Ku Klux Klan Members?

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Bentleyspop said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
You love civil disobedience? Really?
But you are liberal.

You don't?
Most liberals do love civil disobedience, equal rights and living wages, stopping and preventing wars, reigning in the financial maffias...that's what civil disobedience is all about, that's liberalism to a T.

I equate civil disobedience to kkk members.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=mGrxBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=kkk+civil+disobedience&source=bl&ots=xXxiY01Uzx&sig=r96lJ88KZosLccNxWmfIapoUlWE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMIjIiQ77j1yAIVCx8eCh1ERQH2#v=onepage&q=kkk civil disobedience&f=false

That is some article talking about what was going on in the 1860s, and the writer decided to call the (then) legal stuff that the KKK was doing "civil disobedience". That was a very poor choice of words on the writer's part, and totally irrelevant to the way people normally use the term today. It also says that the KKK stepped beyond the author's odd concept of civil disobedience into truly fucked up shit. So you equate civil disobedience to KKK members because of this one thing that I assume you found via Google?

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Bentleyspop said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
You love civil disobedience? Really?
But you are liberal.

You don't?
Most liberals do love civil disobedience, equal rights and living wages, stopping and preventing wars, reigning in the financial maffias...that's what civil disobedience is all about, that's liberalism to a T.

I equate civil disobedience to kkk members.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=mGrxBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=kkk+civil+disobedience&source=bl&ots=xXxiY01Uzx&sig=r96lJ88KZosLccNxWmfIapoUlWE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMIjIiQ77j1yAIVCx8eCh1ERQH2#v=onepage&q=kkk civil disobedience&f=false

That is some article talking about what was going on in the 1860s, and the writer decided to call the (then) legal stuff that the KKK was doing "civil disobedience". That was a very poor choice of words on the writer's part, and totally irrelevant to the way people normally use the term. It also says that the KKK stepped beyond the author's odd concept of civil disobedience into truly fucked up shit. So you equate civil disbedience to KKK members because of this one thing that I assume you found via Google?

You obviously didn't scroll up to read the picture edit.

I did read that actually. I'm not sure what your point is.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Bentleyspop said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
You love civil disobedience? Really?
But you are liberal.

You don't?
Most liberals do love civil disobedience, equal rights and living wages, stopping and preventing wars, reigning in the financial maffias...that's what civil disobedience is all about, that's liberalism to a T.

I equate civil disobedience to kkk members.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=mGrxBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=kkk+civil+disobedience&source=bl&ots=xXxiY01Uzx&sig=r96lJ88KZosLccNxWmfIapoUlWE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMIjIiQ77j1yAIVCx8eCh1ERQH2#v=onepage&q=kkk civil disobedience&f=false

That is some article talking about what was going on in the 1860s, and the writer decided to call the (then) legal stuff that the KKK was doing "civil disobedience". That was a very poor choice of words on the writer's part, and totally irrelevant to the way people normally use the term. It also says that the KKK stepped beyond the author's odd concept of civil disobedience into truly fucked up shit. So you equate civil disbedience to KKK members because of this one thing that I assume you found via Google?

You obviously didn't scroll up to read the picture edit.

I did read that actually. I'm not sure what your point is.

The article draws upon facts that civil disobedience runs rampant in kkk.
1860 till now (or at least a pic from 1999 for reference).
Same manner, same tone after all this time.
Civil disobedience - kkk

But you said you equate civil disobedience to KKK members, and were therefore surprised that I support civil disobedience. I.e. Civil disobedience = KKK. That doesn't mean the same as saying the KKK has practiced civil disobedience. Sorry for paying too much attention to what you wrote.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Bentleyspop said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
You love civil disobedience? Really?
But you are liberal.

You don't?
Most liberals do love civil disobedience, equal rights and living wages, stopping and preventing wars, reigning in the financial maffias...that's what civil disobedience is all about, that's liberalism to a T.

I equate civil disobedience to kkk members.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=mGrxBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=kkk+civil+disobedience&source=bl&ots=xXxiY01Uzx&sig=r96lJ88KZosLccNxWmfIapoUlWE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMIjIiQ77j1yAIVCx8eCh1ERQH2#v=onepage&q=kkk civil disobedience&f=false

That is some article talking about what was going on in the 1860s, and the writer decided to call the (then) legal stuff that the KKK was doing "civil disobedience". That was a very poor choice of words on the writer's part, and totally irrelevant to the way people normally use the term. It also says that the KKK stepped beyond the author's odd concept of civil disobedience into truly fucked up shit. So you equate civil disbedience to KKK members because of this one thing that I assume you found via Google?

