Hillary won more votes for President

1403404406408409488

Comments

  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    HAHAHA!!! This is a joke, right?!?
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    Public vs. private position. Her favorite movie I heard is Say Anything.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    HAHAHA!!! This is a joke, right?!?
    Unlike the Podesta emails and that FBI poll, no, no joke.

    Care to dispute the point I made? This stuff is just common knowledge, but why would I expect a Trump supporter to be grounded in any kind of facts.


    Clinton pledges constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United ruling

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-citizens-united-225658

    Report: Trump hires Citizens United head as deputy campaign manager

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-bossie-citizens-united-227662#ixzz4PBAPFBnZ
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    HAHAHA!!! This is a joke, right?!?
    Unlike the Podesta emails and that FBI poll, no, no joke.

    Care to dispute the point I made? This stuff is just common knowledge, but why would I expect a Trump supporter to be grounded in any kind of facts.


    Clinton pledges constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United ruling

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-citizens-united-225658

    Report: Trump hires Citizens United head as deputy campaign manager

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-bossie-citizens-united-227662#ixzz4PBAPFBnZ
    You need to pay more attention to the leaks. That's the truth.

    I am a genuine Bernie Sanders supporter. If you really cared about that issue then you should have supported someone who would have actually attempted to do something about it.
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    Because Citizen United is not about money in politics but about someone's right to make a movie that showed Hillary in a negative light.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    tonifig8 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    HAHAHA!!! This is a joke, right?!?
    Unlike the Podesta emails and that FBI poll, no, no joke.

    Care to dispute the point I made? This stuff is just common knowledge, but why would I expect a Trump supporter to be grounded in any kind of facts.


    Clinton pledges constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United ruling

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-citizens-united-225658

    Report: Trump hires Citizens United head as deputy campaign manager

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-bossie-citizens-united-227662#ixzz4PBAPFBnZ
    You need to pay more attention to the leaks. That's the truth.

    I am a genuine Bernie Sanders supporter. If you really cared about that issue then you should have supported someone who would have actually attempted to do something about it.
    I gave you all the information you need in the above links, but we both know you have no interest in the truth.


    And not a trump supporter? Come on man!
    image
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,961
    http://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/news/a40557/beyonce-and-her-dancers-hillary-clinton-pantsuits/

    What a nice nod to Secretary Clinton...the pant suit. :heart: That show looked like lots of fun. :)
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,419

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    Public vs. private position. Her favorite movie I heard is Say Anything.
    https://youtu.be/dzD7f8VnEhw
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    Now Anonymous is getting in on the act...

    http://freedomoutpost.com/anonymous-posts-clinton-underground-child-sex-scandal-part-1/

    Just when you thought it couldn't get uglier
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    Because Citizen United is not about money in politics but about someone's right to make a movie that showed Hillary in a negative light.
    CU was supposed to be about that until conservative judges made an uncharacteristic broad ruling that money is speech and corporations are entitled to free speech.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    Because Citizen United is not about money in politics but about someone's right to make a movie that showed Hillary in a negative light.
    CU was supposed to be about that until conservative judges made an uncharacteristic broad ruling that money is speech and corporations are entitled to free speech.
    So kind of like Collin Powell and his server, it's cool to do, right? That's kind of how it goes with Clinton, right? How much did sanders take in from special interest?

    So you say you're against something, but don't set the example, right? She knows how to lead, I guess that's what makes her a great leader....
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    Trump might pull this thing off, he has double the Black support than Romney did already and they won't turn out to vote like they did in 2012.

    I'm reading he has 30% of the Hispanic vote in Nevada
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    tonifig8 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    This thread and the Podesta emails thread are proof that all the liberals who complain about the influence of the corporations and the wealthy were completely disingenuous. They have no problem with corruption and political pay for play as long as it supports their candidate.

    Oh yeah...and the years of whining about getting money out of politics has been shown to be a complete load of crap.
    Oh yeah? Than why does Hillary want to overturn citizens united? I haven't heard your candidate talk too much about that.
    Because Citizen United is not about money in politics but about someone's right to make a movie that showed Hillary in a negative light.
    CU was supposed to be about that until conservative judges made an uncharacteristic broad ruling that money is speech and corporations are entitled to free speech.
    So kind of like Collin Powell and his server, it's cool to do, right? That's kind of how it goes with Clinton, right? How much did sanders take in from special interest?

    So you say you're against something, but don't set the example, right? She knows how to lead, I guess that's what makes her a great leader....
    This has been hashed out on here many times before. You just don't get it.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    edited November 2016
    unsung said:

    Trump might pull this thing off, he has double the Black support than Romney did already and they won't turn out to vote like they did in 2012.

    I'm reading he has 30% of the Hispanic vote in Nevada

    This info sounds suspiciously like those photo-shopped memes you like to post. You know, the ones that aren't true.

    Reminds of when Donald says "people are saying".
    Post edited by dignin on
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    Anyone hear from Hillary Clinton yet? So many questions..
This discussion has been closed.