Viewing child pornography online not a crime

catefrances wrote:

so as long as i dont download save or print images im safe??? :think:

very classy!

catefrances wrote:

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

catefrances wrote:

so as long as i dont download save or print images im safe??? :think:

very classy!

should i have also added a winky so you knew i was joking? :think:

Too late. US authorities have been alerted and you have been flagged by the TSA.

catefrances wrote:

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

catefrances wrote:

so as long as i dont download save or print images im safe??? :think:

very classy!

should i have also added a winky so you knew i was joking? :think:

Even with a winky, a joke about child porn is inappropriate, IMHO

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

Even with a winky, a joke about child porn is inappropriate, IMHO

she was commenting on the absurdity of the ruling, not making a joke about child porn. come on.

jb306534 wrote:

Of course only liberals care about babies that's why they are pro-life...wait a sec...

I may have missed the point here but IMHO this is not about being liberal or conservative. It's about being a normal, decent human as opposed to a very fucked up sick human and it has nothing to do with pro life/ pro choice.

On the surface it seems like a good ruling.... viewing child pornography wasn't deemed illegal by the state legislature. If all this guy did was view child pornography, I'm not sure why he should be arrested. If the populace doesn't like the result, change the legislation.

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

While I would never support sexual exploitation of a minor... if you're all so upset with it, why was it OK for Britney Spears to prance around in a red leather cat suit at 17 in that "Oops I did it again" video?"

Why is Toddlers and Tiaras allowed on TV?

Why aren't all Catholics in jail?

(and before you get all in my face about that last one... ALL Catholics support child sexual abuse. You go to church, give your money to them, they use it to move priests from place to place like it's an "all you can screw child buffet" or hire lawyers to get them acquitted. All the way up to the King Child molester himself, Pope Palpatine... who has protected child rapists again and again. if you give them money... you have finically supported child abuse. I make porn movies for a living and I feel pretty comfortable looking down on Catholics. I mean, at least I get two forms of photo ID proving the one getting banged is at least 18.)

thats fantastic old son made me smile that last one great start to my day
happy sat all

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

While I would never support sexual exploitation of a minor... if you're all so upset with it, why was it OK for Britney Spears to prance around in a red leather cat suit at 17 in that "Oops I did it again" video?"

Why is Toddlers and Tiaras allowed on TV?

Why aren't all Catholics in jail?

(and before you get all in my face about that last one... ALL Catholics support child sexual abuse. You go to church, give your money to them, they use it to move priests from place to place like it's an "all you can screw child buffet" or hire lawyers to get them acquitted. All the way up to the King Child molester himself, Pope Palpatine... who has protected child rapists again and again. if you give them money... you have finically supported child abuse. I make porn movies for a living and I feel pretty comfortable looking down on Catholics. I mean, at least I get two forms of photo ID proving the one getting banged is at least 18.)

I'm not catholic, but dude, I think you crossed the line on this one. My wife and her family are catholic, and very involved in their church, and I find this incredibly offensive. My father in law supports YOUR cauase, as a matter of fact, and he's nearly 80 years old.

Just because someone hangs from a tree with a few bad apples doesn't mean the tree or all the other apples are rotten.

You pay money to the Pearl Jam fan club. Do you support absolutely everything everyone in the band and on their payroll is involved in? If one of Pearl Jam's employees was charged with something and Ed hired the lawyer for them, are you then a supporter of the crime they commited? Absolutely not. that's hogwash.

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

I make porn movies for a living and I feel pretty comfortable looking down on Catholics.

drug abuse is fairly prevalent in your industry. does that mean you should be in jail for trafficking?

Well actually, that's not really accurate.

That's just more slander against my industry, really. I worked in a corporate purchasing office and I saw a lot more drug abuse, back-stabbing, sexual harassment, under-handed business practices and just plain poor treatment of employees there than I EVER have in the adult industry.

I would see people getting up from their desks and coming back 10 minutes later sniffing and wiping their noses all the time. I never see that in the adult industry. And you don't get bodies like Francois Sagat, Adam Herst or Trenton Ducati by doing meth.

And besides... with your example, I would have to have some part in drug trafficking. And although I do know that some of the male performers use HGH, we never allow it on set, we never have anything to do with it's use and I often tell performers that they don't need it or to stop using it. I certainly don't knowingly give money to help it along.

And if someone shows up on set under the influence of drugs or alcohol, they're fired on the spot and often don't get hired back.