3-D TVs

2»

Comments

  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    its a fad. wasn't 3d also a fad like 40 years ago too? :roll:

    my dad wants to get one. i told him he's wasting his money. can't imagine having to put on a pair of those stupid glasses to watch tv.

    anyone who thinks this is the next logical step from hd is kidding themselves.

    i do remember reading that espn is coming out with an all 3d network at some point this year.
    www.myspace.com
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,036
    What about porn in 3-D? I can't decide if it would be awesome or too much.
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    What about porn in 3-D? I can't decide if it would be awesome or too much.


    can it ever be too much
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,036
    81 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    What about porn in 3-D? I can't decide if it would be awesome or too much.


    can it ever be too much

    Very good point.
  • The Fixer
    The Fixer Posts: 12,837
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    81 wrote:
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    What about porn in 3-D? I can't decide if it would be awesome or too much.


    can it ever be too much

    Very good point.

    depends what's coming at you. there are certain body parts I want nothing to do with
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,036
    Also a good point. And putting glasses on to watch porn might be a bit strange.
  • CJMST3K
    CJMST3K Posts: 9,722
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    Also a good point. And putting glasses on to watch porn might be a bit strange.


    ...but sometimes practical for protection of the eyes. :?
    ADD 5,200 to the post count you see, thank you. :)
    *NYC 9/28/96 *NYC 9/29/96 *NJ 9/8/98 (front row "may i play drums with you")
    *MSG 9/10/98 (backstage) *MSG 9/11/98 (backstage)
    *Jones Beach 8/23/00 *Jones Beach 8/24/00 *Jones Beach 8/25/00
    *Mansfield 8/29/00 *Mansfield 8/30/00 *Nassau 4/30/03 *Nissan VA 7/1/03
    *Borgata 10/1/05 *Camden 5/27/06 *Camden 5/28/06 *DC 5/30/06
    *VA Beach 6/17/08 *DC 6/22/08 *MSG 6/24/08 (backstage) *MSG 6/25/08
    *EV DC 8/17/08 *EV Baltimore 6/15/09 *Philly 10/31/09
    *Bristow VA 5/13/10 *MSG 5/20/10 *MSG 5/21/10
  • smg97791
    smg97791 Posts: 151
    The Fixer wrote:
    am I the only one that doesn't get this concept? who wants to watch TV in 3-D? I can understand a movie or two, but TV just doesn't make sense...especially sports (unless you're on some kind of drugs at the time. that could be cool).

    also, having to wear those stupid 3-D glasses would get old after 2 minutes.

    maybe someone can enlighten me

    Yeah, i agree with you. Lots of companies trying to profit off the hype Avatar brought IMO. As long as you have to wear very clumsy looking glasses this idea is never gonna take off.
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    FrankieG wrote:
    Dont say that you won't get one until you see it in person. They are amazing!

    Panasonic has the best 3D TV's by far.

    i will say it. :P

    i live my life in 3D i dont need it on tv.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • Kilgore_Trout
    Kilgore_Trout Posts: 7,334
    81 wrote:
    now what would be cool is if they made it 3d with a headset for a video game so that when you look left, it looks left. but then you would need surround tv.
    saw something like that in the latest popular science... its a big orb TV on rollers... you can walk around in it like you're walking through a virtual environment... i think the army is testing it right now... combine that with that harness thing that can duplicate the feeling of rain and wind using low freq sound and a cooler wii remote and you have the ultimate gaming experience

    oh and 3-D TVs suck
    "Senza speme vivemo in disio"

    http://seanbriceart.com/
  • Kilgore_Trout
    Kilgore_Trout Posts: 7,334
    and can someone PLEASE get to work on smell-o-vision?!?

    but maybe just for the food network...
    "Senza speme vivemo in disio"

    http://seanbriceart.com/
  • Franny
    Franny Posts: 2,054
    Cliffy6745 wrote:
    What about porn in 3-D? I can't decide if it would be awesome or too much.

    Oh that could be scary! Or the best method of reducing teen pregnancies and std rates!!! Hey kids get a load of this......... :shock:

    Although I would have LOVED to have seen the origin match on wed night in 3d with all the biffs!!! That would have been awesome!!! :lol:
  • South of Seattle
    South of Seattle West Seattle Posts: 10,724
    The Jeagler wrote:
    its a fad. wasn't 3d also a fad like 40 years ago too? :roll:

    my dad wants to get one. i told him he's wasting his money. can't imagine having to put on a pair of those stupid glasses to watch tv.

    anyone who thinks this is the next logical step from hd is kidding themselves.

    i do remember reading that espn is coming out with an all 3d network at some point this year.
    The 3-D network for ESPN started this month with the World Cup.

    3-D of 40 years ago is nothing even close to today's 3-D though. That's apples and oranges my friend.
    NERDS!
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    we just got a new tv...not even a month ago. we saved & saved, out it off & saved some more. so my wife & i were watching tv the other night when one of those HDTV3D commercials comes on & she says "oooooohhhhh.....maybe we should have waited."

    i walked out of the room in disbelief while saying "we aren't taking it back."

    i've been wanting a flat screen for a long time....and she has as well. now the 3D fucker comes out.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • maj4e
    maj4e Posts: 605
    I had HD for a while and while sports and nature looked cool. I just didn't care. Still don't. I guess SD looks good enough and I'm really just there for the information. To each his own though.

Categories