Reasonable US Position on Israel-Palestine
Comments
-
I hope you find it soon. Anything to put an end to all the petty bitching and phoney indignation.brianlux said:
Yeah- the whole point for some here anymore seems to be striking out against other posters, seeing who can be more sarcastic and clever and insulting. Not exactly a very productive way to talk about serious issues. Most of us here find no use or interest in the petty bantering. Good to know others here feel the same way.JimmyV said:
Good time to practice the "ignore" button... although I think I've tried every key and button, f key and ctrl combo and still can't find that damn "ignore" button, hahaha!
Then maybe the rest of us can have a serious discussion without a bunch of thin-skinned people getting offended every five minutes.
0 -
Byrnzie said:
I hope you find it soon. Anything to put an end to all the petty bitching and phoney indignation.brianlux said:
Yeah- the whole point for some here anymore seems to be striking out against other posters, seeing who can be more sarcastic and clever and insulting. Not exactly a very productive way to talk about serious issues. Most of us here find no use or interest in the petty bantering. Good to know others here feel the same way.JimmyV said:
Good time to practice the "ignore" button... although I think I've tried every key and button, f key and ctrl combo and still can't find that damn "ignore" button, hahaha!
Then maybe the rest of us can have a serious discussion without a bunch of thin-skinned people getting offended every five minutes.www.myspace.com0 -
Byrnzke, just as an example, if you could try and go 5 posts on the subject without using the phrase 'illegal land-grab,' it'd be nice. Not because you're not entitled to argue that Israeli grabbed land over the course of its existence, but because everybody knows that's how you feel about the way Israel acquired territory over the course of its existence, and you just repeating that phrase over and over again does nothing for the conversation at this point. Before the Imagine That thread was locked, for example, bad brains' contributions sometimes got me to think about/clarify/modify my own position. That kind of exchange is constructive. You constantly repeating the same phrase like you're on autopilot isn't.0
-
I agree with dancin...Byrnzie,change 'illegal land grab' with...'taking more land away from the Palestinian people, building illegal settlements and breaking international laws'
I dunno, B, perhaps it is time to rephrase the truth.0 -
Idris, I like this post. Clever my friend.Idris said:I agree with dancin...Byrnzie,change 'illegal land grab' with...'taking more land away from the Palestinian people, building illegal settlements and breaking international laws'
I dunno, B, perhaps it is time to rephrase the truth.0 -
But is an illegal land-grab. So why would you want to pretend otherwise?dancinacrossthewater said:Byrnzke, just as an example, if you could try and go 5 posts on the subject without using the phrase 'illegal land-grab,' it'd be nice. Not because you're not entitled to argue that Israeli grabbed land over the course of its existence, but because everybody knows that's how you feel about the way Israel acquired territory over the course of its existence, and you just repeating that phrase over and over again does nothing for the conversation at this point. Before the Imagine That thread was locked, for example, bad brains' contributions sometimes got me to think about/clarify/modify my own position. That kind of exchange is constructive. You constantly repeating the same phrase like you're on autopilot isn't.
Like I said above, which seemed to offend all of the easily offended people, if we can have a discussion from a position of basic honesty and reference to the factual record, instead of indulging personal fantasies, then we might get somewhere - we may get to a point where we can begin to focus on effective strategies by which to protest what's going on. In the meantime, personal opinions, fantasies and lies, simply clog up the arteries.
http://www.btselem.org/settlements/international_law
The establishment of settlements in the West Bank violates international humanitarian law which establishes principles that apply during war and occupation. Moreover, the settlements lead to the infringement of international human rights law.
The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits an occupying power from transferring citizens from its own territory to the occupied territory (Article 49). The Hague Regulations prohibit an occupying power from undertaking permanent changes in the occupied area unless these are due to military needs in the narrow sense of the term, or unless they are undertaken for the benefit of the local population.
The establishment of settlements results in the violation of the rights of Palestinians as enshrined in international human rights law. Among other violations, the settlements infringe the right to self-determination, equality, property, an adequate standard of living, and freedom of movement.
Post edited by Byrnzie on0 -
I'd like to believe that this can be done. But can it? From everyone here?brianlux said:
Yeah, I'm totally up for that. I vote* that we either lock the thread* or carry on a respectful conversation.dancinacrossthewater said:See it'd be easy to lock this thread now, but if it's left open maybe the people who wanna talk - agree and disagree but actually talk - can carry on a dialogue.
(*Both figures-of speech- not like I have either a right to vote here or any influence on whether a thread is locked or not.)
