Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered to 18 in the US? - Read My HuffPo Piece

2»

Comments

  • dunkman
    dunkman Posts: 19,646
    yes, the more americans hooked on booze can only be a good thing!
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • rr165892
    rr165892 Posts: 5,697

    ldent42 said:

    rr165892 said:

    Ann,Good article.

    I absolutely feel the MLDA should be lowered.
    My kids 20,22 and 24 all allegedly had or have fake Id for drinking.My concern is not drinking but drinking and driving ,and for the girls drinking and puttin themselves in a position to be taken advantage of.

    We ask our young adults to sign up with selective service,we tell them they will be tried as adults if they get in trouble,they can now legally get into many establishments. Hypocritical to ask these young uns to kill or be killed for your country.Your old enough for that but not to drink.Kinda BS if you ask me.

    Seriously? seriously? Ugh.

    I do agree with your entire second paragraph though. If you can vote, purchase tobacco products, be tried as an adult, and above all serve in the military at 18, there's no logical reason why you should not be allowed to legally purchase alcohol.
    I don't quite get your "ugh". Is it because rr only mentioned girls getting taken advantage of? Because I think as a parent of a teenager or young adult that is one of the biggies that you worry about - your kid drinking too much and getting into a situation where they can't make the decision that protects themselves. Whether that is not getting into a car with a drunk driver, or being able to leave when they're being pressured into sex that they don't want. Talking with your kids about staying sober enough to keep themselves safe, whether they are male or female, is not victim blaming.
    Exactly!!!!
  • rr165892
    rr165892 Posts: 5,697
    RKCNDY said:

    ldent42 said:

    rr165892 said:

    Ann,Good article.

    I absolutely feel the MLDA should be lowered.
    My kids 20,22 and 24 all allegedly had or have fake Id for drinking.My concern is not drinking but drinking and driving ,and for the girls drinking and puttin themselves in a position to be taken advantage of.

    We ask our young adults to sign up with selective service,we tell them they will be tried as adults if they get in trouble,they can now legally get into many establishments. Hypocritical to ask these young uns to kill or be killed for your country.Your old enough for that but not to drink.Kinda BS if you ask me.

    Seriously? seriously? Ugh.

    I do agree with your entire second paragraph though. If you can vote, purchase tobacco products, be tried as an adult, and above all serve in the military at 18, there's no logical reason why you should not be allowed to legally purchase alcohol.
    I don't quite get your "ugh". Is it because rr only mentioned girls getting taken advantage of? Because I think as a parent of a teenager or young adult that is one of the biggies that you worry about - your kid drinking too much and getting into a situation where they can't make the decision that protects themselves. Whether that is not getting into a car with a drunk driver, or being able to leave when they're being pressured into sex that they don't want. Talking with your kids about staying sober enough to keep themselves safe, whether they are male or female, is not victim blaming.
    So again, we are putting the responsibility on the girls to fend off an over zealous male that wants to get in her pants? Why not teach these 'young responsible adult men' to respect the word 'no'. Or in general, to respect a young woman who has consumed too much alcohol and passed out by making sure she is well cared for until she is sober enough to go home?
    We hear of several cases of rape by underage college kids who 'drank too much...oops' correct?
    If these so called 'adults', are old enough to die for our country, they damn well know better than to take advantage of a person who has had too much to drink. Alcohol use for unacceptable behavior needs to quit being used as an excuse.
    Take some fucking responsibility for your actions.
    RC,I don't disagree with everything you said here.I think it can go hand in hand with my concern.My 2 youngest the 20-22 year olds are both girls and college students.So as a parent my worries run the gamut.We have raised them well,but my concerns are for the stuff they can't control.
    I had one of girls get shit slipped into drink at a party.I also have met a very scared young man who brought my very intoxicated daughter home late one evening after he and his girlfriend watched over her at a high school party.She was late by 2 hours,we couldn't reach her and we were worried sick.But they made sure she was safe.Now the kids are adults and good people.
    There are some good kids out there with the values you advocate for.
    So this stuff is concerning
  • Last-12-Exit
    Last-12-Exit Charleston, SC Posts: 8,661
    edited March 2015
    I think the legal driving age should be 18.
  • ldent42
    ldent42 NYC Posts: 7,859
    edited March 2015
    I don't wanna derail so I'll keep it brief. If you're a parent that's actually concerned about your offspring's well being then more power to you, I hope your kids know how lucky they are to have you. I don't think for a second you spoke with malice, however your use of language does in fact denote victim blaming, whether you meant it to or not. These days they call it a "micro aggression", usually people don't even know what they're saying is wrong. But it perpetuates the idea that the onus is on a woman to keep herself safe rather than on every one not to prey on others. There's significantly more pressure on girls to "not get raped" than there is on men to "not rape". In the context of alcohol use, you could say the concern is for women not to drink in bars lest they be attacked, but the same concern isn't as great for young men, whose physiology allows for them to be drugged the same as women.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't live in a bubble. In reality, as a woman in a bar you DO have to take certain precautions, that shit is drilled into us from childhood. My "ugh" wasn't in response to your point, which I take to be "I don't want anything terrible to happen to my kid at all, and there's an increased chance something terrible could happen to her if she's been drinking, because that's just the reality we live in." But it was specifically in response to your phrasing, because the reality we live in ain't gonna change until we can get the field levelled, so that perception isn't "chicks get taken advantage of cuz they were drunk" but "asshat took advantage of someone cuz he's scum". The way that field gets levelled, is to rid ourselves as a society of the idea that a girl "puts herself" in the position to be attacked. It's a latent idea we all have that people ought to keep themselves safe, and any failure of that is to some degree, their own failure. It's amplified in crimes against women, but it's there for any crime, you can see it in every headline in the papers.
    "Why didn't they have the two person in the cockpit rule?"
    "Why didn't they have smoke detectors?"
    "What were they doing walking through that area at night?"
    "Why didn't she just leave him?"
    Etc etc

