Infant in GA last night

124678

Comments

  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,998
    edited November 2013
    I bring my babies to use to cover my ears. One for each
    Post edited by MayDay10 on
  • JH6056
    JH6056 Posts: 2,444
    RoleModelsinBlood31 wrote:
    I have to go poop. Wait for me before you post anything else, this is riveting.

    Are you the infant from the pit last night? Are your parents SO irresponsible that, not only did they bring you to the pit, you have no diaper on either?

    Shocking and unacceptable! Revoke their parenting licenses!!!

    :o:o
  • Given2Fly2012
    Given2Fly2012 Posts: 659
    It's an insane thing, why is there no age limit for the shows? We had it (13 years) in Stockholm (Sweden).
    She holds the hand that holds her down...
    She will... rise above...
  • Nami
    Nami Newfoundland Posts: 5,998
    Cosmo wrote:
    Everyone needs to calm down.
    That baby was the one I rented out to someone. The reason why he didn't have ear protection was because the renter checked the 'Ear Protection Waiver' box so he wouldn't incur the $5.00 fee.
    ...
    Oh, and I was sure to note that the dent on his head was from the previous show in San Diego.
    :lol:
    Hamilton 9-13-05; Toronto 5-9-06, Toronto 8-21-09, Toronto 9-12-11, Hamilton 9-15-11....
  • backseatLover12
    backseatLover12 Posts: 2,312
    JimmyV wrote:
    JH6056 wrote:
    Sooo... 4 pages in, and has anyone actually confirmed the existence of an ACTUAL INFANT in the pit last night? Where did this rumor start, and where is the evidence?

    Because without it, this whole thread is fake and just trying to stir the pot because someone was losing ground in the other thread this was discussed in.

    Where is the evidence of this infant in the pit?

    So if no one took a picture of said baby then said baby could not have existed? That is a leap. Not saying it couldn't just be a rumor - it certainly could - but the OP not having photographic or other "evidence" doesn't mean the thread is a fake. The story could certainly be true.

    I was not there, but heard from a friend who was there, that yes, there was a woman with an infant in GA. So take my buddy's word for it, as he was there and couldn't believe it. And there was a post on p. 1 saying he thought he saw it as well.
  • JH6056
    JH6056 Posts: 2,444
    edited November 2013
    backseatLover12 wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    JH6056 wrote:
    Sooo... 4 pages in, and has anyone actually confirmed the existence of an ACTUAL INFANT in the pit last night? Where did this rumor start, and where is the evidence?

    Because without it, this whole thread is fake and just trying to stir the pot because someone was losing ground in the other thread this was discussed in.

    Where is the evidence of this infant in the pit?

    So if no one took a picture of said baby then said baby could not have existed? That is a leap. Not saying it couldn't just be a rumor - it certainly could - but the OP not having photographic or other "evidence" doesn't mean the thread is a fake. The story could certainly be true.

    I was not there, but heard from a friend who was there, that yes, there was a woman with an infant in GA. So take my buddy's word for it, as he was there and couldn't believe it.

    Well, given your strong strong opinion on the bigger issue, sorry, but your reporting your buddy's report of an infant just doesn't prove anything to me. But it's not about me, so carry on... I just think that given all the discussions on this so far, if someone really had an actual baby in the pit, it would have been news. Matter of fact, it DEFINITELY would have been discussed here.

    I don't buy it for a second.

    But have a good time talking crap about the phantom crappy parent that your friend supposedly saw, as a way to conveniently keep weakly making your bigger anti-kids at shows point...
    Post edited by JH6056 on
  • backseatLover12
    backseatLover12 Posts: 2,312
    MayDay10 wrote:
    to me, this is a growing problem, and one that EV feeds into and needs to stop.

    I am on the wings every show, and I always have a good view of the "Pit" or the front seated area pre 2013.

    I have noticed that the dragging of infants/toddlers/preschoolers to shows has been on the increase, and very often there is an obvious and intentional effort to hoist the kid up at certain points so EV notices him, and provides acknowledgement and/or memorabilia.
    It is actually rare now, since 2010, that I go to a show and do NOT notice this.

