Should there be recounts in MI, PA and WI?

1…5681011

Comments

  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,501
    Yes
    JimmyV said:

    If there is nothing to this (and I don't think there is) then why are Trump's people going to court to stop it?

    yes. what might a recount expose?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,692
    edited December 2016
    JimmyV said:

    If there is nothing to this (and I don't think there is) then why are Trump's people going to court to stop it?

    I think they must be worried about something. Why else would they fight it? Kind of suggests that maybe there is something to it after all.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    https://youtu.be/pC8l-0e3pd0
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    JimmyV said:

    If there is nothing to this (and I don't think there is) then why are Trump's people going to court to stop it?

    To shut the whiny litigious people up.
    Two can play the game as you are well aware as to why President-elect Trump won.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    I wonder if those Michigan residents that see leaded brown water pour from their faucets are in favor of a $2M election recount? Could the money be better spent on clean water.

    In other news the Wisconsin recount update
    http://wbay.com/2016/12/02/recount-results-day-2/
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited December 2016
    ^^^
    I'm starting to think you have more than a hat rack on your shoulders JC.
    While the radlibs/Hillary supporters are befuddled with poll numbers real work is getting done.
    Good article.
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    edited December 2016
    JC29856 said:

    I wonder if those Michigan residents that see leaded brown water pour from their faucets are in favor of a $2M election recount? Could the money be better spent on clean water.

    In other news the Wisconsin recount update
    http://wbay.com/2016/12/02/recount-results-day-2/

    Money can always be spent on something else. In this case, the money being spent on a possible recount was never going to be spent on clean water..
    Post edited by oftenreading on
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    oftenreading said:

    JC29856 said:

    I wonder if those Michigan residents that see leaded brown water pour from their faucets are in favor of a $2M election recount? Could the money be better spent on clean water.

    In other news the Wisconsin recount update
    http://wbay.com/2016/12/02/recount-results-day-2/

    Money can always be spent on something else. In this case, the money being spent on a possible recount was never going to be spent on clean water..
    image
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    its not looking good right now:
    nytimes.com/2016/12/03/us/jill-stein-pennsylvania-recount.html?smid=fb-share
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    ^^^
    Radlibs/liberals are always slow.
    You have to tell them things before it happens.
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Jill Stein claims that 75,000 votes in Detroit did not vote for president, 7 times higher than the national average. IF this is true than I smell a rat in Detroit.
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,501
    Yes
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    ^^^
    Radlibs/liberals are always slow.
    You have to tell them things before it happens.

    like the election is rigged?
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    ^^^
    No,
    That numbers and recounting will do nothing.
    The first set of numbers show President-elect Trump was the winner.
    Libs/radlibs can't accept this and want new numbers.
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    ^^^^the hope for change was based on some cries from a group of computer scientists and exit poll discrepancies. my guess is that if there was tampering, the same people that did the tampering will also be involved in the recounts. So, yeah, its probably a lost cause.
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    in our new fact void society, 'computers' and 'scientists' are the last ones to trust:
    cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    hope still
    npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/12/03/504285672/jill-stein-campaign-drops-her-recount-effort-in-pennsylvania

    bipartisanreport.com/2016/12/04/breaking-federal-court-intervention-announced-for-immediate-recount-in-swing-state-details/
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,600
    Michigan recounts ordered to begin:

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/05/politics/michigan-election-recount/index.html
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JimmyV said:

    Michigan recounts ordered to begin:

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/05/politics/michigan-election-recount/index.html

    I'm thinking they will find some really really irregular irregularities. 70k+ people voted down ballot only? Seems fishy
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,600
    JC29856 said:

    JimmyV said:

    Michigan recounts ordered to begin:

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/05/politics/michigan-election-recount/index.html

    I'm thinking they will find some really really irregular irregularities. 70k+ people voted down ballot only? Seems fishy
    I've heard that but I've also heard anyone who wrote someone in was officially recorded as leaving the top line blank. So anyone who wrote in Bernie, Obama, Pence, etc. would be included in that 70k number. I agree it sounds fishy but it's possibly innocent. Definitely worth recounting to be sure.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,507
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    ^^^
    Radlibs/liberals are always slow.
    You have to tell them things before it happens.

    liberals are slow? you still haven't figured out you can win the federal election and lose the popular vote.
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




Categories