WikiLeaks published documents on Hillary Clinton and the US Democrats. How do you reply to those who accuse you of having helped to elect Mr. Trump? "What is the allegation here exactly? We published what the Democratic National Committee, John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, and Hillary Clinton herself were saying about their own campaign, which the American people read and were very interested to read, and assessed the elements and characters, and then they made a decision. That decision was based on Hillary Clinton's own words, her campaign manager's own words. That's democracy".
Do you agree with those who say that it was a hit job, because you hit Hillary Clinton when she was most vulnerable, during the final weeks of her campaign? "No, we have been publishing about Hillary Clinton for many years, because of her position as Secretary of State. We have been publishing her cables since 2010 and her emails also. We are domain experts on Clinton and her post 2008 role in government. This is why it is natural for sources who have information on Hillary Clinton to come to us. They know we will understand its significance".
So Clinton is gone, has WikiLeaks won? "We were pleased to see how much of the American public interacted with the material we published. That interaction was on both sides of politics, including those to the left of Hillary Clinton those who supported Bernie Sanders, who were able to see the structure of power within the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and how the Clintons had placed Debbie Wasserman Schultz to head up the DNC and as a result the DNC had tilted the scales of the process against Bernie Sanders".
What about Donald Trump? What is going to happen? "If the question is how I personally feel about the situation, I am mixed: Hillary Clinton and the network around her imprisoned one of our alleged sources for 35 years, Chelsea Manning, tortured her according to the United Nations, in order to implicate me personally. According to our publications Hillary Clinton was the chief proponent and the architect of the war against Libya. It is clear that she pursued this war as a staging effort for her Presidential bid. It wasn't even a war for an ideological purpose. This war ended up producing the refugee crisis in Europe, changing the political colour of Europe, killing more than 40,000 people within a year in Libya, while the arms from Libya went to Mali and other places, boosting or causing civil wars, including the Syrian catastrophe. If someone and their network behave like that, then there are consequences. Internal and external opponents are generated. Now there is a separate question on what Donald Trump means".
What do you think he means? "Hillary Clinton's election would have been a consolidation of power in the existing ruling class of the United States. Donald Trump is not a DC insider, he is part of the wealthy ruling elite of the United States, and he is gathering around him a spectrum of other rich people and several idiosyncratic personalities. They do not by themselves form an existing structure, so it is a weak structure which is displacing and destabilising the pre-existing central power network within DC. It is a new patronage structure which will evolve rapidly, but at the moment its looseness means there are opportunities for change in the United States: change for the worse and change for the better".
4th paragraph? Kind of funny. Last paragraph? Hilarious. Stay relevant ol' Julian and enjoy your puddin pop. What a joke!!! Fake, fake, fake relevancy and news!!!
11:00 Assange starts talking 29:00 Question: About proof of life 41:00 DNC rigging of primary exposed by wikileaks 42:35 Democratic party heads are fighting like dogs to prevent getting kicked out 42:45 Democrats are trying to undermine legitimacy Trump administration, probably for the next four years 43:30 Even if you believe hackers were involved, what difference did it make? Yes, wikileaks was most discussed political topic on facebook/twitter, but what was discussed is the actual words of Clinton, Podesta, and team, revealing corruption etc. 44:45: Question: Is there a future for the FOIA in the present fake news attack on freedom of the press and speech? 46:45: Question: Is the election outcome what you hoped for? 48:05: Obama administration prosecuted or attempted to prosecute more journalists / journalistic sources, three times as many as all previous administrations combined. 48:50 Question: Why the focus on the USA and not the rest of the world? 50:15 Question: Why don't you explain why it would be hard for Russia to hack the votes; explain the security and how easy it would be to track them. 51:15: Intelligence agencies are not claiming that vote count was hacked, it is hard to do such hacking. However, one should not trust claims of security. 52:45: Hand counted ballots flaunt large scale vote fraud, while machines flaunt local vote fraud, so do both. 53:00 Question: Why is there more focus on those who expose corruption of DNC/Clinton instead of the offenders? 53:15: There was some focus on the actual corruption, mainly from independent journalists and reddit. 54:10 Question: Is there any truth to rumor that wikileaks had access to RNC data but chose not to leak? Answer: Absolutely false 54:55 Question: What do you think about people in the US who once called for the death penalty for you? 55:30 Pentagon admitted under oath that no one had been killed as a result of wikileaks, after Obama administration lied about that earlier.
