Ku Klux Klan Members?
Comments
-
1995 San Francisco
San JoseSan Diego 2 shows
2003 Missoula
2005 Missoula
2006 Denver 2 shows with Tom PettyGorge 2 shows
2009 UtahLA1
LA2
2012 Missoula : Meet and Greet : "Instant Classic show"
2013 PortlandSpokane
2018 Missoula
0 -
while I agree with the premise to some extent where do you draw the line on shaming someone? there are plenty of instances of people being shamed on the internet for much less things than being KKK members but ends up with those having very bad effects on those being shamed, even to the point of death. Shaming and outing people is a form of bullying. Where is the line to be drawn? Shaming and outing people like this is a very thin line that all of us should give second thoughts too supporting.Kat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
Edit: i don't want anyone to take my above comments in any way as some kind of support for KKK members who are outed.0 -
I think that shaming is a completely valid thing to do in some cases, and this is one of them. I think bringing "bullying" into it is a really tired thing to do. It's basically ridiculous to brow beat the shaming of KKK members. Shaming them and white supremacists in general is completely appropriate. I actually think we'd be remiss NOT to shame such people.pjhawks said:
while I agree with the premise to some extent where do you draw the line on shaming someone? there are plenty of instances of people being shamed on the internet for much less things than being KKK members but ends up with those having very bad effects on those being shamed, even to the point of death. Shaming and outing people is a form of bullying. Where is the line to be drawn? Shaming and outing people like this is a very thin line that all of us should give second thoughts too supporting.Kat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
Edit: i don't want anyone to take my above comments in any way as some kind of support for KKK members who are outed.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Screw it. If your a racist, no less a white racists that has all the advantages, you should be called out for being an insecure ass. Racism is a cancer and should be exposed.pjhawks said:
while I agree with the premise to some extent where do you draw the line on shaming someone? there are plenty of instances of people being shamed on the internet for much less things than being KKK members but ends up with those having very bad effects on those being shamed, even to the point of death. Shaming and outing people is a form of bullying. Where is the line to be drawn? Shaming and outing people like this is a very thin line that all of us should give second thoughts too supporting.Kat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
Edit: i don't want anyone to take my above comments in any way as some kind of support for KKK members who are outed.10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG0 -
Anonymous has good intentions. Their information has backfired in the past but to compare Anonymous to the KKK isn't really fair.usamamasan1 said:
none i can think ofKat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
agree but i guess my contention is who decides what is shaming worthy? If we leave that decision up people like Kim Davis we could end up in a dark place. it's a slippery slope.PJ_Soul said:
I think that shaming is a completely valid thing to do in some cases, and this is one of them. I think bringing "bullying" into it is a really tired thing to do. It's basically ridiculous to brow beat the shaming of KKK members. Shaming them and white supremacists in general is completely appropriate. I actually think we'd be remiss NOT to shame such people.pjhawks said:
while I agree with the premise to some extent where do you draw the line on shaming someone? there are plenty of instances of people being shamed on the internet for much less things than being KKK members but ends up with those having very bad effects on those being shamed, even to the point of death. Shaming and outing people is a form of bullying. Where is the line to be drawn? Shaming and outing people like this is a very thin line that all of us should give second thoughts too supporting.Kat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
Edit: i don't want anyone to take my above comments in any way as some kind of support for KKK members who are outed.0 -
not trying to compare the two at all. just asking a question about the slope that this type of behavior is taking us down. as i said above, who gets to decide what is shame worthy? yea KKK members are shame worthy, but if people like Kim Davis get to decide then we could be going down a slippery path.Gern Blansten said:
Anonymous has good intentions. Their information has backfired in the past but to compare Anonymous to the KKK isn't really fair.usamamasan1 said:
none i can think ofKat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.0 -
How about we just go with common sense on this one? I personally don't subscribe to the slippery slope theory. I believe it to be one of the weakest arguments in just about all cases precisely because it rejects common sense.pjhawks said:
agree but i guess my contention is who decides what is shaming worthy? If we leave that decision up people like Kim Davis we could end up in a dark place. it's a slippery slope.PJ_Soul said:
I think that shaming is a completely valid thing to do in some cases, and this is one of them. I think bringing "bullying" into it is a really tired thing to do. It's basically ridiculous to brow beat the shaming of KKK members. Shaming them and white supremacists in general is completely appropriate. I actually think we'd be remiss NOT to shame such people.pjhawks said:
while I agree with the premise to some extent where do you draw the line on shaming someone? there are plenty of instances of people being shamed on the internet for much less things than being KKK members but ends up with those having very bad effects on those being shamed, even to the point of death. Shaming and outing people is a form of bullying. Where is the line to be drawn? Shaming and outing people like this is a very thin line that all of us should give second thoughts too supporting.Kat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
