Proof that pearl jam are in touch with a higher entity

2»

Comments

  • CheekyCat
    CheekyCat Cincinnati Posts: 23
    one in touch with a HIGHer entity?? I mean, you are in Amsterdam, after all. ;) Must have been some reaaaallly good tea!
    "The waiting drove me mad..."
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    CheekyCat wrote:
    one in touch with a HIGHer entity?? I mean, you are in Amsterdam, after all. ;) Must have been some reaaaallly good tea!

    It's not me.... it's the camera....:-) My camera is old a battled hardy... maybe it has imbibed something... Lee Scratch Perry used to breath hash smoke into all the studio equipment when he was making an album to capture the essense of the weed.... maybe he was onto something.
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    It's shocking how many people read this forum.... the views on this photo have gone from 15 to 450 in less than 24 hours... and it's of nothing... imagine if I'd pointed to the photo of Vedder Nudity on stage:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/furbyx4/142646782/in/set-72057594129064081/
  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    ScotInAmsterdam wrote:
    It's shocking how many people read this forum.... the views on this photo have gone from 15 to 450 in less than 24 hours... and it's of nothing... imagine if I'd pointed to the photo of Vedder Nudity on stage:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/furbyx4/142646782/in/set-72057594129064081/

    You knew I was going to click on that even if I knew there wasn't going to be anything! Evil person you are!

    PS - and it's not shocking the number of views... we just like strange things!
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    redrock wrote:

    PS - and it's not shocking the number of views... we just like strange things!

    Now while I know that(even though I can't work out how) its some sort of digital ghosting effect by a hand coming somewhere, I wonder how many of the views actually believe it's supernatural.

    I'll only settle for supernatural if Jimi is involved.
  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    ScotInAmsterdam wrote:
    I'll only settle for supernatural if Jimi is involved.

    ... or Jim Morrison......
  • tdub
    tdub Posts: 226
    you are all missing it!! It's STONE's hand!! he's trying to crush Mike's amp for always outplaying him ; )
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    tdub wrote:
    you are all missing it!! It's STONE's hand!! he's trying to crush Mike's amp for always outplaying him ; )

    Hmmmmm - a new perspective....
  • goldenegg
    goldenegg Posts: 371
    Sorry if I'm about to ruin this for everyone, but there's a simple explaination for this. I'm actually surprised I'm the first to explain it. There must be other photographers on the forum.

    The shot was taken with a shutter speed of 1/8 sec. It was probably done by disabling the flash and keeping the camera in AUTO. At some point while taking the picture, someone infront of you put their hand up. It's still a fast enough shutter to not fully expose the hand in the shot.
  • justam
    justam Posts: 21,415
    ScotInAmsterdam wrote:
    I was looking through my photos from Barcelona. Who's hand is in this photo, and where is it reflecting from?

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/furbyx4/232608291/in/set-72157594266285351/

    I honestly haven't altered this. I really don't know who's hand this is or how it got there.

    Or, it could just be your greasy fingers from those chips you ate. :p;)
    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&
  • pearljam_chivas
    pearljam_chivas Posts: 66
    Barcelona 1.07.06 ??
    Santo was victorious over Bu$h
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    pearljam_chivas wrote:
    Barcelona 1.07.06 ??

    Ah.. should be the 9th month...
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    goldenegg wrote:
    Sorry if I'm about to ruin this for everyone, but there's a simple explaination for this. I'm actually surprised I'm the first to explain it. There must be other photographers on the forum.

    The shot was taken with a shutter speed of 1/8 sec. It was probably done by disabling the flash and keeping the camera in AUTO. At some point while taking the picture, someone infront of you put their hand up. It's still a fast enough shutter to not fully expose the hand in the shot.

    Would it not blur from entry point to exit point if that happened, a la:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/furbyx4/232608040/in/set-72157594266285351/
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    justam wrote:
    Or, it could just be your greasy fingers from those chips you ate. :p;)

    You're talking to a Scotsman.. do you mean fries or Potato chips?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chips
  • cuyler41
    cuyler41 Posts: 388
    whats really scarey is that those fingers appear to have 3 knuckles!
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    I'll go back and check.....
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    You're right....

    Could the three knuckled spaniard please walk forward, or maybe this is proof that it's hendrix... did he not have and extremly long............... forefinger.
  • justam
    justam Posts: 21,415
    ScotInAmsterdam wrote:
    You're talking to a Scotsman.. do you mean fries or Potato chips?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chips

    Fries is what I meant!! I know the difference over there. :)
    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&
  • ScotInAmsterdam
    ScotInAmsterdam Posts: 1,004
    justam wrote:
    Fries is what I meant!! I know the difference over there. :)

    Either way - they make your fingers greasy....

Categories