Julian Assange will not hand himself in because Chelsea Manning's release won't happen immediately, lawyer says Lawyers had previously only said that Julian Assange would stand by his previous commitment
Julian Assange will not hand himself in because Chelsea Manning's release won't happen immediately, lawyer says Lawyers had previously only said that Julian Assange would stand by his previous commitment
Julien Asstrange appears at the window of the Peruvian embassy in London like the pope. The gaggle of press assembled below shouts questions: julien julien care to comment on events in the US? Julien julien, would you consider immunity for testimony? Julien julien how's the food? Julien julien, are you proud? Julien julien, was it worth it? Julien julien can you confirm or deny Russia involvement in the hacks of Hillary's emails and the DNC? Julien?
saw an article saying he may be ousted from the embassy soon enough. Peruvian Pres cant run for re-election due to term limits and the frontrunner isnt a fan of ole Julian. SAD.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
sorry have not read everything here but my question is: if the goal of Assange is to bring to light the inner workings of the government to the citizens then why doesn't he release everything he all at the same time? why the delay in when he releases things?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
sorry have not read everything here but my question is: if the goal of Assange is to bring to light the inner workings of the government to the citizens then why doesn't he release everything he all at the same time? why the delay in when he releases things?
Is a complete idiot. 74 countries that now have folks with locked computers being held for ransom. I hope he's eventually arrested and tried for treason.
JULIAN ASSANGE HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR OVER A MONTH. WHERE IS ASSANGE?
Here is a brief timeline of events:
Apr 16th: John Jones QC, Assange's U.N. Lawyer dies jumping in front of a train.
May 11th: Michael Ratner, WikiLeaks' chief counsel, dies of cancer.
Jul 10th: Seth Rich, DNC staffer who supposedly leaked DNC documents to Wikileaks, is shot in the back and dies. Nothing is stolen from his body.
Aug 5th: Edward Snowden (source of leaks on surveillance by the NSA) tweets 64 bit code (potential dead man's switch),
Aug 10th: Wikileaks offers $20k reward for information on murder of Seth Rich.
Oct 7th: Podestamails leaks first batch.
Oct 14th: John Podesta tweets "I bet the lobster risotto is better than the food at the Ecuadorian Embassy”.
Oct 16th/17th: John Kerry visits the UK, personally pressures Equador to stop Assange from publishing documents about Clinton.
Oct 16th: Wikileaks tweets SHA-256 prerelease keys.
Oct 18th: Equadorian Embassy cuts off Assange's internet access.
Oct 18th: Pamela Anderson visits Assange and brings him a vegan sandwich.
Oct 18th: Witnesses photograph and report heavily armed police and vans outside Equadorian Embassy, are barred from approaching and have cellphones confiscated. Live feeds are cut off.
Oct 18th: Some report Assange will be arrested in a matter of hours.
Oct 18th: https://file.wikileaks.org/file made publicly visible, file dates/timestamps changed to 1984 (Orwell reference).
Oct 18th: London Airport evacuated due to "chemical attack", potentially used as cover to fly Assange out of country.
Oct 20th: /r/wikileaks, /r/dncleaks, /r/wikileakstaskforce and /r/nsaleaks add 21 new moderators and remove previous mods, all threads about Assange going missing deleted since.
Oct 20th/21st: Wikileaks tweets 5 tweets with misspelled words. The incorrect letters spell "HELP HIM". The Wikileaks twitter has never made a spelling error, let alone 5 in two days.
Oct 21st: Massive DDoS attack on US internet. Wikileaks tweets to imply the attack originates from its supporters, asking them to stop, no evidence supports claim.
