What was the last movie you watched?

1114115117119120833

Comments

  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    something like, white house down??something like that
    You are thinking of Olympus Has Fallen. :geek:
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Jason P wrote:
    something like, white house down??something like that
    You are thinking of Olympus Has Fallen. :geek:
    nop..wait to google it
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Jason P wrote:
    something like, white house down??something like that
    You are thinking of Olympus Has Fallen. :geek:
    this one
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2334879/
    White House Down"
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Jason P wrote:
    something like, white house down??something like that
    You are thinking of Olympus Has Fallen. :geek:
    this one
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2334879/
    White House Down"

    that's why Olympus got skewered in the press, because it essentially is the same movie as White House Down and didn't come out that long after.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • davidtrios
    davidtrios Posts: 9,732
    insidious 2. not bad, the conjuring was better
  • district 9
    06/12/03,06/13/03
    10-05-04 09-09-05
    05-16-06-5-17-06-5-19-06,06-26-06-06-27-06 05-03-10 09-04-11
    07/19/13 11-15-13
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    that's why Olympus got skewered in the press, because it essentially is the same movie as White House Down and didn't come out that long after.

    olympus opened before white house down ... both hollywood trash ...
  • polaris_x wrote:
    that's why Olympus got skewered in the press, because it essentially is the same movie as White House Down and didn't come out that long after.

    olympus opened before white house down ... both hollywood trash ...

    alright, whichever.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • justam
    justam Posts: 21,415
    The last movie I watched was interesting. It was a documentary about hunters living in Siberia called "Happy People".
    Here's the trailer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WirR-WgO-E
    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&
  • CROJAM95
    CROJAM95 Posts: 10,830
    saw "RUSH" over the weekend, it was pretty good.

    Thor is a good actor

    Wasnt familar with the story, a little before my time....pretty intense.

    Olivia Wilde is a nice (borat voice)
  • SVRDhand13
    SVRDhand13 Posts: 27,003
    Cabin in the Woods. I loved it. My girlfriend said to me "You complain about every movie. I'm shocked you actually like this". :lol:
    severed hand thirteen
    2006: Gorge 7/23 2008: Hartford 6/27 Beacon 7/1 2009: Spectrum 10/30-31
    2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
    2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
    2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
    2017: RRHoF 4/7   2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4   2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18 
    2022: MSG 9/11  2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
    2025: Pittsburgh 5/16+5/18
  • Who Princess
    Who Princess out here in the fields Posts: 7,305
    Jason P wrote:
    Killer Joe

    It was good until the ending.
    The ending annoyed me.
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • ldent42
    ldent42 NYC Posts: 7,859
    percy jackson and the sea of monsters. not a bad movie but not great either it was kind of exactly what i expected it to be, but i never had read the books so i dont know if it stayed true to the story or not.
    It didn't. I mean in the beginning it seems like it tried to, but then they gave up trying entirely.
    Nathan Fillion's Firefly joke was the best part of that movie IMHO. Also Anthony Stewart Head was awesome as Chiron.
    I am a huge fan of the books.

    Watched Star Trek Into Darkness. Did not like. Simon Pegg & Benedict Cumberbatch were both awesome but it was just too cheesy and noticeably sexist in a way that irked me.
    NYC 06/24/08-Auckland 11/27/09-Chch 11/29/09-Newark 05/18/10-Atlanta 09/22/12-Chicago 07/19/13-Brooklyn 10/18/13 & 10/19/13-Hartford 10/25/13-Baltimore 10/27/13-Auckland 1/17/14-GC 1/19/14-Melbourne 1/24/14-Sydney 1/26/14-Amsterdam 6/16/14 & 6/17/14-Milan 6/20/14-Berlin 6/26/14-Leeds 7/8/14-Milton Keynes 7/11/14-St. Louis 10/3/14-NYC 9/26/15
    LIVEFOOTSTEPS.ORG/USER/?USR=435
  • hangover 3
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    duska3419 wrote:

    Watched Star Trek Into Darkness. Did not like. Simon Pegg & Benedict Cumberbatch were both awesome but it was just too cheesy and noticeably sexist in a way that irked me.

    Are you talking about how its hundreds of years in the future and all the commanders gather and its a bunch of old white men? I thought that was odd. Was there more?
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • ldent42
    ldent42 NYC Posts: 7,859
    duska3419 wrote:

    Watched Star Trek Into Darkness. Did not like. Simon Pegg & Benedict Cumberbatch were both awesome but it was just too cheesy and noticeably sexist in a way that irked me.

    Are you talking about how its hundreds of years in the future and all the commanders gather and its a bunch of old white men? I thought that was odd. Was there more?