Edit: i don't want anyone to take my above comments in any way as some kind of support for KKK members who are outed.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
The public decides. If Anonymous issued a list of people that jerked off no one would care because everyone jerks off.pjhawks said:
not trying to compare the two at all. just asking a question about the slope that this type of behavior is taking us down. as i said above, who gets to decide what is shame worthy? yea KKK members are shame worthy, but if people like Kim Davis get to decide then we could be going down a slippery path.Gern Blansten said:
Anonymous has good intentions. Their information has backfired in the past but to compare Anonymous to the KKK isn't really fair.usamamasan1 said:
none i can think ofKat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
Kim Davis gave us her version of shaming and the public was overwhelming against it.Post edited by Gern Blansten onRemember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
not true, people cared about who was on the AshleyMadison.com list that was put out. Was that ok to out regular people for that? And i think it's a huge difference in outing celebrities for these types of behaviors (like the Duggar dude) and outing regular everyday people. outing people based on what you think is shame-worthy can ruin lives and you may have different levels of what you consider shame worthy.Gern Blansten said:
The public decides. If Anonymous issued a list of people that jerked off no one would care because everyone jerks off.pjhawks said:
not trying to compare the two at all. just asking a question about the slope that this type of behavior is taking us down. as i said above, who gets to decide what is shame worthy? yea KKK members are shame worthy, but if people like Kim Davis get to decide then we could be going down a slippery path.Gern Blansten said:
Anonymous has good intentions. Their information has backfired in the past but to compare Anonymous to the KKK isn't really fair.usamamasan1 said:
none i can think ofKat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone.
again not advocating against outing KKK members here as I think every reasonable person agrees with the shamefulness of those members .0 -
Thats never his agenda. Fairness.Gern Blansten said:
Anonymous has good intentions. Their information has backfired in the past but to compare Anonymous to the KKK isn't really fair.usamamasan1 said:
none i can think ofKat said:I'd call it more of a shaming...a bright light shining in dark places. Who wears hoods in a good organization? It's really creepy to do that and we'll just see how it shakes out and how much validity we should attach to the list. We'll evaluate it as we do everything we talk about in here.
Have a beautiful week, everyone._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
just a quick thought,
"We become what we think about." - Earl Nightingale
Godfather.0 -
The KKK operate in the dark because they are cowardly.
If they were people of principle, they'd stand behind their values and openly practice their hatred.
With that said, goofy organizations like the Westboro Baptist Church are worthy of more respect given they at least 'walk the walk'.
For the simple fact that their knees are likely knocking together at this very moment at the thought of being exposed... expose them."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
The KKK operate in the dark because they are cowardly.
If they were people of principle, they'd stand behind their values and openly practice their hatred.
With that said, goofy organizations like the Westboro Baptist Church are worthy of more respect given they at least 'walk the walk'.
For the simple fact that their knees are likely knocking together at this very moment at the thought of being exposed... expose them.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
0
-
I believe that Anonymous operates the way it does because if they didn't do it that way they'd be stopped from doing what they're doing.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I believe the KKK wears hoods so that the members can hide their dark side - their dirty little secret - from their community and their employers.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Thank you Dignin.
Wow. Fascinating. I didn't get 1 minute in before:
Ben “Zyklon” Garrison AKA Wyatt Mann AKA Skeeter
Gladeville, Tennessee
militant.tn.ns@gmail.com
militant.tn.klavern01@gmail.com
Associates degree in Applied Science, HVAC
Attended White House High School
Disavowed by the KKK, has a million aliases
described as an “alpha nazi” by those that know him
Hangs out on /pol/ & cartoonist hobby
“rebuked by others for his extremism”
“the Aryan Brotherhood, and the Hammerskin Nation for his levels of rampant, psychotic hatred.”
“Truly a demented nexus of omnidirectional loathing in the shape of a man”
Many interesting comments included. I.e.:
Bill Potts
Imperial Wizard of his very own KKK group in TN.
Former member of several KKK groups
Former member of the original Knight Riders
Former law enforcement
Generally a harmless old fart now
https://www.facebook.com/bill.potts1Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I don't see a comparison, KKK can operate in the open if they have the balls to, Anonymous doesn't have that option.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
One of their next big targets will be pedophiles, will that change your opinion?Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
Just did a random spot check of FB profiles listed.... yeah, so far it seems pretty fucking accurate. These people are sick fucks. Most of them don't seem to be hiding it. A few do, but for the most part, it's really a list of people we should stay away from... and who the cops and FBI should keep an eye on.
I don't understand how these people can have public FB pages like this and still have jobs. It's actually pretty fucking scary to browse these pages. A lot of them look really evil.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help