Wikileaks founder Julian Assange

rgambs · November 2016

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.

Boxes&Books · November 2016

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.

Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal

rgambs · November 2016

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal

Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

Boxes&Books · November 2016

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal
Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

Let me know if you want me to post a video of a women being stoned to death. Maybe you can tell us if that's more distract and deflect?

I'm sure clinton can clear her tears with the million Dollars they received for 5mins of their time. I'm sure that women in the video completely understands your logic.

rgambs · November 2016

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal
Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?
Let me know if you want me to post a video of a women being stoned to death. Maybe you can tell us if that's more distract and deflect?

I'm sure clinton can clear her tears with the million Dollars they received for 5mins of their time. I'm sure that women in the video completely understands your logic.

I don't understand why you can't answer the question. It's pretty simple.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

bootlegger10 · November 2016

While the money goes to good use, it also is meant to protect the foreign regimes from undue US influence when the Clintons are in office. The effect of that is much worse than the benefit of a few million dollars going to Africa. Pay for play.

Boxes&Books · November 2016

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal
Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?
Let me know if you want me to post a video of a women being stoned to death. Maybe you can tell us if that's more distract and deflect?

I'm sure clinton can clear her tears with the million Dollars they received for 5mins of their time. I'm sure that women in the video completely understands your logic.
I don't understand why you can't answer the question. It's pretty simple.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

Awwwww the funds also went towards Chelsea's wedding.. What a beautiful wedding that was. No blood on that money. They got that from the 80 billion arms sale deals.

So sweeeeeet baby boo.

Progress

rgambs · November 2016

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal
Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?
Let me know if you want me to post a video of a women being stoned to death. Maybe you can tell us if that's more distract and deflect?

I'm sure clinton can clear her tears with the million Dollars they received for 5mins of their time. I'm sure that women in the video completely understands your logic.
I don't understand why you can't answer the question. It's pretty simple.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

Awwwww the funds also went towards Chelsea's wedding.. What a beautiful wedding that was. No blood on that money. They got that from the 80 billion arms sale deals.

So sweeeeeet baby boo.

Progress

Distort and distract?
Can't answer a straight question with a straight answer? How very Clintonish of you!

bootlegger10 · November 2016

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal
Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?
Let me know if you want me to post a video of a women being stoned to death. Maybe you can tell us if that's more distract and deflect?

I'm sure clinton can clear her tears with the million Dollars they received for 5mins of their time. I'm sure that women in the video completely understands your logic.
I don't understand why you can't answer the question. It's pretty simple.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

Awwwww the funds also went towards Chelsea's wedding.. What a beautiful wedding that was. No blood on that money. They got that from the 80 billion arms sale deals.

So sweeeeeet baby boo.

Progress
Distort and distract?
Can't answer a straight question with a straight answer? How very Clintonish of you!

To be Clintonish there would have to be some blame on Russia in the answer.

HIllary: "Huma, where is the daily briefing for the President".

Huma: "The maid has it."

THis is our future president. Way to go America.

Boxes&Books · November 2016

bootlegger10 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

tonifig8 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

unsung said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

tonifig8 said:
Clinton and the Dems in power are desperate to silence this guy
i don't know why you say they are desparate to silence him. nothing he has said or released has hurt clinton or her election chances.

my opinion is he is trying to deflect from his own reputation as a sexual predator.
Alleged. Probably manufactured charges.
then why is he in hiding?

if he has nothing to fear, why is he being sheltered?

oh yeah that's right. because he is a wanted man by the united states.

but he is opposed to clinton so i guess he is a folk hero now.

pathetic.
Pathetic would be calling yourself a progressive, but still support someone who is taking in money from foreign govts that are stoning women to death.

What you're saying about Assange is not true. And he has offered himself to the US in exchange for manning.

So you prefer they keep the money to enrich their woman-stoning budget?
Sounds progressive.

I prefer that money to be extracted and spent on families.
Hahaha!! What the fuck is this?!? Women are being stoned to death with fucking rocks! And this crooked politician is taking in truck loads of money from them. I've never heard a more out of touch response by a liberal
Distract and Deflect.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?
Let me know if you want me to post a video of a women being stoned to death. Maybe you can tell us if that's more distract and deflect?

I'm sure clinton can clear her tears with the million Dollars they received for 5mins of their time. I'm sure that women in the video completely understands your logic.
I don't understand why you can't answer the question. It's pretty simple.

Would you prefer they keep their money and use it to stone women or would you prefer it be given to an A+ rated charity (for dubious reasons, sure) that specializes in helping women and their children?

Awwwww the funds also went towards Chelsea's wedding.. What a beautiful wedding that was. No blood on that money. They got that from the 80 billion arms sale deals.

So sweeeeeet baby boo.

Progress
Distort and distract?
Can't answer a straight question with a straight answer? How very Clintonish of you!
To be Clintonish there would have to be some blame on Russia in the answer.

