#PJTrackReveal

StoneGarden wrote:

So based on Black Diamond's theory.. the list so far is...

1.
2. Mind Your Manners
3.
4.
5. Sleeping By Myself
6. Let the Records Play
7. My Father's Son
8. Getaway
9. Swallowed Whole
10. Yellow Moon
11. Sirens
12. Future Days

Has it been 100% confirmed that the album will have 12 tracks?

It's fun to see the track names with the pictures like this.

Gern Blansten wrote:

I was thinking it would be cool if these reveals lead to a double album

Holy F that would be sweet

SVRDhand13 wrote:

mvw wrote:

I'm not blind
I can see it coming
Looks like lightning

The A should have a round top, not pointed

OOOOOOO-AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH HELL NAW!!!! :nono:

:x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x

If they put Of the Earth on this album... I WILL QUIT THIS BAND!!!!!
OMG!

Ty wrote:

Man, I hope "Of The Earth" makes the cut!!!

I'm still hoping for "Of the Earth" too!

SVRDhand13 wrote:

Gern Blansten wrote:

I was thinking it would be cool if these reveals lead to a double album

"Tracklist Reveal
August 26 2013

Follow Pearl Jam on twitter, instagram and here on pearljam.com this week as the tracklisting for Lightning Bolt is revealed."

Doubt it because of this statement and because the band does not seem like they go to the studio together enough to make a double

2x album would be a welcome surprise but, like SVRD mentions, highly unlikely.

As for posters on previous pages bitching about the inclusion of a revamped Sleeping By Myself :fp: ....three words: Get. Over. It. If the band chooses to channel their creativity towards reimagining one of Ed, or for that matter any of the members', songs then IMHO it's exciting to see where they take it. Why bemoan that they find it important enough to release that piece of music into the world as an album track? There's a current thread questioning if we the fans have gotten spoiled. To those that vehemently bitch about the inclusion or exclusion of this or that song, yes, you have become spoiled.

Who's to say that the track names haven't been released at random? The order of songs is still only speculation at this point.

jjflash wrote:

SVRDhand13 wrote:

Gern Blansten wrote:

I was thinking it would be cool if these reveals lead to a double album

"Tracklist Reveal
August 26 2013

Follow Pearl Jam on twitter, instagram and here on pearljam.com this week as the tracklisting for Lightning Bolt is revealed."

Doubt it because of this statement and because the band does not seem like they go to the studio together enough to make a double

2x album would be a welcome surprise but, like SVRD mentions, highly unlikely.

As for posters on previous pages bitching about the inclusion of a revamped Sleeping By Myself :fp: ....three words: Get. Over. It. If the band chooses to channel their creativity towards reimagining one of Ed, or for that matter any of the members', songs then IMHO it's exciting to see where they take it. Why bemoan that they find it important enough to release that piece of music into the world as an album track? There's a current thread questioning if we the fans have gotten spoiled. To those that vehemently bitch about the inclusion or exclusion of this or that song, yes, you have become spoiled.

I dont think questioning SBM is being spoiled (bitching about it TOO much is though )...its just an unusual move by the band. Im honestly a bit surprised SBM is on there, but I'm eager to hear the tune...but I'm surprised they put a rehashed song thats a few years old on a fresh new album. I just think its unusual and something they havent done in previous 9 albums.

Im not criticizing it, or upset, i just think its odd...Of course we havent even heard it yet, and it might be awesome.

JonnyPistachio wrote:

jjflash wrote:

SVRDhand13 wrote:

2x album would be a welcome surprise but, like SVRD mentions, highly unlikely.

As for posters on previous pages bitching about the inclusion of a revamped Sleeping By Myself :fp: ....three words: Get. Over. It. If the band chooses to channel their creativity towards reimagining one of Ed, or for that matter any of the members', songs then IMHO it's exciting to see where they take it. Why bemoan that they find it important enough to release that piece of music into the world as an album track? There's a current thread questioning if we the fans have gotten spoiled. To those that vehemently bitch about the inclusion or exclusion of this or that song, yes, you have become spoiled.

I dont think questioning SBM is being spoiled (bitching about it TOO much is though )...its just an unusual move by the band. Im honestly a bit surprised SBM is on there, but I'm eager to hear the tune...but I'm surprised they put a rehashed song thats a few years old on a fresh new album. I just think its unusual and something they havent done in previous 9 albums.

Im not criticizing it, or upset, i just think its odd...Of course we havent even heard it yet, and it might be awesome.

I hear ya. Questioning it is one thing and entirely within reason (after all is an odd move ), I just don't get the multiple posts where folks spit venom over the decision.

I don't like the idea of including sleeping by myself on the new album because I would just rather hear a brand new song. Same reason I don't care if they include Of the Earth. However, it is one of the Uke songs that could be interesting as a full band. It will be interesting if it is a different take with modified lyrics. I just would have preferred hearing it on a complication or a live setting.