Will PJ play Arizona in the current political climate?

13»

Comments

  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,431
    Wow...I was not looking to start a whole political discussion just wondered what people thought about the likelihood of PJ playing or not playing Arizona while that law was still in place.

    A couple of things I have noted......

    1. who would have thought there were so many conservatives who were also PJ fans

    2. who elected the thread police? were they empowered by the 10 club? by fellow fans? By the Arizona state govt? seriously...chill out and find something worthwhile to worry about

    3. it'snice to see people having educated opinions
  • AmyMoore
    AmyMoore Posts: 141
    I'll bite.
    http://www.truthout.org/breaking-up-with-arizona60095

    Love the fact that she is hiring another attorney to defend the law, instead of letting the Attorney General, whose constitutional duty is to defend the state in lawsuits.
    Huge budget deficit, it's like and instead of eating the PB&J sandwich she brought for lunch, she's going out for prime rib.

    On topic, what is a boycott meant to address? I seriously doubt anyone one the AZ legislature cares whether PJ doesn't play the state, or the majority of the people that have voted them into office. Now maybe if Johnny Mathis or Neil Diamond boycotted the state, then it might be a different story.
  • drsluggo
    drsluggo Posts: 4,742
    2. who elected the thread police? were they empowered by the 10 club? by fellow fans? By the Arizona state govt? seriously...chill out and find something worthwhile to worry about
    It's not trying to be thread police - its more that this thread is such a BS attempt to try and bash Arizona by using a distant PJ reference.

    Put this in AMT where people argue about politics until they go to sleep... this is for PJ music and related stuff.

    I could think of 100 threads that have nothing to really do with PJ but you can use some reference to a lyric/song title/etc to make it seem like it. Doesn't mean it belongs here.
  • breath123
    breath123 Posts: 397
    U2 opened up the joshua tree tour in the midst of the (completely racist) MLK debacle that was going on there at the time. When other acts refused to play AZ, Bono said " We choose to protest with our voices, not with our silence".

    Pearl Jam should follow suit. I mean, can you imagine how f**cking cool the poster could be?!
  • P-Jam
    P-Jam Posts: 807
    I hope they return to AZ, I lived there for a while and I hope to return to the Southwest within the next few years. I hate the politics, But I love the land. So much untouched beauty!!!
  • kj1nyr
    kj1nyr Posts: 837
    P-Jam wrote:
    I hope they return to AZ, I lived there for a while and I hope to return to the Southwest within the next few years. I hate the politics, But I love the land. So much untouched beauty!!!
    :thumbup:
  • vant0037
    vant0037 Posts: 6,170
    BF25394 wrote:
    Powers20 wrote:You are right. Arizona shouldnt be allowed to deal with an illegal immigration problem that is crippling the state.

    It's not crippling Arizona or any other state. Illegal immigration is a net positive economically. Illegal immigrants purchase goods and services, just like legal immigrants and citizens. Nor is illegal immigration a danger to public safety. Illegal immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than citizens. (When contact with the police could lead to deportation, you tend to be circumspect about not violating the law.) Arizona's crime rate continues to decline, including in border counties, regardless of well-publicized examples to the contrary. For the record, illegal immigrants are not criminals simply by virtue of their presence. Being present in the U.S. illegally is a civil violation, not a criminal one. And it's the federal government's prerogative to enforce the immigration laws, not the state's-- and it's not like there isn't any enforcement. Hundreds of thousands of people are detained at the Arizona border every year by immigration authorities.

    They should just deal with the people who enter the country illegally and not pay taxes.

    Illegal immigrants pay taxes. They pay sales tax. They pay payroll tax. Many of them even pay income tax.

    They are completely wrong for listening to the wishes of their citizens who have to deal with the thousands of illegals who are in their state.

    A majority of citizens of Alabama and Mississippi had certain wishes with respect to the enforcement of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to protect the rights of blacks. I'm glad we didn't defer to their wishes. Equal protection is not contingent on majority rule.