Oct 22nd: Gavin MacFadyen (mentor to Assange and key player in Wikileaks) dies of lung cancer.
Oct 23rd: Wikileaks Tweets poll asking how best to prove Assange is alive (he still hasn't appeared on video or at the window since).
Oct 24th: Wikileaks Tweets video of Assange and Michael Moore recorded in June.
Oct 26th: 4chan users successfully successfully decode their first message in Wikileak's blockchain. Threads are instantly flooded by shills saying that it's not worth looking into. The blockchain is blocked with fees and 43000 unconfirmed transactions appear in the mempool.
Nov 6th: Huge DDoS takes down Wikileaks for first time in years.
Nov 7th: Various entities notice hundreds of Podesta and DNC emails are missing from recent leaks, accessed with direct entry.
Nov 8th: Trump wins.
Nov 12th: Assange allegedly meets with Swedish prosecutor regarding rape allegations, lawyers barred from attending, meeting conducted via an Equadorian ambassador (not face to face)
Nov 14th: Wikileaks releases insurance files, SHA-256 hashes do not match those tweeted in October.
JULIAN ASSANGE HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR OVER A MONTH. WHERE IS ASSANGE?
Here is a brief timeline of events:
Apr 16th: John Jones QC, Assange's U.N. Lawyer dies jumping in front of a train.
May 11th: Michael Ratner, WikiLeaks' chief counsel, dies of cancer.
Jul 10th: Seth Rich, DNC staffer who supposedly leaked DNC documents to Wikileaks, is shot in the back and dies. Nothing is stolen from his body.
Aug 5th: Edward Snowden (source of leaks on surveillance by the NSA) tweets 64 bit code (potential dead man's switch),
Aug 10th: Wikileaks offers $20k reward for information on murder of Seth Rich.
Oct 7th: Podestamails leaks first batch.
Oct 14th: John Podesta tweets "I bet the lobster risotto is better than the food at the Ecuadorian Embassy”.
Oct 16th/17th: John Kerry visits the UK, personally pressures Equador to stop Assange from publishing documents about Clinton.
Oct 16th: Wikileaks tweets SHA-256 prerelease keys.
Oct 18th: Equadorian Embassy cuts off Assange's internet access.
Oct 18th: Pamela Anderson visits Assange and brings him a vegan sandwich.
Oct 18th: Witnesses photograph and report heavily armed police and vans outside Equadorian Embassy, are barred from approaching and have cellphones confiscated. Live feeds are cut off.
Oct 18th: Some report Assange will be arrested in a matter of hours.
Oct 18th: https://file.wikileaks.org/file made publicly visible, file dates/timestamps changed to 1984 (Orwell reference).
Oct 18th: London Airport evacuated due to "chemical attack", potentially used as cover to fly Assange out of country.
Oct 20th: /r/wikileaks, /r/dncleaks, /r/wikileakstaskforce and /r/nsaleaks add 21 new moderators and remove previous mods, all threads about Assange going missing deleted since.
Oct 20th/21st: Wikileaks tweets 5 tweets with misspelled words. The incorrect letters spell "HELP HIM". The Wikileaks twitter has never made a spelling error, let alone 5 in two days.
Oct 21st: Massive DDoS attack on US internet. Wikileaks tweets to imply the attack originates from its supporters, asking them to stop, no evidence supports claim.
Oct 22nd: Gavin MacFadyen (mentor to Assange and key player in Wikileaks) dies of lung cancer.
Oct 23rd: Wikileaks Tweets poll asking how best to prove Assange is alive (he still hasn't appeared on video or at the window since).
Oct 24th: Wikileaks Tweets video of Assange and Michael Moore recorded in June.
Oct 26th: 4chan users successfully successfully decode their first message in Wikileak's blockchain. Threads are instantly flooded by shills saying that it's not worth looking into. The blockchain is blocked with fees and 43000 unconfirmed transactions appear in the mempool.
Nov 6th: Huge DDoS takes down Wikileaks for first time in years.
