Blank Discussion Topic
Options
Comments
-
Incidental collection.. no one argued it. Is it news that Flynn was picked up in surveillance while monitoring the Russian ambassador?BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
Nunes described the surveillance as most likely being “incidental collection.” This can occur when a person inside the United States communicates with a foreign target of U.S. surveillance. In such cases, the identities of U.S. citizens are supposed to be kept secret — but can be “unmasked” by intelligence officials under certain circumstances.0 -
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
I don't know but maybe these 65 other countries can explain why
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3205724/How-65-countries-erected-security-walls-borders.html0 -
Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs0
-
I don't know if you rat out the Russians.. that seems to be a risky proposition.Cliffy6745 said:Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs
0 -
So your answer is a false sense of security as a result of fear-mongering. Got it.rssesq said:I don't know but maybe these 65 other countries can explain why
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3205724/How-65-countries-erected-security-walls-borders.htmlStar Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
I wonder what the gun control laws are like in those 65 countries, and if we'll be advocating for those too.HesCalledDyer said:
So your answer is a false sense of security as a result of fear-mongering. Got it.rssesq said:I don't know but maybe these 65 other countries can explain why
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3205724/How-65-countries-erected-security-walls-borders.html0 -
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.0 -
the daily kos called it a "bombshell of vagueness"BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
if the campaign and transition team weren't so busy running their mouths to the Russians instead of figuring out how to actually govern and doing things the American public actually wanted (like not torpedoing the EPA and the Department of Education), they wouldn't find themselves being surveilled (incidentally).
idiots.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
I don't know if you rat out the Russians.. that seems to be a risky proposition.Cliffy6745 said:Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs
Proven right the he was wiretapped by Obama? Seems like we closed that book already.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.0 -
LOLBS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.0 -
The cat is out of the bag on the Russians. Don't think it's the Russians that are going to be much of the focus, no?mrussel1 said:
I don't know if you rat out the Russians.. that seems to be a risky proposition.Cliffy6745 said:Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs
0 -
Leakers! Find the leakers! Both candidates were under investigation but only one was publically exposed before the election. With all the Russian ties, shady business dealings and Wiki knowledge, why would it be a surprise that Trump was under surveillance? And, we've already heard testimony that Obama couldn't order up a wiretap. Distraction and deflection from the true crimes of the Trump administration.BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
“I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, I guess, at least monitored,” Nunes told reporters. “It looks to me like it was all legally collected, but it was essentially a lot of information on the president-elect and his transition team and what they were doing.”
Nunes described the surveillance as most likely being “incidental collection.” This can occur when a person inside the United States communicates with a foreign target of U.S. surveillance. In such cases, the identities of U.S. citizens are supposed to be kept secret — but can be “unmasked” by intelligence officials under certain circumstances.
He also said he did not know yet whether the Trump transition team members who were unmasked were communicating from Trump Tower. Earlier this month, Trump claimed in a series of Tweets that former President Barack Obama ordered a wiretap of the phones at Trump Tower — something Nunes reiterated on Wednesday he had no evidence of.
FBI Director James Comey appeared before the panel on Monday and confirmed that the FBI launched a counterintelligence investigation in July into Russia’s election meddling, including possible coordination with the Trump campaign.
More like the sound of a felt slipper falling gently to a carpeted floor in the basement. Nice try though.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Yea, that's the whole point. That Trump was under surveillance. Sure, not the reasons why he was under surveillance. Brilliance at its finest.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
If they had been investigating the Russian connection since July 2016 & had found that a lot of the Russian ties were to the Trump campaign, it makes perfect sense that they would look into the transition team. This is just spin, folks.
Like I stated earlier, we don't have all of the facts. That being said, based on what we know, this doesn't look good for Trump and/or his administration/transition team/whateveryouwantocallthem. Manafort went from being a "key part of the campaign & transition" to being a nobody overnight. Why? SPIN & DEFLECTION.I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
The book was closed on the literal interpretation of the tweet but not on the substance that people within the Obama administration were conducting surveillance of the Trump administration via a backdoor of incidental collection and then selectively leaked said information illegally for nefarious purposes.mrussel1 said:
I don't know if you rat out the Russians.. that seems to be a risky proposition.Cliffy6745 said:Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs
Proven right the he was wiretapped by Obama? Seems like we closed that book already.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-admin-loyalists-government-insiders-sabotage-trump-white-house/
Most of you support this type of duplicitous game as members of the #resistance but rest assured it is watergate 2.0 if true. People don't seem to be comprehending how seriously this damages your country. With a new found hate for Putin members of the previous administration decided to act like him. When the story is finally told this will be the Obama and Democratic party legacy.
Addendum - What's crazy is that Trump had this information all along but he and Nunez waited for the massive over reach by the left post-Comey that they knew would come. Most of you just can't help yourselves. Brilliance.
0 -
If Trump is correct based on this conversation, then the full, honest story would read: "The US routinely surveils foreign targets, and captures conversations between those foreign targets and domestic counterparts. If Trump or his associates were in contact with those foreign targets, it is plausible that security agencies would have recorded said conversations."BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.