    The nerve of those people who actually go thru the legal process of entering the country legally, they should be ashamed of themselves.

    You're being facetious, but no one has even remotely suggested or implied this sentiment.

    I look at it this way. It's a good thing if people view America as a place of economic opportunity. Most of these people risked their lives to come here for that opportunity. Thousands have died trying. Most of those who tried did so because the situation in their home countries was absolutely desperate. They work hard at jobs that most Americans don't want. They make a positive contribution to American society, and they are being singled out and demonized in spite of it. There are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of illegal aliens in this country because they overstayed their visas, and there are countless others who sneaked in from Asian countries such as China and Korea, and even our neighbor to the north, Canada. None of these folks are the target of suspicion or hostility, even though they are every bit as illegal as the Mexicans whom the Arizona law clearly targets. Illegal immigration is a hot-button political issue, but it is not a serious problem.

    Amen. :D
    1998-06-30 Minneapolis
    2003-06-16 St. Paul
    2006-06-26 St. Paul
    2007-08-05 Chicago
    2009-08-23 Chicago
    2009-08-28 San Francisco
    2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
    2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
    2011-09-03 PJ20
    2011-09-04 PJ20
    2011-09-17 Winnipeg
    2012-06-26 Amsterdam
    2012-06-27 Amsterdam
    2013-07-19 Wrigley
    2013-11-21 San Diego
    2013-11-23 Los Angeles
    2013-11-24 Los Angeles
    2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
    2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
    2014-10-09 Lincoln
    2014-10-19 St. Paul
    2014-10-20 Milwaukee
    2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
    2016-08-22 Wrigley 2
    2018-06-18 London 1
    2018-08-18 Wrigley 1
    2018-08-20 Wrigley 2
    2022-09-16 Nashville
    2023-08-31 St. Paul
    2023-09-02 St. Paul
    2023-09-05 Chicago 1
    2024-08-31 Wrigley 2
    2024-09-15 Fenway 1
    2024-09-27 Ohana 1
    2024-09-29 Ohana 2
    2025-05-03 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
  • MG79478
    MG79478 Posts: 1,726
    BF25394 wrote:
    Powers20 wrote:You are right. Arizona shouldnt be allowed to deal with an illegal immigration problem that is crippling the state.

    It's not crippling Arizona or any other state. Illegal immigration is a net positive economically. Illegal immigrants purchase goods and services, just like legal immigrants and citizens. Nor is illegal immigration a danger to public safety. Illegal immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than citizens. (When contact with the police could lead to deportation, you tend to be circumspect about not violating the law.) Arizona's crime rate continues to decline, including in border counties, regardless of well-publicized examples to the contrary. For the record, illegal immigrants are not criminals simply by virtue of their presence. Being present in the U.S. illegally is a civil violation, not a criminal one. And it's the federal government's prerogative to enforce the immigration laws, not the state's-- and it's not like there isn't any enforcement. Hundreds of thousands of people are detained at the Arizona border every year by immigration authorities.

    Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

    Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact; has committed a federal crime.
  • MG79478
    MG79478 Posts: 1,726
    Check this out -- an opinion Poll on Arizona's new immigration law, and when I voted a few minutes ago, more than 96% said they SUPPORT it. I realize that an online poll isn't the most scientific thing in the world, but this is an overwhelming response on a very liberal news site!

    I wonder if the administration will listen this time unlike with healthcare?
  • vant0037
    vant0037 Posts: 6,170
    MG79478 wrote:
    Check this out -- an opinion Poll on Arizona's new immigration law, and when I voted a few minutes ago, more than 96% said they SUPPORT it. I realize that an online poll isn't the most scientific thing in the world, but this is an overwhelming response on a very liberal news site!

    I wonder if the administration will listen this time unlike with healthcare?

    I think its doubtful that the White House is watching this anonymous online dichotomous poll. I shudder to think democracy and protest can be reduced to online clicking.