    It was that combined with the only two female characters being stereotyped in a way that suggests whoever wrote them has a really weird idea of women.

    Caution! Spoilers to follow:
    The only 2 female characters I noticed were Lt. Uhura (Yea I know I'm spelling it wrong, sue me) and the blond chick whose name escapes me. The Lt starts an argument with her bf with a passive aggressive comment while on a mission with him & the captain. She goes out to do her job & talk with the klingons and ends up needing to be rescued. I'm not crazy, this character is supposed to be a solider right? Yet she's portrayed as insecure, weak and out of her depth.
    The blonde chick that lied her way onto the ship ends up being super smart which is nice until we learn she only has knowledge of these things because she her daddy let her read his files. This is the same character that defuses the bomb so I recognize there are some strengths to her, but remember she's also the screaming woman injured on the floor during a major fight scene.
    I know the characters are based on existing framework from the old series, so I'm hesitant to even complain about it, but that's a big part of why it irked me. It very easily could've been updated to include some more modern representation of gender roles, and of power structure .... but it didn't have to be because that shit is still acceptable. On the other hand, back in the day Stark Trek was like well known for its casting of women, and not-just-white people and it was seen as forward-thinking or progressive or something. Or am I wrong on this? I dunno I can't articulate it well but it just bugged the hell out of me.
    NYC 06/24/08-Auckland 11/27/09-Chch 11/29/09-Newark 05/18/10-Atlanta 09/22/12-Chicago 07/19/13-Brooklyn 10/18/13 & 10/19/13-Hartford 10/25/13-Baltimore 10/27/13-Auckland 1/17/14-GC 1/19/14-Melbourne 1/24/14-Sydney 1/26/14-Amsterdam 6/16/14 & 6/17/14-Milan 6/20/14-Berlin 6/26/14-Leeds 7/8/14-Milton Keynes 7/11/14-St. Louis 10/3/14-NYC 9/26/15
    LIVEFOOTSTEPS.ORG/USER/?USR=435
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    don jon ... a bizarre film but underneath it all - a nice look into addiction, gender roles and social constructs ... really enjoyed this film ... great performances all around ...
  • Indifference71
    Indifference71 Chicago Posts: 14,910
    The Place Beyond the Pines. Not bad, but not great.
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    duska3419 wrote:
    duska3419 wrote:

    Watched Star Trek Into Darkness. Did not like. Simon Pegg & Benedict Cumberbatch were both awesome but it was just too cheesy and noticeably sexist in a way that irked me.

    Are you talking about how its hundreds of years in the future and all the commanders gather and its a bunch of old white men? I thought that was odd. Was there more?

    It was that combined with the only two female characters being stereotyped in a way that suggests whoever wrote them has a really weird idea of women.

    Caution! Spoilers to follow:
    The only 2 female characters I noticed were Lt. Uhura (Yea I know I'm spelling it wrong, sue me) and the blond chick whose name escapes me. The Lt starts an argument with her bf with a passive aggressive comment while on a mission with him & the captain. She goes out to do her job & talk with the klingons and ends up needing to be rescued. I'm not crazy, this character is supposed to be a solider right? Yet she's portrayed as insecure, weak and out of her depth.
    The blonde chick that lied her way onto the ship ends up being super smart which is nice until we learn she only has knowledge of these things because she her daddy let her read his files. This is the same character that defuses the bomb so I recognize there are some strengths to her, but remember she's also the screaming woman injured on the floor during a major fight scene.
    I know the characters are based on existing framework from the old series, so I'm hesitant to even complain about it, but that's a big part of why it irked me. It very easily could've been updated to include some more modern representation of gender roles, and of power structure .... but it didn't have to be because that shit is still acceptable. On the other hand, back in the day Stark Trek was like well known for its casting of women, and not-just-white people and it was seen as forward-thinking or progressive or something. Or am I wrong on this? I dunno I can't articulate it well but it just bugged the hell out of me.

    That makes sense duska! I didnt see too many of the earliest Star Trek TV episodes, but I get the feeling that women were portrayed the same back then too. I can see why that would bother you..They shouldve made Uhura a badass and able to handle herself.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    That makes sense duska! I didnt see too many of the earliest Star Trek TV episodes, but I get the feeling that women were portrayed the same back then too. I can see why that would bother you..They shouldve made Uhura a badass and able to handle herself.

    not that i disagree with duska's issues but uhura is a communications expert ... her role is in linguistics and translating ... she's going up against a klingon security force ... i don't see any reasonable expectation that she could deliver any sort of ass kicking there ...