Instead, the story delivered was: "How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!"
Whether true or not, the man uses ambiguity and timing to control messages brilliantly. The omission of context (if this is, in fact, the context he was referring to) and the accusation of malice attributed directly to Obama, are highly effective means of controlling the perception of an event. Trump has managed to frame a controversial and potentially damaging story (my team and I were in contact with foreign agents being monitored by security agencies) as one where they are victims (I've been spied on by my own government). If Trump knew that this information would come to light, there's little doubt in my mind that his action (making an ambiguous statement involving conspiracy, shock value, discrediting of the establishment) was the most effective damage control available. Best case scenario, he gave people a meaningless and unimpeachable topic to distract them while he continues with the topics people have serious objection to (like a poor attempt at a Health Care Bill). Worst case scenario, he loses a handful of supporters for a re-election he likely has no concern about, and is no further away or closer to accomplishing what he'd like to.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
Watergate 2.0.. you're drinking the crazy juice. Watergate was a break in, an ILLEGAL wiretap and a cover up. Using Director Comey's testimony as a source, which of those things happened to implicate Obama?BS44325 said:
The book was closed on the literal interpretation of the tweet but not on the substance that people within the Obama administration were conducting surveillance of the Trump administration via a backdoor of incidental collection and then selectively leaked said information illegally for nefarious purposes.mrussel1 said:
I don't know if you rat out the Russians.. that seems to be a risky proposition.Cliffy6745 said:Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs
Proven right the he was wiretapped by Obama? Seems like we closed that book already.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-admin-loyalists-government-insiders-sabotage-trump-white-house/
Most of you support this type of duplicitous game as members of the #resistance but rest assured it is watergate 2.0 if true. People don't seem to be comprehending how seriously this damages your country. With a new found hate for Putin members of the previous administration decided to act like him. When the story is finally told this will be the Obama and Democratic party legacy.
Addendum - What's crazy is that Trump had this information all along but he and Nunez waited for the massive over reach by the left post-Comey that they knew would come. Most of you just can't help yourselves. Brilliance.0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
Yea, that's the whole point. That Trump was under surveillance. Sure, not the reasons why he was under surveillance. Brilliance at its finest.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.Halifax2TheMax said:
Yea, that's the whole point. That Trump was under surveillance. Sure, not the reasons why he was under surveillance. Brilliance at its finest.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.
Still trying to have it both ways...Halifax2TheMax said:
Yea, that's the whole point. That Trump was under surveillance. Sure, not the reasons why he was under surveillance. Brilliance at its finest.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.
1) There is so much evidence through surveillance that Trump is colluding with Russia!
2) Trump is a liar on "wire tapping"! Obama's administration wasn't spying on him! This is outrageous!
3) Well of course he was under surveillance! He was colluding with Russia for fuck sakes!
This has been the basics of HalifaxToTheMaxineWatters since inauguration. It is why I spend most of the time laughing at you. It is funny.0 -
All you need to know or see is the opening statements from the respective party leaders of the House Intelligence Committee. One was sweaty, nervous, misspoke, eyes blinking and darted around. The other was calm, steady, didn't blink much and looked the camera in the eye as he listed all the things we do know and wondered aloud if they were coincidences. And that the investigation was continuing. I expect Obama will be locked up, just like Hillary?mrussel1 said:
Watergate 2.0.. you're drinking the crazy juice. Watergate was a break in, an ILLEGAL wiretap and a cover up. Using Director Comey's testimony as a source, which of those things happened to implicate Obama?BS44325 said:
The book was closed on the literal interpretation of the tweet but not on the substance that people within the Obama administration were conducting surveillance of the Trump administration via a backdoor of incidental collection and then selectively leaked said information illegally for nefarious purposes.mrussel1 said:
I don't know if you rat out the Russians.. that seems to be a risky proposition.Cliffy6745 said:Wonder what kind of singing voice Manafort has, because he is gonna be singing at the top of his lungs
Proven right the he was wiretapped by Obama? Seems like we closed that book already.BS44325 said:
Exactly. That is the whole point. Trump might still be proven right on surveillance.mfc2006 said:
"Nunes said the surveillance appeared to be legal but that he was concerned because it was not related to the FBI’s investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election and was widely disseminated across the intelligence community."BS44325 said:Cards being put on the table
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/devin-nunes-donald-trump-surveillance-obama-236366
You hear that? That's the sound of the other shoe dropping.
We don't have all the facts yet. I think we can all agree on that.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-admin-loyalists-government-insiders-sabotage-trump-white-house/
Most of you support this type of duplicitous game as members of the #resistance but rest assured it is watergate 2.0 if true. People don't seem to be comprehending how seriously this damages your country. With a new found hate for Putin members of the previous administration decided to act like him. When the story is finally told this will be the Obama and Democratic party legacy.
Addendum - What's crazy is that Trump had this information all along but he and Nunez waited for the massive over reach by the left post-Comey that they knew would come. Most of you just can't help yourselves. Brilliance.
Follow the money, from Russia with love, all the way to impeachment. That'll be the real brilliance.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 272 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help