0 -
I'm against the settlements man. Get em outta there. Gone. The continued existence of settlements is one reason I'd possibly support certain kinds of BDS.Byrnzie said:
But is an illegal land-grab. So why would you want to pretend otherwise?dancinacrossthewater said:Byrnzke, just as an example, if you could try and go 5 posts on the subject without using the phrase 'illegal land-grab,' it'd be nice. Not because you're not entitled to argue that Israeli grabbed land over the course of its existence, but because everybody knows that's how you feel about the way Israel acquired territory over the course of its existence, and you just repeating that phrase over and over again does nothing for the conversation at this point. Before the Imagine That thread was locked, for example, bad brains' contributions sometimes got me to think about/clarify/modify my own position. That kind of exchange is constructive. You constantly repeating the same phrase like you're on autopilot isn't.
Like I said above, which seemed to offend all of the easily offended people, if we can have a discussion from a position of basic honesty and reference to the factual record, instead of indulging personal fantasies, then we might get somewhere - we may get to a point where we can begin to focus on effective strategies by which to protest what's going on. In the meantime, personal opinions, fantasies and lies, simply clog up the arteries.
http://www.btselem.org/settlements/international_law
The establishment of settlements in the West Bank violates international humanitarian law which establishes principles that apply during war and occupation. Moreover, the settlements lead to the infringement of international human rights law.
The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits an occupying power from transferring citizens from its own territory to the occupied territory (Article 49). The Hague Regulations prohibit an occupying power from undertaking permanent changes in the occupied area unless these are due to military needs in the narrow sense of the term, or unless they are undertaken for the benefit of the local population.
The establishment of settlements results in the violation of the rights of Palestinians as enshrined in international human rights law. Among other violations, the settlements infringe the right to self-determination, equality, property, an adequate standard of living, and freedom of movement.
Now what constructive criticism would you offer Hamas?0 -
And you calling viewpoints that differ from yours fantasies or lies is both not true and not ok. There's nothing fantastic about the analysis I'm offering - it just clogs your arteries because it challenges your narrative.0
-
You will get crickets when it comes to criticism of Hamas.They do no wrong.Didnt you know that? The are just a cute little group of freedom fighters.dancinacrossthewater said:
I'm against the settlements man. Get em outta there. Gone. The continued existence of settlements is one reason I'd possibly support certain kinds of BDS.Byrnzie said:
But is an illegal land-grab. So why would you want to pretend otherwise?dancinacrossthewater said:Byrnzke, just as an example, if you could try and go 5 posts on the subject without using the phrase 'illegal land-grab,' it'd be nice. Not because you're not entitled to argue that Israeli grabbed land over the course of its existence, but because everybody knows that's how you feel about the way Israel acquired territory over the course of its existence, and you just repeating that phrase over and over again does nothing for the conversation at this point. Before the Imagine That thread was locked, for example, bad brains' contributions sometimes got me to think about/clarify/modify my own position. That kind of exchange is constructive. You constantly repeating the same phrase like you're on autopilot isn't.
Like I said above, which seemed to offend all of the easily offended people, if we can have a discussion from a position of basic honesty and reference to the factual record, instead of indulging personal fantasies, then we might get somewhere - we may get to a point where we can begin to focus on effective strategies by which to protest what's going on. In the meantime, personal opinions, fantasies and lies, simply clog up the arteries.
http://www.btselem.org/settlements/international_law
The establishment of settlements in the West Bank violates international humanitarian law which establishes principles that apply during war and occupation. Moreover, the settlements lead to the infringement of international human rights law.
The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits an occupying power from transferring citizens from its own territory to the occupied territory (Article 49). The Hague Regulations prohibit an occupying power from undertaking permanent changes in the occupied area unless these are due to military needs in the narrow sense of the term, or unless they are undertaken for the benefit of the local population.
The establishment of settlements results in the violation of the rights of Palestinians as enshrined in international human rights law. Among other violations, the settlements infringe the right to self-determination, equality, property, an adequate standard of living, and freedom of movement.
Now what constructive criticism would you offer Hamas?
I agree with you that the settlements need to stop.Ill go one step farther and say The blockade needs to be relaxed and or modified and removed.
So now Hamas will lay down arms right?Im sure they will allow The UN monitor a de militarized Gaza right? These are really the big issues on both sides .This should be easy,right?0 -
Ok let's see if any criticism at all of Hamas is forthcoming. I'm not baiting you, Byrnzie...I'd like to hear in what areas you think Hamas has acted wrongly when it comes to the lives of both Palestinians and Israelis.