    I find it sickening that people exploit their kids to get Eddie's attention, as well as thinking Eddie is wrong to feed into it. Get with it, EV!
  • backseatLover12
    backseatLover12 Posts: 2,312
    JH6056 wrote:
    backseatLover12 wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:

    So if no one took a picture of said baby then said baby could not have existed? That is a leap. Not saying it couldn't just be a rumor - it certainly could - but the OP not having photographic or other "evidence" doesn't mean the thread is a fake. The story could certainly be true.

    I was not there, but heard from a friend who was there, that yes, there was a woman with an infant in GA. So take my buddy's word for it, as he was there and couldn't believe it.

    Well, given your strong strong opinion on the bigger issue, sorry, but your reporting your buddy's report of an infant just doesn't prove anything to me. But it's not about me, so carry on... I just think that given all the discussions on this so far, if someone really had an actual baby in the pit, it would have been news.

    I don't buy it for a second.

    But have a good time talking crap about the phantom crappy parent that your friendsupposedly saw.

    Ok, well, when more people who actually saw it come on the forums and see this thread, you will be sweetly proved wrong, now, won't you? :lol:
  • retropony
    retropony Myrtle Beach SC Posts: 352
    Chuckhaint wrote:
    DURP wrote:
    retropony wrote:
    please allow natural selection to run it's course....

    I've been saying that for years and I'm still waiting. This world needs a good plague and I would gladly line up first.

    It's EVOLUTION BABY!

    :lol::lol::lol: :clap: :thumbup:
    Washington DC 2008
    Charlotte NC 2013
    Greenville SC 2016
    Wrigley 1 2018
  • JH6056
    JH6056 Posts: 2,444
    backseatLover12 wrote:
    JH6056 wrote:
    backseatLover12 wrote:

    I was not there, but heard from a friend who was there, that yes, there was a woman with an infant in GA. So take my buddy's word for it, as he was there and couldn't believe it.

    Well, given your strong strong opinion on the bigger issue, sorry, but your reporting your buddy's report of an infant just doesn't prove anything to me. But it's not about me, so carry on... I just think that given all the discussions on this so far, if someone really had an actual baby in the pit, it would have been news.

    I don't buy it for a second.

    But have a good time talking crap about the phantom crappy parent that your friendsupposedly saw.

    Ok, well, when more people who actually saw it come on the forums and see this thread, you will be sweetly proved wrong, now, won't you? :lol:

    Well, the Oakland thread is already pages long and NO mention of a baby in the pit. Any sudden flurry of sightings of a baby in the pit, yeah, totally suspicious. I have no problem admitting being wrong, it happens often enough LOL! But if it hasn't been mentioned yet, it getting mentioned now is just kinda BS.

    Point settled, no actual infant in the pit at the Oakland show. Backseatlover make sure you get someone to bring one to the next show, and throw it around during Evenflow for good measure, and get video this time! Then maybe your campaign will get some traction... :mrgreen:
  • richieheaps
    richieheaps Posts: 182
    RoleModelsinBlood31 wrote:
    I have to go poop. Wait for me before you post anything else, this is riveting.

    :lol: ...This post makes the time reading this whole thing worth wile...I'm still laughing...that is some funny shit...no pun intended... :lol:
  • retropony
    retropony Myrtle Beach SC Posts: 352
    richieheaps wrote:
    RoleModelsinBlood31 wrote:
    I have to go poop. Wait for me before you post anything else, this is riveting.

    :lol: ...This post makes the time reading this whole thing worth wile...I'm still laughing...that is some funny shit...no pun intended... :lol:


    that was a funny line. :lol:
    Washington DC 2008
    Charlotte NC 2013
    Greenville SC 2016
    Wrigley 1 2018
  • austin.macrae
    austin.macrae Posts: 249
    I have a picture but not sure what the legality is on this nonsense. My friend was rail stone-side.
    Last night, 9:55 pm CST:
    Him: U won't believe this shit there's a woman with a baby right behind us that breast feeding it right now.
    WTF??????????????
    Me: Stop. Stop. Stop.
    Him: (sends pic, don't wanna be graphic but woman with flannel shirt wide open, full nipple, baby on hip {no sling that I can see})
    Me: (vomiting in mouth) Holy f*ck mother.