    And let's not start the health care debate...I think there is anything but a consensus as to whether the health care bill was a good or bad thing...
    1998-06-30 Minneapolis
    2003-06-16 St. Paul
    2006-06-26 St. Paul
    2007-08-05 Chicago
    2009-08-23 Chicago
    2009-08-28 San Francisco
    2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
    2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
    2011-09-03 PJ20
    2011-09-04 PJ20
    2011-09-17 Winnipeg
    2012-06-26 Amsterdam
    2012-06-27 Amsterdam
    2013-07-19 Wrigley
    2013-11-21 San Diego
    2013-11-23 Los Angeles
    2013-11-24 Los Angeles
    2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
    2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
    2014-10-09 Lincoln
    2014-10-19 St. Paul
    2014-10-20 Milwaukee
    2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
    2016-08-22 Wrigley 2
    2018-06-18 London 1
    2018-08-18 Wrigley 1
    2018-08-20 Wrigley 2
    2022-09-16 Nashville
    2023-08-31 St. Paul
    2023-09-02 St. Paul
    2023-09-05 Chicago 1
    2024-08-31 Wrigley 2
    2024-09-15 Fenway 1
    2024-09-27 Ohana 1
    2024-09-29 Ohana 2
    2025-05-03 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
  • vant0037
    vant0037 Posts: 6,170
    MG79478 wrote:
    BF25394 wrote:
    Powers20 wrote:You are right. Arizona shouldnt be allowed to deal with an illegal immigration problem that is crippling the state.

    It's not crippling Arizona or any other state. Illegal immigration is a net positive economically. Illegal immigrants purchase goods and services, just like legal immigrants and citizens. Nor is illegal immigration a danger to public safety. Illegal immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than citizens. (When contact with the police could lead to deportation, you tend to be circumspect about not violating the law.) Arizona's crime rate continues to decline, including in border counties, regardless of well-publicized examples to the contrary. For the record, illegal immigrants are not criminals simply by virtue of their presence. Being present in the U.S. illegally is a civil violation, not a criminal one. And it's the federal government's prerogative to enforce the immigration laws, not the state's-- and it's not like there isn't any enforcement. Hundreds of thousands of people are detained at the Arizona border every year by immigration authorities.

    Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

    Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact; has committed a federal crime.

    How does pointing out a federal statute alleviate concerns about racial profiling?
    1998-06-30 Minneapolis
    2003-06-16 St. Paul
    2006-06-26 St. Paul
    2007-08-05 Chicago
    2009-08-23 Chicago
    2009-08-28 San Francisco
    2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
    2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
    2011-09-03 PJ20
    2011-09-04 PJ20
    2011-09-17 Winnipeg
    2012-06-26 Amsterdam
    2012-06-27 Amsterdam
    2013-07-19 Wrigley
    2013-11-21 San Diego
    2013-11-23 Los Angeles
    2013-11-24 Los Angeles
    2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
    2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
    2014-10-09 Lincoln
    2014-10-19 St. Paul
    2014-10-20 Milwaukee
    2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
    2016-08-22 Wrigley 2
    2018-06-18 London 1
    2018-08-18 Wrigley 1
    2018-08-20 Wrigley 2
    2022-09-16 Nashville
    2023-08-31 St. Paul
    2023-09-02 St. Paul
    2023-09-05 Chicago 1
    2024-08-31 Wrigley 2
    2024-09-15 Fenway 1
    2024-09-27 Ohana 1
    2024-09-29 Ohana 2
    2025-05-03 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
  • LikeAnOcean
    LikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    Why would they purposely punish fans in Arizona, people most likely to not even agree with what's going on there?
  • BF25394
    BF25394 Posts: 4,940
    edited June 2010
    MG79478 wrote:

    Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

    Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact; has committed a federal crime.

