silenced?
I'll readily admit I'd love if we could end the conversations on Trump's impeachment as well as Trump's nonsensical messages to the public, but to participate in sharing Trump's crap while being perturbed by the MSM's shows your inability to remove your own bias from your decision-making process, and entirely invalidates the points you're currently trying to make. Your words are nothing more than fallacious regurgitated propaganda which you've decided have the right to be disseminated unchecked because of the office they came from.
To any Americans reading this trash, please know that some of us Canadians are capable of seeking conclusions based on empirical evidence, and that we aren't all so easily deceived as this one was.
I never thought of my words as propaganda, that's a little extreme. Anyway President Trump was duly elected and there has been nothing but darts thrown at him every single step he takes when walking across the lawn of the WH or the golf course. Regardless I am not biased I just don't fall in the crowd of President Trump hate. To me that is propaganda. The impeachment process may be all fine and dandy with rules and such but that does not mean that others can't call for a speedier due process if the truth is so plainly defined. The impeachment steam is running out and only comes in wafts on TV.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
^^^I
I stated for an entire year during the election process that Donald Trump would win. I met the same mockery other people were subjected to on tv for stating such as well on here. It is no massively presumptuous to suggest again that he will win again a few years from now especially since there is nothing for President Trump to run against currently. I'm a propagandist now? There was empirical evidence coming from my keyboard the President Trump would win for an entire year and collectively the people who laughed did nothing to stop it. Please spare me the propaganda label. How do you circumvent a defined structure? - ask President Trump.
0 -
2019PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^I
I stated for an entire year during the election process that Donald Trump would win. I met the same mockery other people were subjected to on tv for stating such as well on here. It is no massively presumptuous to suggest again that he will win again a few years from now especially since there is nothing for President Trump to run against currently. I'm a propagandist now? There was empirical evidence coming from my keyboard the President Trump would win for an entire year and collectively the people who laughed did nothing to stop it. Please spare me the propaganda label. How do you circumvent a defined structure? - ask President Trump.
It can be circumvented by calling him what he is, a pathological liar who only cares about himself.
Peace*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)0 -
2019Oh I predicted that it would be the republicans turn to taKE office and they did so but this guy has failed to get much done other than get a Supreme Court judge nominated which wasn't very difficult to get done. I'd like see one instance where Trump speaks out or condemns the RUSSIANS on hacking into our election just ONE.
Peace*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)0 -
I only spread the word of your elected President to discuss. Please.benjs said:
No, it's not extreme. You ignore or repudiate when people prove your words, or the rhetoric of Trump, empirically false. You ignore a trend of almost perfectly fallacious arguments over a span of over half a year, and continue to post them as though there's no precedence for Trump being discredited. With that knowledge at hand, it is blatantly dishonest to call yourself anything but a propagandist. Not a shred of anything remotely empirical comes from your keyboard, and yet you spread the falsehoods like you're paid to do it.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:benjs said:
If relentless fluff that means nothing is so undesirable for you, then why do you keep posting Trump's fabrications and self-agrandizing statements? They are (at least) as unsubstantial and/or unsubstantiated as what the MSM spews.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
I get dizzy from vomiting after reading their spew all day. It's relentless fluff that means nothing and the outcome will mean even less for President Trump.
Why do you believe in Trumpian exceptionalism; why should he be exempt from the criticisms you attribute to posters here and the MSM (namely immediate deliverables)?
Some ask for impeachment, he asks for a border wall, a travel ban, the best health care - which is closer to fruition?
Pro-impeachers hark on obstruction of justice and collusion with foreign bodies, he harks on DNC obstruction (instead of conceding to the fact that bills being submitted are morally bankrupt in many cases) and the fact that he should have won the popular vote - why should one of these voices be silenced?
I'll readily admit I'd love if we could end the conversations on Trump's impeachment as well as Trump's nonsensical messages to the public, but to participate in sharing Trump's crap while being perturbed by the MSM's shows your inability to remove your own bias from your decision-making process, and entirely invalidates the points you're currently trying to make. Your words are nothing more than fallacious regurgitated propaganda which you've decided have the right to be disseminated unchecked because of the office they came from.
To any Americans reading this trash, please know that some of us Canadians are capable of seeking conclusions based on empirical evidence, and that we aren't all so easily deceived as this one was.
I never thought of my words as propaganda, that's a little extreme. Anyway President Trump was duly elected and there has been nothing but darts thrown at him every single step he takes when walking across the lawn of the WH or the golf course. Regardless I am not biased I just don't fall in the crowd of President Trump hate. To me that is propaganda. The impeachment process may be all fine and dandy with rules and such but that does not mean that others can't call for a speedier due process if the truth is so plainly defined. The impeachment steam is running out and only comes in wafts on TV.
0 -
g under p said:Oh I predicted that it would be the republicans turn to taKE office and they did so but this guy has failed to get much done other than get a Supreme Court judge nominated which wasn't very difficult to get done. I'd like see one instance where Trump speaks out or condemns the RUSSIANS on hacking into our election just ONE.
