Boston Marathon - explosion

JimmyV wrote:

redrock wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

I don't know how much interrogating has actually happened yet.

It would seem they zoomed in on him as soon as they could. Apparently, he was writing his responses...
Maybe not much was said at all, but maybe what was said was crucial.

We'll never know so it's all speculation.

I assume if he is in as bad shape as they say then he is also on pain medication. I think most questioning would have to wait until he is at least sober enough to answer coherently.

I could be wrong, but I think most of the questioning is going to be in regards to who he was working with, what further plans did he have, etc. I think they have more than enough to convict just based on what happened in Watertown. He doesn't need to say much.

the have the best drugs to make him say everything..
actually,this is more important about his right..than if a policeman slap him during the arrest

dimitrispearljam wrote:

unsung wrote:

Did I ever say that is right?

i thought we was talking here about facts anf reality and what happens in real world..
if we talking about dreams and ideal situations,then i want only one thing

Monica Belluci with me in my bed..and ill be the happiest man on earth..

lukin2006 wrote:

Well I'll have to let this discussion go for now as i'm off to do other things ... just want to say that this thread is over a 100 pages with many opinions and people being respectful ... good job

i try to post this,and didnt let me cos you post first!!


i dont believe this is a thread at AMT thread and its over 100 pages ,isnt locked and the conversation is in so high level!

He has been charged...

http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/04 ... story.html

Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been charged in a sealed complaint, and his initial court appearance was conducted today by a federal magistrate judge in his hospital room, a federal court official says.

The announcement by Gary H. Wente, circuit executive for the US courts for the First Circuit , came after a White House spokesman said earlier today that Tsarnaev, who is in serious condition at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, would be tried in the federal court system.

Speaking at a media briefing in Washington, spokesman Jay Carney said Tsarnaev would not be tried as an enemy combatant.

“He will not be treated as an enemy combatant. We will process this terrorist through our system of justice,” he said.

unsung wrote:

unsung wrote:

The police keeping us safe, just don't take any pictures.

Seriously, no opinions on this make me believe that this behavior is accepted here.

There is nothing to comment on. There is no way that soldier is training his gun on someone in their home because they're taking a picture. It only appears that way, because it's a STILL PHOTO and he happened to be facing in that direction while doing his job.

unsung wrote:

Yeah, it's ok to drag people out of their homes by gunpoint, that they were ordered to stay in. All in the name of keeping them safe. I know what Ben Franklin would say, he would say "fuck that".

horse shit! I've saw one home filled with men being removed from the home. did it ever occur to you that one or both of the bombers frequented that house and was pals with the guys in there?

hedonist wrote:

I'm curious how they call him a terrorist but then will not be tried as an enemy combatant.

Is this a case of semantics? Aren't they essentially the same thing?

Terrorism is just a means of using violence for political reasons, to create fear. This can be done by anyone of any nationality. So a terrorist can be 'home grown' or foreign.

An enemy combatant would normally be a member of some armed forces from a country/state which is at war with your country. This has been extended to any foreigner who attacks the USA, I guess.

This guy is being charged with similar charges to McVeigh (except for the 8 deaths of McVeigh) - using weapon of mass destruction, destruction of property and causing death.

redrock wrote:

hedonist wrote:

I'm curious how they call him a terrorist but then will not be tried as an enemy combatant.

Is this a case of semantics? Aren't they essentially the same thing?

Terrorism is just a means of using violence for political reasons, to create fear. This can be done by anyone of any nationality. So a terrorist can be 'home grown' or foreign.

An enemy combatant would normally be a member of some armed forces from a country/state which is at war with your country. This has been extended to any foreigner who attacks the USA, I guess.

This guy is being charged with similar charges to McVeigh (except for the 8 deaths of McVeigh) - using weapon of mass destruction, destruction of property and causing death.

Ahh, thank you!

Illridethewave20 wrote:

I wanted to take a minute to thank everyone who prayed or kept Boston in there thoughts. Our City of Boston and Massachusetts really appreciated all the well wishes. We are Boston Strong.

And thank you, Illridethewave20, for reminding us that the victims and their families and anyone close to this situation deserves as much attention and certainly more care than the perpetrators.

lukin2006 wrote:

Thats their job to be vigilante in public spaces ... entering my home without cause or telling me I can't leave is not ok with me ... that is slippery slope ... a slope in which no one should want to be on.

to bad. stay home or go out driving your car to screw with the manhunt... good idea you have there. go walking up & down the sidewalks as if nothing is going on, and you can because you are a u.s. citizen, right?

horse shit. how about let the cops have the city so they may physically hunt this clown down before another bombing?