    Improper entry is a federal crime. Illegal presence is a civil violation. As I said, illegal immigrants are not criminals simply by virtue of their presence. That is the common misapprehension. Many illegal immigrants enter the country legally, through work, study or tourist visas or otherwise, and then remain here illegally when their visa or other permit expires. Studies show that about 40 percent to 50 percent of illegal immigrants came here legally but overstayed. These individuals have not committed a crime. A person cannot be sent to prison for being here without documentation. The federal government can, however, impose civil penalties on the person, namely deportation, for this violation of the civil immigration laws.
    Post edited by BF25394 on
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • BF25394
    BF25394 Posts: 4,940
    By the way, having said all of this, I am not necessarily in favor of a boycott.
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • kj1nyr
    kj1nyr Posts: 837
    Forwarded in email by my local indy record store here in Phoenix, Stinkweeds:
    Hey everyone, I have never used this avenue to get the word out about a social/political issue before, but I wanted to share an Op-Ed piece written by Charlie Levy at Stateside Presents regarding all of the misinformed bands that are boycotting us here in Arizona due to SB1070.

    An Open Letter to All Artists Boycotting Arizona:
    As a political activist and 15-year independent concert promoter in Arizona, I feel a deep obligation to speak out about the real world effects of artists boycotting the state in protest of SB 1070, the recent anti-immigration bill passed by the legislature and signed into law by our (unelected) Governor. While I respect the intentions of the artists protesting what they find to be an unjust law, the practical effect of the boycott is resulting in exactly the opposite of their good-willed intentions.

    By not performing in Arizona, artists are harming the very people and places that foster free speech and the open exchange of ideas that serve to counter the closed-mindedness recently displayed by the new law. The people who will feel the negative effects of the boycott the deepest are local concert venues, including non-profit art house theatres, independent promoters, motivated fans, and the hundreds of people employed in the local music business. If the boycott continues, it is all but guaranteed that some of these venues will be forced to close their doors.

    Think of it this way: What if otherwise outspoken and inspirational activists like Martin Luther King, Jr. had turned their backs on the State of Alabama and its citizens because they didn’t agree with the discriminatory practices of its government during the critical years of the civil rights movement? What would have happened if they had chosen to boycott Alabama rather than speak out, organize, and effect change?

    We are faced with a similar situation in Arizona today. The legislators currently in office don’t care if outspoken artists boycott the state. The people responsible for SB 1070 don't want you here. They don't want your voices heard. And as a result of the boycott, they are the only ones who benefit. In effect, the decision to boycott is playing right into their hands.

    As Curtis McCrary, the general manager of the non-profit Rialto Theatre in Tucson recently stated, “The individuals and organizations behind this bill are...more than likely delighted about the prospect of politically vocal artists canceling shows – silencing themselves rather than using the platform their status as artists gives them to speak out against SB 1070.”

    The truth is, a boycott is an easy gesture that doesn’t require much more than a statement and removing a date from your tour schedule. However, if you truly care about the effects of the controversial immigration law that was passed, this is an opportunity to use your unique position as an artist with the ability to reach thousands of people to inspire, educate, and motivate your fans to actively be a part of the change.

    I have felt and seen the effects of what artists can do to change peoples' lives individually and as a whole. In this important midterm election year, it is imperative that the voters are organized and prepared to express their views about the recent law at the voting booths in November. Every concert venue and promoter in the state would be happy to help coordinate voter registration drives and set up information booths in connection with concerts. Many of us are already planning specific events, including rallies and benefit concerts, designed to educate and encourage local music lovers to get involved at this crucial time.

    This open letter is a call out to all artists to come take a stand and perform in Arizona. We need you now more than ever.

    If you are interested in exploring ways to help us, including voter outreach and organizing with local non-profits, or you just want more information, please feel free to contact me at <!-- e --><a href="mailto:charlie@statesidepresents.com">charlie@statesidepresents.com</a><!-- e -->.

    Charlie Levy
    Stateside Presents
  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,335
    PJ - get your asses to AZ!


