Is Backspacer brickwalled/Compressed as S/T, Ten Remix etc?

Spiritual_Chaos
Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,720
edited September 2009 in The Porch
Just a question? How is the audio quality?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun
    LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun Posts: 6,097
    infinitely superior.
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,720
    infinitely superior.

    Ok. So no disturbing compression etc?
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Spencer
    Spencer Posts: 867
    Spiritual_Chaos wrote:
    infinitely superior.

    Ok. So no disturbing compression etc?
    Yeah, it's there - but it's not as extreme as S/T or the Ten reissue.

    Still really loud though, I wish it were mastered more sympathetically but oh well.
  • NothinMan
    NothinMan Posts: 45
    I haven't taken a visual look at it yet, but the sound quality is far superior to s/t and the Ten reissues from what my ears can tell. Bob Ludwig is one of the best, so quality is to be expected.

    Anyone know who mastered s/t? I can't imagine it was Ludwig.
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,461
    best since Yield, but yes, still a teeny bit loud. its like different planets compared to S/T. what the hell happened there?!
    www.cluthelee.com
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    It definitely sounds better than s/t. I don't think I listened to the Ten remix enough to notice any bad compression.

Categories