HIllary: "Huma, where is the daily briefing for the President".

Huma: "The maid has it."

THis is our future president. Way to go America.

That's a whole lot of sarcasm there. Very funny.

To paraphrase what Brian said... I can understand the whole anti-trump thing, but how can anyone be proud to support this politician.

Especially progressives.

JC29856 · November 2016

After UN & court findings condemning 6 years of abuses by Sweden against Assange, Sweden finally takes his statement for the first time ever

mickeyrat · November 2016

That's only because Trump won. Ecuador put a clamp down on his internet access and frankly I hear are sick of him.
HE has kept himself locked up there. He seems to think he is above the law or the need for due process. Question that remains , did he submit to DNA testing?

rgambs · November 2016

Thanks for giving us a POTUS Trump, jerk.
You and Russia and the BernieBros screwed us over pretty good!

JC29856 · November 2016

mickeyrat said:
That's only because Trump won. Ecuador put a clamp down on his internet access and frankly I hear are sick of him.
HE has kept himself locked up there. He seems to think he is above the law or the need for due process. Question that remains , did he submit to DNA testing?

If you had to pick most likely to statutory rape would you choose:
Assange over Arkansas Bill
or
Assange over Trump?

Keep in mind Julian never ever flew Epstein airlines aka the Lolita Express.

JC29856 · November 2016

mickeyrat said:
That's only because Trump won. Ecuador put a clamp down on his internet access and frankly I hear are sick of him.
HE has kept himself locked up there. He seems to think he is above the law or the need for due process. Question that remains , did he submit to DNA testing?

I would think that any real investigation would first take a statement from the accused before taking DNA, no?

mickeyrat · November 2016

JC29856 said:

mickeyrat said:
That's only because Trump won. Ecuador put a clamp down on his internet access and frankly I hear are sick of him.
HE has kept himself locked up there. He seems to think he is above the law or the need for due process. Question that remains , did he submit to DNA testing?
I would think that any real investigation would first take a statement from the accused before taking DNA, no?

given he fled THEN holed up in a sovereign space makes it kinda hard dontcha think? further the swedes werent the ones asking questions here. a lawyer for the equadoran embassy asked them in their presense.

theres no connection it happens now, after hillary wont be president is there?

meanwhile, those women havent seen justice.

JC29856 · November 2016

mickeyrat said:

JC29856 said:

mickeyrat said:
That's only because Trump won. Ecuador put a clamp down on his internet access and frankly I hear are sick of him.
HE has kept himself locked up there. He seems to think he is above the law or the need for due process. Question that remains , did he submit to DNA testing?
I would think that any real investigation would first take a statement from the accused before taking DNA, no?
given he fled THEN holed up in a sovereign space makes it kinda hard dontcha think? further the swedes werent the ones asking questions here. a lawyer for the equadoran embassy asked them in their presense.f

theres no connection it happens now, after hillary wont be president is there?

meanwhile, those women havent seen justice.

Fled?
Was in Sweden from August time of allegations to November. If you call fleeing fled hanging around for close to 2 months before it became obvious that the charges were trumped up then you win.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11949341

JC29856 · November 2016

20 August 2010
The Swedish Prosecutor's Office issues an arrest warrant for Mr Assange on allegations of rape and molestation.
Both women reportedly say that what started as consensual sex became non-consensual.
Wikileaks quotes Mr Assange as saying the accusations are "without basis" and that their appearance "at this moment is deeply disturbing".

JC29856 · November 2016

The story appears to proceed as follows: Miss A, having invited Assange to speak to a leftwing campaign group in the town of Enkoping, suggested he stay in her flat, although the two had not met. Both agree that they slept together on the night before the event, during which the condom split.

The following day, the woman attended and helped facilitate the event, at which Miss W was also present. According to her police interview, Miss W accompanied the Australian and some male guests to lunch at which he flirted with her; afterwards the pair went to the cinema, where she told police she had performed oral sex on him. They slept together that night, using a condom, and again the following morning, when both parties appear to agree that a condom was not used, after which Assange left.

What happened next will be the subject of any legal process, but according to her testimony Miss W, for some reason, got in touch with Miss A (they did not previously know each other); some days later the two went to a Stockholm police station where they said they were "seeking advice" on making a complaint against Assange. Miss A is understood to have told police that he had ripped the condom on purpose, while Miss W said the unprotected sex act had been without her consent. They were reportedly advised by the police officer that these allegations amounted to rape against Miss W and sexual molestation against Miss A.

The accusations leaked to the press two days later, shortly after which Miss A gave an interview to the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet. She said: "The responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man who had attitude problems with women."

josevolution · November 2016

So he only has emails from Clinton but none of Trump or Pence , how about Bannon surely there must be some real juicy shit spewing from this dirt bag no ?

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange

Comments

Categories