You answering that question doesn't mean at all that I want you to stop criticizing Israel, btw.0 -
And I do agree with Byrnzie,no need to sugar coat anyone's thoughts here.Say what you think,no PC needed.I don't want to hear the Watered down opinions.I like the free flow of opinions and ideas.I don't have to agree with them or see it the same way,but I think we are all adults here and can handle a more "Spirited" conversation.
Its healthy and Entertaining.0 -
Well said.rr165892 said:And I do agree with Byrnzie,no need to sugar coat anyone's thoughts here.Say what you think,no PC needed.I don't want to hear the Watered down opinions.I like the free flow of opinions and ideas.I don't have to agree with them or see it the same way,but I think we are all adults here and can handle a more "Spirited" conversation.
Its healthy and Entertaining.0 -
Agree up to a point. When you're literally just trying to shut other people down that's no good. But being too thin-skinned isn't good either.0
-
We are all on a freakin Rock band message board.We all have that in common.Right of the bat we have that brotherhood as a common thread.If we were at a show,none of this would matter to our fellow fans.So its all good.
If someone puts a passioned and well researched opinion out for all to see and read,we have the choice to make our own opinion of it.Dig deeper or take it at face value.I don't agree (on this subject) with a lot of the views expressed here but on other threads I may agree with that person alot on another topic.You can't take this shit personally.0 -
RR, wtf happened to you man, you're making sense now and I'm totally tripping. Wtf has happened to the world alright!!!rr165892 said:We are all on a freakin Rock band message board.We all have that in common.Right of the bat we have that brotherhood as a common thread.If we were at a show,none of this would matter to our fellow fans.So its all good.
If someone puts a passioned and well researched opinion out for all to see and read,we have the choice to make our own opinion of it.Dig deeper or take it at face value.I don't agree (on this subject) with a lot of the views expressed here but on other threads I may agree with that person alot on another topic.You can't take this shit personally.)
0 -
Ah badbrains, you make me laugh sometimes!badbrains said:
RR, wtf happened to you man, you're making sense now and I'm totally tripping. Wtf has happened to the world alright!!!rr165892 said:We are all on a freakin Rock band message board.We all have that in common.Right of the bat we have that brotherhood as a common thread.If we were at a show,none of this would matter to our fellow fans.So its all good.
If someone puts a passioned and well researched opinion out for all to see and read,we have the choice to make our own opinion of it.Dig deeper or take it at face value.I don't agree (on this subject) with a lot of the views expressed here but on other threads I may agree with that person alot on another topic.You can't take this shit personally.)
RR, hope you don't take that line too personally.. I admire your desire for peace, in spite of our disagreement on how to arrive there.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
i agree with this, but we also want to keep the threads open, or at least maintain consistency over what stays open and what doesn't.rr165892 said:We are all on a freakin Rock band message board.We all have that in common.Right of the bat we have that brotherhood as a common thread.If we were at a show,none of this would matter to our fellow fans.So its all good.
If someone puts a passioned and well researched opinion out for all to see and read,we have the choice to make our own opinion of it.Dig deeper or take it at face value.I don't agree (on this subject) with a lot of the views expressed here but on other threads I may agree with that person alot on another topic.You can't take this shit personally.
there's also just no point in cheap-shotting each other. it's just dumb.0 -
Thanks Ben, I try my friend. I know RR is all good with that jab. He knows I meant it with "love" lol.benjs said:
Ah badbrains, you make me laugh sometimes!badbrains said:
RR, wtf happened to you man, you're making sense now and I'm totally tripping. Wtf has happened to the world alright!!!rr165892 said:We are all on a freakin Rock band message board.We all have that in common.Right of the bat we have that brotherhood as a common thread.If we were at a show,none of this would matter to our fellow fans.So its all good.
If someone puts a passioned and well researched opinion out for all to see and read,we have the choice to make our own opinion of it.Dig deeper or take it at face value.I don't agree (on this subject) with a lot of the views expressed here but on other threads I may agree with that person alot on another topic.You can't take this shit personally.)
RR, hope you don't take that line too personally.. I admire your desire for peace, in spite of our disagreement on how to arrive there.0 -
Opinions?!!rr165892 said:We are all on a freakin Rock band message board.We all have that in common.Right of the bat we have that brotherhood as a common thread.If we were at a show,none of this would matter to our fellow fans.So its all good.
If someone puts a passioned and well researched opinion out for all to see and read,we have the choice to make our own opinion of it.Dig deeper or take it at face value.I don't agree (on this subject) with a lot of the views expressed here but on other threads I may agree with that person alot on another topic.You can't take this shit personally.
You're not allowed to have opinions here.
Just straight facts homie straight facts
\:D/0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help