Iranians, we will never bomb your country - We Love You

usamamasan1
usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
edited May 2012 in A Moving Train
To the Iranian people
To all the fathers, mothers, children, brothers and sisters
For there to be a war between us, first we must be afraid of each other, we must hate.
I’m not afraid of you, I don’t hate you.
I don t even know you. No Iranian ever did me no harm. I never even met an Iranian…Just one in Paris in a museum. Nice dude.
I see sometime here, on the TV, an Iranian. He is talking about war.
I’m sure he does not represent all the people of Iran.
If you see someone on your TV talking about bombing you …be sure he does not represent all of us.
I’m not an official representative of my country. I m a father and a teacher. I know the streets of my town, I talk with my neighbors, my family, my students, my friends and in the name of all these people …we love you.
We mean you no harm.
On the contrary, we want to meet, have some coffee and talk about sports.
To all those who feel the same, share this message and help it reach the Iranian people.

744982653.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... BnCX7_bPxo

very nice huh.

Guess the two governments aren't so sure though. Would be nice if bombs didn't drop down but that whole nuclear Iran conundrum sure is problematic.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • Johnny Abruzzo
    Johnny Abruzzo Philly Posts: 12,614
    Think I met one Iranian at a wedding. Nice guy.

    We all have much more in common than we have in difference.
    Spectrum 10/27/09; New Orleans JazzFest 5/1/10; Made in America 9/2/12; Phila, PA 10/21/13; Phila,  PA 10/22/13; Baltimore Arena 10/27/13; Phila, PA 4/28/16; Phila, PA 4/29/16; Fenway Park 8/7/16; Fenway Park 9/2/18; Asbury Park 9/18/21; Camden 9/14/22; Las Vegas 5/16/24; Las Vegas 5/18/24; Phila, PA 9/7/24; Phila, PA 9/9/24; Baltimore Arena 9/12/24; Pittsburgh 5/16/25; Pittsburgh 5/18/25

    Tres Mtns - TLA 3/23/11; EV - Tower Theatre 6/25/11; Temple of the Dog - Tower Theatre 11/5/16
  • peacefrompaul
    peacefrompaul Posts: 25,293
    Then... Why support Romney?
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    ....that whole nuclear Iran conundrum sure is problematic.
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Fearmongering and bigotry are problematic.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,846

    very nice huh.

    Great message. I'm sure a lot of us may feel cynical about this and, considering how tangled the world is, the history of war and so forth that's understandable to some extent, but I don't think wishing for peace can ever be a waste of time and I don't think hoping for peace is foolishness.

    Thanks for posting this.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Drowned Out
    Drowned Out Posts: 6,056
    I heard about this weeks ago on fb...its very heartening to see so many people in both countries sending messages of peace and love. But then you've got some hawk-types that have to turn the discussion away from positivity and attempt to frame one side as evil, negating the positive momentum.

    Usama, why not just post the link and focus on the message? You contradict the whole point of the message with your 'problematic' comment. point being: most people in both countries abhor what their leaders push for. Many, many Iranians have taken a risk to post messages in support of this campaign. How can you hear that message, and respond with 'but your leaders are dicks'...? Be a part of the solution, not the problem. Woot.
  • jb306534
    jb306534 Posts: 19
    Do you realize AhmadInejad (Iran's president) refutes the Holocaust and has said he wants to wipe out all the Jews. Do you realize Israel is surrounded by countries that want to destroy it. Israel is the one country in the middle east that shares our US values and beliefs.
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    jb306534 wrote:
    Do you realize AhmadInejad (Iran's president) refutes the Holocaust and has said he wants to wipe out all the Jews. Do you realize Israel is surrounded by countries that want to destroy it. Israel is the one country in the middle east that shares our US values and beliefs.

    :lol:
  • Tom K
    Tom K Posts: 842
    jb306534 wrote:
    Israel is the one country in the middle east that shares our US values and beliefs.

    They DO NOT share my values...

    Sincerely,
    Citizen of the US
    I'm gone ..Long gone..This time I'm letting go of it all...So long...Cause this time I'm gone
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    jb306534 wrote:
    Do you realize AhmadInejad (Iran's president) refutes the Holocaust and has said he wants to wipe out all the Jews. Do you realize Israel is surrounded by countries that want to destroy it. Israel is the one country in the middle east that shares our US values and beliefs.

    Do you realize that everything you just typed is pure guff?

    Ahmadinejad didn't say that Israel should be wiped off the map. This was a deliberate Western Mistranslation, much like the more recent mistranslation that had him saying Israel is a cancerous tumour that should be removed. He never said it. He said that the Zionist regime is a cancerous tumour that should be removed. Big difference.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ah ... ontroversy
    Many news sources repeated the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting statement by Ahmadinejad that "Israel must be wiped off the map",[5][6] an English idiom which means to "cause a place to stop existing",[7] or to "obliterate totally",[8] or "destroy completely".[9]

    The Iranian presidential website stated that "the Zionist Regime of Israel faces a deadend and will under God's grace be wiped off the map," and "the Zionist Regime that is a usurper and illegitimate regime and a cancerous tumor should be wiped off the map."[10]

    Ahmadinejad's phrase was "بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود" according to the text published on the President's Office's website.[11]

    The translation presented by the official Islamic Republic News Agency has been challenged by Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem". Norouzi translated the original Persian to English, with the result, "the Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."[12] Juan Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, agrees that Ahmadinejad's statement should be translated as, "the Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)."[13] According to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to 'wipe Israel off the map' because no such idiom exists in Persian." Instead, "he did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse."[14] The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history."[15]