Peace
He has spoken out quite loudly actually. In very Presidential words he called it bullshit and continues to do so.0 -
Great, then shut up when people choose to spread the word of their Press. You don't get to silence one, but not the other; especially when the caliber of the content is so low on both fronts, the truthfulness is questionable on both fronts, and the exploitation of the (on average) simplicity-seeking Americans is present on both fronts.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I only spread the word of your elected President to discuss. Please.benjs said:
No, it's not extreme. You ignore or repudiate when people prove your words, or the rhetoric of Trump, empirically false. You ignore a trend of almost perfectly fallacious arguments over a span of over half a year, and continue to post them as though there's no precedence for Trump being discredited. With that knowledge at hand, it is blatantly dishonest to call yourself anything but a propagandist. Not a shred of anything remotely empirical comes from your keyboard, and yet you spread the falsehoods like you're paid to do it.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:benjs said:
If relentless fluff that means nothing is so undesirable for you, then why do you keep posting Trump's fabrications and self-agrandizing statements? They are (at least) as unsubstantial and/or unsubstantiated as what the MSM spews.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
I get dizzy from vomiting after reading their spew all day. It's relentless fluff that means nothing and the outcome will mean even less for President Trump.
Why do you believe in Trumpian exceptionalism; why should he be exempt from the criticisms you attribute to posters here and the MSM (namely immediate deliverables)?
Some ask for impeachment, he asks for a border wall, a travel ban, the best health care - which is closer to fruition?
Pro-impeachers hark on obstruction of justice and collusion with foreign bodies, he harks on DNC obstruction (instead of conceding to the fact that bills being submitted are morally bankrupt in many cases) and the fact that he should have won the popular vote - why should one of these voices be silenced?
I'll readily admit I'd love if we could end the conversations on Trump's impeachment as well as Trump's nonsensical messages to the public, but to participate in sharing Trump's crap while being perturbed by the MSM's shows your inability to remove your own bias from your decision-making process, and entirely invalidates the points you're currently trying to make. Your words are nothing more than fallacious regurgitated propaganda which you've decided have the right to be disseminated unchecked because of the office they came from.
To any Americans reading this trash, please know that some of us Canadians are capable of seeking conclusions based on empirical evidence, and that we aren't all so easily deceived as this one was.
I never thought of my words as propaganda, that's a little extreme. Anyway President Trump was duly elected and there has been nothing but darts thrown at him every single step he takes when walking across the lawn of the WH or the golf course. Regardless I am not biased I just don't fall in the crowd of President Trump hate. To me that is propaganda. The impeachment process may be all fine and dandy with rules and such but that does not mean that others can't call for a speedier due process if the truth is so plainly defined. The impeachment steam is running out and only comes in wafts on TV.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
^^^
President Trump is not preventing the press from speaking nor is he shutting people up. Actually it is opposite he has global headlines everywhere. Again, your point is not a credible one for impeachment.
0 -
It is absolutely massively presumptuous to suggest he'll win again. His whole campaign was based around the fact that he is politically inexperienced, and that that was somehow an expedited means to political success, which coupled with listening to the will of the people would translate to success for America. Throughout this time period, Trump has sought scapegoats in DNC, Clinton, Qatar, Muslims to justify his lack of political success. In addition, he has made declarations rather than performing explorations, assuming he has an innate understanding of the American people and their hopes and wishes.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^I
I stated for an entire year during the election process that Donald Trump would win. I met the same mockery other people were subjected to on tv for stating such as well on here. It is no massively presumptuous to suggest again that he will win again a few years from now especially since there is nothing for President Trump to run against currently. I'm a propagandist now? There was empirical evidence coming from my keyboard the President Trump would win for an entire year and collectively the people who laughed did nothing to stop it. Please spare me the propaganda label. How do you circumvent a defined structure? - ask President Trump.
Believing that because Trump won once that he will win again is to ignore the concept of context shaping outcomes (which most humans just call logic). You may as well win a game of chess and state that you will therefore win all others.
And no, I won't spare you the label you've earned. Denying yourself exposure to a source being proven invalid on an overwhelmingly regular basis, and continuing to spread that bullshit regularly, absolutely defines you as a propagandist. To play dumb and pretend that the empirically-proven counter-evidence is inaccessible (or even hard to access) when it is just not the case, does not exempt you from your title.
Not that you care - you're a troll, and the fact that I'm responding to you means that in your eyes, you've already won.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
^^^
On the same token the empirical evidence you seem to have for impeachment is not tangible to the powers that be to act on it yet. It is always a yet. So your evidence also is inaccessible to others.0 -
I understand the impulse but don't see the value in responding when posters are simply needling.
Sometimes fans can clear the air. Other times, when shit has hit the fan, the fan just spreads that shit around.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
2018I think Trump may be paying per post. No other way to explain the loyalty and volume of posts.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help