    I said I'd keep it brief. I lied. :naughty: (sorry Enkidu)
    Post edited by ldent42 on
    NYC 06/24/08-Auckland 11/27/09-Chch 11/29/09-Newark 05/18/10-Atlanta 09/22/12-Chicago 07/19/13-Brooklyn 10/18/13 & 10/19/13-Hartford 10/25/13-Baltimore 10/27/13-Auckland 1/17/14-GC 1/19/14-Melbourne 1/24/14-Sydney 1/26/14-Amsterdam 6/16/14 & 6/17/14-Milan 6/20/14-Berlin 6/26/14-Leeds 7/8/14-Milton Keynes 7/11/14-St. Louis 10/3/14-NYC 9/26/15
    LIVEFOOTSTEPS.ORG/USER/?USR=435
  • Enkidu
    Enkidu So Cal Posts: 2,996
    Ident43, don't think you derailed the thread - the whole thing is insanely complicated. My husband and I know a family. Their daughter is a super crazy party girl in college on the east coast. (The parents admit that. Not happy about it and they used the expression "slutty party girl.") So the girl goes to a fraternity party, gets wasted, goes upstairs with a guy she knows. He's as drunk as she is. They're in bed, they're naked, she changes her mind.

    Part of me feels sorry for the guy - maybe that makes me a bad female. However, when she says no, that should be it. Right? My husband and I both felt sort of sorry for the guy. More sorry for the girl because they had sex and she had said no.

    Then the story takes an even worse turn. His roommate comes in, he has sex with the girl too. She knew the roommate, said no. He had sex with her anyway. (She didn't really remember most of this until the next morning when she woke up in the guy's bed.)

    She reported this to the school and the school said - sorry, with your reputation, nothing is going to happen with these two guys. And it didn't. They didn't get kicked out of school or suspended or a reprimand. Nothing happened to them.

    Pretty screwed up. How do we level the field? We can't ban alcohol, I don't think we can ban fraternities. But shouldn't those 2 guys have been held accountable?

    (Damn, did I just derail my own thread?)
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,396
    Wow! I'm an a__hole, have been known to be drunk, went to drunken parties, but would just never do anything like that.

    Is it alcohol......or lack of common decency?
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • Enkidu
    Enkidu So Cal Posts: 2,996
    Some of is obviously a fraternity mindset and how think they can get away with anything. I have a friend from UVa who was in a super snobby frat (a Bush was with him, Neil maybe?) and although they didn't rape anyone (that my friend knows of), they were quite elitist. No blacks, no Jews, etc. My husband's fraternity, SAE (Sexual Assault Expected), was recently suspended at Stanford for sexual harassment issues.

    But I have to say, I went to some great fraternity parties at UVa. I knew a lot of really great fraternity guys.
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,396
    I've always thought fraternities could exhibit a bit of mob mentality.....and that's scary.

    sorority mob mentality? bring it! (Sorry)
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • Last-12-Exit
    Last-12-Exit Charleston, SC Posts: 8,661
    I've never been a fan of people using the expression "I was so drunk" for their actions. I've been wasted before and I've never raped a woman, driven a car, beat my wife, or shot somebody. I always knew right from wrong. Men that rape women, even if they are drunk, know what no means. I'd be willing to bet that guy would have still raped that girl even if he was sober. Maybe not if she was. But it's still no excuse.
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,396
    how about "I was so drunk, i peed in the closet"?

    I hear ya, last.
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • rr165892
    rr165892 Posts: 5,697
    Enkidu said:

    Ident43, don't think you derailed the thread - the whole thing is insanely complicated. My husband and I know a family. Their daughter is a super crazy party girl in college on the east coast. (The parents admit that. Not happy about it and they used the expression "slutty party girl.") So the girl goes to a fraternity party, gets wasted, goes upstairs with a guy she knows. He's as drunk as she is. They're in bed, they're naked, she changes her mind.

    Part of me feels sorry for the guy - maybe that makes me a bad female. However, when she says no, that should be it. Right? My husband and I both felt sort of sorry for the guy. More sorry for the girl because they had sex and she had said no.

    Then the story takes an even worse turn. His roommate comes in, he has sex with the girl too. She knew the roommate, said no. He had sex with her anyway. (She didn't really remember most of this until the next morning when she woke up in the guy's bed.)