Nov 7th: Various entities notice hundreds of Podesta and DNC emails are missing from recent leaks, accessed with direct entry.
Nov 8th: Trump wins.
Nov 12th: Assange allegedly meets with Swedish prosecutor regarding rape allegations, lawyers barred from attending, meeting conducted via an Equadorian ambassador (not face to face)
Nov 14th: Wikileaks releases insurance files, SHA-256 hashes do not match those tweeted in October.
Reports are that Seth Rich was the leak.
Julian Asstrange claims that Wikileaks doesn't know who supplies them with stolen documents, electronic files, etc. because their system is encrypted and fosters trust and encourages people to submit their purloined booty. How then can he claim that it wasn't the Russians? Someone is lying and someone knows who supplied the DNC's purloined material.
JULIAN ASSANGE HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR OVER A MONTH. WHERE IS ASSANGE?
Here is a brief timeline of events:
Apr 16th: John Jones QC, Assange's U.N. Lawyer dies jumping in front of a train.
May 11th: Michael Ratner, WikiLeaks' chief counsel, dies of cancer.
Jul 10th: Seth Rich, DNC staffer who supposedly leaked DNC documents to Wikileaks, is shot in the back and dies. Nothing is stolen from his body.
Aug 5th: Edward Snowden (source of leaks on surveillance by the NSA) tweets 64 bit code (potential dead man's switch),
Aug 10th: Wikileaks offers $20k reward for information on murder of Seth Rich.
Oct 7th: Podestamails leaks first batch.
Oct 14th: John Podesta tweets "I bet the lobster risotto is better than the food at the Ecuadorian Embassy”.
Oct 16th/17th: John Kerry visits the UK, personally pressures Equador to stop Assange from publishing documents about Clinton.
Oct 16th: Wikileaks tweets SHA-256 prerelease keys.
Oct 18th: Equadorian Embassy cuts off Assange's internet access.
Oct 18th: Pamela Anderson visits Assange and brings him a vegan sandwich.
Oct 18th: Witnesses photograph and report heavily armed police and vans outside Equadorian Embassy, are barred from approaching and have cellphones confiscated. Live feeds are cut off.
Oct 18th: Some report Assange will be arrested in a matter of hours.
Oct 18th: https://file.wikileaks.org/file made publicly visible, file dates/timestamps changed to 1984 (Orwell reference).
Oct 18th: London Airport evacuated due to "chemical attack", potentially used as cover to fly Assange out of country.
Oct 20th: /r/wikileaks, /r/dncleaks, /r/wikileakstaskforce and /r/nsaleaks add 21 new moderators and remove previous mods, all threads about Assange going missing deleted since.
Oct 20th/21st: Wikileaks tweets 5 tweets with misspelled words. The incorrect letters spell "HELP HIM". The Wikileaks twitter has never made a spelling error, let alone 5 in two days.
Oct 21st: Massive DDoS attack on US internet. Wikileaks tweets to imply the attack originates from its supporters, asking them to stop, no evidence supports claim.
Oct 22nd: Gavin MacFadyen (mentor to Assange and key player in Wikileaks) dies of lung cancer.
Oct 23rd: Wikileaks Tweets poll asking how best to prove Assange is alive (he still hasn't appeared on video or at the window since).
Oct 24th: Wikileaks Tweets video of Assange and Michael Moore recorded in June.
Oct 26th: 4chan users successfully successfully decode their first message in Wikileak's blockchain. Threads are instantly flooded by shills saying that it's not worth looking into. The blockchain is blocked with fees and 43000 unconfirmed transactions appear in the mempool.
Nov 6th: Huge DDoS takes down Wikileaks for first time in years.
Nov 7th: Various entities notice hundreds of Podesta and DNC emails are missing from recent leaks, accessed with direct entry.
Nov 8th: Trump wins.
Nov 12th: Assange allegedly meets with Swedish prosecutor regarding rape allegations, lawyers barred from attending, meeting conducted via an Equadorian ambassador (not face to face)
Nov 14th: Wikileaks releases insurance files, SHA-256 hashes do not match those tweeted in October.