You obviously didn't scroll up to read the picture edit.

I did read that actually. I'm not sure what your point is.

The article draws upon facts that civil disobedience runs rampant in kkk.
1860 till now (or at least a pic from 1999 for reference).
Same manner, same tone after all this time.
Civil disobedience - kkk

Nice try, not.
Did you read it? It specifies the different manners and tones throughout the decades, almost all of which do not qualify as civil disobedience.
The KKK wear hoods to protect their identity in the committing of crimes, by nearly every definition, civil disobedience requires breaking the law openly and getting arrested for it.
A better use of Google would have been starting with a definition of what civil disobedience is.

I believe you said earlier
Most liberals do love civil disobedience, equal rights and living wages, stopping and preventing wars, reigning in the financial maffias...that's what civil disobedience is all about, that's liberalism to a T.

So breaking the law is required for civil disobedience?
And someone states they love civil disobedience......

Yes it is. Maybe try some reading.
Yes, she did and I do too.
So too should women, black people, native people, and any laborers who make a living wage, because they all owe their rights to those who practiced civil disobedience.

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Bentleyspop said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

rgambs said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
You love civil disobedience? Really?
But you are liberal.

You don't?
Most liberals do love civil disobedience, equal rights and living wages, stopping and preventing wars, reigning in the financial maffias...that's what civil disobedience is all about, that's liberalism to a T.

I equate civil disobedience to kkk members.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=mGrxBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184&lpg=PA184&dq=kkk+civil+disobedience&source=bl&ots=xXxiY01Uzx&sig=r96lJ88KZosLccNxWmfIapoUlWE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMIjIiQ77j1yAIVCx8eCh1ERQH2#v=onepage&q=kkk civil disobedience&f=false

That is some article talking about what was going on in the 1860s, and the writer decided to call the (then) legal stuff that the KKK was doing "civil disobedience". That was a very poor choice of words on the writer's part, and totally irrelevant to the way people normally use the term. It also says that the KKK stepped beyond the author's odd concept of civil disobedience into truly fucked up shit. So you equate civil disbedience to KKK members because of this one thing that I assume you found via Google?

You obviously didn't scroll up to read the picture edit.

I did read that actually. I'm not sure what your point is.

The article draws upon facts that civil disobedience runs rampant in kkk.
1860 till now (or at least a pic from 1999 for reference).
Same manner, same tone after all this time.
Civil disobedience - kkk

Based on your posts...kkk= civil disobedience

So therefore you are okay with....

Lynchings
Burning crosses on people's lawns
Beatings
Church burnings
Murders
Etc etc

Lets clear something up here real easy like: All apples are a fruit. Not all fruits are apples.

Go Beavers said:

Godfather. said:

Smellyman said:

Godfather. said:

words like "alleged" "anonymous" and "Hacker" give this story a bit of a bullshit base to start with, maybe before we start believing some idiots listing names of people they say are KKK we should be looking into the hackers first, maybe Kat or myself are KKK members ?.....or maybe EV is the grand wizard. hay ! lets start listing names numbers and address's of folks we think are black panthers members....lets look on the interweb for pictures of Elvis alive today living in small town America and hanging out with Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin......I seen em' !!!!!

that's it America let's keep stoking the fire of racism because we can't live without it.

Godfather.

That's what is great about anonymous they will lay out all the evidence out to be judged.

I know it's a little bit more worrisome about the names on your side.

Also on your side you say you want transparency but when exposed get very angry. It's all lip service. Your side wants the secrets.

my side ? what is my side in your opinion ?

Godfather.

I'd say your side is conservatives. In the last few years, you guys have been parroting each other, saying that if someone says racism is happening, that the person identifying the racism is being racist themselves and that doing this is making racial tensions worse. It's an interesting form of denial. This gets paired with blind faith in law enforcement in cases of cops abusing their power. I think it has to do with us white guys slowly losing our white privilege, which makes some people afraid of that change.

I don't know about loosing the privilege, not for many generations to come. I look at concentration of $$$.