    And Ed, if you read this...this will be a perfect opportunity for you to go on some long speech about the law between songs! It'll be great! :D
  • Brock Samson
    Brock Samson Posts: 328
    who would have thought there were so many conservatives who were also PJ fans

    yeah, because as we all know, only liberals listen to music...right?
    9/1/00, 9/2/00, 9/3/00, 12/31/00, 3/2/01, 4/29/01, 6/21/01, 7/25/01, 8/31/01, 9/1/01, 9/2/01, 4/18/02, 8/30/02, 8/31/02, 8/31/02, 9/1/02, 9/22/02, 3/22/03, 5/6/03, 6/29/03, 8/29/03, 8/30/03, 8/30/03, 8/31/03, 2/21/04, 4/2/04, 4/3/04, 9/3/04, 9/4/04, 9/4/04, 9/5/04, 2/19/05, 7/22/05, 9/2/05, 9/3/05, 9/3/05, 9/4/05, 1/22/06, 6/7/06, 9/1/06, 9/2/06, 9/2/06, 9/3/06, 7/6/07, 8/31/07, 9/1/07, 9/1/07, 9/2/07, 3/7/08, 8/29/08, 8/30/08, 8/30/08, 8/31/08, 7/11/09, 6/4/10, 6/11/11
  • Boxes&Books
    Boxes&Books USA Posts: 2,672
    4Powers20 wrote:
    vant0037 wrote:

    this law was passed because the fed govt wasnt doing it's job in protecting the borders. It obviously has become such a problem that Arizona had to take such drastic measures. Racial profiling is wrong, but unfortunately it works and is cost effective. I live on Long island and I could tell you exactly where to go and you would find 30 illegals any given day looking for work. This law enables police to go to these "hot spots" and ask for proper identification, something they are allowed to do by law. Next time a police officer asks you for id , tell him no and see what happens. you dont have the right to conceal your identity if law enforcement asks for it. This is not a new law really, just it is being enforced now.

    So basically you're ok with racial profiling? You're ok with making Hispanic's Second Class Citizens! Because if racial profiling is ok with you ,then that basically means you have no problem with Hispanic's becoming second class citizens!

    Do you even understand this law? Do you understand the issues this law has and will create? Imagine citizens will not be calling 911 because they see a dark person they suspect is an illegal immigrant...Also if you are caught with an illegal immigrant you are guilty by association - So if you're a parent picking up your kids from school and one of your kids friends wants a ride, you better make sure that kid has papers because you could be taken to jail for transporting illegal immigrants-
    This is not about checking ID's - in order to properly determine if someone is a legal citizen - the person must provide a birth certificate, a pass port, or other federally issued documents - I guess every Hispanic / brown persons should now have to carry these documents.
    Not only is this a horrible law because of its racist overtones, but it's also going to cause a huge stress on law enforcement - now the state/cities will have to pay for all of these illegal immigrants to be held, when before the federal gov was paying for the ones caught --- It's going to stretch AZ's already horrible finances.....
    Along with so many other issues...... It's going to divide the state like never before--- Do you really think Hispanic police officers are going to want to profile other Hispanic's? And guess what if they don't civilians, according to the law, have the right to file a law suite against police departments that are not enforcing the law!!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEMS THEY WILL BE FACING BECAUSE OF THAT???????
  • BF25394
    BF25394 Posts: 4,940
    moe.ron wrote:
    who would have thought there were so many conservatives who were also PJ fans

    yeah, because as we all know, only liberals listen to music...right?

    I don't think that's what's he saying. I think he's surprised because Pearl Jam has been open about its politics and, from the beginning, their songs have expressed ideas that are anathema to most conservatives, such as support for gun control ("Jeremy"; "Glorified G") and skepticism of law enforcement ("W.M.A.").

    Having said that, it shouldn't be surprising because Pearl Jam draws its greatest influences from classic rock and the band's fans are disproportionately white and male, just like the audience for classic rock, and white males are disproportionately conservative.

    (This doesn't mean that Pearl Jam doesn't have any female fans or any non-white fans. Of course, they do. I'm talking about percentages and proportionality.)
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.