Hillary won more votes for President

1…365366368370371…488

Comments

  • Earth Posts: 357
    Jason P said:

    show previous quotes
    Why didn't they pick someone smart instead?
    That is a great point. People say it is a change election, which is hard to believe as the massively popular sitting President could win this election with his hands (and Biden) tied around his back, and a non-elite outsider should be elected.
    But has the definition of elite changed to meaning educated, expert or something like that?
    Trump has many issues with his personality and all his incredible terribleness, but if he was at least a reasonably smart dude he would have a decent shout at being in this.
  • Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,835
    Go Beavers said:

    show previous quotes
    No. What got us Trump was lower educated white males with little contact with people different than they are. Now add in 4 or 5 republican clowns in the primary to split the rest of the vote, and there you have it.
    Exactly....Trump is not the answer to the disenfranchised. He became their answer because he said he was the answer...plus he threw out a lot of racist jargon that the deplorables latched on to.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • Posts: 9,617
    Did someone mention marc rich earlier???

    http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-01/fbi-surprises-with-files-on-bill-clinton-01-pardon-of-marc-rich
  • Posts: 7,762
    JC29856 said:

    Did someone mention marc rich earlier???

    http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-01/fbi-surprises-with-files-on-bill-clinton-01-pardon-of-marc-rich

    Yes. You did.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/wikileaks-emails-hint-collusion-between-115813462.html
    Clinton
    News
    Network

    Good Night and Good Luck Ladies
  • Posts: 7,762
    It's funny how you turned CNN into meaning Clinton News Network. Bravo. Well done.

    A Bernie surrogate was just on the news and was talking about how he also had conversations and emails with Donna Brazile and if it were his email hacked, it would look like CNN was colluding with the Sanders campaign and feeding them questions.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,964
    ledvedderman said:

    It's funny how you turned CNN into meaning Clinton News Network. Bravo. Well done.

    A Bernie surrogate was just on the news and was talking about how he also had conversations and emails with Donna Brazile and if it were his email hacked, it would look like CNN was colluding with the Sanders campaign and feeding them questions.

    The ability of the public to turn nothing into a scandal is pretty impressive.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • USA Posts: 2,672
    edited November 2016
    ledvedderman said:

    It's funny how you turned CNN into meaning Clinton News Network. Bravo. Well done.

    A Bernie surrogate was just on the news and was talking about how he also had conversations and emails with Donna Brazile and if it were his email hacked, it would look like CNN was colluding with the Sanders campaign and feeding them questions.

    great reply. Let's just all move on with our life's now. Clinton is just as rotten as the sanders people according to this guy. Wait I got that backwards
    Post edited by Boxes&Books on
  • Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,964
    tonifig8 said:

    show previous quotes
    great reply. Let's just all move on with our life's now. Clinton is just as rotten as the sanders people according to this guy. Wait I got that backwards
    That isn't even close to what he was suggesting IMO. Doesn't it seem to you that the only one with a problem is Donna Brazile?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Posts: 9,617
    Panama papers link Clinton Podesta to Russia months ago

    http://observer.com/2016/04/panama-papers-reveal-clintons-kremlin-connection/
  • Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,964
    edited November 2016
    JC29856 said:

    Panama papers link Clinton Podesta to Russia months ago

    http://observer.com/2016/04/panama-papers-reveal-clintons-kremlin-connection/

    You mean link Podesta. Not Clinton. Clinton is not automatically linked to everything The Podesta Group happens to do. However, Clinton would be well-served to keep this link in mind in the future.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Posts: 13,576
    PJ_Soul said:

    show previous quotes
    That isn't even close to what he was suggesting IMO. Doesn't it seem to you that the only one with a problem is Donna Brazile?
    Aside from the debate questions, the entire "media collusion" is a ridiculous claim from people who don't understand politics OR the media. It is simply ridiculous, and the people pulling their hair out over it look childish and naive to people living in the real world.
    MOST of it is just the normal coordination that has to occur before interviews, appearances, and statements can be arranged, and most of the rest is just proffesional courtesy and communication.

    Any campaign's internal emails will show connections to media sources, that's how you get someone who is insanely busy touring the country to give you some of their time.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Posts: 9,617
    rgambs said:

    show previous quotes
    Aside from the debate questions, the entire "media collusion" is a ridiculous claim from people who don't understand politics OR the media. It is simply ridiculous, and the people pulling their hair out over it look childish and naive to people living in the real world.
    MOST of it is just the normal coordination that has to occur before interviews, appearances, and statements can be arranged, and most of the rest is just proffesional courtesy and communication.

    Any campaign's internal emails will show connections to media sources, that's how you get someone who is insanely busy touring the country to give you some of their time.
    https://theintercept.com/2016/02/25/tv-pundits-praise-hillary-clinton-on-air-fail-to-disclose-financial-ties-to-her-campaign/
  • Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,964
    Haha, you expect pundits to be neutral??
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Posts: 13,576
    PJ_Soul said:

    Haha, you expect pundits to be neutral??

    Yeah, I mean, come on.
    Get real.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Posts: 12,885
    rgambs said:

    show previous quotes
    Any campaign's internal emails will show connections to media sources, that's how you get someone who is insanely busy touring the country to give you some of their time.
    So whose internal emails have better media sources.
    Hillary or Trump.
  • Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,804
    Gern Blansten said:

    show previous quotes
    At a minimum the dems have kept the GOP from pulling us right.

    Do you like to buy beer on Sunday? In Indiana I can't do that....Mike Pence thinks Jesus would get mad.
    But he would get mad! I think Jesus, the dude who liked changing water into wine, would say, "What? No beer on Sunday? Are you kidding me?"

    I pretty much agree with pjalive with one major exception- dems are more pro-environment that repubs. But not nearly enough so and even that is too often too much talk, not enough action. Who was president when the Kyoto Protocol was non-ratified by the United States? A Clinton!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Posts: 13,576
    JC29856 said:

    show previous quotes
    https://theintercept.com/2016/02/25/tv-pundits-praise-hillary-clinton-on-air-fail-to-disclose-financial-ties-to-her-campaign/
    So, why aren't you bothered by the collusion between Fox News and the candidate you are backing for POTUS?
    Hmmm..
    Could it be that you only care because it's Clinton?
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Posts: 9,617
    PJ_Soul said:

    Haha, you expect pundits to be neutral??

    Nope, similar to the DNC, just tell the truth. If you prefer a candidate say so, if you or you're employer is paid by a campaign simply say so. Don't look and act impartial. Read the article first not just the link
  • Posts: 13,576
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    show previous quotes
    So whose internal emails have better media sources.
    Hillary or Trump.
    Oh, that's Trump by a country mile. He has almost an entire news network (by far the most watched news network) openly campaigning for him.

    It's funny, you don't hear progressives getting all butthurt about it...
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
This discussion has been closed.

Quick Links

Categories