On May 16, a story was posted on the Fox News website on the investigation into the 2016 murder of DNC Staffer Seth Rich. The article was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all our reporting. Upon appropriate review, the article was found not to meet those standards and has since been removed.
/in other news, Fox apparently actually has standards
On May 16, a story was posted on the Fox News website on the investigation into the 2016 murder of DNC Staffer Seth Rich. The article was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all our reporting. Upon appropriate review, the article was found not to meet those standards and has since been removed.
/in other news, Fox apparently actually has standards
On May 16, a story was posted on the Fox News website on the investigation into the 2016 murder of DNC Staffer Seth Rich. The article was not initially subjected to the high degree of editorial scrutiny we require for all our reporting. Upon appropriate review, the article was found not to meet those standards and has since been removed.
/in other news, Fox apparently actually has standards
No, they were probably threatened with a lawsuit by the Rich family's attorney. They probably figured their track record on those wasn't so great.
Comments
And OMG, Julian Astrange is still alive???
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
WikiLeaks: To be clear, our statements about our US election publications are only: 1) Our publications are accurate. 2) Our source is not a state."
Coincidentally this aired on Seth Rich's birthday.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article110904727.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/wikileaks-proposes-tracking-verified-twitter-users-homes-families-and-finances/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_wikileaks-twitter-740pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.c207c185d99a
Let's use social media to surveil you. When is his fifteen minutes up? Stay relevant Asstrange.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/817579925771341825
He starts talking at about 11 minutes in.
11:00 Assange starts talking
29:00 Question: About proof of life
41:00 DNC rigging of primary exposed by wikileaks
42:35 Democratic party heads are fighting like dogs to prevent getting kicked out
42:45 Democrats are trying to undermine legitimacy Trump administration, probably for the next four years
43:30 Even if you believe hackers were involved, what difference did it make? Yes, wikileaks was most discussed political topic on facebook/twitter, but what was discussed is the actual words of Clinton, Podesta, and team, revealing corruption etc.
44:45: Question: Is there a future for the FOIA in the present fake news attack on freedom of the press and speech?
46:45: Question: Is the election outcome what you hoped for?
48:05: Obama administration prosecuted or attempted to prosecute more journalists / journalistic sources, three times as many as all previous administrations combined.
48:50 Question: Why the focus on the USA and not the rest of the world?
50:15 Question: Why don't you explain why it would be hard for Russia to hack the votes; explain the security and how easy it would be to track them.
51:15: Intelligence agencies are not claiming that vote count was hacked, it is hard to do such hacking. However, one should not trust claims of security.
52:45: Hand counted ballots flaunt large scale vote fraud, while machines flaunt local vote fraud, so do both.
53:00 Question: Why is there more focus on those who expose corruption of DNC/Clinton instead of the offenders?
53:15: There was some focus on the actual corruption, mainly from independent journalists and reddit.
54:10 Question: Is there any truth to rumor that wikileaks had access to RNC data but chose not to leak? Answer: Absolutely false
54:55 Question: What do you think about people in the US who once called for the death penalty for you?
55:30 Pentagon admitted under oath that no one had been killed as a result of wikileaks, after Obama administration lied about that earlier.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5n58sm/i_am_julian_assange_founder_of_wikileaks_ask_me/?st=ixrprucg&sh=6139b41d
Julian Assange will not hand himself in because Chelsea Manning's release won't happen immediately, lawyer says
Lawyers had previously only said that Julian Assange would stand by his previous commitment
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/julian-assange-chelsea-manning-barack-obama-hand-in-embassy-arrest-extradition-us-a7533911.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
The Cyber Wars have started
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
hand me another Scooby snack shaggy!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth-rich-family-response-claims-of-wikileaks-contact/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Sweden Drops Rape Investigation Of Julian Assange — But He's Not In The Clear http://n.pr/2ryDNLG
/in other news, Fox apparently actually has standards
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/02/media/fox-news-seth-rich-investigation/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©