    So, given the accounts and this I'd say, even though I was not there, a baby was in the pit about 2-3 back from stone. No further opinions offered on my end.
  • nutbarz
    nutbarz Posts: 227
    austin.macrae wrote:
    I have a picture but not sure what the legality is on this nonsense. My friend was rail stone-side.
    Last night, 9:55 pm CST:
    Him: U won't believe this shit there's a woman with a baby right behind us that breast feeding it right now.
    WTF??????????????
    Me: Stop. Stop. Stop.
    Him: (sends pic, don't wanna be graphic but woman with flannel shirt wide open, full nipple, baby on hip {no sling that I can see})
    Me: (vomiting in mouth) Holy f*ck mother.

    So, given the accounts and this I'd say, even though I was not there, a baby was in the pit about 2-3 back from stone. No further opinions offered on my end.

    Well, I Guess if you got thirsty in the Pit, you would not have to go too far...

    wait, I think I just went too far... :fp:
  • backseatLover12
    backseatLover12 Posts: 2,312
    JH6056 wrote:
    backseatLover12 wrote:
    JH6056 wrote:

    Well, given your strong strong opinion on the bigger issue, sorry, but your reporting your buddy's report of an infant just doesn't prove anything to me. But it's not about me, so carry on... I just think that given all the discussions on this so far, if someone really had an actual baby in the pit, it would have been news.

    I don't buy it for a second.

    But have a good time talking crap about the phantom crappy parent that your friendsupposedly saw.

    Ok, well, when more people who actually saw it come on the forums and see this thread, you will be sweetly proved wrong, now, won't you? :lol:

    Well, the Oakland thread is already pages long and NO mention of a baby in the pit. Any sudden flurry of sightings of a baby in the pit, yeah, totally suspicious. I have no problem admitting being wrong, it happens often enough LOL! But if it hasn't been mentioned yet, it getting mentioned now is just kinda BS.

    Point settled, no actual infant in the pit at the Oakland show. Backseatlover make sure you get someone to bring one to the next show, and throw it around during Evenflow for good measure, and get video this time! Then maybe your campaign will get some traction... :mrgreen:

    I'll be awaiting your apology... :lol:

    I know it appears way too ironic given my stance on the kid topic, but it's for realz people.
  • mydogmookieblaylock
    mydogmookieblaylock Posts: 2,996
    austin.macrae wrote:
    I have a picture but not sure what the legality is on this nonsense. My friend was rail stone-side.
    Last night, 9:55 pm CST:
    Him: U won't believe this shit there's a woman with a baby right behind us that breast feeding it right now.
    WTF??????????????
    Me: Stop. Stop. Stop.
    Him: (sends pic, don't wanna be graphic but woman with flannel shirt wide open, full nipple, baby on hip {no sling that I can see})
    Me: (vomiting in mouth) Holy f*ck mother.

    So, given the accounts and this I'd say, even though I was not there, a baby was in the pit about 2-3 back from stone. No further opinions offered on my end.
    of course the baby was on Stone's side ...... IT'S ALL STONE'S FAULT!!!!
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,672
    austin.macrae wrote:
    I have a picture but not sure what the legality is on this nonsense. My friend was rail stone-side.
    Last night, 9:55 pm CST:
    Him: U won't believe this shit there's a woman with a baby right behind us that breast feeding it right now.
    WTF??????????????
    Me: Stop. Stop. Stop.
    Him: (sends pic, don't wanna be graphic but woman with flannel shirt wide open, full nipple, baby on hip {no sling that I can see})
    Me: (vomiting in mouth) Holy f*ck mother.

    So, given the accounts and this I'd say, even though I was not there, a baby was in the pit about 2-3 back from stone. No further opinions offered on my end.

    Mind blowing. Just mind blowing.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • austin.macrae
    austin.macrae Posts: 249
    Babygate Update: just texted eye witness for update, he reports baby and mom were removed from the pit and baby given ear plugs about "a third of the way in" to the show.

    There you have it, folks. Keep on rockin.
  • mydogmookieblaylock
    mydogmookieblaylock Posts: 2,996
    hippies
  • chiquimonkey
    chiquimonkey Posts: 9,337
    mydogmookieblaylock wrote:
    of course the baby was on Stone's side ...... IT'S ALL STONE'S FAULT!!!!

    :lol::lol:

Categories