    She reported this to the school and the school said - sorry, with your reputation, nothing is going to happen with these two guys. And it didn't. They didn't get kicked out of school or suspended or a reprimand. Nothing happened to them.

    Pretty screwed up. How do we level the field? We can't ban alcohol, I don't think we can ban fraternities. But shouldn't those 2 guys have been held accountable?

    (Damn, did I just derail my own thread?)

    Yes they should if she really said no.Such a slippery slope of he said she said.
  • ldent42
    ldent42 NYC Posts: 7,859
    Enkidu said:


    How do we level the field?

    obviously there's no bulletproof answer to this, but the best I can figure is to tackle victim blaming, which is such a common staple in our lexicon. I think we gotta get it to the same level as racism or homophobia, in the sense that most people perceive those who hold those views as the small minded ignorant minority, flotsam from a (shameful) bygone era.
    Specifically in regard to the examples we discussed of girls getting raped while intoxicated, the only way that happens is over time, as in generations. Boys have to be taught how to not rape a girl, just like today girls are instructed how to not put themselves in a position to be raped. It might sound fucked up and gender biased but it's true. The "blurred line" of consent and the "not my responsibility" mentality that tends to come with privilege are problems that arise out of the sheer lack of respect those guys have for a girls autonomy. It might seem ridiculous, those two guys you mentioned might be otherwise complete upstanding citizens who send their mothers flowers on mothers day and idolize accomplished female professors in their uni, but because they are conditioned to think that a drunk girl's decisions are irrelevant, or meaningless, and because they're conditioned to think that if she went into bed with you she definitely wants it, in spite of what she might say while in the moment, shit like that happens and more often than not without any consequences for them, but nearly always with some level of trauma as a consequence for the girl. In this specific case the campus cops told her that her reputation was part of the case against her, but the boys' reputation is never something that came into question. That line of thinking needs to change.

    I know I'm gonna regret posting this. I know it. I don't want to come off like I'm picking on anyone or nitpicking the subject, but even what rr said, "if she did say no" implies that there is/should be some doubt. That bit up there^^ about being conditioned to think about the situation a certain way? That's how we are conditioned to think that way, or rather further evidence of it. And I mean I know it's difficult cuz it does boil down to he said/she said a LOT in those type of situations but what a lot of people I think tend to forget is that there's no benefit whatsoever to a girl reporting that crime, as Enkidu's friend's kid found out the hard way. That why the vaaaaaaaast majority of sexual assaults are not reported. And the estimate is 1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted once in her lifetime, but it increases once you become that 1 (I don't remember the figure, which I know invalidates my entire argument, but the point is once a woman's been assaulted her odds of being assaulted again increase.)
    I'm sorry I know I probably should've not pointed out the second microaggression but it illustrated my point too well not to. I think this thread is getting a wee bit AMT-y and yea I know if that's anyone's fault it's mine, so I'm gonna have to bow out here. I get too defensive about this stuff and I think I've said all I can in a constructive philosophical/academic manner.
    NYC 06/24/08-Auckland 11/27/09-Chch 11/29/09-Newark 05/18/10-Atlanta 09/22/12-Chicago 07/19/13-Brooklyn 10/18/13 & 10/19/13-Hartford 10/25/13-Baltimore 10/27/13-Auckland 1/17/14-GC 1/19/14-Melbourne 1/24/14-Sydney 1/26/14-Amsterdam 6/16/14 & 6/17/14-Milan 6/20/14-Berlin 6/26/14-Leeds 7/8/14-Milton Keynes 7/11/14-St. Louis 10/3/14-NYC 9/26/15
    LIVEFOOTSTEPS.ORG/USER/?USR=435
  • RKCNDY
    RKCNDY Posts: 31,013
    edited March 2015
    First I'm glad this thread is here, we are all being respectful of everyone else (part of why I rarely post on the train).
    I'm very sorry to hear that one of Ann's daughters was slipped something in her drink, sad to think some one has to make sure the other person is at a disadvantage so they can make them do something they would otherwise probably not do.
    The daughter that had the young man bring her home was a very mature and responsible thing to do, and that is what we need to be teaching to young adults. If they are going to drink to an excess, please watch out for one another, take care of each other and make sure everybody is okay. When I was in HS, that's just the way it was, we'd laugh at the guy on his hands and knees ripping up the lawn, but once someone started crying or puking, someone stayed with that person to make sure they didn't lay on their back and pass out. Just like in the old days of the mosh put, 'if someone falls, you pick them up'. Not sure what happened, but it seems now some mosh pits turned into MMA rings, and people are in there to hurt others.
    With the girl that was unable to do anything about being taken advantage of, that's another case of victim blaming, and it needs to be changed. I can see both sides, but the boys not getting any sort of disciplinary action just gives them the green light to do it again to another girl.
    Seems that these days when an underage person has been caught drinking, there is no legal action being taken, so are we essentially already lowering the drinking age?
    Post edited by RKCNDY on
    The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon, for each day to have a new and different sun.

    - Christopher McCandless