    Iranian government sources denied that Ahmadinejad issued any sort of threat. On 20 February 2006, Iran's foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki told a news conference: "How is it possible to remove a country from the map? He is talking about the regime. We do not recognize legally this regime."[16][17][18]

    Shiraz Dossa, a professor of Political Science at St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia, Canada, also believes the text is a mistranslation.[19]

    Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini in the specific speech under discussion: what he said was that "the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time." No state action is envisaged in this lament; it denotes a spiritual wish, whereas the erroneous translation – "wipe Israel off the map" – suggests a military threat. There is a huge chasm between the correct and the incorrect translations. The notion that Iran can "wipe out" U.S.-backed, nuclear-armed Israel is ludicrous





    And as for Israel being surrounded by countries that want to destroy it, can you name one?
  • jb306534
    jb306534 Posts: 19
    Iranian government sources... :D

    The Muslim Brotherhood that is taking over the Middle East
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    jb306534 wrote:
    Iranian government sources... :D

    The Muslim Brotherhood that is taking over the Middle East

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... omment.usa

    Jonathan Steele
    The Guardian, Friday 2 June 2006


    The remarks are not out of context. They are wrong, pure and simple. Ahmadinejad never said them. Farsi speakers have pointed out that he was mistranslated. The Iranian president was quoting an ancient statement by Iran's first Islamist leader, the late Ayatollah Khomeini, that "this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time" just as the Shah's regime in Iran had vanished.

    He was not making a military threat. He was calling for an end to the occupation of Jerusalem at some point in the future. The "page of time" phrase suggests he did not expect it to happen soon. There was no implication that either Khomeini, when he first made the statement, or Ahmadinejad, in repeating it, felt it was imminent, or that Iran would be involved in bringing it about.


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... 14/post155

    Jonathan Steele
    guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 14 June 2006


    The phrase was widely interpreted as 'map', and for years, no one objected. In October, when Mr Ahmadinejad quoted Khomeini, he actually misquoted him, saying not 'Sahneh roozgar' but 'Safheh roozgar', meaning pages of time or history. No one noticed the change, and news agencies used the word 'map' again."

    This, in my view, is the crucial point and I'm glad the NYT accepts that the word "map" was not used by Ahmadinejad. (By the way, the Wikipedia entry on the controversy gets the NYT wrong, claiming falsely that Ethan Bronner "concluded that Ahmadinejad had in fact said that Israel was to be wiped off the map".)

    If the Iranian president made a mistake and used "safheh" rather than "sahneh", that is of little moment. A native English speaker could equally confuse "stage of history" with "page of history". The significant issue is that both phrases refer to time rather than place. As I wrote in my original post, the Iranian president was expressing a vague wish for the future. He was not threatening an Iranian-initiated war to remove Israeli control over Jerusalem.

    Two other well-established translation sources confirm that Ahmadinejad was referring to time, not place. The version of the October 26 2005 speech put out by the Middle East Media Research Institute, based on the Farsi text released by the official Iranian Students News Agency, says: "This regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history." (NB: not "wiped". I accept that "eliminated" is almost the same, indeed some might argue it is more sinister than "wiped", though it is a bit more of a mouthful if you are trying to find four catchy and easily memorable words with which to incite anger against Iran.)

    MEMRI is headed by a former Isareli military intelligence officer and has sometimes been attacked for alleged distortion of Farsi and Arabic quotations for the benefit of Israeli foreign policy. On this occasion they supported the doveish view of what Ahmadinejad said.
  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,212
    B, what exactly do you think is meant by "Zionist regime"?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yosi wrote:
    B, what exactly do you think is meant by "Zionist regime"?

    Just that. The Zionist regime. The regime that currently governs Israel. Like the Apartheid regime that ruled South Africa, or the Nazi regime that once ruled Germany.
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Fearmongering and bigotry are problematic.

    Huh? Bigotry? Fearmongering?

    Do explain. Please no long winded cut-pastes from the guardian. Sure seems like you got some kind of guardian discount.


    Thread shitting fun eh?
  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,212
    I'll choose to ignore your incredibly innacurate comparisons. What would it mean to get rid of the "Zionist regime"?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yosi wrote:
    I'll choose to ignore your incredibly innacurate comparisons. What would it mean to get rid of the "Zionist regime"?

    Hmm, I dunno, maybe the same methods that were used to get rid of the Apartheid regime in South Africa. Sanctions, boycotts, protests, strikes, petitions, e.t.c.
  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,212
    No, what I mean is what would Israel as a political entity look like once the "Zionist regime" is gotten rid of?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    yosi wrote:
    No, what I mean is what would Israel as a political entity look like once the "Zionist regime" is gotten rid of?

    Perhaps it would resemble a democratic, multicultural, secular state, much like present day Germany.
  • yosi
    yosi NYC Posts: 3,212
    Please, could I get a concrete, non-evasive answer?

    While you're at it, let me ask you this: If Turkey were to call for the "hellenic regime" in Greece to vanish from the page of time, and were then to take actions that resulted in Greece becoming a majority Turkish country, with Islam supplanting Greek Orthodoxy as the state religion, and Turkish supplanting Greek as the national language, and the repeal of all laws relating to Greek culture, but the state retained the name "Greece," would you argue that Turkey had not, in some meaningful way, destroyed Greece?
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane