Rolling Stones top 500 Songs
Comments
-
PJam82 wrote:Dirtie_Frank wrote:hopethatuchoke wrote:I was waiting for this post....hahahaha. Time for the semi-annual bashing of Rolling Stone magazine because they don't worship your favorite band!

It's not about worship, but you are going to tell me that Stan from Eminem and Ignition from R Kelly, are better songs?
edit: then anything that the boys have done.
Stan is an incredible song with the shifting narrator tackling quite a few topics and perspectives. Not many people can do this as effectively as Eminem did. It's a GREAT accomplishment, even if you don't enjoy it.
stan is shit
he switches perspectives once and the only topic every tackled is murder.
eminem is the most overrated pop icon of the past 25 years. it blows me away the people actually listen to him and think "man, this guy is so talented". if eminem was black, he would not be where he is today. he's a white man in a black mans world and that's why he gets attention.
eminem has had the same shtick since 1998. he's a poser and needs to fade away.
now, as for the list... who cares if pearl jam isn't on it? they are still the same band that they were before the list was made.0 -
www.myspace.com0
-
bottom line: out of 500 fucking songs, at least 1 or 2 pj tunes should have been on there. this was the biggest band of the 90's we're talking about here. fucking joke.www.myspace.com0
-
The Jeagler wrote:
False alarm. I was just impersonating the old you
I agree...out of 500 songs....at least throw 1 Pearl Jam in there. Any Radiohead? Knowing Rolling Stone they will throw something from Kid A on there when it really should be something from OK.0 -
Thirty Bills Unpaid wrote:Hope...
Last one for me. OP never kicked and screamed. He pointed out RS's lack of respect for any of PJ's songs (all- apparently- unworthy of the top 500 list which they endorsed). It is quite fair for him to respond on PJ's fan site with his distaste for the omission.
I have found myself at odds with your point of view on a few occasions and have not bothered to respond. Today, for whatever reason, I didn't like what you were getting at. If PJ is your favourite band (10 Club since '03 might support what you've said), show them more respect.
You made an obnoxious post suggesting PJ fans were crybabies whenever they disagreed with someone's opposing point of view. I would suggest they are more passionate than volatile. Your statement made people defend the integrity of their favourite band on their home field. I crossed the line with the popped collar statement.
There is a great discussion going on about Nirvana between these petty arguments. Who would have 'thunk' that Grohl was a musical genius and that he would become the musician he has (have you ever heard him speak when he was the drummer for Nirvana?)?
I need to learn how to quote in that brown outline that prefaces posts.
When you see a post you want to quote....on the top right of that post box you will see a button that says "Quote". Just click that and it will automatically include the message in brown above what you respond with.
0 -
hopethatuchoke wrote:The Jeagler wrote:hopethatuchoke wrote:
False alarm. I was just impersonating the old you
I agree...out of 500 songs....at least throw 1 Pearl Jam in there. .
okay. :problem:
so....then..... you have no beef with the point of this thread. you just enjoy trying to annoy people apparently.
atta guy :roll:

www.myspace.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help

